• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 04:19
CET 10:19
KST 18:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book15Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14
Community News
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)13Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker8PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar)12Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win2
StarCraft 2
General
Terran Scanner Sweep Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16) RSL Revival: Season 4 Korea Qualifier (Feb 14) PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 512 Overclocked Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth Mutation # 510 Safety Violation
Brood War
General
ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/02 Gypsy to Korea Liquipedia.net NEEDS editors for Brood War Recent recommended BW games [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo 2 thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread ZeroSpace Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ADHD And Gaming Addiction…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3919 users

Planets that can potentially support life... - Page 18

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 43 Next All
Nizaris
Profile Joined May 2010
Belgium2230 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-06 14:07:18
December 06 2011 14:05 GMT
#341
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).
Seldentar
Profile Joined May 2011
United States888 Posts
December 06 2011 14:10 GMT
#342
Still not far enough away from my ex...
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
December 06 2011 14:11 GMT
#343
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.
On my way...
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
December 06 2011 20:32 GMT
#344
On December 06 2011 23:05 Xalorian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:02 ryanAnger wrote:
Your use of the term "debunked" implies that it has been proven false. This is not true. Its neither true or false. Thus, not debunked.


The term "debunked" imply that :

"To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims"


No one exaggerated claims about anything. They merely reported the results of the many tests they did. No one involved in the OPERA findings has come out and said "We have proven neutrinos can move faster than light." They said "According to our results, these particular neutrinos can move faster than light, but the results may be wrong, and we are currently investigating further."

Again, no exaggerated claims, therefore, your use of the word "debunked" is wrong.
On my way...
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
December 06 2011 20:47 GMT
#345
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Sorry for me being a noob here but how is 1 lightyear 76000 years? A lightyear is a measure of distance not time?
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
D10
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Brazil3409 Posts
December 06 2011 20:52 GMT
#346
On December 07 2011 05:47 solidbebe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Sorry for me being a noob here but how is 1 lightyear 76000 years? A lightyear is a measure of distance not time?


its how much distance light travels in a year, which is called c also

he measured that distance, and then calculated how much it would take for nasa's shitty shuttle to do the same voyage
" We are not humans having spiritual experiences. - We are spirits having human experiences." - Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
December 06 2011 20:56 GMT
#347
On December 07 2011 05:52 D10 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2011 05:47 solidbebe wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Sorry for me being a noob here but how is 1 lightyear 76000 years? A lightyear is a measure of distance not time?


its how much distance light travels in a year, which is called c also

he measured that distance, and then calculated how much it would take for nasa's shitty shuttle to do the same voyage



Ah I read over that, thank you thank you.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Nenyim
Profile Joined April 2010
France110 Posts
December 06 2011 23:27 GMT
#348
c is in meter/s therefore 1 lightseconde and not 1 lighyear. (important for every calculs including c like the infamous E=mc²)
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
December 21 2011 02:37 GMT
#349
Well not life sustaining, unless something we don't know, earth size planets have been discovered.

[image loading]

NASA's Kepler mission has discovered the first Earth-size planets orbiting a sun-like star outside our solar system. The planets, called Kepler-20e and Kepler-20f, are too close to their star to be in the so-called habitable zone where liquid water could exist on a planet's surface, but they are the smallest exoplanets ever confirmed around a star like our sun.

The discovery marks the next important milestone in the ultimate search for planets like Earth. The new planets are thought to be rocky. Kepler-20e is slightly smaller than Venus, measuring 0.87 times the radius of Earth. Kepler-20f is a bit larger than Earth, measuring 1.03 times its radius. Both planets reside in a five-planet system called Kepler-20, approximately 1,000 light-years away in the constellation Lyra.

Kepler-20e orbits its parent star every 6.1 days and Kepler-20f every 19.6 days. These short orbital periods mean very hot, inhospitable worlds. Kepler-20f, at 800 degrees Fahrenheit, is similar to an average day on the planet Mercury. The surface temperature of Kepler-20e, at more than 1,400 degrees Fahrenheit, would melt glass.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Keyboard Warrior
Profile Joined December 2011
United States1178 Posts
December 21 2011 02:48 GMT
#350
This is amazing!

Is life there gonna be like earth's? thanks
Not your regular Keyboard Warrior ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
DaCruise
Profile Joined July 2010
Denmark2457 Posts
December 21 2011 02:48 GMT
#351
Man, there gotta be earth like planets closer than a 1000! light-years away.
zachMEISTER
Profile Joined December 2010
United States625 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 03:00:50
December 21 2011 02:57 GMT
#352
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?
psillypsybic!
doubleupgradeobbies!
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Australia1196 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 03:06:59
December 21 2011 03:04 GMT
#353
On December 06 2011 23:05 Xalorian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:02 ryanAnger wrote:
Your use of the term "debunked" implies that it has been proven false. This is not true. Its neither true or false. Thus, not debunked.


The term "debunked" imply that :

"To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims"


They don't actually claim that neutrinos travel faster than light. I don't think you are quite familiar with how scientists actually communicate.

Their claim is that their experimental data implies an inconsistency between behaviour of neutrinos and the expected behaviour of neutrinos according to our current model. The results are more significant than expected errors, and they cannot find any unaccounted for source of error in their experiment to explain this inconsistency.

They then tentatively put foward it may due to flaws in our current model (eg neutrinos might be able to travel faster than light), since lets face it if you are sure it's not experimental error, that is the next most intuitive explanation for the phenomena.

But I stress, even THEY are appropriately sceptical of the results and are running several braces of tests and looking very hard for any unaccounted for error, because thats the morelikely possibility. But in all this they have neither made a false or exaggerated claim, and evidence is inconclusive in either direction, so it is far from 'debunked' since the inconsistency between the data and the model is still unexplained.

Please do not confuse media hype with actual scientific claims, scientists benefit from careful analysis of results and awareness of incomplete/uncertain information, the media benefit from hype and exaggeration.
MSL, 2003-2011, RIP. OSL, 2000-2012, RIP. Proleague, 2003-2012, RIP. And then there was none... Even good things must come to an end.
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 04:54:38
December 21 2011 04:35 GMT
#354
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


From http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/interstellar.html :

Voyager 1 is escaping the solar system at a speed of about 3.6 AU per year, 35 degrees out of the ecliptic plane to the north, in the general direction of the Solar Apex (the direction of the Sun's motion relative to nearby stars). Voyager 2 is also escaping the solar system at a speed of about 3.3 AU per year, 48 degrees out of the ecliptic plane to the south.


1 AU is 149,598,000 km.

3.6 AU is 538,552,800 km.

Per year, so 538,552,800 km / 365.25 (days) / 24 (hours) = ~61,000 km/h

1 km = ~0.62 mi

61,000 * 0.62 = 37,820 mph


It used to say directly on the website that I linked how fast they were going in MPH but I couldn't seem to find it, so I apologize for the math lesson if you didn't need help, I just wanted to be clear about how I got those numbers.

Something to keep in mind about this speed is that due to the virtual lack of friction in space, the probes will maintain these speeds forever, unless something interferes with them. One of the best possible methods of future space travel would be utilizing this lack of friction, and accelerating continuously at 1G until reaching the half-way point of the destination, and then decelerating the rest of the flight. Theoretically, the human body would feel little different during this acceleration than it does accelerating at normal speeds on Earth.
On my way...
Kenshin_915
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada139 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 04:37:31
December 21 2011 04:35 GMT
#355
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


Show nested quote +
On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


"Voyager 1's current relative velocity to the sun is 17,060 m/s (61,400 km/h; 38,200 mph)."

Still fantastic speeds IMO, most people don't believe these probes travel so quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1

Edit: Whoops, responded at the same time as someone else.
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-21 04:42:02
December 21 2011 04:40 GMT
#356
On December 21 2011 13:35 Kenshin_915 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


"Voyager 1's current relative velocity to the sun is 17,060 m/s (61,400 km/h; 38,200 mph)."

Still fantastic speeds IMO, most people don't believe these probes travel so quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1

Edit: Whoops, responded at the same time as someone else.


Haha, I was just going to link the Wiki article, but some people don't trust Wikipedia.
On my way...
Kenshin_915
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada139 Posts
December 21 2011 04:45 GMT
#357
On December 21 2011 13:40 ryanAnger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 21 2011 13:35 Kenshin_915 wrote:
On December 21 2011 11:57 zachMEISTER wrote:
I think space travel needs to be higher on the list before we worry about destination. Discovering these planets is cool and what-not, but what's the point in looking/discovering if we can't even remotely come close to landing on them?


On December 06 2011 23:11 ryanAnger wrote:
On December 06 2011 23:05 Nizaris wrote:
On December 06 2011 19:27 TheRealArtemis wrote:
On December 06 2011 17:23 Reborn8u wrote:
A lot of people here are pretty pessimistic. Try to realize what the world was like over a century ago. Automobiles, flight, communications (internet, television, cellphones), space travel, were all unimaginable dreams just a generation before they happened. I think it is foolish to rule out that mankind could have a major breakthrough in the next half century that will change life as we know it and our role in the universe. Ask your grandparents how many times over their world was revolutionized by technology. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but don't rule it out.

Who knows, maybe 20 years from now someone will discover a propulsion method to get much closer to light speed than we think is possible today. According to the theory of relativity, time slows as you approach light speed. So a trip that is 35 light years would pass as much less time if you were to move fast enough. Although, much more time would pass for us here on earth during the voyage.

I don't know what the future holds, but I like to hope, just maybe, someday in my life, even if I'm 100 years old, that someone will visit another world like earth or at least get a probe there and send back the pictures. Maybe by flying there, maybe mankind will master gravity and be able to bend space, distort time, who knows.....

I doubt that people will be willing to bear the financial burden of the vast resources it would take to get a human to another star system with no idea what is there. But maybe in our lives a probe will reach the nearest star, Look at this there are a lot of stars withing 16 light years. Some just 4 light years away. Is it crazy to think that 10 or 20 years from now that it's possible for anyone to develop a propulsion system that could get there in 50 years? Maybe in our lives we will get to see up close pictures of some of the planets orbiting these stars.

Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but if you went back 100 years and tried to convince anyone that a man would set foot on the moon, you'd be committed to an asylum. Perhaps we are only 1 epiphany away from the impossible becoming possible. A little more optimism please




I think you confuse realism with pessimism. The fact that nothing can live long enough for just 1 lightyear, (76,526 years) with a NASA spaceshuttle traveling 17,500 miles per hour. One can only hope that it will happen in out lifetime, but thats just lying to yourself. Even with an unmanned spacecraft traveling faster, it will still take thousands of years. Its not pessimism, just being real.


What we can accomplish today is almost irrelevant. His point was simply that all the things we take for granted today seemed just as impossible to ppl 100y ago as FTL is to us. there's a good chance that in the next 200y we'll cruise the solar system like it is our own backyard.

Besides, using a shuttle as reference is lol-worthy, the thing barely has engines. I mean, it's main engines are on separate vehicule and aren't even there by the time it gets to space. Technology to go MUCH faster existed 50y ago (Orion).


Yeah, especially considering that the Voyager probes we launched in the 70's are currently leaving our Solar System at speeds of nearly 40,000 mph.



Source?


"Voyager 1's current relative velocity to the sun is 17,060 m/s (61,400 km/h; 38,200 mph)."

Still fantastic speeds IMO, most people don't believe these probes travel so quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1

Edit: Whoops, responded at the same time as someone else.


Haha, I was just going to link the Wiki article, but some people don't trust Wikipedia.


True, I though that too and was going to link directly to NASA's website but I'm lazy. I think people forget they can go to Wikipedia even if they don't "trust" it, and then just backtrack to the sources they use to see if their trustworthy.
TruePuffin
Profile Joined December 2011
United States39 Posts
December 21 2011 08:33 GMT
#358
God this is just so cool. I never cease to be amazed by the sheer vastness of the universe. This kind of thing is simultaneously exciting and depressing because I doubt that we will ever be able to overcome our petty squables. I hope that we just once find proof of life elsewhere in the universe before we nuke ourselves to oblivion and/or destroy the atmosphere and fry ourselves to death through global warming.

This kind of thing begs the question: What the hell is all of this that we call the universe, how did it come to be, and where is it going?
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
December 21 2011 08:42 GMT
#359
hundreds of billions of stars in a galaxy and hundreds of billions of galaxies in the visible universe.

and God wants us to chop off our daughters clit.

Religions are so silly.
JumboJohnson
Profile Joined December 2011
537 Posts
December 21 2011 09:05 GMT
#360
Eighteen pages without a religious reference then you break it with female genital mutilation? Come on man.
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 6971
Rain 760
Leta 246
actioN 190
Sharp 118
Mong 113
Aegong 75
ToSsGirL 48
Killer 36
NaDa 32
[ Show more ]
sSak 24
zelot 23
JulyZerg 20
soO 18
ZerO 17
GoRush 16
Sacsri 13
Rush 10
Noble 9
Light 0
Dota 2
Fuzer 128
League of Legends
JimRising 580
C9.Mang0411
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss955
kRYSTAL_53
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King124
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor148
Other Games
gofns9059
summit1g4275
ceh9508
Happy330
crisheroes141
KnowMe90
ZerO(Twitch)2
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH158
• LUISG 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 9
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1009
• Stunt786
Upcoming Events
Escore
41m
LiuLi Cup
1h 41m
Serral vs Zoun
Cure vs Classic
Big Brain Bouts
7h 41m
ByuN vs GgMaChine
Serral vs Jumy
RSL Revival
17h 41m
RSL Revival
22h 41m
LiuLi Cup
1d 1h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 2h
RSL Revival
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
LiuLi Cup
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
OSC
3 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
KCM Race Survival
6 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-10
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Escore Tournament S1: W8
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round Qualifier
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.