EPTthen I found out TB did a WTF is of that game
wtf did i just watch and will i ever feel clean again
PC Games Sales Thread - Page 154
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Stancel
Singapore15360 Posts
then I found out TB did a WTF is of that game wtf did i just watch and will i ever feel clean again | ||
|
DwD
Sweden8621 Posts
On July 15 2012 22:36 MilesTeg wrote: I thought Batman was really overrated. Maybe it's just not my kind of game. There is nothing particularly awful, it's just not nearly as fantastic as a lot of critics have said. I think it's the most boring game I have played in recent years. I really want to buy both Civilization V AND G&K, now the question is how? Having ruled out the Civilization collection which is silly unless you want to play Civilization IV (already have it), what should I do? Should I wait? It won't become cheaper than the daily deal.. So buy | ||
|
MilesTeg
France1271 Posts
On July 15 2012 22:57 DwD wrote: It won't become cheaper than the daily deal.. So buy Yeah didn't realise it was a daily... I bought Civ 5 complete and the Korea expansion. I'm waiting to see if G&K gets cheaper but I'll definitely buy that too. | ||
|
DwD
Sweden8621 Posts
On July 15 2012 23:09 MilesTeg wrote: Yeah didn't realise it was a daily... I bought Civ 5 complete and the Korea expansion. I'm waiting to see if G&K gets cheaper but I'll definitely buy that too. Well technically a flash isnt a daily  But Flash deal seems to be better than daily.. So gogo  | ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
On July 15 2012 22:53 DoNotDisturb wrote: I saw Binding of Isaac's price and the genre, was thinking okay, might buy this then I found out TB did a WTF is of that game wtf did i just watch and will i ever feel clean again I couldn't keep playing that for longer than 20 minutes. I can see the mechanics and gameplay being really addictive, but the characters and ambient were incredibly repulsive to me and I just couldn't get past that. Definitely not for everyone (although for that price, it kinda is for everyone as it's definitely try-worthy). | ||
|
wattabeast
United States957 Posts
| ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
Is Civ 3 a good indication of how the rest of the series is? Are there major fundamental differences? If I like 3, am I likely to like 4 and 5? Not gonna lie, I haven't been so excited over one dollar game, like... ever | ||
|
Zhou
United States832 Posts
| ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
| ||
|
ilion
United States65 Posts
Reading the descriptions, it seems they're just adding single player scenarios if I'm not mistaken. Edit: Actually, it turns out they add new civilizations and a bunch of other features, so nevermind. At least warlords does. | ||
|
MilesTeg
France1271 Posts
On July 15 2012 23:16 DwD wrote: Well technically a flash isnt a daily But Flash deal seems to be better than daily.. So gogo Thanks, I did  First time I follow closely these sales, I heard many people talk about how hard it is not to buy things but it's the first time I experience it... yes it's really hard. Even if realistically there's no way I'll have the time to play them I just WANT them. | ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
On July 15 2012 23:23 Talin wrote: If you like Civ 3, you'll probably like Civ 4 at least. It really depends on how you determine what you like. For people who get really into the Civ series, all games are radically different. For someone who's just casually playing an empire building TBS, they're pretty much all about the same thing. That said, 5 is a lot more tactical (combat wise) than any other Civ. So... similar but different. Would it be like SC1 and SC2, where they are similar in spirit, but radically different in many fundamental ways? Similar enough that it feels like you're still playing the same series, but at the same time very different, enough so that you're playing a different game? | ||
|
Mysticesper
United States1183 Posts
On July 15 2012 23:55 Purind wrote: So... similar but different. Would it be like SC1 and SC2, where they are similar in spirit, but radically different in many fundamental ways? Similar enough that it feels like you're still playing the same series, but at the same time very different, enough so that you're playing a different game? I would say that's fairly accurate, especially in the transition from civ 3/4 to 5 just due to the fact that you go from square tiles to hexagonal tiles. | ||
|
L3gendary
Canada1470 Posts
Also, is G&K a must have in the sense that it improves the game in a fundamental way? | ||
|
Zhou
United States832 Posts
On July 15 2012 23:59 L3gendary wrote: Regarding the civ5 dlc, do the civs carry over to gods and kings? Like if i get the korea pack can i use them in G&K? Also, is G&K a must have in the sense that it improves the game in a fundamental way? Absolutely. That's why it's dlc! | ||
|
MoneyHypeMike
Canada305 Posts
On July 15 2012 23:18 wattabeast wrote: opinions on L.A. Noire now that it won the vote? Awesome Game. Easily worth the 7.5$ | ||
|
Chillax
England585 Posts
| ||
|
Murdco
United States745 Posts
On July 16 2012 00:25 Chillax wrote: Does anyone know when the next set of dailys will be up? In 1 hour and 30 minutes | ||
|
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
| ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
On July 15 2012 23:19 Purind wrote: Civ sale looks pretty sick. I don't know anything about Civ, just that it's turn based strategy and it's supposed to be very good. The most eye-popping thing to me was Civ 3 for $1.24. I'm not willing to spend $25 on a series I have no clue whether or not I like, but I'm definitely willing to try it for $1.24. Only experience I have with turn based strategy is the Heroes of Might and Magic series and board games like Settlers. Is Civ 3 a good indication of how the rest of the series is? Are there major fundamental differences? If I like 3, am I likely to like 4 and 5? Not gonna lie, I haven't been so excited over one dollar game, like... ever civ 3 has some flaws that make some decisions only between good and bad instead of choosing 2 viable paths. Civ 4 did the best job in giving viable strategic choices, but 3 is still pretty good, especially if you only play a few matches, you will probably not really notice anything strange. Civ 3 also had really nice scenarios that changed the tech trees and units completely, i loved that! Playing only in ancient times for example, it had great charme. On civ 5, yes the DLCs carry over. And yes, gods and kings fixes some glaring flaws in the gameplay design, for example it readjusts the costs of building anything. the ratio was way off in the original because they wanted the player to have much less units (otherwise 1 stack per tile doesnt work). | ||
| ||
