Totally obliterated - Page 14
Forum Index > General Forum |
thee telescopes
321 Posts
| ||
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
On March 25 2011 06:39 bubO wrote: Man gota feel bad for this guy his life just got destroyed... he did it to himself. actions have consequences. | ||
Fruscainte
4596 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:12 jinorazi wrote: he did it to himself. actions have consequences. Yeah, talking shit online deserves your livelihood to be destroyed by a psycotic stalker. | ||
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10292 Posts
| ||
Half
United States2554 Posts
Yeah, talking shit online deserves your livelihood to be destroyed by a psycotic stalker. You got to be fucking kidding me. Talking racist, sexist shit via a socket puppet account you claim is your imaginary girlfriend deserves to be revealed for what it is. And what livelihood. If it was only people finding out I would have no objections to it. But if you look at his youtube account and his reddit post its just people attacking him (and for some reason he is defending himself) I am guessing this is why I kinda side with the guy What other possible outcome could people finding out have? | ||
s4life
Peru1519 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:14 Fruscainte wrote: Yeah, talking shit online deserves your livelihood to be destroyed by a psycotic stalker. Being racist and offensive to someone in the most despicable and hypocritical way, sometimes results in that someone getting back at you.. that's just fair imho. | ||
adeezy
United States1428 Posts
I put it in spoilers + Show Spoiler + ![]() This is the one where he claims he was informed about what his gf posted and what clued to him that he was being deceived + Show Spoiler + ![]() Now there is a possibility that he somehow had a feeling that this girl may not be real and he didn't make her up and that it was someone else. He would tell people he met her up to satisfy his own insecurities and the accusations of his viewers. Still sad but I could see how he didn't make the girl up and said a lot of those things on twitter about meeting her up and having sex with her because he was insecure about his girl: not web camming, not actually seeing each other, etc. etc. Not justifying his actions, just attempting to explain it, just in case he is telling the truth that he didn't know his girl friend was fake. I still think he was the one that made her up, but making up those conversations just seems overboard but I can see how he could fake those too easily, (even the date is easily modified | ||
xza
Singapore1600 Posts
The guy is so pathetic, it makes it even funnier. okay he could probably be deceived but 8 months? LOL. | ||
iNSiPiD1
United States140 Posts
On March 25 2011 06:57 NIJ wrote: I got the impression that the relationship being staged was real relationship and not online relationship. (you can correct me on this). How can she trap that if she didnt pull a face off and bang him on date nights. I'm not understanding you entirely. The relationship was claimed to be real (by Peter and Kimi) and was hosted online for us to view, we all agree on this right? But now we know the whole thing was fake. The way I'm suggesting the blogger girl trapped him is by her creating the fake Kimi twitter and youtube accounts, etc. and initially saying he was his boyfriend. Then, Peter being the idiot that he is just goes along with it. Next thing you know he supplies her with all of the information for the blog post. I AM NOT defending anyone, but am merely pointing out why I cannot immediately assume he did this whole thing, because I believe I came up with another equally valid theory, and what I'm looking for is for someone to point out the flaw in my logic. | ||
Half
United States2554 Posts
The way I'm suggesting the blogger girl trapped him is by her creating the fake Kimi twitter and youtube accounts, etc. and initially saying he was his boyfriend. Then, Peter being the idiot that he is just goes along with it. Next thing you know he supplies her with all of the information for the blog post. They were in a relationship for eight months. | ||
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
| ||
xza
Singapore1600 Posts
G.I.R.L = Guy in real life. "Pics or it didnt happen" is made for a reason, and it fits this perfectly. i mean who would actually believe him after 8 months of a relationship and not a single picture together. really? | ||
iNSiPiD1
United States140 Posts
What does that prove? That she went along with it for 8 months before making that blog post is all. | ||
NIJ
1012 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:08 Eppa! wrote: If it was only people finding out I would have no objections to it. But if you look at his youtube account and his reddit post its just people attacking him (and for some reason he is defending himself) I am guessing this is why I kinda side with the guy I really think that the guy is the one that is bullied even if he attacked first. She has "the masses" behind him and I agree with what Asjo has written. And I suppose the nazis got bullied in nuremberg when the 'masses' were behind the world. I don't get why you're buying into bully playing the victim here. I can agree that maybe people are over reacting when attacking his site. Its wrong and maybe dished out for wrong reasons (bit of schadenfreude perhaps and kicking the guy when he's down). He's still getting off light for what he did. | ||
Half
United States2554 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:38 iNSiPiD1 wrote: What does that prove? That she went along with it for 8 months before making that blog post is all. Because Peter first insulted her twenty days ago. lol...this shouldn't need to be explained. | ||
iNSiPiD1
United States140 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:40 Half wrote: Because Peter first insulted her twenty days ago. lol...this shouldn't need to be explained. How do you know Peter first insulted her 20 days ago? Furthermore, how do you know that she didn't come across him 8+ months ago and scheme this up then? User was temp banned for this post. | ||
Half
United States2554 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:43 iNSiPiD1 wrote: How do you know Peter first insulted her 20 days ago? Furthermore, how do you know that she didn't come across him 8+ months ago and scheme this up then? So your saying that this random person insults a random person he doesn't know for 8 months, and as a response that random person pretends to be the first persons internet girlfriend for eight months, making a frequently updates twitter account that eventually amasses 7000 followers, when random #2 is also a wealthy singaporean commenter ... I'm sorry this thread is just silly. bai | ||
NIJ
1012 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:35 iNSiPiD1 wrote: I'm not understanding you entirely. The relationship was claimed to be real (by Peter and Kimi) and was hosted online for us to view, we all agree on this right? But now we know the whole thing was fake. The way I'm suggesting the blogger girl trapped him is by her creating the fake Kimi twitter and youtube accounts, etc. and initially saying he was his boyfriend. Then, Peter being the idiot that he is just goes along with it. Next thing you know he supplies her with all of the information for the blog post. I AM NOT defending anyone, but am merely pointing out why I cannot immediately assume he did this whole thing, because I believe I came up with another equally valid theory, and what I'm looking for is for someone to point out the flaw in my logic. I don't thin you got what I was saying. I'm saying that this fake relationship (whoever faked it) was portrayed to me a real life relationship. Meaning gf you goto dinner,movies etc. Not just online flirting.That chinese girl can't stage that unless she did plastic surgery to look like that 'japanese girl' (my reference to face off, the movie), meet the guy and suck him off. | ||
Copymizer
Denmark2078 Posts
On March 25 2011 07:38 Saechiis wrote: They're both pretty pathetic, can't believe people find their squabble interesting. Exactly my same thought. Waste o' energy | ||
ChoRds
United States127 Posts
| ||
| ||