On August 21 2015 10:17 Thieving Magpie wrote:
All I heard was long and cherry so I'm assuming this is a porno.
All I heard was long and cherry so I'm assuming this is a porno.
Dam mobile swipe! Low! Low hanging cherries!
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
August 21 2015 03:28 GMT
#6541
On August 21 2015 10:17 Thieving Magpie wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2015 08:01 Cascade wrote: On August 21 2015 01:47 Acrofales wrote: Three cheers for cherrypicking! Huzzah huzzah huzzah! For it's a jolly good fellow, for its a jolly good fellow, ... Can you say long hanging cherry picking? All I heard was long and cherry so I'm assuming this is a porno. Dam mobile swipe! Low! Low hanging cherries! | ||
|
domane
Canada1606 Posts
August 21 2015 15:19 GMT
#6542
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18291 Posts
August 21 2015 15:20 GMT
#6543
On August 22 2015 00:19 domane wrote: Every sperm is unique. Is every egg unique as well? Yes. But every sperm is sacred. Monty Python said nothing about eggs. | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
August 21 2015 15:56 GMT
#6544
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
August 21 2015 16:53 GMT
#6545
| ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
August 21 2015 17:43 GMT
#6546
On August 22 2015 00:56 Djzapz wrote: What if quantum physics don't even fucking exist and the concept was actually invented specifically for new-age fuckwits to use the word "quantum" haphazardly in their seminars while nonchalantly peddling their quantic crystals to simpletons? the public use of the word "quantic" and the scientific use are really different ^^ Every quack coming with a product with ridiculous claims justify it by "yeah it's quantum stuff". You can replace it with "magic" and the result would be the same Scientific quantum theory is actually a well studied and well-known thing, that has been proved to work countless time. The computer in front of you is one of the proof of that | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
August 21 2015 17:45 GMT
#6547
On August 22 2015 02:43 oGoZenob wrote: Show nested quote + On August 22 2015 00:56 Djzapz wrote: What if quantum physics don't even fucking exist and the concept was actually invented specifically for new-age fuckwits to use the word "quantum" haphazardly in their seminars while nonchalantly peddling their quantic crystals to simpletons? the public use of the word "quantic" and the scientific use are really different ^^ Every quack coming with a product with ridiculous claims justify it by "yeah it's quantum stuff". You can replace it with "magic" and the result would be the same Scientific quantum theory is actually a well studied and well-known thing, that has been proved to work countless time. The computer in front of you is one of the proof of that I was kidding . But the quack use of the word "quantum" actually is derived from the scientific one. They just appropriated the word to some supernatural shit and treat is as truth. | ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
August 21 2015 17:47 GMT
#6548
On August 22 2015 02:45 Djzapz wrote: Show nested quote + On August 22 2015 02:43 oGoZenob wrote: On August 22 2015 00:56 Djzapz wrote: What if quantum physics don't even fucking exist and the concept was actually invented specifically for new-age fuckwits to use the word "quantum" haphazardly in their seminars while nonchalantly peddling their quantic crystals to simpletons? the public use of the word "quantic" and the scientific use are really different ^^ Every quack coming with a product with ridiculous claims justify it by "yeah it's quantum stuff". You can replace it with "magic" and the result would be the same Scientific quantum theory is actually a well studied and well-known thing, that has been proved to work countless time. The computer in front of you is one of the proof of that I was kidding . But the quack use of the word "quantum" actually is derived from the scientific one. They just appropriated the word to some supernatural shit and treat is as truth.it's kinda similar of the use of the word "theory", that is pretty much completely different for the public and us | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18291 Posts
August 21 2015 17:50 GMT
#6549
On August 22 2015 02:47 oGoZenob wrote: Show nested quote + On August 22 2015 02:45 Djzapz wrote: On August 22 2015 02:43 oGoZenob wrote: On August 22 2015 00:56 Djzapz wrote: What if quantum physics don't even fucking exist and the concept was actually invented specifically for new-age fuckwits to use the word "quantum" haphazardly in their seminars while nonchalantly peddling their quantic crystals to simpletons? the public use of the word "quantic" and the scientific use are really different ^^ Every quack coming with a product with ridiculous claims justify it by "yeah it's quantum stuff". You can replace it with "magic" and the result would be the same Scientific quantum theory is actually a well studied and well-known thing, that has been proved to work countless time. The computer in front of you is one of the proof of that I was kidding . But the quack use of the word "quantum" actually is derived from the scientific one. They just appropriated the word to some supernatural shit and treat is as truth.it's kinda similar of the use of the word "theory", that is pretty much completely different for the public and us But in theory they're the same! | ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
August 21 2015 17:52 GMT
#6550
On August 22 2015 02:50 Acrofales wrote: Show nested quote + On August 22 2015 02:47 oGoZenob wrote: On August 22 2015 02:45 Djzapz wrote: On August 22 2015 02:43 oGoZenob wrote: On August 22 2015 00:56 Djzapz wrote: What if quantum physics don't even fucking exist and the concept was actually invented specifically for new-age fuckwits to use the word "quantum" haphazardly in their seminars while nonchalantly peddling their quantic crystals to simpletons? the public use of the word "quantic" and the scientific use are really different ^^ Every quack coming with a product with ridiculous claims justify it by "yeah it's quantum stuff". You can replace it with "magic" and the result would be the same Scientific quantum theory is actually a well studied and well-known thing, that has been proved to work countless time. The computer in front of you is one of the proof of that I was kidding . But the quack use of the word "quantum" actually is derived from the scientific one. They just appropriated the word to some supernatural shit and treat is as truth.it's kinda similar of the use of the word "theory", that is pretty much completely different for the public and us But in theory they're the same! you mean in hypothesis ? :p | ||
|
fluidrone
France1478 Posts
August 21 2015 18:54 GMT
#6551
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
August 21 2015 19:23 GMT
#6552
On August 22 2015 01:53 OtherWorld wrote: Why do Americans find oval racing so exciting compared to road racing? There was an episode of Top Gear that made me appreciate some of the skill involved in Nascar. I would guess there is no real attachment to F1 here in the states, Nascar just grew organically and took over. | ||
|
Oshuy
Netherlands529 Posts
August 21 2015 20:33 GMT
#6553
On August 22 2015 00:20 Acrofales wrote: Show nested quote + On August 22 2015 00:19 domane wrote: Every sperm is unique. Is every egg unique as well? Yes. But every sperm is sacred. Monty Python said nothing about eggs. Unique is a strong word. Random mutations not taken into account, there are 23 chromosom pairs, which makes 2^23 possibilities (8 million). Since there are ~250 million sperm cells released, a number of them are the same. (probability of one of the possible combinations not to in the 250 million is close to 0) For eggs, a woman produces only 500 mature eggs or so during her lifetime (out of a few million available). Probability of having twice the same egg is low, but surprisingly enough >1% | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18291 Posts
August 21 2015 20:38 GMT
#6554
On August 22 2015 05:33 Oshuy wrote: Show nested quote + On August 22 2015 00:20 Acrofales wrote: On August 22 2015 00:19 domane wrote: Every sperm is unique. Is every egg unique as well? Yes. But every sperm is sacred. Monty Python said nothing about eggs. Unique is a strong word. Random mutations not taken into account, there are 23 chromosom pairs, which makes 2^23 possibilities (8 million). Since there are ~250 million sperm cells released, a number of them are the same. (probability of one of the possible combinations not to in the 250 million is close to 0) For eggs, a woman produces only 500 mature eggs or so during her lifetime (out of a few million available). Probability of having twice the same egg is low, but surprisingly enough >1% I know. But I really just wanted to get to the every sperm is sacred bit. | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11835 Posts
August 21 2015 20:42 GMT
#6555
| ||
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
August 21 2015 23:23 GMT
#6556
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/179/6/482 If the main reason a rapist rapes someones is because they suffered neglect, sexual abuse, and trauma as a child, doesn't that make them equally a victim? | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
August 22 2015 01:00 GMT
#6557
On August 22 2015 08:23 whatisthisasheep wrote: Are perpetrators of rape as much of victims as the ones they choose to rape? http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/179/6/482 If the main reason a rapist rapes someones is because they suffered neglect, sexual abuse, and trauma as a child, doesn't that make them equally a victim? Well I think that labels like those are unfortunate because you're never just a rapist or a victim. Either way if a person rapes someone they'll still be be labeled a rapist in reference to that act in particular, the reason being no one gives a fuck (understandably) what were their motivations or underlying causes. The "tough childhood" and the repercussions of that are viewed separately. Context can be used to "justify" (sort of) any act. I think there are limits to how much that can be used. | ||
|
calgar
United States1277 Posts
August 22 2015 01:01 GMT
#6558
How is RP-1 different from JP-1 (or JP-8)? | ||
|
Uldridge
Belgium5159 Posts
August 22 2015 02:00 GMT
#6559
It's all about the Standard enthalpy of formation and my guess, without even looking closely at the reactions and individually calculating stuff, is that when the formation of the H2O and CO2, the bonds the O2 undergoes with the carbochains of kerosene, the heat (or energy) created from that reaction, is greater than the energy needed to break the carbochains and the ones in the O2. Has to do with electronegativity, valence and volume of the molecules I guess. | ||
|
Yoav
United States1874 Posts
August 22 2015 04:25 GMT
#6560
On August 22 2015 08:23 whatisthisasheep wrote: Are perpetrators of rape as much of victims as the ones they choose to rape? http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/179/6/482 If the main reason a rapist rapes someones is because they suffered neglect, sexual abuse, and trauma as a child, doesn't that make them equally a victim? No. Happy to help! | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2Calm Sea Bisu Horang2 BeSt EffOrt Mini Light Hyuk [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games singsing1653 B2W.Neo631 Beastyqt388 crisheroes286 Mew2King126 monkeys_forever103 QueenE60 elazer46 ZerO(Twitch)11 Organizations StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War• iHatsuTV • CranKy Ducklings SOOP12 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
|
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Classic vs Solar
herO vs SHIN
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
RSL Revival
Clem vs Rogue
Bunny vs Lambo
IPSL
Dewalt vs nOmaD
Ret vs Cross
BSL
Bonyth vs Doodle
Dewalt vs TerrOr
GSL
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
IPSL
Bonyth vs Napoleon
G5 vs JDConan
BSL
OyAji vs JDConan
DragOn vs TBD
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
The PondCast
GSL
Replay Cast
GSL
|
|
|