| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On March 24 2015 00:56 Crusnik wrote: I hope Bloodbourne is better than Dark Souls 2, DkS2 was ass. Different team. The guy who made DS 1 is making Bloodbourne. From reports the level design is the same, where its a series of interlocking environments. Which is good, because there was nothing more amazing that reaching the well of the world in DS 1 and see the vast sea of giant trees and emptiness. | ||
|
Jinxed
United States6450 Posts
| ||
|
Crusnik
United States5378 Posts
I actually never got that far in 2 just because the game didn't grab me, it lacked the atmosphere of the first game. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:01 Crusnik wrote: Everyone I talked with said Dark Souls 2's PvP was ass, granted, that's mostly the really hardcore PvP'ers. I actually never got that far in 2 just because the game didn't grab me, it lacked the atmosphere of the first game. Dark Souls 2 feels more like an expansion rather than a full fledged sequel. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
The bosses in DS2 felt empty and without much character. And there were so many it felt just....blah. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On March 24 2015 00:55 PhoenixVoid wrote: Ironic that the people who claim they are the most hardcore gamers and say only gameplay and design matter are usually the ones to jump on, "game has downgrades, graphics are shit, 30 FPS lololol". There several kinds of "hardcore gamers". You don't spend thousands of dollars on a PC and dozens of hours setting things up and downloading mods so that Skyrim looks pretty because only gameplay matters. 30 FPS shit graphics console game is a pretty standard PCMasterRace thing to say. Some of them may also be part of the crowd that wastes hundreds of hours in Dwarf Fortress, but even that doesn't really kill the idea that some games would be much better if they weren't limited by console hardware. A lot of it is also just a reaction from years of shitty ports. | ||
|
Slomo
Germany7198 Posts
On March 24 2015 00:55 PhoenixVoid wrote: Ironic that the people who claim they are the most hardcore gamers and say only gameplay and design matter are usually the ones to jump on, "game has downgrades, graphics are shit, 30 FPS lololol". Dunno man, I am genereally not interested in all those games. But when somebody of my friends buy them and actually complain then I have to chuckle. If the devs do a shitty port with horrible menues and fuzzy controls. When the only "graphic settings" the game offers to you are the resolution and a "high - low" switch and it still has absurd hardware requirements despite being 30fps, I wont even consider buying it in a steam sale for two bucks. A shitty technical basis like that always scares me off. That being said: I WANT THE WITCHER 3 AND I WANT IT NAO! Or maybe I just wait for the enhanced edition like I did with the previous two games. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:14 Slomo wrote: Dunno man, I am genereally not interested in all those games. But when somebody of my friends buy them and actually complain then I have to chuckle. If the devs do a shitty port with horrible menues and fuzzy controls. When the only "graphic settings" the game offers to you are the resolution and a "high - low" switch and it still has absurd hardware requirements despite being 30fps, I wont even consider buying it in a steam sale for two bucks. A shitty technical basis like that always scares me off. That being said: I WANT THE WITCHER 3 AND I WANT IT NAO! Or maybe I just wait for the enhanced edition like I did with the previous two games. Witcher 3 won't have enhanced edition because CDPR want to release about as close to a technically perfect game they can get in one try this time. Explains the delays from February to May. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:16 PhoenixVoid wrote: Witcher 3 won't have enhanced edition because CDPR want to release about as close to a technically perfect game they can get in one try this time. Explains the delays from February to May. They can delay that game as much as they want. We have had to many broken games and I would prefer this one just fucking work. | ||
|
Slomo
Germany7198 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:16 PhoenixVoid wrote: Witcher 3 won't have enhanced edition because CDPR want to release about as close to a technically perfect game they can get in one try this time. Explains the delays from February to May. Like always in game (or even software) development the delays are most likely just to minimize the damage done to the games reputation. My bet is that it will be a fucking mess at release and we get a 2gb patch within a week. And the enhanced editions wernt only engine work and bug fixing. They actually improved some of the stuff the got feedback for by the players. Guys do you even know how fucking hard it is to think/speak/write in three different languages all the time. Fuck my fucking spelling. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:23 Slomo wrote: Like alway in game (or even software) development the delays are most likely just to minimize the damage done to the games reputation. My bet is that it will be a fucking mess at release and we get a 2gb patch within a week. And the enhanced editions werent only engine work and bug fixing. They actually improved some of the stuff the got feedback for by the players. One of Gamestar's guys played the game for two days and only encountered three bugs, one was a horse being placed on a pole and the only significant one requiring a restart was some save thing but after resolving it there was no issue. | ||
|
Crusnik
United States5378 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:27 PhoenixVoid wrote: One of Gamestar's guys played the game for two days and only encountered three bugs, one was a horse being placed on a pole and the only significant one requiring a restart was some save thing but after resolving it there was no issue. You underestimate the ability of a playerbase to break a game. Also, am I the only one who never got into Witcher? The story was interesting, but the combat didn't grab me, and in a game like Witcher, if the combat isn't enjoyable, I can't force myself to play it. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
I'll just keep packing money away from a PS4. On March 24 2015 01:32 Crusnik wrote: You underestimate the ability of a playerbase to break a game. Also, am I the only one who never got into Witcher? The story was interesting, but the combat didn't grab me, and in a game like Witcher, if the combat isn't enjoyable, I can't force myself to play it. The combat was not the reason I played that game. Witch 2 was really good for combat and challenging, but no the reason I came to the show. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:32 Crusnik wrote: You underestimate the ability of a playerbase to break a game. Also, am I the only one who never got into Witcher? The story was interesting, but the combat didn't grab me, and in a game like Witcher, if the combat isn't enjoyable, I can't force myself to play it. I can understand why people dislike the combat but I found it engaging when you have to keep rhythm. Adding in signs and potions which are toxic add more complexity. The first two chapters are really slow and take some willpower to truck through, but once you get to chapters 3-5 it is all worth it. | ||
|
Slomo
Germany7198 Posts
They have been treating CDProject with love after they fucked up their test of the first game so hard. Gave it like 75% or and their forums were filled with complaints. And he still didnt play the complete map with complete quests and stuff. In such a huge hame there will aways be some critical bugs. But as a matter of fact 100,000 people buying the game and playing it for a day is 100x the game time (and indirectly: bug testing) CDProject can do before release. I just learned to not get my hopes up. Especially with so few single player games I like I cant risk being upset about fuck ups. | ||
|
Vaelone
Finland4400 Posts
| ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:39 Comeh wrote: can i play witcher 2 wihtout playing witcher 1, or do i need to play witcher 1 to get witcher 2 Witcher 1 is pretty independent of the other games in the series so you don't have to play it to understand Witcher 2. What I believe is that Witcher 1 is made to introduce non-readers to the series so they compiled elements from the books to introduce them without needing to read them and hardly reference it in Witcher 2. For good measure Witcher 3 will allow you to continue a save file from Witcher 2 but not from Witcher 1 directly because it is so independent and of no consequence to Witcher 3. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
CranKy Ducklings
PiG Sty Festival
Zoun vs Solar
SHIN vs Maru
Patches Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
PiG Sty Festival
TBD vs Reynor
Serral vs TBD
OSC
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs ggaemo
Larva vs Mong
The Patches Monday
Afreeca Starleague
Soulkey vs PianO
JyJ vs sSak
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
