NHL Playoff SemiFinals - Test Yer Wits! - Page 22

On June 04 2007 20:02 Fishball wrote:
although its sad to say... I dont think sens will win the series anymore -_-

On June 04 2007 19:02 LegendaryDreams wrote:



This series so truely so even, I\'ve been rooting for SENS all the way.

It\'s like NaDa vs Savior.. my heart says NaDa but everyone says savior..

SENators strong throughout like nada (micro/macro), ducks good in defence (saviors defending with defilers)..

Close series yo.. gl ottawa.

As for all these Canadian commentators commenting on how Emery has been keeping the sens in these games, it's absolute bs. In the previous rounds, you don\'t have to care about letting in 5 goals when your offense is scoring 6. That\'s basically why he had such a pretty record before and why he doesn\'t seem up to par now.

Maybe he should jump ship to rap, he seems to already have had a start...

About the play on Niedermeyer, ugly alfe showed his true colours in this game. What a fucking dirty cunt. Everyone crying about Pronger\'s hit on McAmmond should be crying about this bs too because Pronger\'s hit was really not intentional. He\' fucking 6\'6\'\' and if he side steps someone to make a defensive play, I think most people would make contact with his his lifted arms.

alfredsson on the other hand, as much as the fucker tries to lie about it in press conferences or what not, purposely tried to hit (and could have injured) someone he can never live up to in class, in all senses of the word. I use to have a little respect for him but after that heartless play, I\'ve lost all of it for him. I hope Pronger comes back in the next game and fucking murders him and then Neil afterwards.I\'ve always thought alfredsson looked coy and sly and he proved me right tonight.

The saying is true, it\'s the quiet ones you have to watch out for.

There was absolutely no game that ended 6-5 for the sens in these playoffs. in fact he the most goals he let in in one game was 4 and he only did that once.

this line right here makes me think you do not know what you are talking about.

Pronger's hit may or may not have been intentional but when you put your arm up like that you risk risk injuring someone and that is why he got the suspension for it.

He always looked coy and sky and he proved it to you that night? that weird because he looks the same now as before that game.

no comment.

The intent of that statement was to get across the point that Emery didn't have to worry about how many goals he let in because his offense in the previous rounds were spectacular and made up for any mistakes he may have made in net. I came up with those numbers off the top of my head. I thought about some idiot taking what I wrote out of context, and I had half the mind to edit it to make the numbers irrationally larger, but I had faith in the TL hockey fans and that they were not that stupid to misinterpret what I was trying to get across—you proved me wrong.

No, it wasn’t because Pronger “risked” getting someone injured that he was suspended for, it was the fact that McAmmond was injured as a result of Pronger’s play. If McAmmond wasn’t hurt after the play and had gotten up, I highly doubt Pronger would have been suspended. What your talking about is being suspended for intentions and if that’s what the case is, then Neil should have been suspended as well in that game for trying to hurt one of Anaheim’s players when he made a check aimed at their head—in which case he missed because the Anaheim player ducked—but it still doesn’t change the fact there could have been a head shot with a following injury. Same case with Alfredsson, who intentionally (arguable, but most think so) took a hard shot at Niedermeyer with a puck in the last second of a period and could have seriously injured him too.

I’d also just like to point out that McAmmond has a history of concussions as well, so that may have played a factor in why he was hurt after the hit; maybe Pronger wouldn’t have been suspended if he had made the same hit on someone else.