EPTAGAIN
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3627080
FUCKKKKKKK
NFL Playoffs 2008-2009 - Page 20
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
AGAIN http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3627080 FUCKKKKKKK | ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
 poor Saints though, no Colston is murderous for their offense. | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On October 07 2008 15:06 Ace wrote: that game was great poor Saints though, no Colston is murderous for their offense. Uhh, not including this week, they're averaging 29 ppg without him. Him missing is hardly the problem. Gramatica missing, on the other hand.... On October 07 2008 14:08 zer0das wrote: Anyone else watch the Vikings and Saints? Most ridiculous game I've watched in a long, long while. Actually, probably the most ridiculous game I've ever seen. This is the most ridiculous and exciting season of football I've ever seen. This game is just icing. On October 07 2008 07:35 KOFgokuon wrote: FML AGAIN http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3627080 FUCKKKKKKK The poor bastard just can't stay healthy. I'm glad I didn't get him in my money league this year. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Without Colston, NO is in deep shit. Their offense is NOT going to win games when their Defense isn't able to stop teams from pretty much rolling down the field. Brees may be one of the best QBs in the league at the moment, but with no marquee receiver he can't do it all. 3 losses, all down to the wire for Saints. They need Colston. | ||
|
Dknight
United States5225 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
Going: Peterson, Ocho and BigBen Coming: Romo, Turner the Burner | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On October 07 2008 18:49 Ace wrote: 29 ppg obviously isn't helping them win the shootouts. I said earlier this game would be close and lo and behold it came down to the final possessions. Without Colston, NO is in deep shit. Their offense is NOT going to win games when their Defense isn't able to stop teams from pretty much rolling down the field. Brees may be one of the best QBs in the league at the moment, but with no marquee receiver he can't do it all. 3 losses, all down to the wire for Saints. They need Colston. No, they need their defense to make stops. To give up over 29 points per game is absurd. You can't expect an offense to consistently put up more than that. The defense needs to stop the other team; and if they can't, they won't win, REGARDLESS of Coltson being there or not. The point is, the offense is NOT the problem. | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On October 08 2008 01:50 Hawk wrote: How's this trade: Going: Peterson, Ocho and BigBen Coming: Romo, Turner the Burner Post your roster. | ||
|
JudgeMathis
Cuba1286 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
really, this is more of a qb upgrade for me. i think there's gonna be minimal differeence between turner and peterson. Romo's hitting 40td this season and culter's hitting 30. sick sick sick | ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
i still think peterson > turner in the long run, turner's schedule gets harder after this, and peterson ends with detroit, arizona, and atlanta at the end of the season. It's not a terrible trade though, you can afford to lose ocho cinco though cause he hasn't done jack all year interesting. i'll have to think about it | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
| ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
On October 08 2008 01:50 Hawk wrote: How's this trade: Going: Peterson, Ocho and BigBen Coming: Romo, Turner the Burner You're giving way too much away. You could probably almost get Romo and Turner for Peterson alone. Bit of an exaggeration, but seriously. Turner has been good against bad defenses, but AP is still AP. He had a bad week, oh well. Look at their schedules, AP is going to burn the weak defenses he faces. It's not like you even need an upgrade at QB, you have Cutler and he faces plenty of weak opponents and he is going to score more points than Romo in all likelyhood. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32163 Posts
However, he just came back and asked for cutler lol. This things prolly dead now | ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On October 08 2008 04:23 Hawk wrote: yeah, but i figure even if turner doesnt continue this tear, im ok with the other guys ive got. grant has to come around, hes too good. ronnie brown will be pretty solid for the rest of the season. edge and jamal are ok in the flex spot. felix jones is nice, because our league gives points for return yards and td. Grant isn't good at all. He had one good season (last year), and it wasn't really all that great. The best second half of the season went to Earnest Graham. He probably won't come around, because, for whatever reason, that team is on a downward slope right now. Plus he's had a hamstring problem all year. Anyway, since he wants Cutler too, there's no way. He's just trying to rip you off. Even before then, you're kind of thin at HB, and Turner has in no way proven himself like AP has. Yeah, AP had a terrible game this week, but how many do you think he'll have? Turner has torched bad defenses this year, and done nothing against decent ones. Anyone can run for a lot of yards on Detroit (except Forte); I'm not impressed by that. Don't take me wrong, he's a solid #2 HB, but you'd have to be an absolute retard to trade him for AP. The other guys were just fluff, basically, in my opinion, so with that, you're basically getting a 2 for 1, and then it's considerable if you're deep at HB, which you aren't. Even if he takes Cutler out, you shouldn't make that trade. If you had like... AP, Forte, Slaton, and Brown instead of what you have, then I think I'd make that trade. Since you start 2 QB's, you'd get a HUGE upgrade at your QB 2 slot, for a fair loss at HB, but something you could easily withstand. But, with your team, there's no way I'd make that trade. Just as a bragging kind of thing, I have Portis, Forte, and Slaton on my team. How sick is that? I got Slaton off of WW, drafted the other two. I got Portis at #16 overall. I took P. Manning with my first pick because of the scoring in my league. 12 of the top 15 in my league are QB's right now. Last year ended with the top nine as QB's, so a QB as first pick made sense, and I ended up with one of the best teams in my league. I'm 2-3 because of a couple roster mistakes that I made, but I'm second in total points, which puts me in a good position. | ||
|
Yogurt
United States4258 Posts
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/081007&sportCat=nfl | ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On October 09 2008 07:10 zer0das wrote: Well... Eli has been this year, no question. No one expected him to guide the Giants to the Super Bowl and he did. It's really not all that crazy to say Eli has a brighter future than Peyton at this point in time. Although it'll be interesting to see if he has his usual late season dip in production. Peyton is also at the tail end of his career, while Eli is at the prime of his. There is no doubt in my mind, nor should there be in anyone's, that at the end of their careers, Peyton's stats will far surpass Eli's stats, and he will be considered the better of the two. Eli has a long way to go before he can be considered as good as Peyton. | ||
| ||
