EPTBattle Royale - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
gg_hertzz
2152 Posts
Asshole. | ||
|
SiS
United States753 Posts
But I like all kinds of violent movies especially Takashi Miike's works (Koroshiya Ichi, Visitor Q, Audition) I'm not sick or perverted or anything, I just understand that none of it is real and then its very easy for me to watch and to like :O btw, did you notice the part where the girls were shooting at each other was taken from Reservoir Dogs? | ||
|
Refrain[FriZ]
Canada4337 Posts
Liked it so much I downloaded it and watched it. Hated the movie. Loved the book. :edit: the Chigori girl that was in it (also in kill bill movie, the japanese school girl with a mace vs. the bride) who is very pretty =] | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
I'll leave you with the words of someone far smarter than I (slightly paraphrased): "I guess I just don't get it. I come from a world where people do something for a reason. I didn't really get French New Wave, but I know I liked it. I don't get films like that, but I know I don't like them. You know... shit, by any other name, smells just as bad." - Martin Scorsese (about, specifically, Battle Royale) | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
On February 10 2005 19:08 SiS wrote: I loved this movie But I like all kinds of violent movies especially Takashi Miike's works (Koroshiya Ichi, Visitor Q, Audition) I'm not sick or perverted or anything, I just understand that none of it is real and then its very easy for me to watch and to like :O btw, did you notice the part where the girls were shooting at each other was taken from Reservoir Dogs? Not only that, many parts of the movie were taken directly from Anime. | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
Watch Versus. ^_^ No plot and several decapitations within the first 3 minute of the film!! | ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
BR 2 has double the violence and half of the plot of BR 1. Great movies though. | ||
|
Ryshi
Canada361 Posts
| ||
|
gg_hertzz
2152 Posts
On February 10 2005 19:14 BroOd wrote: gg_hertzz, you're so funny when you're all riled up! Listen, I could care less about film arguments on the internet. Too many idiots just google somsone else's ideas, and then inflate them with verbose, masturbatory dick cheese. They have no conception of how translucent their charade is, nor that anyone with even a tentative foundation in reality knows that you can't just say whatever you want and label it "your interpretation". I'll leave you with the words of someone far smarter than I (slightly paraphrased): "I guess I just don't get it. I come from a world where people do something for a reason. I didn't really get French New Wave, but I know I liked it. I don't get films like that, but I know I don't like them. You know... shit, by any other name, smells just as bad." - Martin Scorsese Who says I'm riled up? The fact that you say something like that gives credence to your predicability. It's the sort of thought people who talk and think through repetition would come up with during the half way point of any argument. I'm just as calm now as when I was brushing my teeth this morning. Perhaps I'm missing the point. Maybe you're just incapable of forming original lines of dialogue. Your strict adherence to film making edicts is certainly persuasive and indictive of that. The fact that nothing you say is beyond what I don't normally hear or read, almost verbatim, from anonymous mono-faceted schlubs who grandstand to indoctrinate their superior views speaks volumes about you. To think that you could have altered the course of this thread if you were not so hesitant (insecure?) or tardy (incapable?) to enlighten me with more than just your ability to regurgitate juvenile banters. | ||
|
SiS
United States753 Posts
On February 10 2005 19:30 Ryshi wrote: Is the book a comic or just plain english text? How thick is the book? its a novel, but I've never heard of it being translated into English edit: or maybe it was http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/156931778X/102-8059334-0316130 | ||
|
insaneknights
482 Posts
| ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
If you want violence as a message, check out Sam Peckinpah (Wild Bunch). If you want to watch a character's spiral into madness, check out John Cassavettes(A Woman Under the Influence or Roman Polanski (Rosemary's Baby). If you want characters finding out about themselves, you have the entire French New Wave. There are hundreds of great films that convey emotion without exploiting your senses with bullets and buckets of blood. Heck, even John Woo's Hong Kong stuff had more meaning than BR. There are so many things to say, but I get the feeling you'd rather be right than actually learn something. Although, after all this, I guess I do see the connection between LOTF and BR. LOTF was everything that BR wanted to be, but failed at. | ||
|
gg_hertzz
2152 Posts
I enjoyed BR-in spite of what Martin Scorsese says. | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
On February 10 2005 20:17 gg_hertzz wrote: The last word is yours brood. I enjoyed BR-in spite of what Martin Scorsese says. I also enjoyed it. It's ok to enjoy something that isn't amazing. Hell, you can enjoy shit that just plain sucks. (See: 95% of American horror). I just don't think it's right to intellectualize a film like this so you can justify enjoying it. I guess we can just agree to disagree. I'd be glad to entertain a civilized discussion on film anytime, though. EDIT: I always feel so damn unproductive after flame fests like these. Let me apologize for being so immature. If you've honestly found deeper levels to this film, perhaps you're just more intune or estute than I am. Either way, I think we both need to be less uptight. | ||
ToKoreaWithLove
Norway10161 Posts
On February 09 2005 23:39 insaneknights wrote: What about battle royale 2. I heard that i sucked but i want a second opinion! Well I really liked the first one, but the 2nd one was so-so ... not the same coolness at all. | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
On February 10 2005 20:38 ToKoreaWithLove wrote: Well I really liked the first one, but the 2nd one was so-so ... not the same coolness at all. The second one was absolutely HORRIFIC. An abomination. The director of the original only shot a few scenes before passing away, and his hack son came along and fucked everything up. AVOID THIS FILM. | ||
|
rplant
United States1178 Posts
On February 10 2005 19:22 Mindcrime wrote: Versus is better. Watch Versus. ^_^ No plot and several decapitations within the first 3 minute of the film!! Is this anything like Versus? I kind of want to see it if only to find out what the hell a "convoluted entanglement of failed possibility" could be. But Versus was really painful. I have no idea where some of my friends come find with shit like that. Ughhhhh. | ||
Caution
2059 Posts
| ||
| ||
