EPTNo LT
WCG Maps? No LT?
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
AgonyRush
United States2540 Posts
No LT | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
 | ||
|
LaZyFoO
Canada76 Posts
| ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
hasuwar
7365 Posts
| ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
i prefer lt 100x over those | ||
Liquid`Spy
Netherlands1301 Posts
| ||
Emlary
China3334 Posts
| ||
|
FreeZEternal
Korea (South)3396 Posts
| ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
| ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
bring back 02 maps, for god's sake !!! | ||
|
Yarertz
Djibouti1891 Posts
 )j/k | ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
Gryffindor_us
United States5606 Posts
| ||
|
NerO
United States2071 Posts
| ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
Remmus(Cfr
Russian Federation207 Posts
On April 13 2004 08:47 STIMEY d okgm fish wrote: wcg so gay i bet they switch to some even worse maps last second! they fuck boxer, they fuck everybody, they fuck everything, they fuckkk! Lol =)) Maps are OK , its just a matter of time to adopt playing on them various matchups | ||
|
Ready2[ESC]
Hungary1436 Posts
| ||
|
FreeZEternal
Korea (South)3396 Posts
| ||
|
Beast_Bg
Bulgaria1623 Posts
Gorky and Kohral are fun maps..but too imbalanced.Terran is too strong on both and PvZ on Kohral is just impossible. | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28678 Posts
| ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
ExtremeHangover2
Denmark23 Posts
On April 13 2004 09:17 Beast_Bg wrote: Dahlia is a VERY good map.Martian is ok for a all-land map(I hate em,well most of em..) Gorky and Kohral are fun maps..but too imbalanced.Terran is too strong on both and PvZ on Kohral is just impossible. lol? noob? Korhal absolutely sucks for Terran | ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
BerZergKer
United States69 Posts
On April 13 2004 08:42 NerO wrote: ur obviously a T user since u like gorky. i think dahila and martian cross are only good ones but they overall suck just those suck less then the others i hope they make good maps or hold a map contest to determine the maps used. I like Gorky too (Z player). Why is Gorky good for T? The cliff behind the mineral? That's just like the cliff on ur nat of LT, except now you can hold both that expo and ur main by expoing there first. All expoes are along the edges, map has mostly no walls/cliff in middle except for that little mineral spot. Seems like a pretty balance map. I guess the only problem is T able to float CC up the cliff for early expo...actually, that is a big problem...I haven't played much vT games on that map to really find out...but I'm ok with it. | ||
|
OgerDaniel
273 Posts
| ||
|
NoNameLoser
United States1508 Posts
On April 13 2004 11:57 ExtremeHangover2 wrote: lol? noob? Korhal absolutely sucks for Terran ROFL | ||
|
Mids-Elite
United States34 Posts
Edit: This is about the cliff expo on Gorky, BTW. | ||
|
AgonyRush
United States2540 Posts
agreed | ||
|
iamimat
Canada367 Posts
Dahlia is probabaly a decent map for some, I myself don't prefer it due to its very small bases, and its just so entirly diffrerent from anything alse, very hard to adjust too. If I had to find a similar map to it, it would most definatally be blade storm (just worse). Martarin is my favorite map out of the 4, simply because terran has so many opprunities, and the side expansions can be easly attained and easly protected (but thats for all races) Gorky is a obviously a terran map, terran is obviously on a huge up right from the start, the only problem for terran is if protoss or zerg can control the center, the thing about that map is terran can easly match as many expos as protoss/zerg on that map. (If you don't think gorky is a terran map, you are a noob) (P.S these are only terran perspective, im not even considering zvp/zvz/pvp) | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
dahlia is ok. gorky's sucks horribly. korhal sucks, but i do kind of like pvz on it. martians sucks ass pvt, pvz its fun but tilted towards p. all of the maps have some serious issues. they should definitely be replaced | ||
|
InToTheWannaB
United States4770 Posts
| ||
|
ApollyoN
United States1297 Posts
i wonder if anything could be done about it though really, considering there is generally a consensus in the community that these maps suck (i havent seen ANYONE saying they like them), i wonder why we are being forced to play on them  | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28678 Posts
and the other maps are pretty much garbage imo. | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
I havent really played the map enough to notice anything. | ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
NoNameLoser
United States1508 Posts
| ||
|
ApollyoN
United States1297 Posts
On April 13 2004 13:40 NoNameLoser wrote: Look at the bright side, the more luck they put in maps, the more likely foreigners have a chance in winning.  way to be optimistic i guess | ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
And again, those maps are weird and sucky. | ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
ya fisheye and ogogo top 2 players last year.. better than everyone else in the world clearly shown in the world cyber games! wcg last year proof that korea is just overrated ogogo is the best nada cant even qualify! no boxer no yellow! allt hose players are clearly overrated as evidenced by the very useful result of last wcg. lets s4ee these wonderful maps and format again! | ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
Then maybe a foreigner will win (: | ||
|
Kobayashi
Portugal1970 Posts
Anyway, including LT is not (and shouldn't be) an option, they sould just select some pro-league/user-submited maps and either ask the players opinion (poll at the wcg site) or let someone who has a clue about the game select the maps for them (because who ever made the decision last year is a strange strange man...) | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28678 Posts
same goes for all other positions. and in pvp, it's possible to storm the mineral only natural extreeeemely easy if you're close to eachother. im not 100% certain if lurkers are able to hit minerals, but I think they can, although that's much easier to prevent with cannons and ob. it's kinda like 9 vs 6 tvp on some old temple version where tanks could hit nexus, cept I think this is even more abusive. (as there are plenty of counters to that strat. -.-) | ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
I don't see what is so bad about Martian Cross for PvT, but I've played like 2 games on it. Grrr... and Fisheye beat Silent_Control PvT there. And Stimey, I don't think these maps were even used in the Korean qualifiers last year (I seem to remember it being a last minute change), so Nada failing to qualify wouldn't have to do with the maps. I can't believe they didn't fix the maps after a year though, geez | ||
|
Oxygen
Canada3581 Posts
| ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
| ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
| ||
|
Hoops
417 Posts
| ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
Bigballs plz tell whats wrong with pvt on martian cross. | ||
|
Pumpkin
United States1141 Posts
| ||
|
ApollyoN
United States1297 Posts
i was thinking that if we made a big plea for a map change on their forums or something we could get a change. worth a try anyway :D | ||
|
Sadist
United States7246 Posts
| ||
|
Kacas
Brazil3143 Posts
=D | ||
Arbiter[frolix]
United Kingdom2674 Posts
| ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
When you have a 4 map rotation, lost temple is a good map to have. Every1 has played it and its balanced. for wcg you need to play the other 3 maps just as much as temple. :X | ||
|
comabreaded
United States2166 Posts
On April 13 2004 13:52 STIMEY d okgm fish wrote: ya fisheye and ogogo top 2 players last year.. better than everyone else in the world clearly shown in the world cyber games! wcg last year proof that korea is just overrated ogogo is the best nada cant even qualify! no boxer no yellow! allt hose players are clearly overrated as evidenced by the very useful result of last wcg. lets s4ee these wonderful maps and format again! i think you're forgetting that the korean wcg prelims were played on the original wcg maps. | ||
|
Zerius[TPR]
Canada1633 Posts
On April 13 2004 09:17 Beast_Bg wrote: Dahlia is a VERY good map.Martian is ok for a all-land map(I hate em,well most of em..) Gorky and Kohral are fun maps..but too imbalanced.Terran is too strong on both and PvZ on Kohral is just impossible. um, wasnt Korhal the map that Giyom was unbeatable PvZ on in WCG2003? He won like all his PvZs on Korhal within like 10 minutes. | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
the rest suck my map picks would be: On April 14 2004 01:38 Teroru wrote: Enter The Dragon, Nostalgia, Charity, and Lost Temple would be my picks~ When you have a 4 map rotation, lost temple is a good map to have. Every1 has played it and its balanced. for wcg you need to play the other 3 maps just as much as temple. :X | ||
|
iamimat
Canada367 Posts
And dispite what i have said previously (braking down each map), if I am correct a zerg came in 1st place, protoss 2ed, protoss 3ed, terran 4th. So how is it in terrans favor? These maps are probabaly more suited for protoss then any other map pack for other tournaments overall. Gorky is the only map that people will have trouble against terran, but does not mean its impossible. | ||
|
AgonyRush
United States2540 Posts
On April 14 2004 05:07 iamimat wrote: Nada went to korean qualifier lost 1 game and went home, was not even eliminated =O. i thought it was single elimination... | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
| ||
|
GroT
Belgium3003 Posts
every stereotype i've seen posted here (for example, terran owns all on gorky park) has been broken multiple times in wcg 2003 why don't we all just try to improve on the maps they gave (or at least those of you that are lucky enough to have a wcg for starcraft), and stop whining about what race owns what race? what will you all say when you get eliminated by your own race or on the map where your race was supposed to own? | ||
|
AgonyRush
United States2540 Posts
On April 14 2004 08:00 GroT wrote: every stereotype i've seen posted here (for example, terran owns all on gorky park) has been broken multiple times in wcg 2003 every rule has its exeptions. | ||
| ||
