• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:43
CEST 16:43
KST 23:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202538RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 721 users

Kerbal Space Program - Page 35

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 48 Next All
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
May 08 2015 01:55 GMT
#681
Picture in spoiler - all my engines are unobstructed.

Kerbal Engineer doesn't like my ship either... at some points it's just given up and said 0 TWR when I'm flying normally.

Ah well, still have things to figure out. On the plus side of things, infiniglide is dead.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
May 08 2015 07:33 GMT
#682
I can't explain that if the engine exhaust is not hitting anything and they're fed with intakes (you can see intake air usage % from kerbal engineer in flight, below 50% is good)
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-09 23:49:05
May 09 2015 23:48 GMT
#683
I made a new plane today. Can carry a payload to a stable orbit, i'm not sure how high - but not a very big one. Parts count is too high to fly comfortably, the game runs ok but the physics get more and more wonky as you add more stuff.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


center of lift is too far forward when fuel is low, i will keep that in mind for edits and future designs. My plane with COM that falls forward onto the center of lift @0% fuel flies a lot better
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
May 10 2015 00:11 GMT
#684
That's a ridiculous amount of engines. And I note that it is using Mk2 parts.

How large of a payload can it lift? And is there a reason why I'm not seeing a lot of Mk3 parts in successful spaceplanes? (I know that EJ_sa's not flying his shuttle currently, as it appears it no longer functions well.)
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-10 00:30:48
May 10 2015 00:27 GMT
#685
I've just never really built with mk.3 before.

To a 75km circular orbit.. maybe a mk.2 fuel tank or two (regular size, like the two in the middle of the plane) so not much at all.

The engines stopping working well at so low heights really hurts. If you make an orbital trajectory, your engines will cut off and then you have to drag through the atmosphere from ~15km-30km and lose hundreds of meters per second. Going too steeply gave me worse results than going up more sharply, but if you go up too sharply you need like 1km/s of delta-v to circularize entirely from oxidizer and it's all a mess.


If i took off the side wing engines, i don't think it'd be able to easily break through mach 1. I saw a graph recently, the drag there is actually drastically higher than at mach 1.1 and if you can't get some more airspeed, your engines won't give more thrust and you're stuck at mach 0.95 all day instead of 3.5x faster

^that craft does have ZERO staging though.
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
May 10 2015 02:16 GMT
#686
The Mk3 plane parts have some oddness with them. They seem prone to falling apart somewhat easily, and I think there's still something up with that Mk3 cargo bay.

I think I'll try a ridiculous pancake rocket to see if they have actually become totally useless.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-10 03:17:55
May 10 2015 02:24 GMT
#687
I think I'll try a ridiculous pancake rocket to see if they have actually become totally useless.


Not useless, but less efficient - especially if you have a decent TWR (like 2.5)

You can watch the atmospheric efficiency display in kerbal engineer. It gives you your speed as a % of terminal velocity.

The moment you stage, you can see it jump - so it might say 150% then drop to 30% when you remove some huge stuff sticking out of the sides of your rocket. For fuel-efficient ascent, you'd vary your thrust to keep it above 85% but below 100% at all times AFAIK.

A kick to get off the launchpad is nice (some rt-5 clusters that burn and detach almost immediately are good, you don't need to worry about them being aerodynamic as there's little air resistance going from 0m/s to ~250m/s) and then it's fairly reasonably easy to stay at >90% of terminal velocity for ~2km-15km, but after that the more thrust, the better. The faster you're going, the less energy you are wasting to gravity and the more effective your thrust will be due to the oberth effect and they actually has a fairly huge impact on your ability to set an orbit - it's visible when comparing 0.5 TWR to 2.0 TWR to 6.0 TWR (in-flight TWR is higher than initial because of fuel consumption, check it out on kerbal engineer display)

Since terminal velocity is much higher with a thinner rocket, it's probably best if possible to have a fairing (or nose cone) and then have it go down in a stack, i think, with nothing huge (like big size fuel tanks) sticking out of the sides. That does limit your ability to do stuff like asparagus staging though, which is still extremely powerful. If you stack straight down, there's nowhere to put more engines so you can easily have less thrust than desired
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-10 03:40:59
May 10 2015 03:39 GMT
#688
On May 10 2015 11:24 Cyro wrote:
Show nested quote +
I think I'll try a ridiculous pancake rocket to see if they have actually become totally useless.


Since terminal velocity is much higher with a thinner rocket, it's probably best if possible to have a fairing (or nose cone) and then have it go down in a stack, i think, with nothing huge (like big size fuel tanks) sticking out of the sides. That does limit your ability to do stuff like asparagus staging though, which is still extremely powerful. If you stack straight down, there's nowhere to put more engines so you can easily have less thrust than desired


Well. I can get three orange tanks to orbit full with only a little effort.

This one is being a little more difficult, but I think if I can solve the spent boosters slamming into other portions of the rocket on the tricky stage 4, it could get much more to orbit. Also, launching is touchy - light the engines, then must QUICKLY release the launch clamps (I could stage the engines and clamps at the same time, I guess) or my rocket launches out of the flames of my exploding launch pad.

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
This is a night launch. The launchpad did not survive.
[image loading]

[image loading]
The view from below - the asparagus staging is tricky to get that circle, because there is one unmatched stack that has to feed into the next stage and then across a small gap to the stack on its right - not enough space for another stack in there to keep it "even" and fully symmetrical.

[image loading]
Post-launch in the daylight. Viewed from above, with data.


The current issue comes in when the "T" at the end of the main six spokes releases both side tanks at the same time. Inevitably there's an unbalanced collision of the dropped spent stacks into one of the arms. Oh, and SAS? That's turned off pretty quickly as the "gyrating" to keep it in one spot induces lots of wobble I can avoid by manually nudging it.

Why build this? No reason - putting fuel into orbit.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
May 10 2015 10:37 GMT
#689
I'l give it a try later :D
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
stenole
Profile Blog Joined April 2004
Norway868 Posts
May 10 2015 16:17 GMT
#690
On May 10 2015 08:48 Cyro wrote:
I made a new plane today. Can carry a payload to a stable orbit, i'm not sure how high - but not a very big one. Parts count is too high to fly comfortably, the game runs ok but the physics get more and more wonky as you add more stuff.


Cool plane.

On May 10 2015 09:11 felisconcolori wrote:
And is there a reason why I'm not seeing a lot of Mk3 parts in successful spaceplanes


I think it's mostly a problem of scale and how they will fit awkwardly with other parts. Mk3 parts are so much heavier than mk2 but only really offer twice as much area real estate for engines. So you are forced to be more creative when placing the extra engines you need. In the same way you need more wings, but the old 0.90 wings are a little flimsy and the new mk3 wings make for bad building blocks for building bigger wings. If you want things to look pretty you also need to use the adapter parts which are also bulky and parts don't clip on nicely to them. In order to keep the large plane from flexing too much and breaking apart when landing you need lots of struts. The end result is that you get a high part count which can cause the game to run slowly.

What I've seen from other people's spaceplanes is they don't make planes that deliver cargo to orbit, but instead fly to other worlds. So if you don't need the mk3 cargo bay, why not use parts that are easier to build with. Personally, I don't think it makes a lot of sense to carry around air breathing engines and wings in space.

On the plus side, mk3 parts hold the most fuel per ton of the tanks in the entire game (mk2 almost holds the least per ton being almost as bad as the oscar and donut tanks).

On May 10 2015 12:39 felisconcolori wrote:
Why build this? No reason - putting fuel into orbit.


Seems like a great reason to me. Sometimes, you want to refuel in space instead of sending a giant craft into space with its own fuel.
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
May 10 2015 16:29 GMT
#691
On May 11 2015 01:17 stenole wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2015 09:11 felisconcolori wrote:
And is there a reason why I'm not seeing a lot of Mk3 parts in successful spaceplanes


I think it's mostly a problem of scale and how they will fit awkwardly with other parts. Mk3 parts are so much heavier than mk2 but only really offer twice as much area real estate for engines. So you are forced to be more creative when placing the extra engines you need. In the same way you need more wings, but the old 0.90 wings are a little flimsy and the new mk3 wings make for bad building blocks for building bigger wings. If you want things to look pretty you also need to use the adapter parts which are also bulky and parts don't clip on nicely to them. In order to keep the large plane from flexing too much and breaking apart when landing you need lots of struts. The end result is that you get a high part count which can cause the game to run slowly.

What I've seen from other people's spaceplanes is they don't make planes that deliver cargo to orbit, but instead fly to other worlds. So if you don't need the mk3 cargo bay, why not use parts that are easier to build with. Personally, I don't think it makes a lot of sense to carry around air breathing engines and wings in space.

On the plus side, mk3 parts hold the most fuel per ton of the tanks in the entire game (mk2 almost holds the least per ton being almost as bad as the oscar and donut tanks).

Show nested quote +
On May 10 2015 12:39 felisconcolori wrote:
Why build this? No reason - putting fuel into orbit.


Seems like a great reason to me. Sometimes, you want to refuel in space instead of sending a giant craft into space with its own fuel.


That's what you can't see underneath the fairing at the top. It's got a probe core, Sr. Docking port, some RCS, and solar panels. I put it into orbit, then leave it there with all the fuel available for future missions or emergency topping up. Also makes for a cheap refueling station or interplanetary propulsion section. I'm thinking, with the amount of dV that's still in orbit, I could make a pretty sloppy transition to Moho and still manage to get into orbit.

The strength of the Mk3 part node attach (or lack of it) seems like a pretty significant thing. But the Mk3 wet wings and the cargo bay are pretty important to the shuttle enthusiasts out there. You're right, they don't really scale well when you're looking at larger craft - and making large wings from wing parts can be all kinds of pain, as the stock Stearjet shows so painfully.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany984 Posts
May 10 2015 20:04 GMT
#692
Spaceplanes are boring. I'd rather fly through space with my C-type asteroid fuel tank.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
May 10 2015 21:45 GMT
#693
So~ how do you actually get to asteroids and fly them around? Do they have much mass?
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
May 10 2015 21:46 GMT
#694
On May 11 2015 06:45 Cyro wrote:
So~ how do you actually get to asteroids and fly them around? Do they have much mass?

You need to upgrade tracking station twice, track an asteroid, and yeah the biggest ones are extremely heavy.
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-11 00:18:45
May 10 2015 22:52 GMT
#695
Would it be worth dragging one to orbit to mine for fuel or is it easier to just dump huge fuel tanks with docking ports up there?

I kinda took a break from building rockets for a while, now i'm having an issue with side-attached engines smashing into the rest of the rocket after detaching. The hydraulic detachment manifold seems to have insufficient force for big parts in atmosphere. I was looking to make a reasonably big (but simple) rocket using parts just bigger than mk.1 with ~5km/s (ish) of delta-v for someone new to the game. Maybe more vertical staging
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
May 11 2015 08:45 GMT
#696
I haven't played 1.0 yet~
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany984 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-11 09:44:33
May 11 2015 09:23 GMT
#697
On May 11 2015 07:52 Cyro wrote:
Would it be worth dragging one to orbit to mine for fuel or is it easier to just dump huge fuel tanks with docking ports up there?

I kinda took a break from building rockets for a while, now i'm having an issue with side-attached engines smashing into the rest of the rocket after detaching. The hydraulic detachment manifold seems to have insufficient force for big parts in atmosphere. I was looking to make a reasonably big (but simple) rocket using parts just bigger than mk.1 with ~5km/s (ish) of delta-v for someone new to the game. Maybe more vertical staging


Launching some orange tanks to orbit is significantly easier. Getting a big asteroid (they have only limited ressources, so you'd want a type-E for a refueling station) into a precise orbit is a real pain, turning them is a struggle, getting the camera in the direction you want is annoying because the center of mass will be inside the asteroid while you are attached to it. It's just a question of would you rather launch fuel tanks again and again or combine an asteroid redirection contract with building a refueling station.

Something to keep in mind is how laggy it gets once you combine something heavy like a station with multiple ports and some stocked fuel with a heavy asteroid. I built this station when asteroids first came out, but it got eaten by the kraken shortly after I finished construction and I made no quicksave after I attached the type-D (which took about 40minutes from a 500m rendezvous to docking)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[image loading]
total mass: 3200t


For your staging problem, I'd try sepatrons, but don't point their exhaust at your rocket, rather shoot them off sideways. Also, you can try to attach the decoupler directly at the center of mass of the empty fuel tank, otherwise it may flip in one direction or the other and destroy the rocket.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
May 11 2015 11:03 GMT
#698
For your staging problem, I'd try sepatrons


Ahh yes. Fuck, those things exist
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-11 17:02:33
May 11 2015 17:00 GMT
#699
I wish we had stronger rapiers. A lot of the cool spaceplanes simply have to use a ton of them. My plane uses like 22, i saw a skylon-based craft that can actually carry an orange tank to orbit but that also uses like >20 rapiers and a huge parts count.

I made a rocket with rapiers and put 16 of them on - but the TWR was too low to get anywhere near breaking the mach 1.0 air resistance cliff. I couldn't add more, because there was nowhere to put them - the entire cross section of the rocket was just rapier exhausts. If i stuck more out the sides, i'd be increasing resistance and maybe not actually helping?~ (perhaps it's doable if you build a rocket and then use an adapter to get the base of the rocket bigger than the fuel tanks you're using above, but that would still drag a lot)

Everything cool generally seems to be small (with like 3-5 rapiers) or big (with like 20+) and i'd just like a version that's like four times as big with eight times more kick
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
May 11 2015 23:24 GMT
#700
One possible use for an asteroid, could be as a giant heat shield for a craft during some extreme aerobraking. It's something I've wanted to test but haven't gotten to yet - as I first have to build something to grab an asteroid.

I think using an asteroid to refuel might be workable but it'd have to be pretty situational - in a lot of cases, you can just as easily land on the body you're going to find them around and mine that for fuel.

The fuel mining capability should make it a little bit easier to land on and take back off of places like Tylo and Laythe, though. The landers I had built in the past for those planets were monster rockets capable of getting orbit from Kerbin unassisted.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 48 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11745
ComeBackTV 2637
TaKeTV 619
Hui .578
3DClanTV 396
Rex262
EnkiAlexander 244
mcanning194
CranKy Ducklings182
Reynor153
UpATreeSC123
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11745
Hui .571
Rex 258
mcanning 171
Reynor 153
UpATreeSC 121
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4146
Barracks 1880
Flash 1807
Jaedong 1449
BeSt 1421
EffOrt 1071
Mini 557
Stork 494
ggaemo 355
Snow 333
[ Show more ]
GuemChi 262
Soma 257
Soulkey 240
ZerO 239
ToSsGirL 185
Rush 118
Hyun 105
TY 49
soO 49
Sea.KH 37
Sacsri 37
scan(afreeca) 23
Terrorterran 14
Movie 12
ivOry 9
Bale 8
Britney 0
Dota 2
syndereN434
420jenkins289
XcaliburYe284
Counter-Strike
sgares671
flusha129
edward65
Super Smash Bros
Westballz37
Other Games
singsing2040
hiko1301
B2W.Neo1057
crisheroes444
Fuzer 168
ArmadaUGS108
KnowMe56
QueenE49
ZerO(Twitch)21
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH281
• Adnapsc2 3
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1624
• WagamamaTV576
League of Legends
• Nemesis4248
• TFBlade799
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 18m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.