EPTAsk and answer stupid questions here! - Page 304
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
farvacola
United States18866 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24264 Posts
On July 05 2015 23:07 Djzapz wrote: If there's one thing I know, it's that people don't wash their hands after touching their penis. When you're in the washroom, only like 50% of people seem to wash their hands after taking a leak, and that's when you see them. Gotta figure it's fewer than that when there's no one to see. My point being, when you shake hands you touch a huge amount of dick. I've always thought this was odd. I looked at like this, at the end of the night ideally my penis will be in a woman's mouth, so before going out I thoroughly washed my penis. Now it's been sitting in my pants relaxing, meanwhile, my hands have been touching every filthy thing around. My thought is, guys (who have intentions of gettting some) should probably be washing their hands before they piss and/or their penis, but unless you piss on yourself washing your hands after seems kind of silly. Other than that people should wash their hands reasonably often, and making a point of doing it after using the restroom should mean you do it several times a day. I guess shaking dick hand is kinda gross, particularly if its dirty dick hand (wash your penis and your hands you filthy animal) but the really gross stuff is on peoples hands dick soiled or not. | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
On July 06 2015 03:31 GreenHorizons wrote: I've always thought this was odd. I looked at like this, at the end of the night ideally my penis will be in a woman's mouth, so before going out I thoroughly washed my penis. Now it's been sitting in my pants relaxing, meanwhile, my hands have been touching every filthy thing around. My thought is, guys (who have intentions of gettting some) should probably be washing their hands before they piss and/or their penis, but unless you piss on yourself washing your hands after seems kind of silly. Other than that people should wash their hands reasonably often, and making a point of doing it after using the restroom should mean you do it several times a day. I guess shaking dick hand is kinda gross, particularly if its dirty dick hand (wash your penis and your hands you filthy animal) but the really gross stuff is on peoples hands dick soiled or not. If anything that is an ode to your dick hygiene and I must commend you for your stellar cock and balls game, my friend. I'll go back through your reasoning to make a point, although I don't find your assessment to be unreasonable. At the end of the night, ideally your penis is in a woman's mouth - and then some. Presumably you'll have those disgusting hands of your playing around her mucous membranes of various provenance too, and I've been known to wash my hands at various parts of the day, namely before food and after shaking dick, yet not necessarily before play time where, it seems to me, the sharing of germs is pretty much a standard part of the practice. You share all the standard cultures that you've got growing on you. While it is true that dick hand is only symbolically gross and standard germ-hand is actually gross and often legit deadly, you have to admit that dick hand says a lot about a person's hand hygiene. Washing your hands after every dick touch seems like a good habit to have since it eliminated whatever dick-related germs as well as the previous layers of filth that you've been accumulating and that'll quite possibly end up on (or in) another person. Penis. | ||
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On July 05 2015 21:18 fruity. wrote: Not it wont. Are you telling me that when this technology (either on the biochemical or technological level) Is fully understood, that every corporation in the world isn't going to want to sell it? That every person will demand access to it? It will be the Holy Grail, a product that everyone without question will want. It'll stand as testament to humanity's progress, and the final nail in the coffin for religion. I understand the moral stance you take, but when push comes to shove, and in light of immortality, I don't feel even you would say no. Think of what we could achieve if we still had the minds of Einstein, Dirac or Feynman about. Do you think there are people in the world who would want slaves? They don't complain, don't require pay, do all your dirty work, clean your house, do your garden, do your job, you can take him/her (or shall I say "it") with you when you're going out to hold your stuff, etc. So, would some people want slaves? Yeah, sure, there certainly are. Why can't they have some? Because it is forbidden. Why it is forbidden? Because most societies consider that it is an attack to human dignity, that no human being shall live only to serve another human being. Notice that the people who, given the possibility to do so in all legality, would refuse slaves, would most likely refuse them based on the same reasoning. Yet there would be plenty, plenty of money to be made by selling slaves and having slaves. Yet, despite this, it is forbidden. Because human dignity is at stakes. The same reasoning applies to reproductive human cloning : literally every country in the world condemn it simply based the fact that it would be a major issue as far as ethics go. The same reasoning applies to an hypothetical "real immortality" technology. First off, it is not sure everyone would want it, for two main reasons : (1) we are assuming that immortality would be guaranteed, but aging would still exist. Would you want to live eternally with your mind and body from your 20s? Sure. Would you want to live eternally with your mind and body aging eternally? (2)on what conditions? Especially concerning work? If you can retire at 60 and then live eternally without having to work, sure. If you can't, what happens? You work 8+ hours per day, 6 to 7 days a week, possibly doing a physically damaging work, for eternity? Do you think many people would want that? And even then, even if you consider that everyone would want it, it would be terrible. Obviously, the riches would get it before the poors, and maybe they wouldn't let the poors get it. Can you imagine an immortal dictator or politician? It also poses tons of problems concerning work and its repartition in society. Etc etc. This not being forbidden would be possible in a world where ethics wouldn't exist and the slightest form of democracy wouldn't exist either. It is possible that such a world will be real in the future, but I sure don't hope so. | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
Sounds good to me! | ||
|
Coppermantis
United States845 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On July 06 2015 06:53 Coppermantis wrote: How is one supposed to pronounce lmao? Is every letter said out, like el-em-ay-oh, or something like elmao? I mentally pronounce it lih-may-oh. | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24264 Posts
On July 06 2015 06:53 Coppermantis wrote: How is one supposed to pronounce lmao? Is every letter said out, like el-em-ay-oh, or something like elmao? I take it as an opportunity to parody the laugh of whoever typed it. | ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
| ||
|
Advantageous
China1350 Posts
On July 06 2015 06:54 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: l-mao, like zedong HAHAHAHHA i got that joke xD and for those who think it's something related to Jaedong... im gonna have to spell it out for u: + Show Spoiler + Chairman MaoZeDong of China | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
| ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10939 Posts
On July 06 2015 13:06 Advantageous wrote: HAHAHAHHA i got that joke xD and for those who think it's something related to Jaedong... im gonna have to spell it out for u: + Show Spoiler + Chairman MaoZeDong of China Which joke? l-mao all the way.... But why would you speak it out? | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On July 06 2015 16:15 OtherWorld wrote: Every letter spelled out, there's no other way. I think the pop group of the same name solidified this pronunciation | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18413 Posts
On July 06 2015 22:13 ThomasjServo wrote: I think the pop group of the same name solidified this pronunciation Pop group called lmao? Whuh? | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
Woops, LMFAO. Sorry, I am not as hip as I once was. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18413 Posts
On July 06 2015 22:50 ThomasjServo wrote: Woops, LMFAO. Sorry, I am not as hip as I once was. Don't know them either. But I am definitely not hip, and never was  | ||
|
farvacola
United States18866 Posts
 | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On July 06 2015 22:54 farvacola wrote: LMFAO fucking sucks anyways, so no worries Yeah, not missing anything. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
| ||
