|
On September 30 2008 04:14 Hawk wrote:
I can't wait til karma plants her foot up Mangini's ass real soon. We get it, your team can't beat real competitors, so you want to boost your ego by continuing to beat up a team way after it's over. Going for it on 4th how many times when you're up? He's a mini Bellichek, minus the coaching skills and a talented team. Egotistical fuckhead who isn't going to be happy until his idiot moves really fuck over his team.
And fuck you 49ers, you made me sad.
No way dude... arizona was lighting it up toward the end of the game. Keeping the ball was the best thing they could have done.
|
On September 30 2008 12:52 bdams19 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2008 04:14 Hawk wrote:
I can't wait til karma plants her foot up Mangini's ass real soon. We get it, your team can't beat real competitors, so you want to boost your ego by continuing to beat up a team way after it's over. Going for it on 4th how many times when you're up? He's a mini Bellichek, minus the coaching skills and a talented team. Egotistical fuckhead who isn't going to be happy until his idiot moves really fuck over his team.
And fuck you 49ers, you made me sad. No way dude... arizona was lighting it up toward the end of the game. Keeping the ball was the best thing they could have done.
Yeah, it's not like they were playing the Dolphins. The Cardinals have a very potent offense. If they allowed them any chance to come back, they very well could have.
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR TPR
|
I can start three out of this group. Who sits?
AD @ NO (no brainer)
Grant @ ATL (He's putting me on the verge of suicidal)
Edge @ Buf
Brown @ SD
I was leaning towards sitting Brown personally. I don't think he's coming anywhere last week's output. Before this, he had yet to break 25 yards this season or 4.0 ypc. Edge hasn't been much better, but at least he's got a much better offense to work with.
Bonus question: Steve Slaton is on the FA list. I've got 4 qb (Ben, Cutler, Cambell and Cassell). I was gonna hold Cassell for trade bait, but he really hasn't given me anything lol. Should I just dump him for Slaton??
|
I'd bench Brown, especially against the Chargers defense.
|
why do you have 4 QBs? Whats the league setup?
Doubt you need Slaton that bad when you've got Cutler.
|
he plays 2 qb's a week, that was answered earlier
slaton's a running back, how does cutler matter
i wouldn't trust ronnie brown either, SD held the ravens to pretty shitty running numbers and oakland's backs are decent
|
On October 01 2008 01:30 Ace wrote:
why do you have 4 QBs? Whats the league setup?
Doubt you need Slaton that bad when you've got Cutler.
2 qb league, so I need at least 3 (Cambell) for bye, and Cassell was just a trading chip for later, but he isn't generating any interest.
|
Phil > Washington
Carolina > KC
Chicago > Detroit
Green Bay > Atlanta
Tennessee > Baltimore
San Diego > Miami
Indy > Houston
NYG > Seattle
Den < TB
Arizona < Buffalo
Dallas > Cincinnati
NE > San Fran
Jack > Pitt
New Orleans < Minnesota
|
On September 30 2008 23:35 Hawk wrote:
I can start three out of this group. Who sits?
AD @ NO (no brainer)
Grant @ ATL (He's putting me on the verge of suicidal)
Edge @ Buf
Brown @ SD
I was leaning towards sitting Brown personally. I don't think he's coming anywhere last week's output. Before this, he had yet to break 25 yards this season or 4.0 ypc. Edge hasn't been much better, but at least he's got a much better offense to work with.
Bonus question: Steve Slaton is on the FA list. I've got 4 qb (Ben, Cutler, Cambell and Cassell). I was gonna hold Cassell for trade bait, but he really hasn't given me anything lol. Should I just dump him for Slaton??
Without a doubt get Steve Slaton. Post your roster, though, because you may want to drop someone else. If Cassel blows up one week, you should be able to sell high, and personally, I'd like to give him another week if I were you. So post your roster. This actually looks like a good week for Cassel.
|
Phil < Washington
Carolina > KC
Chicago > Detroit
Green Bay < Atlanta (GB is on a downward spiral, their D is shot, and Rodgers is hurt, Turner will kill them this week)
Tennessee > Baltimore
San Diego > Miami
Indy > Houston
NYG > Seattle
Den > TB (Their offense won't struggle like that two weeks in a row)
Arizona < Buffalo
Dallas > Cincinnati
NE > San Fran
Jax > Pitt
New Orleans < Minnesota
|
I really can't see Denver beating Tampa Bay this weekend. They have a balanced offense and I can see them putting up 24-30 points on the Broncos. The only way I can see the Broncos winning is if their defense actually steps up and Griese throws the game away.
The more I think about it, the more I agree with you on Washington and Atlanta winning. Westbrook's absence will kill the Eagles again and I have much love and faith in Ryan (BC fan) in dismantling the Packers defense.
|
I don't think Minnesota is going to beat NO. Saints have had some decent games, just that their offense isn't as strong as it started out with Colston.
If Vikings win, it'll probably be a close game (lol for NO).
|
On October 02 2008 07:43 Ace wrote:
I don't think Minnesota is going to beat NO. Saints have had some decent games, just that their offense isn't as strong as it started out with Colston.
If Vikings win, it'll probably be a close game (lol for NO).
Their entire offense is based on passing the ball. Reggie Bush can't run it, unless he's playing Denver, and that's been proven time and time again--he really has no business being called a half back, but I digress. If there's one thing that the Minnesota defense can do other than stopping the run, it's generating a pass rush. You saw it against the Colts, and the Panthers. New Orleans has a better line than the Panthers, and fewer injuries than the Colts, but I think they'll still be able to get at Drew Brees (who has very few options right now). The Vikings offense will not be hindered at all this week, either. The Saints can't stop the run (or the pass for that matter), and the Vikings can run like no other team in the league.
http://www.azcardinals.com/news/detail.php?PRKey=2591
Anquan Boldin is a real man's man. Seriously, what a badass. How many guys would be so confident after getting their head smashed like that?
On October 02 2008 06:18 Dknight wrote:
I really can't see Denver beating Tampa Bay this weekend. They have a balanced offense and I can see them putting up 24-30 points on the Broncos. The only way I can see the Broncos winning is if their defense actually steps up and Griese throws the game away.
The more I think about it, the more I agree with you on Washington and Atlanta winning. Westbrook's absence will kill the Eagles again and I have much love and faith in Ryan (BC fan) in dismantling the Packers defense.
That Eagles game is going to be close, but Washington is red hot right now, and I like to take the hot hand. Portis will get shut down, for the most part, but I think Campbell will continue to play well. He'll need to against that defense too. It'll be a good game, that's for sure. But I think missing Westbrook just takes too much away from Philly right now. McNabb isn't quite as dynamic as he once was, and their receiving corps isn't really too great.
Denver is going to score on Tampa Bay, at least they should. Tampa's D can't stop Brandon. As long as they don't have two fumbles deep in their territory again, and Jay doesn't throw costly picks, they should win. The offense is too good.
I don't have faith in Ryan at all, personally. He's probably the better of the two rookie starters, but he hasn't shown a whole lot, other than he can throw for about a hundred eighty yards, and a TD on bad defenses, behind 150+ and three TD games from the running back. He has a long way to go in his career before I start putting my faith in him.
|
You put the home team first? that's odd. nevermind, these are like completely random lol
tennessee > baltimore
kc < carolina
chicago > detroit
atlanta < green bay
indi < houston
san diego > miami
seattle < giants
washington < philly
tampa > denver
buffalo > arizona
cinci < dallas
NE > SF
Pitts < Jacksonville
|
On October 02 2008 11:43 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2008 07:43 Ace wrote:
I don't think Minnesota is going to beat NO. Saints have had some decent games, just that their offense isn't as strong as it started out with Colston.
If Vikings win, it'll probably be a close game (lol for NO). Their entire offense is based on passing the ball. Reggie Bush can't run it, unless he's playing Denver, and that's been proven time and time again--he really has no business being called a half back, but I digress. If there's one thing that the Minnesota defense can do other than stopping the run, it's generating a pass rush. You saw it against the Colts, and the Panthers. New Orleans has a better line than the Panthers, and fewer injuries than the Colts, but I think they'll still be able to get at Drew Brees (who has very few options right now). The Vikings offense will not be hindered at all this week, either. The Saints can't stop the run (or the pass for that matter), and the Vikings can run like no other team in the league. http://www.azcardinals.com/news/detail.php?PRKey=2591Anquan Boldin is a real man's man. Seriously, what a badass. How many guys would be so confident after getting their head smashed like that? Show nested quote +On October 02 2008 06:18 Dknight wrote:
I really can't see Denver beating Tampa Bay this weekend. They have a balanced offense and I can see them putting up 24-30 points on the Broncos. The only way I can see the Broncos winning is if their defense actually steps up and Griese throws the game away.
The more I think about it, the more I agree with you on Washington and Atlanta winning. Westbrook's absence will kill the Eagles again and I have much love and faith in Ryan (BC fan) in dismantling the Packers defense. That Eagles game is going to be close, but Washington is red hot right now, and I like to take the hot hand. Portis will get shut down, for the most part, but I think Campbell will continue to play well. He'll need to against that defense too. It'll be a good game, that's for sure. But I think missing Westbrook just takes too much away from Philly right now. McNabb isn't quite as dynamic as he once was, and their receiving corps isn't really too great. Denver is going to score on Tampa Bay, at least they should. Tampa's D can't stop Brandon. As long as they don't have two fumbles deep in their territory again, and Jay doesn't throw costly picks, they should win. The offense is too good. I don't have faith in Ryan at all, personally. He's probably the better of the two rookie starters, but he hasn't shown a whole lot, other than he can throw for about a hundred eighty yards, and a TD on bad defenses, behind 150+ and three TD games from the running back. He has a long way to go in his career before I start putting my faith in him.
boldin is a beast
if westbrook plays, eagles take this game
without him, it's a tossup
|
Westbrook is starting Sunday. Eagles will win this. Rodgers is a game time decision.
|
EAGLES!
FLY HIIIGH!
FLY HIIIIIIIIIIGH!
and dont fucking get injured : (
|
tennessee > baltimore
kc < carolina
chicago > detroit
atlanta < green bay
indi > houston
san diego > miami
seattle < giants
washington > philly
tampa < denver
buffalo > arizona
cinci < dallas
NE < SF
Pitts < Jacksonville
|
On October 05 2008 23:50 ShloobeR wrote:
EAGLES!
FLY HIIIGH!
FLY HIIIIIIIIIIGH!
and dont fucking get injured : (
ON THE ROAD TO VICTORYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
