EPTAlso Clarkson May and Hammond were all in negotiations for new 3 and half year deals before this happened so it be even more interesting to see if any of them sign up ^_^
[TV] Top Gear - Page 45
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
Check out their new show - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/entertainment/508970-tv-the-grand-tour | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
Also Clarkson May and Hammond were all in negotiations for new 3 and half year deals before this happened so it be even more interesting to see if any of them sign up ^_^ | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/jeremy-clarkson-could-bbc-punch-inquiry-fail-because-top-gear-producer-hasnt-complained-10104786.html And that the BBC Investigation is not as serious as claimed: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/mar/13/bbc-apologises-top-gear-jeremy-clarkson-inquiry | ||
GTR
51476 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On March 16 2015 07:16 GTR wrote: need to get used to waking up every monday morning realizing that top gear isn't on anymore lol This kind of sums it up http://imgur.com/gallery/wx4F8Lq | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
| ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
i think he is just fed up with the situation for which he has just himself to blame. an action he is obviously not capable of. too bad | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
BBC loses 4m viewers after Jeremy Clarkson's suspension from Top Gear The BBC’s decision to suspend Jeremy Clarkson and pull the three remaining episodes of Top Gear cost BBC2 nearly 4 million viewers on Sunday night. lol  | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On March 17 2015 23:35 Pandemona wrote: BBC loses 4m viewers after Jeremy Clarkson's suspension from Top Gear lol Jesus those numbers are insane. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On March 18 2015 01:20 Pandemona wrote: Yeah when you think UK population is only 64million on top of that xD In the states if you approach 1 million viewers these days you are golden, I almost don't believe that is purely domestic That is an insane percentage. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
Sauce Lowest rating in years at 9.1million. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
I add the question mark because I am talking out of my ass, but the US is 330 million, very diverse groups in terms of just about everything. It can't just be that everything is so niche in terms of audience, I mean you have as many channels as we do presumably. | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10760 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On March 18 2015 01:58 Velr wrote: Even the german swiss national tv tends to break 1 mio. on big stuff and thats a population of 10 mio split in 2 big language zones + competing with german and austrian tv.... If anything the us seems to be the strange one. Well the US is the odd one out completely, I am just a bit surprised that the viewership isn't more split up from what you two are telling me. As far as ratings were concerned, I had just imagined that it would extrapolate to the broader TV audiences in that more channels, and increasingly specialized areas of interest would have translated to a similar dispersal of views in any given market. Rather naive when you put it that way, but I learn something new every day. | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9674 Posts
| ||
|
Excludos
Norway8111 Posts
Jezza is top gear. As evident by any similar shows, including the international versions of Top Gear, that just doesn't get right. Both May and Hammond have stated this several times as well. Without him, there's not point in continuing the show. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
On March 18 2015 02:26 ThomasjServo wrote: Well the US is the odd one out completely, I am just a bit surprised that the viewership isn't more split up from what you two are telling me. As far as ratings were concerned, I had just imagined that it would extrapolate to the broader TV audiences in that more channels, and increasingly specialized areas of interest would have translated to a similar dispersal of views in any given market. Rather naive when you put it that way, but I learn something new every day. xD Tbh i can't remember when i watched anything live the last though, with on demand and iplayers and what not i don't get how they can still determine viewership by who watches it live on said day. I never watched anything live for past 4 years lol. Guessing that could be a reason for the viewing figures for shows in US? Or has it always been like that? | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On March 18 2015 04:35 Pandemona wrote: xD Tbh i can't remember when i watched anything live the last though, with on demand and iplayers and what not i don't get how they can still determine viewership by who watches it live on said day. I never watched anything live for past 4 years lol. Guessing that could be a reason for the viewing figures for shows in US? Or has it always been like that? Mayhaps, networks still use the Nielson ratings which are woefully outdated. I don't think anyone has the complete metrics sorted for aggregating streamers. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
 like you say it outdated. | ||
| ||
