• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:38
CEST 16:38
KST 23:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202537RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 706 users

The US debt (proper debate) - Page 16

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 59 Next
nukeazerg
Profile Joined June 2011
United States168 Posts
July 26 2011 06:00 GMT
#301
Raising the debt limit is only ok in times of war. When you are saving your country. Having to raise it in times of peace is declaring war on your children.
Nightfall.589
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada766 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 06:02:48
July 26 2011 06:02 GMT
#302
Well, if you put it that way, the United States has been in a perpetual state of war for decades. War on Communism, War on Drugs, War on Terrorism...
Proof by Legislation: An entire body of (sort-of) elected officials is more correct than all of the known laws of physics, math and science as a whole. -Scott McIntyre
dogabutila
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1437 Posts
July 26 2011 06:11 GMT
#303
This problem will never be solved by having more money to spend. It might be delayed, or put off, but the only real way to solve and fix this problem rather then punting is to spend less and reduce the size of government.


77% of america think there should be a balanced budget amendment. It's time to stop spending more then we have.
Baller Fanclub || CheAse Fanclub || Scarlett Fanclub || LJD FIGHTING!
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
July 26 2011 06:11 GMT
#304
On July 26 2011 14:46 Nightfall.589 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 14:36 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On July 26 2011 14:00 domovoi wrote:
Sorta right. Health expenditures outpace GDP growth by quite a lot, so even with an economic recovery and expiration of the tax cuts, we'll still have a deficit in the future.

Not to mention repayments on the debt.
Any sane person knows the only way for the US to balance it's budget is to stop the wars , stop the bankster bailouts and start cutting social programs that the USA could never afford.


Or stop the wars, and raise taxes on the rich by a few percentage points. Hell, close the offshore loopholes, and cut corporate taxes while you're at it. Compensate with increased personal income taxes.

Funny how according to you, the only sane solution, is to have the lower classes exclusively bear the burden of reducing debt. (While the wealth gap grows and grows...)

The mega rich avoid taxes anyway , besides i don't see how getting rid of the federal reserve to help reduce the debt burden has anything to do with screwing the lower classes.Getting rid of unaffordable socialist programs was only a small part of my suggestions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Nightfall.589
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada766 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 06:31:59
July 26 2011 06:31 GMT
#305
On July 26 2011 15:11 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 14:46 Nightfall.589 wrote:
On July 26 2011 14:36 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On July 26 2011 14:00 domovoi wrote:
Sorta right. Health expenditures outpace GDP growth by quite a lot, so even with an economic recovery and expiration of the tax cuts, we'll still have a deficit in the future.

Not to mention repayments on the debt.
Any sane person knows the only way for the US to balance it's budget is to stop the wars , stop the bankster bailouts and start cutting social programs that the USA could never afford.


Or stop the wars, and raise taxes on the rich by a few percentage points. Hell, close the offshore loopholes, and cut corporate taxes while you're at it. Compensate with increased personal income taxes.

Funny how according to you, the only sane solution, is to have the lower classes exclusively bear the burden of reducing debt. (While the wealth gap grows and grows...)

The mega rich avoid taxes anyway

Only because your tax code's got so many holes, a silt could hold more water. If the IRS had the tools to have at them, they'd pay.


, besides i don't see how getting rid of the federal reserve to help reduce the debt burden has anything to do with screwing the lower classes.

Getting rid of the federal reserve carries plenty of other problems. (And going back to gold-backed currency would be one of the saddest non-solutions imaginable)


Getting rid of unaffordable socialist programs was only a small part of my suggestions.


Yet, tax reforms/increases weren't any part of your suggestions.
Proof by Legislation: An entire body of (sort-of) elected officials is more correct than all of the known laws of physics, math and science as a whole. -Scott McIntyre
domovoi
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1478 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 07:02:55
July 26 2011 07:01 GMT
#306
On July 26 2011 15:31 Nightfall.589 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 15:11 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
The mega rich avoid taxes anyway

Only because your tax code's got so many holes, a silt could hold more water. If the IRS had the tools to have at them, they'd pay.

I don't think he's American, but this is a myth anyway. There aren't any big tax holes because of the AMT. There's of course abuse here and there (and people do get caught), but the top 1% pays for 40% of the U.S.'s taxes, and that's a lot higher than it was two decades ago.

The U.S., in fact, has a much more progressive taxation structure than pretty much all other European countries (thanks mostly to their VAT). It's the distribution of services that's not so progressive.
Expurgate
Profile Joined January 2011
United States208 Posts
July 26 2011 07:31 GMT
#307
On July 26 2011 10:08 DeepElemBlues wrote:
Show nested quote +
This image is from a book by Joseph Stiglitz, an admittedly liberal economist, but does a good job showing just how much more we've spent in Iraq and Afghanistan than we would otherwise. You are substantially underestimating the expense involved in fighting two wars halfway around the world.


That image is hilarious, $200-$300 billion a year is a joke to blame the skyrocketing debt on. Meanwhile the yearly deficit is approaching $2 trillion dollars. The wars are 10% or less of that cost. And the wars have been a decreasing in spending amount for several years now, at least Iraq. George Bush at one point in 2007 had deficit spending down to about $150 billion a month.

Anytime you hear or read someone ranting about how it's military spending that is a huge problem, you can safely assume that they do not know what they are talking about. Including Secretary Gates. It's time to stop acting like a few hundred billion and a few trillion are comparable; they are not. Adding $300 billion to the debt every year, no one cares. The US can do that until doomsday without trouble. Adding 1.5-2 trillion a year? No. Sorry.

Time for people to acknowledge that even with the wars about 2/3 of yearly government spending is entitlements and less than 10% on "the wars," and another 20% or so on maintaining the military in general, hmm I wonder what I should be focusing on to cut, the things I spend over 60% of my spending on, or the things I spend 20% of it on, or the things I spend 10% of it on. I wonder, what should be my main focus. Maybe someone can help me out, because I keep reading people whine about the wars and the military, I don't understand how going from 1.6 trillion yearly deficits to 1.4 or 1.3 is going to be much of a difference.

It may be ideologically convenient to complain about military spending but it does nothing to address the issue of the US debt. It's just another excuse for people who are against military spending for non-fiscal reasons to trot out their tired old gut the military arguments. I'm all for not expanding combat to a new country every six months or so like Obama has been doing, but I am not for mindlessly cutting military spending just because some people say we "have to" when there are about ten other items that should be much much much higher priority to cut.


This is a misrepresentation of what the actual image claims; also, if you looked at the quote you'd see I was addressing a poster who claimed that operational expenses for the military don't make a difference.

In 2008, for example, non-budgeted expenses, which include operational costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, made up more than 30% of the total federal budget deficit for that year. Also, as I said in my post:
EDIT2: This shouldn't be construed as suggesting that the defense budget itself can be cut adequately, there need to be broad reforms across the board for government spending to regain sustainability.


Please don't be so rabid in your posts. Let's keep this discussion productive.

Nightfall.589
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada766 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 08:37:08
July 26 2011 08:35 GMT
#308
On July 26 2011 16:01 domovoi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 15:31 Nightfall.589 wrote:
On July 26 2011 15:11 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
The mega rich avoid taxes anyway

Only because your tax code's got so many holes, a silt could hold more water. If the IRS had the tools to have at them, they'd pay.

I don't think he's American, but this is a myth anyway. There aren't any big tax holes because of the AMT. There's of course abuse here and there (and people do get caught), but the top 1% pays for 40% of the U.S.'s taxes, and that's a lot higher than it was two decades ago.

The U.S., in fact, has a much more progressive taxation structure than pretty much all other European countries (thanks mostly to their VAT). It's the distribution of services that's not so progressive.


Income taxes - they pay. However, there are plenty of loopholes in the corporate tax code. Especially when it comes to money being hidden in offshore fully-owned subsidiaries.
Proof by Legislation: An entire body of (sort-of) elected officials is more correct than all of the known laws of physics, math and science as a whole. -Scott McIntyre
NotSupporting
Profile Joined February 2008
Sweden1998 Posts
July 26 2011 08:54 GMT
#309
Americans simply need to realize that they are living way over what they can manage. The superpower that was USA will be no more and it's time to save whatever you can instead of crashing the country completely while politicians seem more interested in their own positions. There should be a huge tax increase for wealthy people.
TheDraken
Profile Joined July 2011
United States640 Posts
July 26 2011 09:42 GMT
#310
On July 26 2011 17:54 NotSupporting wrote:
Americans simply need to realize that they are living way over what they can manage. The superpower that was USA will be no more and it's time to save whatever you can instead of crashing the country completely while politicians seem more interested in their own positions. There should be a huge tax increase for wealthy people.


The only Americans that realize how to manage their finances and not spend themselves into bankruptcy are the wealthy. The majority of the upper class have taken the time to educate themselves, stay out of "enjoy now pay later" schemes, read the fine print, and invest their money in an intelligent manner. Nothing other people can't do themselves.

As people have mentioned above, the US tax code already has one of the most dramatic gradients, and about half of Americans don't even pay income taxes. Meanwhile the top 1% pays more taxes to the government than the bottom 95% combined. It's ridiculous that there are people who don't pay a penny to the government demanding more tax increases for other people so they can continue to enjoy benefits they don't pay for.

It's disgusting, and frankly I've become so disillusioned with the laziness of the lower and middle classes that I couldn't give any less of a shit if this economy tanks into another severe depression. My assets have all been paid for. I live within my means. My bank account is stashed with money that was earned through years of six day work weeks and ten hour days, supported by a college education paid for retroactively with my own money. None of that was voodoo magic, and when people cry that the government doesn't coddle their ass, I wait for the day when the government can no longer feed them on a silver spoon. It's ridiculous that there are high school dropouts living with the delusion that healthcare, comfortable retirement, and education are all birthrights. No human is born with the promise that someone else is obligated to keep them alive. They are luxuries earned through years of labor during a person's middle years. As we say in economics, there's no such thing as a free lunch.

The majority of Americans have elected scheming yahoos into government by believing they can get everything for nothing, and that a hard working minority of citizens will pay for the laziness of a majority. The 1929 depression was good for America in that it created a generation of people who knew the value of wise spending and hard work. Let the economy tank and let the depression/revolution/armageddon happen. Time for people to man the fuck up.
fast food. y u no make me fast? <( ಠ益ಠ <)
Casta
Profile Joined April 2010
Denmark234 Posts
July 26 2011 10:16 GMT
#311
I want to comment on a little of your post.
On July 26 2011 18:42 TheDraken wrote:
... It's ridiculous that there are high school dropouts living with the delusion that healthcare, comfortable retirement, and education are all birthrights. No human is born with the promise that someone else is obligated to keep them alive. They are luxuries earned through years of labor during a person's middle years. As we say in economics, there's no such thing as a free lunch. ...

I live in a country where healthcare, comfortable retirement and education is something granted by the state to every citizen. I like the perspective that everyone can become anything if they got the brains and not only the ones with the rich parents and a thick wallet. Also if you are poor and suffer a terrible accident you will still get patched up and get ready to contribute to society.
Of course some are taking advantage of the system, but the overall gain is greater if such a thing would be measured imo.

I understand that not having these safety nets guaranteed sparks a lot of people to work harder, but the ones not capable of the pressure just gets left behind and will eventually become unused potential or even criminals in a modern society.


Reyis
Profile Joined August 2009
Pitcairn287 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 10:24:07
July 26 2011 10:22 GMT
#312
US Dollar wont lose any value since this is something that can be controlled by both sides, USA and rest of the world.

Some countries that are cooperating with USA are already making lots of work to downgrade their own national currency to balance the market and mutually benefiting. Turkey is a huge example since they are one of the main allies with USA militarily, we can see that they have more connections than just military. Last couple of days Turkish money against US Dollar just made a huge increase from 1.60 TL / 1 USD to aprox 2 TL / 1 USD. There are some more countries joining the band rather silently, behind the media coverage same as Turkey.
기적의 혁명가 김택용 화이팅~!!
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10698 Posts
July 26 2011 10:37 GMT
#313
US Dollar vs Swiss Francs:

10 years ago: 1$ = CHF ~1.70 (IIRC).
Today: 1$ = CHF 0.80.

Yeah, not falling at all... The thing is, the $ is not "suddenly" falling (due to the crisis the Franc also got stronger and stronger in the last weeks/months), it's a long term trend, nothing recent.

The Euro compared to the Franc still looks much more stable (last time i checked, it also lost, but not by that margin...).
BlackFlag
Profile Joined September 2010
499 Posts
July 26 2011 10:42 GMT
#314
On July 26 2011 19:16 Casta wrote:
I want to comment on a little of your post.
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 18:42 TheDraken wrote:
... It's ridiculous that there are high school dropouts living with the delusion that healthcare, comfortable retirement, and education are all birthrights. No human is born with the promise that someone else is obligated to keep them alive. They are luxuries earned through years of labor during a person's middle years. As we say in economics, there's no such thing as a free lunch. ...

I live in a country where healthcare, comfortable retirement and education is something granted by the state to every citizen. I like the perspective that everyone can become anything if they got the brains and not only the ones with the rich parents and a thick wallet. Also if you are poor and suffer a terrible accident you will still get patched up and get ready to contribute to society.
Of course some are taking advantage of the system, but the overall gain is greater if such a thing would be measured imo.

I understand that not having these safety nets guaranteed sparks a lot of people to work harder, but the ones not capable of the pressure just gets left behind and will eventually become unused potential or even criminals in a modern society.


It is a human right. And before Industrialization these "services" were guaranteed by "the family" (which is much bigger than the core family.) With Industrialization these large families dissolved and the state had to implent social programs who overtook the social role "family" had before Industrialization. It's the duty of a country to guarantee welfare for everyone. If it doesn't, you can go right back in the 19th century and look how nice urban life was for the broad masses. But that's propably cool for "economists" because wage-slaves are good for "the economy" (What an abstract term, because "the economy" is everyone. It's you, me, my friends and that drug dealer across the street. "The economy" isn't something that's cut off from the rest of society. Society is build on "the economy" and vice versa.)
NotSupporting
Profile Joined February 2008
Sweden1998 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 10:46:21
July 26 2011 10:45 GMT
#315
On July 26 2011 19:16 Casta wrote:
I want to comment on a little of your post.
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 18:42 TheDraken wrote:
... It's ridiculous that there are high school dropouts living with the delusion that healthcare, comfortable retirement, and education are all birthrights. No human is born with the promise that someone else is obligated to keep them alive. They are luxuries earned through years of labor during a person's middle years. As we say in economics, there's no such thing as a free lunch. ...

I live in a country where healthcare, comfortable retirement and education is something granted by the state to every citizen. I like the perspective that everyone can become anything if they got the brains and not only the ones with the rich parents and a thick wallet. Also if you are poor and suffer a terrible accident you will still get patched up and get ready to contribute to society.
Of course some are taking advantage of the system, but the overall gain is greater if such a thing would be measured imo.

I understand that not having these safety nets guaranteed sparks a lot of people to work harder, but the ones not capable of the pressure just gets left behind and will eventually become unused potential or even criminals in a modern society.




My old English teacher who was American but moved to Sweden described this in a great way. In Sweden (also Scandinavia) everyone has the chance to go far but if you happen to fail there will always be a safety-net for you to fall on. In America some people have the chance to go even further but if you happen to fail you will fall much deeper and hope that someone catches you. In other words; Sweden is safer. The risk is much lower but at the same time the reward might not be as big. This does not mean however that you cannot become rich in Scandinavia, trust me you can. However to be come insanely rich like some people in America is really hard.
Traeon
Profile Joined July 2010
Austria366 Posts
July 26 2011 10:48 GMT
#316
On July 26 2011 18:42 TheDraken wrote:
The only Americans that realize how to manage their finances and not spend themselves into bankruptcy are the wealthy. The majority of the upper class have taken the time to educate themselves, stay out of "enjoy now pay later" schemes, read the fine print, and invest their money in an intelligent manner. Nothing other people can't do themselves.


Uh, how about "the wealthy are heavily favored to gain even more wealth in the current system"?

Despite (or probably because of) the economical crisis, the number of millionaires has been increasing in affected countries.
Gamegene
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States8308 Posts
July 26 2011 10:54 GMT
#317
I find it laughable when politicians state that they need to cut spending and pay off the debt when they don't even mention tax increases because they're too afraid of the political backlash.

In fact, I don't even hate the politicians, I hate the dumb atmosphere of the American public who think that all time historic low Bush tax rates can be maintained when we've had 2 wars (possibly 3 now with the supposedly "secret" war in Yemen).

It's a really dumb argument when you say that you are fiscally conservative, that you "care" about the national debt, yet can't bear to tax the more well off (so you can just make the balance by cutting funds to entitlement programs).

Republicans are trying to cater to the fucking stupid American public by complaining that "the debt needs to be solved NOW!111" and that "it's going to kill jobs" (not necessarily, it surely will if the government collapses financially and/or public sector jobs are cut), all while promising no tax hikes.

Right now they're playing political chicken with Obama and his veto signature, but they can't afford to go for a bipartisan (and fucking sane) agreement on the debt because they were given congress through the tea party (fucking insane rightwingers). Yet at the same time they can't allow the government to collapse from the debt otherwise BOTH parties lose (and possibly the entire idea that government can work).

It's frustrating as hell-
You can't have your cake and eat it too, dimwits!
Throw on your favorite jacket and you're good to roll. Stroll through the trees and let your miseries go.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 11:00:54
July 26 2011 10:59 GMT
#318
On July 26 2011 17:54 NotSupporting wrote:
There should be a huge tax increase for wealthy people.


As mentioned by others in this thread, wealthy Americans do foot a large percenage of America's tax bills (top 1% pays 40% of taxes).

Increasing this by a few percentage points would help, but the real tax money that we're missing out on is in corporate tax (and to a lesser extent in capital gains taxing). We have some of the world's highest marginal corporate tax rates, but there are enough loopholes that many corporations don't pay taxes at all. This doesn't even get into the sizable subisides and tax breaks that we go out of our way to provide (why the hell are we giving massive agribusiness corps corn subidisdies, or tax breaks to fossil fuel companies?).

If you want to dramatically increase tax revenue, reform corporate tax to eliminate loopholes while simultaneously lowering the marginal corporate tax rate, with a net result that American corporations will actually pay taxes, but not so much that they'd flee elsewhere. And while you're at it, kill subsidies to big business, and tax capital gains like any other source of income. I wouldn't do this independent of cutting entitlement programs, but this is how we have to handle the revenue side.
TheDraken
Profile Joined July 2011
United States640 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 11:46:04
July 26 2011 11:10 GMT
#319
On July 26 2011 19:42 BlackFlag wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 19:16 Casta wrote:
I want to comment on a little of your post.
On July 26 2011 18:42 TheDraken wrote:
... It's ridiculous that there are high school dropouts living with the delusion that healthcare, comfortable retirement, and education are all birthrights. No human is born with the promise that someone else is obligated to keep them alive. They are luxuries earned through years of labor during a person's middle years. As we say in economics, there's no such thing as a free lunch. ...

I live in a country where healthcare, comfortable retirement and education is something granted by the state to every citizen. I like the perspective that everyone can become anything if they got the brains and not only the ones with the rich parents and a thick wallet. Also if you are poor and suffer a terrible accident you will still get patched up and get ready to contribute to society.
Of course some are taking advantage of the system, but the overall gain is greater if such a thing would be measured imo.

I understand that not having these safety nets guaranteed sparks a lot of people to work harder, but the ones not capable of the pressure just gets left behind and will eventually become unused potential or even criminals in a modern society.


It is a human right. And before Industrialization these "services" were guaranteed by "the family" (which is much bigger than the core family.) With Industrialization these large families dissolved and the state had to implent social programs who overtook the social role "family" had before Industrialization. It's the duty of a country to guarantee welfare for everyone. If it doesn't, you can go right back in the 19th century and look how nice urban life was for the broad masses. But that's propably cool for "economists" because wage-slaves are good for "the economy" (What an abstract term, because "the economy" is everyone. It's you, me, my friends and that drug dealer across the street. "The economy" isn't something that's cut off from the rest of society. Society is build on "the economy" and vice versa.)



There's a huge difference between making someone in your family pay for your "rights" and making some successful stranger pay for your "rights". If the family fails to provide the safety net for its members, it's not the job of the state to forcefully establish a surrogate "mommy" for all of those children with fail parents.


For those from Denmark and Sweden commenting that they do indeed have free healthcare and the like, it's important to remember that these nations are valuing the intervention of the state in exchange for economic growth (and cutting down the reward for work) to create such an environment. While I see no problem with countries adopting that model if they value that, part of America's allure is its traditionally cutthroat environment. People used to come here knowing that they would be rewarded in greater degree for their hard work, accepting the fact that with increased rewards comes increased risk. Recently we've seen a push for Europeanization, but frankly if people want better safety nets, move to Europe. Let the people who don't need them continue to live in an environment where people accept the risks and benefits of greater self-reliance.

50 years ago a man could venture into American business and land himself into bankruptcy 2 or 3 times (and suffer for it) and yet persevere out to make himself a fortune the fourth time around. In fact, the trend of dipping in and out of poverty before making it big is a rather common theme among successful businessmen. That environment is now threatened by a push for greater and greater safety nets (where bankruptcy is an inconvenient packet of paperwork and a check in the mail), which stifles the climb up for entrepreneurs looking to make a fortune. The American Dream is dying a slow death, and we're doing it to ourselves.
fast food. y u no make me fast? <( ಠ益ಠ <)
shell
Profile Joined October 2010
Portugal2722 Posts
July 26 2011 11:32 GMT
#320
What many americans don't get is that without state social politics comes crime, drug abuse, big problems that cost way more to solve after then exist! That's why you have the biggest criminal population, biggest crime % in the western world, worse medical care in the western world, etc..

It's way less expensive to spend millions on food programs against obesity then to fight it later in the hospital where you will lose lives and pay up for the medical care! etc..

So actually your quality of life decreases without social policies.. That's why smaller and weaker countrys are in fact better countrys to live then USA, like sweden, denmark, norway, finland and Canada! But of course almost all EU countrys have a better life standart then in USA even if you guys have all the money!

BENFICA || Besties: idra, Stephano, Nestea, Jaedong, Serral, Jinro, Scarlett || Zerg <3
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 59 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11596
ComeBackTV 2569
TaKeTV 606
Hui .571
3DClanTV 385
Rex251
EnkiAlexander 237
CranKy Ducklings175
mcanning171
Reynor149
UpATreeSC124
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11596
Hui .571
Rex 251
mcanning 171
Reynor 149
UpATreeSC 124
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4343
Barracks 1887
Flash 1877
BeSt 1527
Jaedong 1498
EffOrt 1056
Mini 582
Stork 496
ggaemo 377
Snow 357
[ Show more ]
Soma 272
GuemChi 266
ZerO 253
Soulkey 252
ToSsGirL 188
Rush 132
Hyun 107
TY 57
soO 55
Sacsri 38
scan(afreeca) 26
Movie 14
Terrorterran 14
Yoon 11
ivOry 9
Bale 7
Britney 0
Dota 2
syndereN412
420jenkins322
XcaliburYe295
Counter-Strike
sgares527
flusha135
edward56
Super Smash Bros
Westballz40
Other Games
singsing2011
hiko1301
B2W.Neo1027
crisheroes444
Fuzer 168
ArmadaUGS81
KnowMe50
QueenE49
ZerO(Twitch)20
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 4
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH281
• Adnapsc2 2
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1527
• WagamamaTV564
League of Legends
• Nemesis4058
• TFBlade799
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 23m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.