NASA and the Private Sector - Page 146
Forum Index > General Forum |
Keep debates civil. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
lestye
United States4149 Posts
| ||
oBlade
United States5415 Posts
On December 22 2017 01:43 lestye wrote: Are they actually going to launch that rocket soon? If so whats the payload/where to? The payload is a Tesla Roadster and the destination is Mars. | ||
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On December 22 2017 01:44 oBlade wrote: The payload is a Tesla Roadster and the destination is Mars. *mars orbit nowhere near mars due to how the orbits are aligned, but in an orbit that demonstrates ability to reach mars if launched at a different time etc | ||
lestye
United States4149 Posts
On December 22 2017 02:14 Sn0_Man wrote: *mars orbit nowhere near mars due to how the orbits are aligned, but in an orbit that demonstrates ability to reach mars if launched at a different time etc Oh shit, I didnt realize we were so close to testing that. That is so hype. Is there a like, a site that keeps track of the distance of planets, since it changes throughout the year? | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
![]() Elon Musk's midnight cherry Tesla Roadster. | ||
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
Lmui
Canada6211 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
That first comment lol... | ||
Simberto
Germany11417 Posts
On December 22 2017 01:12 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/943592480926076928 Small tidbit: Even if the imperial system does that silliness of having the same units of measurement for force and mass, the SI units are different. There is no such thing as "xxx tons of force". You could talk about a "force equal to the gravitational force on earths surface of something with a mass of xxx tons", but instead you could simply use the correct units of measure and say "a force of xxx*10 Newton" | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
SpaceX has been ticking off the milestones towards the maiden flight of its Falcon Heavy rocket, with the latest achievement resulting in the vehicle making her first trip to the launch pad. Via a process known as “Fit Checks”, this flow milestone allows for a test run of rollout and erection on Pad 39A ahead of another upcoming first, the Static Fire test involving the ignition of all 27 engines. Falcon Heavy has been a long time in the making, as is usually the case for most new rockets. Signs the impressive renders and fascinating videos were close to becoming a reality stepped up a gear when hardware for this maiden flight started to make appearances out in the open. With the side boosters undergoing testing at SpaceX’s McGregor test site in Texas, obvious due to their aerodynamic nose cones, preparations on the hardware began to pick up the pace during testing opportunities that did not impact on SpaceX’s regular launch manifest with its Falcon 9 rocket. Falcon Heavy’s main propulsion consists of two flight-proven cores for the side-mounted boosters (boosters B1023.2 and B1025.2) and a new core for the central core (booster B1033). That center core also paid a visit to McGregor for a full duration static fire test. These three boosters finally arrived at SpaceX’s 39A Horizontal Integration Facility (HIF) at the Kennedy Space Center to undergo final checks and mating procedures. The HIF at KSC’s historic pad was purpose-built to host both Falcon Heavy and Falcon 9 flows at the same time. They were joined by the upper stage and the fairing, sporting the Falcon Heavy logo. Although the potential of launching before the end of the year – as Elon Musk had previously noted was the hope – was lost, SpaceX did manage to achieve a major milestone over the holidays with the rollout of the full stack to 39A. Riding on the modified Transporter/Erector/Launcher (TEL), which is now capable of launching both Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, as originally envisioned, the huge rocket finally graced 39A, standing proud as the most powerful all-liquid propulsion rocket to sit on the former Apollo and Shuttle pad since the Saturn V in the 1970s. This flow was for the “Fit Checks” a new rocket usually undergoes to provide data on rollout and erection at the pad. This was the first time the modified TEL had taken the full stack to the pad. No propellant loading was conducted, although the vehicle may have been “powered on” to aid the checkouts. “Power On” is one of the first items on the checklist for a launch day. 24 hours later the rocket was lowered back to horizontal and will now head into the flow for its Static Fire test. This test is currently expected to take place on January 6, although – as always – these dates can move around due to numerous factors such as readiness, range authority and weather. One driving factor that directly relates to this preliminary target date is the upcoming launch of the secretive Zuma spacecraft, which is currently targetting January 4 following a lengthy delay relating to a since-cleared concern with the fairing. This launch, providing there isn’t another large slip, is the near-term priority for SpaceX. Once launched, the focus will return to Falcon Heavy Static Fire test. It was originally understood SpaceX would first conduct a Wet Dress Rehearsal (WDR) on the rocket to test prop loading and the characteristics of the rocket before attempting to fire up her engines. However, it is now likely SpaceX will treat the day as a full Static Fire test. This will make sense as any issues that may prevent the ignition of the engines would still allow for good data to be gathered as if it was just a WDR. By the same token, an issue-free WDR would provide the opportunity to take that extra step and run the test through to ignition. It is understood that two Merlin 1D engines will be lit simultaneously followed by the next two… and so on until all 27 are up and running, providing a controlled ramp up to full power for the business end of the vehicle. While the key Launch Readiness Review (LRR) will be another obvious milestone ahead of setting the launch date, this maiden flight is likely to undergo several levels of reviews at the hardware and executive level before SpaceX is comfortable with providing the green light to press to launch day. Based on Range bookings, no date has yet been officially filed, although several sources cite a preliminary window opening on January 15. However, rocket fans should be cautioned against using this date to book flights, given the absolute importance of conducting a successful Static Fire test. Source | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
lestye
United States4149 Posts
![]() | ||
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
CuddlyCuteKitten
Sweden2583 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
| ||