
TL Chess Match - Page 14
Forum Index > General Games |
jfazz
Australia672 Posts
![]() | ||
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + i like to exploit any opportunity to create doubled pawns | ||
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
| ||
iloveambiguity
United States81 Posts
| ||
![]()
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
| ||
ixuz
Sweden38 Posts
| ||
Zinbiel
Sweden878 Posts
edit:+ Show Spoiler + I'd like to see something along the lines of 6. ... 0-0 7. 0-0 c5 | ||
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
![]() | ||
BeSt1g
7 Posts
| ||
Kazius
Israel1456 Posts
On October 26 2009 05:38 benjammin wrote: how come Bxc3+ is getting no love, i think it's a much better move ![]() + Show Spoiler + For the simple reason that if you think a few more moves forward, we will not have as good a time to castle as now. We're not up against a scrub here. Take the time, put the pieces on a chess board and play out a few different continuations and you'll see that this is the moment with which castling leaves us with the most flexibility yet allows very little in the way of tactics on his side. If he doesn't castle in reply now, but instead defends the c3 pawn, he'll be severely limiting his future options. If we take now, we're already committing some of our flexibility, something that may be the right thing in over the board situations, but not when we have a while to think it through. This is the time where more in-depth analysis starts to shine. | ||
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On October 26 2009 05:47 BeSt1g wrote: Bxc3+ is too early we should force him to play a3 before we just waste a move, doubled pawns are ok but 2 bishops can be powerful, 0-0 is the right move. Also how are we sure he's not gonna use a computer engine or something!! or us for that matter. it's kind of an honour system. I would hope no one uses an engine or it ruins the entire purpose of the whole thing also On October 26 2009 05:55 Kazius wrote: + Show Spoiler + For the simple reason that if you think a few more moves forward, we will not have as good a time to castle as now. We're not up against a scrub here. Take the time, put the pieces on a chess board and play out a few different continuations and you'll see that this is the moment with which castling leaves us with the most flexibility yet allows very little in the way of tactics on his side. If he doesn't castle in reply now, but instead defends the c3 pawn, he'll be severely limiting his future options. If we take now, we're already committing some of our flexibility, something that may be the right thing in over the board situations, but not when we have a while to think it through. This is the time where more in-depth analysis starts to shine. + Show Spoiler + i disagree entirely, we don't have to castle right now, and taking on c3 will give us the same positional equality as if we do castle immediately, though both are fine and it's more a matter of taste, but something like this will get us to castle all the same. 6...Bxc3+ 7.bxc3 d6 8.0-0 Nbd7 9.Rb1 0-0 So then ill vote for 6... Bb4-Bxc3+ | ||
Kazius
Israel1456 Posts
On October 26 2009 06:21 Divinek wrote: it's kind of an honour system. I would hope no one uses an engine or it ruins the entire purpose of the whole thing I've not yet opened a book as well, since I'm pretty sure that there is an in depth analysis on this set-up in literature.... and I haven't bought an engine yet. Going way off-topic, would using an engine to analyze my games improve my play? | ||
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On October 26 2009 06:42 Kazius wrote: I've not yet opened a book as well, since I'm pretty sure that there is an in depth analysis on this set-up in literature.... and I haven't bought an engine yet. Going way off-topic, would using an engine to analyze my games improve my play? if you do it right it most certainly would | ||
Chunkybuddha
Canada347 Posts
| ||
jfazz
Australia672 Posts
On October 26 2009 07:07 Chunkybuddha wrote: completely wrong but whatever.bxc3 any other move would set us back. | ||
jfazz
Australia672 Posts
| ||
Athos
United States2484 Posts
On October 26 2009 07:07 Chunkybuddha wrote: bxc3 any other move would set us back. Just no + Show Spoiler + Why would you release the tension this early in a position? Also, double pawns on the C file are actually strengthening his position. Anyways, my vote is to castle here. 0-0 | ||
![]()
l10f
![]()
United States3241 Posts
| ||
![]()
Spazer
Canada8028 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Don't really like the idea of developing a piece just to exchange it in the next move. | ||
jfazz
Australia672 Posts
6...d5; 1 vote 6...Ne4; 3 votes 6...Bxc3+?; 5 votes 6...0-0; 6 votes 6...c5; 2 votes please, dont let 6...Bxc3+? win. That it has so many votes says a lot about the quality of players on the black side. | ||
| ||