• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:58
CET 14:58
KST 22:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win
Tourneys
$100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 951 users

Planets that can potentially support life... - Page 18

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 43 Next All
Nizaris
Profile Joined May 2010
Belgium2230 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-06 14:07:18
December 06 2011 14:05 GMT
#341
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).
Seldentar
Profile Joined May 2011
United States888 Posts
December 06 2011 14:10 GMT
#342
Still not far enough away from my ex...
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
December 06 2011 14:11 GMT
#343
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.
On my way...
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
December 06 2011 20:32 GMT
#344
On December 06 2011 23:05 Xalorian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:02 ryanAnger wrote:
Your use of the term "debunked" implies that it has been proven false. This is not true. Its neither true or false. Thus, not debunked.


The term "debunked" imply that :

"To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims"


No one exaggerated claims about anything. They merely reported the results of the many tests they did. No one involved in the OPERA findings has come out and said "We have proven neutrinos can move faster than light." They said "According to our results, these particular neutrinos can move faster than light, but the results may be wrong, and we are currently investigating further."

Again, no exaggerated claims, therefore, your use of the word "debunked" is wrong.
On my way...
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
December 06 2011 20:47 GMT
#345
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Sorry for me being a noob here but how is 1 lightyear 76000 years? A lightyear is a measure of distance not time?
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
D10
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Brazil3409 Posts
December 06 2011 20:52 GMT
#346
On December 07 2011 05:47 solidbebe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Sorry for me being a noob here but how is 1 lightyear 76000 years? A lightyear is a measure of distance not time?


its how much distance light travels in a year, which is called c also

he measured that distance, and then calculated how much it would take for nasa's shitty shuttle to do the same voyage
" We are not humans having spiritual experiences. - We are spirits having human experiences." - Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
December 06 2011 20:56 GMT
#347
On December 07 2011 05:52 D10 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2011 05:47 solidbebe wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Sorry for me being a noob here but how is 1 lightyear 76000 years? A lightyear is a measure of distance not time?


its how much distance light travels in a year, which is called c also

he measured that distance, and then calculated how much it would take for nasa's shitty shuttle to do the same voyage



Ah I read over that, thank you thank you.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Nenyim
Profile Joined April 2010
France110 Posts
December 06 2011 23:27 GMT
#348
c is in meter/s therefore 1 lightseconde and not 1 lighyear. (important for every calculs including c like the infamous E=mc²)
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
December 21 2011 02:37 GMT
#349
Well not life sustaining, unless something we don't know, earth size planets have been discovered.

[image loading]

NASA's Kepler mission has discovered the first Earth-size planets orbiting a sun-like star outside our solar system. The planets, called Kepler-20e and Kepler-20f, are too close to their star to be in the so-called habitable zone where liquid water could exist on a planet's surface, but they are the smallest exoplanets ever confirmed around a star like our sun.

The discovery marks the next important milestone in the ultimate search for planets like Earth. The new planets are thought to be rocky. Kepler-20e is slightly smaller than Venus, measuring 0.87 times the radius of Earth. Kepler-20f is a bit larger than Earth, measuring 1.03 times its radius. Both planets reside in a five-planet system called Kepler-20, approximately 1,000 light-years away in the constellation Lyra.

Kepler-20e orbits its parent star every 6.1 days and Kepler-20f every 19.6 days. These short orbital periods mean very hot, inhospitable worlds. Kepler-20f, at 800 degrees Fahrenheit, is similar to an average day on the planet Mercury. The surface temperature of Kepler-20e, at more than 1,400 degrees Fahrenheit, would melt glass.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Keyboard Warrior
Profile Joined December 2011
United States1178 Posts
December 21 2011 02:48 GMT
#350
This is amazing!

Is life there gonna be like earth's? thanks
Not your regular Keyboard Warrior ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
DaCruise
Profile Joined July 2010
Denmark2457 Posts
December 21 2011 02:48 GMT
#351
Man, there gotta be earth like planets closer than a 1000! light-years away.
zachMEISTER
Profile Joined December 2010
United States625 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 03:00:50
December 21 2011 02:57 GMT
#352
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?
psillypsybic!
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1187 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 03:06:59
December 21 2011 03:04 GMT
#353
On December 06 2011 23:05 Xalorian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:02 ryanAnger wrote:
Your use of the term "debunked" implies that it has been proven false. This is not true. Its neither true or false. Thus, not debunked.


The term "debunked" imply that :

"To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims"


They don't actually claim that neutrinos travel faster than light. I don't think you are quite familiar with how scientists actually communicate.

Their claim is that their experimental data implies an inconsistency between behaviour of neutrinos and the expected behaviour of neutrinos according to our current model. The results are more significant than expected errors, and they cannot find any unaccounted for source of error in their experiment to explain this inconsistency.

They then tentatively put foward it may due to flaws in our current model (eg neutrinos might be able to travel faster than light), since lets face it if you are sure it's not experimental error, that is the next most intuitive explanation for the phenomena.

But I stress, even THEY are appropriately sceptical of the results and are running several braces of tests and looking very hard for any unaccounted for error, because thats the morelikely possibility. But in all this they have neither made a false or exaggerated claim, and evidence is inconclusive in either direction, so it is far from 'debunked' since the inconsistency between the data and the model is still unexplained.

Please do not confuse media hype with actual scientific claims, scientists benefit from careful analysis of results and awareness of incomplete/uncertain information, the media benefit from hype and exaggeration.
MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 04:54:38
December 21 2011 04:35 GMT
#354
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


From http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/interstellar.html :

Voyager 1 is escaping the solar system at a speed of about 3.6 AU per year, 35 degrees out of the ecliptic plane to the north, in the general direction of the Solar Apex (the direction of the Sun's motion relative to nearby stars). Voyager 2 is also escaping the solar system at a speed of about 3.3 AU per year, 48 degrees out of the ecliptic plane to the south.


1 AU is 149,598,000 km.

3.6 AU is 538,552,800 km.

Per year, so 538,552,800 km / 365.25 (days) / 24 (hours) = ~61,000 km/h

1 km = ~0.62 mi

61,000 * 0.62 = 37,820 mph


It used to say directly on the website that I linked how fast they were going in MPH but I couldn't seem to find it, so I apologize for the math lesson if you didn't need help, I just wanted to be clear about how I got those numbers.

Something to keep in mind about this speed is that due to the virtual lack of friction in space, the probes will maintain these speeds forever, unless something interferes with them. One of the best possible methods of future space travel would be utilizing this lack of friction, and accelerating continuously at 1G until reaching the half-way point of the destination, and then decelerating the rest of the flight. Theoretically, the human body would feel little different during this acceleration than it does accelerating at normal speeds on Earth.
On my way...
Kenshin_915
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada139 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 04:37:31
December 21 2011 04:35 GMT
#355
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


"Voyager 1's current relative velocity to the sun is 17,060 m/s (61,400 km/h; 38,200 mph)."

Still fantastic speeds IMO, most people don't believe these probes travel so quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1

Edit: Whoops, responded at the same time as someone else.
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 04:42:02
December 21 2011 04:40 GMT
#356
On December 21 2011 13:35 Kenshin_915 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


"Voyager 1's current relative velocity to the sun is 17,060 m/s (61,400 km/h; 38,200 mph)."

Still fantastic speeds IMO, most people don't believe these probes travel so quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1

Edit: Whoops, responded at the same time as someone else.


Haha, I was just going to link the Wiki article, but some people don't trust Wikipedia.
On my way...
Kenshin_915
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada139 Posts
December 21 2011 04:45 GMT
#357
On December 21 2011 13:40 ryanAnger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 21 2011 13:35 Kenshin_915 wrote:
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


"Voyager 1's current relative velocity to the sun is 17,060 m/s (61,400 km/h; 38,200 mph)."

Still fantastic speeds IMO, most people don't believe these probes travel so quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1

Edit: Whoops, responded at the same time as someone else.


Haha, I was just going to link the Wiki article, but some people don't trust Wikipedia.


True, I though that too and was going to link directly to NASA's website but I'm lazy. I think people forget they can go to Wikipedia even if they don't "trust" it, and then just backtrack to the sources they use to see if their trustworthy.
TruePuffin
Profile Joined December 2011
United States39 Posts
December 21 2011 08:33 GMT
#358
God this is just so cool. I never cease to be amazed by the sheer vastness of the universe. This kind of thing is simultaneously exciting and depressing because I doubt that we will ever be able to overcome our petty squables. I hope that we just once find proof of life elsewhere in the universe before we nuke ourselves to oblivion and/or destroy the atmosphere and fry ourselves to death through global warming.

This kind of thing begs the question: What the hell is all of this that we call the universe, how did it come to be, and where is it going?
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
December 21 2011 08:42 GMT
#359
hundreds of billions of stars in a galaxy and hundreds of billions of galaxies in the visible universe.

and God wants us to chop off our daughters clit.

Religions are so silly.
JumboJohnson
Profile Joined December 2011
537 Posts
December 21 2011 09:05 GMT
#360
Eighteen pages without a religious reference then you break it with female genital mutilation? Come on man.
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
12:00
Christmas Eve Games
Gerald vs YoungYakovLIVE!
Spirit vs MaNa
SHIN vs Percival
Creator vs Scarlett
WardiTV1051
IndyStarCraft 283
Rex118
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko418
IndyStarCraft 283
mouzStarbuck 154
Rex 118
Livibee 90
trigger 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 52863
Sea 14379
Aegong 1813
Bisu 1765
Horang2 1731
Hyun 615
Larva 564
Soma 500
Stork 436
actioN 381
[ Show more ]
firebathero 353
BeSt 306
Shuttle 236
Mini 235
hero 218
ggaemo 202
Snow 189
Rush 147
Barracks 100
JYJ 85
Pusan 67
PianO 48
HiyA 43
ToSsGirL 43
sorry 40
Movie 29
Shinee 28
sas.Sziky 26
yabsab 20
Terrorterran 20
soO 20
Sacsri 16
zelot 15
GoRush 12
Noble 10
scan(afreeca) 9
SilentControl 8
JulyZerg 7
Dota 2
XcaliburYe1200
syndereN6
League of Legends
C9.Mang0344
rGuardiaN170
Counter-Strike
zeus2199
x6flipin1834
edward152
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King99
Other Games
singsing1796
hiko351
crisheroes295
Happy263
Hui .215
BRAT_OK 34
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 75
• Light_VIP 22
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV2136
League of Legends
• Jankos5067
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
19h 2m
WardiTV Invitational
22h 2m
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-22
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.