EPTOn March 18 2014 04:24 Epishade wrote:
Bags! Then we could compress them and store them in metal containers underground!
Bags! Then we could compress them and store them in metal containers underground!
Try that out in LA, Let me know how it goes
Ask and answer stupid questions here! - Page 65
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
Try that out in LA, Let me know how it goes | ||
|
Dogfoodboy16
364 Posts
| ||
|
Shiragaku
Hong Kong4308 Posts
On March 18 2014 06:03 Dogfoodboy16 wrote: Was John Adams right about tyranny of the majority? Whenever I hear state's rightists talk about the right to deny a right such as gay marriage because more than 50 percent of the population thinks it is wrong, then I think he was right on. | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
Calanthe
United States148 Posts
On March 18 2014 07:42 Deleuze wrote: Why aren't dwarfs employed as jockeys? Dwarfs have a certain amount of muscular atrophy and impaired muscle development that prevents them from controlling a 1200lb animal hurtling along at 40mph. They would, however, probably come in well under the weight requirements. | ||
|
Dogfoodboy16
364 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On March 18 2014 06:06 Shiragaku wrote: Whenever I hear state's rightists talk about the right to deny a right such as gay marriage because more than 50 percent of the population thinks it is wrong, then I think he was right on. I mean, it might be morally wrong in your opinion, but as a democracy, if the majority believe the right should not exist, the people have the ultimate say. If there's something fundamentally wrong about it, such as a basic human right, we have a court system to stand up for the rights of the minority. Then you get into semantics about "why not call it something else and have marriage only apply to religious ceremonies", etc. But that's beside the point. I'm fully in support of gay marriage and my views on this whole issue begin and end with "stick it, or be stuck by it, wherever you want, and by whomever you want as long as it's fully consensual", but I respect the right of the >50% in your example to deny that right within their state. | ||
|
LeeDawg
United States1306 Posts
On March 18 2014 08:19 Calanthe wrote: Dwarfs have a certain amount of muscular atrophy and impaired muscle development that prevents them from controlling a 1200lb animal hurtling along at 40mph. They would, however, probably come in well under the weight requirements. perhaps if dog racing was expanded to have jockeys... | ||
|
Dogfoodboy16
364 Posts
| ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On March 20 2014 08:27 Dogfoodboy16 wrote: Why do adults tell children to respect your elders when the average adult is about as dumb as a kid? Wisdom, mainly. For example, why is one of the rules here to respect people with high post count even though many of them still post like dumbfucks? | ||
|
Roswell
United States250 Posts
| ||
|
Shiragaku
Hong Kong4308 Posts
On March 20 2014 23:55 Roswell wrote: What is reverse racism? Psychological projection This poem by Langston Hughes is relevant "Poet to Bigot" I have done so little For you, And you have done so little For me, That we have good reason Never to agree. I, however, Have such meagre Power, Clutching at a Moment, While you control An hour. But your hour is A stone. My moment is A flower. | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
| ||
|
Dark_Chill
Canada3353 Posts
On March 20 2014 09:14 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Wisdom, mainly. For example, why is one of the rules here to respect people with high post count even though many of them still post like dumbfucks? I don't know about high post count, but usually it's based on some sort of friendship (online or not) between members of a forum/sub-forum, not directly to post-count. However, I still find the rule of respect your elders kind of stupid. It all goes back to children not able to make "their own knowledgeable" decisions, so listen to the people who can. Or at least this is what I assume. Either that or people like to tell others what to do, but don't directly admit to it and instead create a false reason for it. | ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
John, a frequent writer for the local newspaper, does an excellent job reporting about various groups within and without the school in this article. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18870 Posts
| ||
|
Najda
United States3765 Posts
| ||
|
Leonite7
Ireland921 Posts
On March 21 2014 06:04 Epishade wrote: Can I use "without" as an antonym to "within"? As in this sentence: John, a frequent writer for the local newspaper, does an excellent job reporting about various groups within and without the school in this article. Only time I have seen it used like that was in a riddle so it is probably better to use the phrasing that Najda suggested. | ||
| ||
