| Forum Index > General Games |
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 18 2011 07:45 dbddbddb wrote: Is it possible to get BF3 for free if you got the free game code from EA origins? Not sure but I doubt they would let you get it free since its new but I could be wrong  . | ||
|
NationInArms
United States1553 Posts
| ||
|
Karliath
United States2214 Posts
On October 18 2011 08:18 NationInArms wrote: Sorry if this was already posted, but there is apparently going to be a new series on youtube about Pros trying to teach n00bs how to play BF3 while at some military-style training boot camp: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCkkU1TaY0k "It's time to lock and load, fellow gamers! GameSpot and Battlefield 3 are teaming up to bring you The Controller, a reality Web series unlike any you've seen before. Starting Friday, October 21, on our official YouTube channel, the show will bring together 12 professional gamers and total noobs to compete in various challenges, both in the game and on the field. Under the watchful eye of our host, professional skier and Olympic gold medalist Jonny Moseley, the contestants will battle it out in daily challenges designed on scenarios from the game." Still sounds interesting, but I don't think "teaching" is going to be the main point of the series. Too bad; I've never played the previous Battlefields before. | ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
| ||
|
Auru
United Kingdom75 Posts
| ||
|
RoMGraViTy
United States314 Posts
| ||
|
KaoReal
Canada340 Posts
http://gamingbolt.com/battlefield-3-pc-on-low-is-console-settings-says-dice | ||
|
Butcherski
Poland446 Posts
On October 18 2011 09:58 KaoReal wrote: Yeah it looks like console is getting shafted here. http://gamingbolt.com/battlefield-3-pc-on-low-is-console-settings-says-dice Its not that console is getting shafted. Its just that the shit hardware in them cant support the epic size of BF3. Its about time the devs started the trend, we were stuck in the same spot for the last 5 years or so. I bought my high end pc in 2007 and still can play every new game on high settings witch while its nice not to have spend any money i actually prefer the industry go forward than sitting in the same place for so long ... TLDR; fuck consoles | ||
|
PunitiveDamages
United States131 Posts
Wow. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 18 2011 10:07 Butcherski wrote: Its not that console is getting shafted. Its just that the shit hardware in them cant support the epic size of BF3. Its about time the devs started the trend, we were stuck in the same spot for the last 5 years or so. I bought my high end pc in 2007 and still can play every new game on high settings witch while its nice not to have spend any money i actually prefer the industry go forward than sitting in the same place for so long ... TLDR; fuck consoles Yup agreed. Its been the PC version thats been getting shafted by most developers lately and its nice to see dice take advantage of the PC's superior hardware rather then barely improve the graphics. | ||
|
iinsom
Australia339 Posts
On October 13 2011 06:19 XerrolAvengerII wrote: second of all, i will not get this unless it is on steam... because i dont want EA stealing my personal information with origin... LOL, please use this argument more. It makes my day... | ||
|
victoryimminent
20 Posts
On October 18 2011 09:58 KaoReal wrote: Yeah it looks like console is getting shafted here. http://gamingbolt.com/battlefield-3-pc-on-low-is-console-settings-says-dice This has actually been clarified by DICE. Johan Andersson (the presenter) said “that was a bit poor choice of words, but the PC LOW & consoles obviously does not have every single quality feature PC HIGH has.” and also saying “it wasn’t fully fair as the console version can’t be fully compared against the PC settings as it uses different techniques.” For example, “the shadows in the shadows in the final code are way better than PC LOW, same with animated vegetation and such.” Full article: http://mp1st.com/2011/10/17/battlefield-3-dice-clarifies-pc-and-console-graphical-comparisons/ Just attempting to stop the flow of misinformation that runs rampant throughout many forums. | ||
|
rebuffering
Canada2436 Posts
On October 18 2011 10:09 PunitiveDamages wrote: Having greatly enjoyed the beta, (minus the bullet damage) I think I'd like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQR49JGySTM Wow. Fuck that, i dont want to actually get hurt trying to enjoy the game. thats a pass for me lol | ||
|
TMStarcraft
Australia686 Posts
On October 18 2011 10:09 PunitiveDamages wrote: Having greatly enjoyed the beta, (minus the bullet damage) I think I'd like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQR49JGySTM Wow. I know who I'd be aiming for Looks really fun though. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 18 2011 13:29 rebuffering wrote: Fuck that, i dont want to actually get hurt trying to enjoy the game. thats a pass for me lol Well if they didn't make it hurt that much I think it'd be epic if there really was a game that could be simulated like that lol. Those days are like 20+ years in the future though due to I can only imagine how much it would cost to own all that xd. | ||
|
Westy
England808 Posts
On October 18 2011 09:42 ayaz2810 wrote: Im really upset about the console version of the game. The controls are bad, the graphics are worse. It sucks down to the most fundamental things (24 players?! Ha!). The PC version shows a lot more promise imo. Since I can't stand playing shooters on PC, it looks like I'm stuck with MW3. It's a shame really. You PC players are going to have a glorious fall/winter. Can I ask why you don't like shooters on PC? I mean its clearly superior in all aspects for the FPS genre. I can understand people saying they don't want to spend money on a gaming PC (Well actually I can't seeing as the price of an xbox, HDD, HD Screen + xbox live membership for 6 years will be the same as high end gaming PC), but I have never seen anyone saying that they prefer shooters on the xbox? Just curious. | ||
|
chocopaw
2072 Posts
On October 18 2011 09:42 ayaz2810 wrote: Im really upset about the console version of the game. The controls are bad, the graphics are worse. It sucks down to the most fundamental things (24 players?! Ha!). The PC version shows a lot more promise imo. Since I can't stand playing shooters on PC, it looks like I'm stuck with MW3. It's a shame really. You PC players are going to have a glorious fall/winter. what is this i don't even... You should've given it a try in beta. I just can't fathom how you could ever enjoy this on a console. And 32 players max is the smallest problem... | ||
|
Karliath
United States2214 Posts
On October 18 2011 19:00 chocopaw wrote: what is this i don't even... You should've given it a try in beta. I just can't fathom how you could ever enjoy this on a console. And 32 players max is the smallest problem... I can understand him. Playing with a controller just feels so much better, the way both your hands can grip onto an object, and the way the left and right hand mirror each other in terms of movement, to an extent. But yeah, the PC version shows so much more promise, I will definitely be getting this for PC and not a console. | ||
|
Karshe
United States212 Posts
On October 18 2011 18:46 Westy wrote: Can I ask why you don't like shooters on PC? I mean its clearly superior in all aspects for the FPS genre. I can understand people saying they don't want to spend money on a gaming PC (Well actually I can't seeing as the price of an xbox, HDD, HD Screen + xbox live membership for 6 years will be the same as high end gaming PC), but I have never seen anyone saying that they prefer shooters on the xbox? Just curious. You've never heard of someone preferring call of duty on a console? Really? I sit at a desk at work and when I get home, I don't want to be in front of a computer. It's so much more convenient to be able to kick back on your couch in front of your HDTV and relax. Granted, the graphics won't be as good as PC on your TV... but who cares? Not me. | ||
|
Sm3agol
United States2055 Posts
On October 18 2011 22:10 Karliath wrote: I can understand him. Playing with a controller just feels so much better, the way both your hands can grip onto an object, and the way the left and right hand mirror each other in terms of movement, to an extent. But yeah, the PC version shows so much more promise, I will definitely be getting this for PC and not a console. WHAAAAAA????? I guess it's all about what you are used to, but as someone who has played FPS extensively on both, I must say that playing with a keyboard/mouse feels so much more intuitive to me. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv6072 summit1g5647 Grubby2314 shahzam479 PiGStarcraft345 syndereN180 C9.Mang0141 ZombieGrub66 Railgan39 Mew2King37 |
|
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
WardiTV Invitational
Lambo vs Shameless
Rogue vs uThermal
Percival vs YoungYakov
TBD vs GgMaChine
OSC
ArT vs MindelVK
MiniZergUA vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
Ultimate Battle
OSC
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
CranKy Ducklings
IPSL
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
BSL
TerrOr vs OyAji
UltrA vs Gosudark
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
