EPTI hear people saying this is an awesome movie or the best movie they've seen, that is just ridiculous in my opinion.
characters and plot > visuals
James Cameron's AVATAR series - Page 84
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
hmpstr
Norway11 Posts
I hear people saying this is an awesome movie or the best movie they've seen, that is just ridiculous in my opinion. characters and plot > visuals | ||
|
GiantEnemyCrab
Canada503 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27148 Posts
| ||
|
condoriano
United States826 Posts
| ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On May 20 2010 01:17 RoosterSamurai wrote: Just because is CAN be done doesn't mean it SHOULD be done.... Do I really need to pay $10.50 to see james cameron go "lol look wat we cn do wit CG gaiz!!" No..Not really. Then who's going to do it? Until we've actually done such a thing, we wouldn't know how much utility it would have for the film industry. Where would film be if nobody thought that adding sound to The Jazz Singer was a good thing? I view the film as one huge brochure for the different aspects of 3D filming and digital cinematography. I respect that you wouldn't want to pay 10, 11 even 12 dollars to watch a technology demonstration, but many people would. | ||
|
Bub
United States3518 Posts
| ||
|
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
All in all I give the movie this: Visuals: 10/10 - Amazing visuals all-around, great production values. Audio: 8.5/10 - Audio was solid however some of the balancing of the music/character voices/sound effects seemed a little off for me. Overall good audio, weapon fire is loud and clear, for the most part the sound works well. Story: 6/10 - A fairly interesting take on a story-type that has been told many, many times. A lot of similarities to many different films, but I wouldn't say Cameron out-right copied anyone in particular. Acting 7/10 - The acting was convincing, but definitely not anything note-worthy. I gave a 7 instead of a 5.5 or a 6 simply because there was no poorly acted parts, albeit only a few of the actors performances could be considered truly good. Overall - 7.5/10 - I give it an 7.5/10 because I liked the movie and while I do enjoy seeing great acting from time to time, I'm quite simply not picky enough to spend my viewing time picking out every thing that was wrong with a movie that isn't one of the best 25 movies of all-time, as not all movies can be 'the best'. | ||
|
danbel1005
United States1319 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
On May 20 2010 12:24 danbel1005 wrote: Avatar = Epic Failure. Most people would call you overly picky when it comes to movie choices, it might not be the revolutionary / life changing film it was hyped out to be, but it wasn't the worst thing to come out of Hollywood in the past 10 years (far from it in fact). However, I'm not going to try and change people's opinions here, if it wasn't your thing that's perfectly fine, but its not necessary to try and convince others of your view by posting something as inane and childish as 'Avatar = Epic Failure'. | ||
|
Zeke50100
United States2220 Posts
On May 20 2010 12:35 SichuanPanda wrote: Most people would call you overly picky when it comes to movie choices, it might not be the revolutionary / life changing film it was hyped out to be, but it wasn't the worst thing to come out of Hollywood in the past 10 years (far from it in fact). However, I'm not going to try and change people's opinions here, if it wasn't your thing that's perfectly fine, but its not necessary to try and convince others of your view by posting something as inane and childish as 'Avatar = Epic Failure'. ...Or he thought it was an epic failure? >.> Personally, I think the only part that was any good was that it had Terrans in it. On May 20 2010 06:54 condoriano wrote: That's why reviving this thread wasn't that good of an idea, too many new posters that aren't going to read the thread and will make same exact statements that were argued with and countered on like first 75 pages. The only difference is no argumentation this time. Wait, OPINIONS can be COUNTERED now? I'm definitely behind the times. Oh, and I was really disappointed by the use of Titanic music XD | ||
|
condoriano
United States826 Posts
I'm not even going to get started on the literature, it's like half of those sci fi writers with a big name just recycle same plot and idea feeding it to millions of people as a work of their own. What bastards. I also feel bad for everyone who didn't realize that whole concept was ripped off from a "Yes" album cover.. ![[image loading]](http://www.comicbookmovie.com/images/users/uploads/9043/i_dean4.jpg) avatarhasthesameplotaseverything.blogspot.com | ||
|
condoriano
United States826 Posts
On May 19 2010 17:05 Ganondorf wrote: Now try to apply the pocahontas method to stargate. Sorry, I'd have to watch it first. And watching stargate should be rewarded with a lot more than winning a forum debate, so never going to happen  | ||
|
WniO
United States2706 Posts
@ the yes album... there has been floating mountains and shit before as well so you fuck off too. | ||
|
condoriano
United States826 Posts
On May 20 2010 13:19 OneFierceZealot wrote: @ the yes album... there has been floating mountains and shit before as well so you fuck off too. How do you even manage.. Can I use one of the huge manifesto hands to /facepalm myself? | ||
|
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
On May 20 2010 12:56 condoriano wrote: The thing I learned from this thread is that Titanic, Pocahontas, Dances with Wolves and Atlantis (and obviously a dozen more, can't remember now) are the same movie. I'm not even going to get started on the literature, it's like half of those sci fi writers with a big name just recycle same plot and idea feeding it to millions of people as a work of their own. What bastards. I also feel bad for everyone who didn't realize that whole concept was ripped off from a "Yes" album cover.. avatarhasthesameplotaseverything.blogspot.com I don't know what you're talking about but that album cover doesn't remotely resemble 85% of 'Pandora', maybe the floating mountains, and that would be a stretch. | ||
|
WniO
United States2706 Posts
ahhh another person just way too cool to actually say something. just way to cool. | ||
|
condoriano
United States826 Posts
| ||
|
FuDDx
United States5008 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y162/FuDDx/2009_07055-19-10Ball-D-T0023.jpg) | ||
|
AtlaS
United States1001 Posts
looking forward to your next blog.  | ||
|
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
Anyhoo, the visuals were nice, but it became obvious that the 3-D was a bit overdone if you saw it in IMAX. There are parts (most noticeably when the little dandelion-seed things start falling) where the 3-D obscures the action and detracts from the scene overall. Good effects (which they damn well better be thanks to the enormous budget), good acting (except perhaps from the main character, he was a bit flat for me), but a shitty story and bad pacing makes me really dislike the movie compared to the hype. | ||
| ||
