• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:37
CET 00:37
KST 08:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Blizzard Classic Cup - Tastosis announced as captains6Weekly Cups (March 2-8): ByuN overcomes PvT block4GSL CK - New online series18BSL Season 224Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE20
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup - Tastosis announced as captains GSL CK - New online series Weekly Cups (March 2-8): ByuN overcomes PvT block Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE
Tourneys
[GSL CK] Team Maru vs. Team herO WardiTV Team League Season 10 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 516 Specter of Death Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues IPSL Spring 2026 is here! ASL Season 21 Qualifiers March 7-8 BWCL Season 64 Announcement
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
PC Games Sales Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile No Man's Sky (PS4 and PC) Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Mexico's Drug War Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread General nutrition recommendations Cricket [SPORT] TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Gaming-Related Deaths
TrAiDoS
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1979 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 143

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 141 142 143 144 145 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
billy5000
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States865 Posts
June 12 2012 13:49 GMT
#2841
Which do you recommend for learning C: C89, C90, or C99?

I downloaded ubuntu strictly to learn C, and apparently the default is set to either C89 or C90 (I just realized this when I initialized a declaration in a for loop--I was under the impression that it was C99). Is there a valid reason why the default isn't set to C99? I'm like a third way through with this book, and there doesn't seem to be a lot of differences. But who knows, maybe the difference widens later on?
Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly; Man got to sit and wonder, 'Why, why, why?' Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land; Man got to tell himself he understand. Vonnegut
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19193 Posts
June 12 2012 16:07 GMT
#2842
Raise your hand if your first language was QBASIC
o/

Yeahhhhh~
I haven't worked with Pascal, but I know from personal experience QBASIC is just fine for starting off (or at least it was in 1997).

In Ubuntu you can use C90 because GCC is awesome. Just pass -std=c90 to the compiler.
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
MisterD
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1338 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-12 17:37:30
June 12 2012 17:35 GMT
#2843
On June 13 2012 01:07 tofucake wrote:
Raise your hand if your first language was QBASIC
o/

Yeahhhhh~
I haven't worked with Pascal, but I know from personal experience QBASIC is just fine for starting off (or at least it was in 1997).

In Ubuntu you can use C90 because GCC is awesome. Just pass -std=c90 to the compiler.

o/

/cowers in shame

there's actually a os independent freebasic now, which is based off of qbasic (although the syntax evolved away a little bit). It's nice for writing something quickly, but if you try to make something a bit bigger, you very quickly hit the boundaries of natively supported features, which is a huge problem with it. But still, probably the better alternative than trying to get qbasic to run well on modern machines ^^
Gold isn't everything in life... you need wood, too!
Esoterikk
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1256 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-12 20:54:45
June 12 2012 20:54 GMT
#2844
Alright just gonna dive into C++ and go from there, probably go into java right after. This should be an interesting year trying to learn enough to not be a complete shit in Uni.
KaiserJohan
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden1808 Posts
June 12 2012 21:01 GMT
#2845
On June 12 2012 21:22 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2012 20:50 stafu wrote:
In my slightly biased opinion, learn C first, then C++. If you can learn C and C++ to a decent degree, everything else is easy.

C is not the best first language really. I think the old way of Pascal->C->C++->whatever is still the best. You can replace Pascal with similarly clear not OOP language and you can replace C++ with Java/C# as they have better designed OOP aspects. Reason is that before learning OOP you should learn proper structural programming and OOP aspects of Java/C# just get in the way of achieving this goal. C is bad at this as it has a lot of "unnatural" quirks. So after you master basics of structural programming , you move to C to learn the whole pointer and memory management thing. After that OOP. C# may be more natural choice due to the previous step being C, but it does not really matter.


I agree completely, well said.
I started with functional language Moscow ML and then C and then Java at university, and that is really good.
England will fight to the last American
ForgottenOne
Profile Joined August 2010
Romania236 Posts
June 12 2012 21:21 GMT
#2846
On June 13 2012 01:07 tofucake wrote:
Raise your hand if your first language was QBASIC
o/

Yeahhhhh~
I haven't worked with Pascal, but I know from personal experience QBASIC is just fine for starting off (or at least it was in 1997).

In Ubuntu you can use C90 because GCC is awesome. Just pass -std=c90 to the compiler.


My father tought me some QBASIC in the fifth grade (~98). Then I learned some more by myself. I remember the first class in Computer Science in school, the teacher didn't knew what to teach so she tought us a game to play with each other. And by the end of the class I had implemented it in QBASIC. After that I learned Pascal and Visual Basic 6.0 and made a lot of awesome things with those. Those were the times...
Born free, as free as the wind blows...
Defury
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Germany206 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-12 23:01:13
June 12 2012 22:57 GMT
#2847
On June 13 2012 06:01 KaiserJohan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2012 21:22 mcc wrote:
On June 12 2012 20:50 stafu wrote:
In my slightly biased opinion, learn C first, then C++. If you can learn C and C++ to a decent degree, everything else is easy.

C is not the best first language really. I think the old way of Pascal->C->C++->whatever is still the best. You can replace Pascal with similarly clear not OOP language and you can replace C++ with Java/C# as they have better designed OOP aspects. Reason is that before learning OOP you should learn proper structural programming and OOP aspects of Java/C# just get in the way of achieving this goal. C is bad at this as it has a lot of "unnatural" quirks. So after you master basics of structural programming , you move to C to learn the whole pointer and memory management thing. After that OOP. C# may be more natural choice due to the previous step being C, but it does not really matter.


I agree completely, well said.
I started with functional language Moscow ML and then C and then Java at university, and that is really good.


Would Pascal -> C# -> Java -> VB.net work?

Isn't pascal severely out dated and not worth learning? Would I be better off starting with something like python?
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
June 12 2012 23:10 GMT
#2848
On June 13 2012 07:57 Defury wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2012 06:01 KaiserJohan wrote:
On June 12 2012 21:22 mcc wrote:
On June 12 2012 20:50 stafu wrote:
In my slightly biased opinion, learn C first, then C++. If you can learn C and C++ to a decent degree, everything else is easy.

C is not the best first language really. I think the old way of Pascal->C->C++->whatever is still the best. You can replace Pascal with similarly clear not OOP language and you can replace C++ with Java/C# as they have better designed OOP aspects. Reason is that before learning OOP you should learn proper structural programming and OOP aspects of Java/C# just get in the way of achieving this goal. C is bad at this as it has a lot of "unnatural" quirks. So after you master basics of structural programming , you move to C to learn the whole pointer and memory management thing. After that OOP. C# may be more natural choice due to the previous step being C, but it does not really matter.


I agree completely, well said.
I started with functional language Moscow ML and then C and then Java at university, and that is really good.


Would Pascal -> C# -> Java -> VB.net work?

Isn't pascal severely out dated and not worth learning?

Depends what you mean by not worth learning. Basically no language is worth learning in the long run just because of itself. Languages change and new ones emerge, the point of that succession was to hypothesize what is the best way to become a well rounded programmer. The point is not to learn the language, but to gain more general skills. Languages can be learned very quickly and in the process of learning are only as importnant as far as they help you to achieve that goal. Pascal is clear enough language, without too many quirks, so it fits the role of good language to teach basics of structural programming. Actually any modern practical language is probably bad for that role as they all need to support too many features that are not useful in learning process, but are crucial in practice.

As for your progression, I think the lack of C/C++ is kind of a weakness. But more importantly why would you move from C# to Java (joking ) and from Java to VB.Net (not joking ). VB is work of the devil.
RoyGBiv_13
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1275 Posts
June 12 2012 23:23 GMT
#2849
On June 13 2012 08:10 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2012 07:57 Defury wrote:
On June 13 2012 06:01 KaiserJohan wrote:
On June 12 2012 21:22 mcc wrote:
On June 12 2012 20:50 stafu wrote:
In my slightly biased opinion, learn C first, then C++. If you can learn C and C++ to a decent degree, everything else is easy.

C is not the best first language really. I think the old way of Pascal->C->C++->whatever is still the best. You can replace Pascal with similarly clear not OOP language and you can replace C++ with Java/C# as they have better designed OOP aspects. Reason is that before learning OOP you should learn proper structural programming and OOP aspects of Java/C# just get in the way of achieving this goal. C is bad at this as it has a lot of "unnatural" quirks. So after you master basics of structural programming , you move to C to learn the whole pointer and memory management thing. After that OOP. C# may be more natural choice due to the previous step being C, but it does not really matter.


I agree completely, well said.
I started with functional language Moscow ML and then C and then Java at university, and that is really good.


Would Pascal -> C# -> Java -> VB.net work?

Isn't pascal severely out dated and not worth learning?

Depends what you mean by not worth learning. Basically no language is worth learning in the long run just because of itself. Languages change and new ones emerge, the point of that succession was to hypothesize what is the best way to become a well rounded programmer. The point is not to learn the language, but to gain more general skills. Languages can be learned very quickly and in the process of learning are only as importnant as far as they help you to achieve that goal. Pascal is clear enough language, without too many quirks, so it fits the role of good language to teach basics of structural programming. Actually any modern practical language is probably bad for that role as they all need to support too many features that are not useful in learning process, but are crucial in practice.

As for your progression, I think the lack of C/C++ is kind of a weakness. But more importantly why would you move from C# to Java (joking ) and from Java to VB.Net (not joking ). VB is work of the devil.


Agree with this guy ^

Its been said a million times before, but worth repeating that there is no linear progression to these things, and there is no right way to learn programming. I learned off Pascal when I was 13, before I even know what a real program was or that there ever were other languages. It worked, because then when I saw C and Java, I at least knew how to run my own program. (Best skill to learn from C/Pascal is the ability to just run the damn thing, which is an often overlooked skill)

I'd say that you should start with Python or Java though, because being able to do something out the gate is the best feeling. If you enjoy writing your own data structures, and coming up with awesome solutions, you'll end up picking up C/C++, whereas if you like the OOP parts of those languages, you'll move towards even higher level languages.

Also, VB is the work of the devil.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
Esoterikk
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1256 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-13 00:11:19
June 13 2012 00:11 GMT
#2850
Where are the best places to start learning say C++/Java/python, I remember there used to be a link on the OP of this thread but I can't seem to find it.
Ilikestarcraft
Profile Blog Joined November 2004
Korea (South)17733 Posts
June 13 2012 13:37 GMT
#2851
they're still there, just scroll down
"Nana is a goddess. Or at very least, Nana is my goddess." - KazeHydra
Tobberoth
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden6375 Posts
June 13 2012 13:44 GMT
#2852
On June 13 2012 07:57 Defury wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2012 06:01 KaiserJohan wrote:
On June 12 2012 21:22 mcc wrote:
On June 12 2012 20:50 stafu wrote:
In my slightly biased opinion, learn C first, then C++. If you can learn C and C++ to a decent degree, everything else is easy.

C is not the best first language really. I think the old way of Pascal->C->C++->whatever is still the best. You can replace Pascal with similarly clear not OOP language and you can replace C++ with Java/C# as they have better designed OOP aspects. Reason is that before learning OOP you should learn proper structural programming and OOP aspects of Java/C# just get in the way of achieving this goal. C is bad at this as it has a lot of "unnatural" quirks. So after you master basics of structural programming , you move to C to learn the whole pointer and memory management thing. After that OOP. C# may be more natural choice due to the previous step being C, but it does not really matter.


I agree completely, well said.
I started with functional language Moscow ML and then C and then Java at university, and that is really good.


Would Pascal -> C# -> Java -> VB.net work?

Isn't pascal severely out dated and not worth learning? Would I be better off starting with something like python?

Whats your reasoning for that progression? Why not start with C# and then not learn the others? Do you have any need for any of those languages? I'd say that out of those languages, C# is probably the most useful one in a professional context, with Java in close second (but it depends on your area, java is used a lot more in many contexts) while the other two languages are not all that useful. VB.net is used by a lot of corporations but 1. It's extremely easy to learn if you know C# and 2. nowadays, .NET languages are interchanagble, so you could technically write your code in C# and then convert it to VB.net automagically.
FreeZEternal
Profile Joined January 2003
Korea (South)3396 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-13 13:48:12
June 13 2012 13:47 GMT
#2853
Server side, Java is king right now (in fact, it's so widespread it might become the next COBOL....). User applications, I would say .NET.
billy5000
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States865 Posts
June 13 2012 14:22 GMT
#2854
hmm..while reading and doing some exercises from K&R to learn C during the summer, it got me thinking..how exactly should I approach learning this language? I mean, I already have a decent background on java, and I would gladly use this time to learn more about java. Yet I feel that I'm learning C just to have an idea of how low level programming languages work in general. For example, if I were faced with a programming problem, a very simple problem, I would use java. Of course, it could be that I'm just not used to writing in C, but I have this notion of "why bother?" because I don't plan on writing an OS or anything like that in the future. But I do want to understand how computer systems work. I'm actually reading this, and using K&R for some C.

Am I missing out on much by learning C just for "understanding how computer systems work" rather than learning C to "understand computer systems AND be a proficient C programmer?"
Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly; Man got to sit and wonder, 'Why, why, why?' Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land; Man got to tell himself he understand. Vonnegut
KurtistheTurtle
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1966 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-14 00:11:21
June 13 2012 23:42 GMT
#2855
What am I doing wrong? (Trying to create static method to validate input)


package project.pkg2;
/**
*
* // Author: KurtistheTurtle
* // Date: 6/13/12
* // Description: Calculate total number of types of coins per value under 99 cents
*/




import java.util.Scanner;
public class Project2 {



public static void main(String[] args) {
//declare variables
int totalCents, quarters, dimes, nickels, pennies, iterations;
iterations = 0;
String choice = "y";
//create a new scanner type
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
//while to see if they want to continue
while (choice.equalsIgnoreCase("y"))
{
System.out.println("Welcome to Change Calculator");

//validate range and integer here
totalCents = getInt(sc, prompt); <---problem is right here

totalCents = sc.nextInt();

quarters = totalCents/25; //calculate quarters
totalCents = totalCents % 25; //capture the remainder

dimes = totalCents / 10; //calculate dimes
totalCents = totalCents % 10; //catch the remainder

nickels = totalCents / 5; //calculate nickels
totalCents = totalCents % 10; //catch the remainder

pennies = totalCents - (5 * nickels);

System.out.println("You have: ");
System.out.println("Quarters: \t" + quarters);
System.out.println("Dimes: \t\t" + dimes);
System.out.println("Nickels: \t" + nickels);
System.out.println("Pennies: \t" + pennies);

iterations++;
System.out.print("Do you want to continue? y/n: ");
choice = sc.next();

} // end of want to continue

System.out.println("Iterations: " + iterations);

} // end of main method

public static int getInt(Scanner sc, String prompt)
{
prompt = "Enter Cents: 0-99";
int i = 0;
boolean isValid = false;
while (isValid == false)
{ //while start
System.out.print(prompt);
if (sc.hasNextInt())
{
i = sc.nextInt();
isValid = true;
}
else
{
System.out.print("Error! Invalid Input. Try Again.");
}
sc.nextLine(); //discard the entire line
} //isValid while end
return i;
} //getInt end


} //class

“Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears."
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19193 Posts
June 13 2012 23:59 GMT
#2856
semicolon
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
GaiaCaT
Profile Joined June 2011
35 Posts
June 14 2012 00:55 GMT
#2857
prompt not declared?
KurtistheTurtle
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1966 Posts
June 14 2012 00:57 GMT
#2858
so i got caught up by syntax that wasn't in the book. you declare prompt when you call the class in the main method

**fixed!**
“Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears."
ahr28
Profile Joined May 2011
6 Posts
June 15 2012 20:12 GMT
#2859
On June 13 2012 05:54 Esoterikk wrote:
Alright just gonna dive into C++ and go from there, probably go into java right after. This should be an interesting year trying to learn enough to not be a complete shit in Uni.


Ditto my friend. Hope youre not forced to actually completely rely on outside sources like the internet and books to learn about complex algorithms and programming the first year in college just because the teachers are inadequate and the courses/syllabi are utter sh**. Really mad while i'm typing this because I flunked my first year because of this and I have to redo most of my exams in august... FML!
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-18 05:19:42
June 18 2012 05:15 GMT
#2860
On June 13 2012 08:23 RoyGBiv_13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2012 08:10 mcc wrote:
On June 13 2012 07:57 Defury wrote:
On June 13 2012 06:01 KaiserJohan wrote:
On June 12 2012 21:22 mcc wrote:
On June 12 2012 20:50 stafu wrote:
In my slightly biased opinion, learn C first, then C++. If you can learn C and C++ to a decent degree, everything else is easy.

C is not the best first language really. I think the old way of Pascal->C->C++->whatever is still the best. You can replace Pascal with similarly clear not OOP language and you can replace C++ with Java/C# as they have better designed OOP aspects. Reason is that before learning OOP you should learn proper structural programming and OOP aspects of Java/C# just get in the way of achieving this goal. C is bad at this as it has a lot of "unnatural" quirks. So after you master basics of structural programming , you move to C to learn the whole pointer and memory management thing. After that OOP. C# may be more natural choice due to the previous step being C, but it does not really matter.


I agree completely, well said.
I started with functional language Moscow ML and then C and then Java at university, and that is really good.


Would Pascal -> C# -> Java -> VB.net work?

Isn't pascal severely out dated and not worth learning?

Depends what you mean by not worth learning. Basically no language is worth learning in the long run just because of itself. Languages change and new ones emerge, the point of that succession was to hypothesize what is the best way to become a well rounded programmer. The point is not to learn the language, but to gain more general skills. Languages can be learned very quickly and in the process of learning are only as importnant as far as they help you to achieve that goal. Pascal is clear enough language, without too many quirks, so it fits the role of good language to teach basics of structural programming. Actually any modern practical language is probably bad for that role as they all need to support too many features that are not useful in learning process, but are crucial in practice.

As for your progression, I think the lack of C/C++ is kind of a weakness. But more importantly why would you move from C# to Java (joking ) and from Java to VB.Net (not joking ). VB is work of the devil.


Agree with this guy ^

Its been said a million times before, but worth repeating that there is no linear progression to these things, and there is no right way to learn programming. I learned off Pascal when I was 13, before I even know what a real program was or that there ever were other languages. It worked, because then when I saw C and Java, I at least knew how to run my own program. (Best skill to learn from C/Pascal is the ability to just run the damn thing, which is an often overlooked skill)

I'd say that you should start with Python or Java though, because being able to do something out the gate is the best feeling. If you enjoy writing your own data structures, and coming up with awesome solutions, you'll end up picking up C/C++, whereas if you like the OOP parts of those languages, you'll move towards even higher level languages.

Also, VB is the work of the devil.


On June 13 2012 22:44 Tobberoth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2012 07:57 Defury wrote:
On June 13 2012 06:01 KaiserJohan wrote:
On June 12 2012 21:22 mcc wrote:
On June 12 2012 20:50 stafu wrote:
In my slightly biased opinion, learn C first, then C++. If you can learn C and C++ to a decent degree, everything else is easy.

C is not the best first language really. I think the old way of Pascal->C->C++->whatever is still the best. You can replace Pascal with similarly clear not OOP language and you can replace C++ with Java/C# as they have better designed OOP aspects. Reason is that before learning OOP you should learn proper structural programming and OOP aspects of Java/C# just get in the way of achieving this goal. C is bad at this as it has a lot of "unnatural" quirks. So after you master basics of structural programming , you move to C to learn the whole pointer and memory management thing. After that OOP. C# may be more natural choice due to the previous step being C, but it does not really matter.


I agree completely, well said.
I started with functional language Moscow ML and then C and then Java at university, and that is really good.


Would Pascal -> C# -> Java -> VB.net work?

Isn't pascal severely out dated and not worth learning? Would I be better off starting with something like python?

Whats your reasoning for that progression? Why not start with C# and then not learn the others? Do you have any need for any of those languages? I'd say that out of those languages, C# is probably the most useful one in a professional context, with Java in close second (but it depends on your area, java is used a lot more in many contexts) while the other two languages are not all that useful. VB.net is used by a lot of corporations but 1. It's extremely easy to learn if you know C# and 2. nowadays, .NET languages are interchanagble, so you could technically write your code in C# and then convert it to VB.net automagically.


I agree, but there is an order in which you should learn paradigms which is why Pascal/C should be learned first, followed by Java/C#, followed by Javascript/Ruby/Lisp, followed by Haskell, etc.

You should learn the paradigms in this order.

Structured -> Object Oriented -> Imperative Functional -> Declarative Functional.

Going backwards is far more difficult and you will learn a lot slower and develop bad habits. Learning them in the order mentioned above will ensure that you have the best chance of having stronger fundamentals when learning programming.

For example, you need to know functional decomposition to do any language, but you only need to know object decomposition in OOP/FP. Learning Pascal first teaches functional decomposition because that's the primary skill required in structured programming.

Functional decomposition can be (and should be) applied to Java, but with Java there is a bigger focus on object decomposition, which can't be applied to Pascal. The catch is that object decomposition is a lot harder when you don't understand functional decomposition and you end up coming up with some really awkward designs. There is nothing more frustrating than seeing objects decomposed without a second thought applied to functional decomposition, because the developer who coded it started with Java.

So if you want to progress in the a way that ensures the best chance of being a solid programmer, you should follow the order mentioned above.

Not everybody learned it this way, and I'm sure there's some experts out there that started with Haskell. But just from my own experience I think this is the best way.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Prev 1 141 142 143 144 145 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft498
SpeCial 112
ROOTCatZ 74
ProTech38
CosmosSc2 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 604
GuemChi 234
Aegong 41
NaDa 28
LancerX 14
IntoTheRainbow 12
Dota 2
monkeys_forever262
Counter-Strike
fl0m819
taco 326
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe130
Other Games
summit1g12435
Grubby2866
FrodaN908
shahzam720
C9.Mang0173
Mew2King85
ViBE69
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1960
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• EnkiAlexander 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21627
League of Legends
• Doublelift6459
Other Games
• imaqtpie1324
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
23m
The PondCast
10h 23m
WardiTV Team League
12h 23m
Replay Cast
1d
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
WardiTV Team League
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
WardiTV Team League
3 days
BSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
WardiTV Team League
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-10
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
BSL Season 22
Proleague 2026-03-11
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
2026 Changsha Offline CUP
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
NationLESS Cup
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Disclosure: This page contains affiliate marketing links that support TLnet.

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.