EPT[Movie] The Hobbit Trilogy - Page 14
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
feanor1
United States1899 Posts
| ||
|
crappen
Norway1546 Posts
| ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
On December 03 2012 23:35 crappen wrote: The question for me is, should I watch this while high? Not smashed, but just a good mood high. I wouldn't. Afterwards... go right ahead. | ||
|
Zooper31
United States5713 Posts
On December 04 2012 09:12 Boundz(DarKo) wrote: I wouldn't. Afterwards... go right ahead. I'd have to agree. This is going to be a movie I'd want to be fully sober so I can enjoy the LotR universe and all it's glory and actually remember 100% of it the next day. This isn't some Michael Bay film where going high/drunk wouldn't hurt enjoying the explosions and 3D. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
banatboy
120 Posts
 | ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
 + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Zooper31
United States5713 Posts
On December 05 2012 03:38 StarVe wrote: Some clips from the movie, all about a minute long. + Show Spoiler + All of them are private and can't be viewed. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
Clip 1+ Show Spoiler + Clip 2+ Show Spoiler + Clip 3 (Gollum!)+ Show Spoiler + Clip 5+ Show Spoiler + Clip 6+ Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
| ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
If you loved the book as a kid, I don't think you'll be underwhelmed. Some reviews I read earlier complained that the film started way too slow, that it "took ages until they got going" and about unneeded musical numbers. As a new viewer maybe that would put me off, as a fan I can't complain about getting a relatively complete rendition of the unexpected party scene. Maybe it'll be a bit annoying to watch because, since it's the first film of a trilogy, a lot of the stories which are outlined won't come to a conclusion or don't have a pay-off in An Unexpected Journey. Also, keeping in line with the book, every movie should have a progressively darker/grittier tone, the first one is still a lot of fun and jokes and they're kind of naive and oblivious to the dangers they might face, but as the story moves on, they experience more and more dangerous and scary stuff. I'm sure there will be parts that I won't like and find overdone, out of place or useless, but I think if I go into the movie with level-headed expectations, I'll still have a great time. I'd probably see the movie for Riddles in the Dark alone, everything else is just added on awesomeness.  Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage, Ian McKellen and Andy Serkis are supposed to be very good in their roles (how could they not be) and as long as that stands true, I can look over the minor grievances the movie might cause just to see those famous and excellent actors in iconic roles interact with each other. | ||
|
HowardRoark
1146 Posts
| ||
|
DreamChaser
1649 Posts
| ||
|
Alryk
United States2718 Posts
| ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
| ||
|
RusHXceL
United States1004 Posts
dont think it be good. | ||
|
HowardRoark
1146 Posts
On December 05 2012 12:48 DannyJ wrote: As long as this movie doesn't have an equivalent of King Kongs brontosaurus pile up I think I'll enjoy it. CGI goblins piling up. | ||
|
CyDe
United States1010 Posts
| ||
|
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
On December 05 2012 12:48 DannyJ wrote: As long as this movie doesn't have an equivalent of King Kongs brontosaurus pile up I think I'll enjoy it. I hear all of the action is fantastic, just that it gets repetitive because of the length of the movie. Perhaps three 2:00-2:15 movies instead of three movies nearing 3 hours wouldve been a better choice in this regard. Or just two 3 hour movies. | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
| ||
