EPTthat being said the betting system as well - it's not even an official valve thing, is it?
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive - Page 647
| Forum Index > General Games |
GTR
51666 Posts
that being said the betting system as well - it's not even an official valve thing, is it? | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
| ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
ramon
Germany4842 Posts
dig took 8 rounds in 2 maps, ibp took over 20 so even if dig beats them twice, they have to do it by a high margin this system makes vp vs c9 more tense in this case imo e: these clutches :8 | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
Too bad for C9 - but yay VP! | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
HYPE! | ||
|
ramon
Germany4842 Posts
nvm: 13:00 just showed up on stream | ||
|
wptlzkwjd
Canada1240 Posts
On October 25 2014 18:27 MooMooMugi wrote: C9 pls beat VP twice in a row LOL too funny. Much faith in NA teams brings tears of joy to my eyes. | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
On October 25 2014 19:09 wptlzkwjd wrote: It's funny. I bet $8 on Dig for both matches and somehow came out ahead with -$8 and +$15 overall on their matches despite them getting knocked out of the tourney lol. LOL too funny. Much faith in NA teams brings tears of joy to my eyes. Happy for you but that's still super retarded. All due to the tourney format and betting platform not being on the same page of what constitutes a "win". | ||
|
Miragee
8695 Posts
On October 25 2014 18:36 ramon wrote: the faceit system is headtohead? yesterday they said it's just round difference dig took 8 rounds in 2 maps, ibp took over 20 so even if dig beats them twice, they have to do it by a high margin this system makes vp vs c9 more tense in this case imo e: these clutches :8 They play 2 maps and it wins who has won the most rounds in them combined. So if one team wins the first map 16-0 they only have to win one round on the second map because then, the best result the loser from the first map can hope to achieve is 16-17. And well, the tourney management cannot be faulted for the betting thing. It's seperate. It's the task for the betting organisers to inform themselves about the system. That being said, I think this system is so dumb for a game like CS, where the map balance is pretty much achieved by letting both teams play both sides. As you saw in the iBP vs dig match, the kniferound for the second match pretty much decided the result which is borderline ridiculous. | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
//edit: haha that bet on mid push paid out in dividends | ||
|
GTR
51666 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
On October 25 2014 20:39 GTR wrote: iBP stepping up really massive here yep. though on the CT side they have to. coming back from a 3:12 or something like that is not at all uncommon on Inferno. | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
 hopefully they can close it out now.//edit: lol shox. machine. | ||
|
NihiLStarcraft
Denmark1413 Posts
| ||
|
GTR
51666 Posts
don't like 16k as you can buy every round with freedom. i feel 10k is the perfect amount for overtime as it makes the first round extremely important. are there tournaments that still use mr3 10k? | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
| ||
| ||
