• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:30
CEST 16:30
KST 23:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers19Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid25
StarCraft 2
General
MaNa leaves Team Liquid Maestros of the Game 2 announced 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers INu's Battles#14 <BO.9 2Matches> Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh: This Will Be My Final ASL【ASL S21 Ro.16】 BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro16 Group C [ASL21] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Diablo IV Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1483 users

What's In A Draft: TI3 Group Stage Draft Analysis

Forum Index > Dota 2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 17:32:33
September 20 2013 17:01 GMT
#1

The International 3


Follow TI3 on
Liquipedia and in the LR Thread

Focus Mode
Turn off Focus Mode [x]


What's In A Draft: TI3 Group Stage Draft Analysis


by UnoPolak




Dota has always had a close link with statistics, dating back to the spreadsheet of numbers at the end of a game in the original WC3 mod. Valve has continued this tradition with live stats for spectators, a WebAPI for match history, and a basic replay parser that Statsman Bruno has expanded upon. Now there is a shiny new tool called Skadi, allowing even more information to be parsed from replays. For example, we can efficiently determine not only which heroes were picked and banned by a specific team in a bunch of replays, but how long it took them to do it. The International 3 pitted the sixteen best teams against each other, so where better to look to see how top captains drafted? We will be looking at just the group stages since there are an equal number of games for each team, and we should be able to establish general trends as well as tease out the differences between teams. Spoiler alert: Na`Vi and Alliance fans will not be disappointed.

[image loading]
Acronyms: TI3 - The International 3, FP - First pick, SP - Second pick



Overall Draft Times


The International 3 took place during patch 6.78c. This patch had five 30 second bans, five 40 second picks, and 110 seconds of reserve time, giving a maximum possible time of 460 seconds per team. You can see the full breakdown of teams below, but two deserve special mention.

Fastest Draft in the West: Virtus.Pro had the shortest individual draft of 63 seconds in a victory over LGD.int (match page), which breaks down to an average of 6 seconds for each pick or ban. The next lowest individual draft was 118 seconds by Rattlesnake, which is nearly a full minute longer. Virtus.Pro also had the lowest average draft time of 253 seconds, so apparently CIS Dota can be as aggressive in the draft as it is on the battlefield.

Slow and Steady Wins the Race: Alliance had both the longest individual draft of 449 seconds in a victory over Orange (match page) and the highest average draft time of 401 seconds. They banned only 23 different heroes, tied for lowest during the group stages, and still spent nearly all of the allotted time for each individual ban.

In fact, the top three teams in the entire tournament were all in the four longest average draft times during the group stages. Of course just taking longer in the draft does not guarantee success, but it does suggest that these teams were very methodical, taking as much time as possible to think through the draft in order to set up their team for success. We’ll look at exactly how they did this a little later.

[image loading]



Pick/side preference


[image loading]

Another thing that we can look at is the preference for specific sides or pick orders. Before each match, a coin flip was performed backstage, with the winner choosing either a side or first/second pick, and the loser selecting whatever was left. Unfortunately these decisions were not recorded, so we can only make educated guesses. The general consensus seems to have been that Dire is the better side with the much talked about “Dire advantage” around Roshan, and FP being the better pick order since you get both the overall first and last pick. The entire group stage saw 75 games pitting Radiant with FP against Dire with SP, and only 38 games of Radiant with SP against Dire with FP. Interestingly, teams with both Dire and FP only went 16-22 in the group stages though, so either the consensus was wrong, or execution simply trumps all.

 

Dire and/or Bust: LGD, Rattesnake, DK and Alliance got Dire at least 11 times each. It is difficult to believe that they won the coin flip that many times, but this does indicate that if given the choice Dire was their preference. There was mixed success, ranging from Alliance’s 11-0 run on Dire to Rattlesnake’s 2-10.

The Middle Road: Dignitas appeared to have no bias to either side or pick order with a nearly equal distribution of Radiant/Dire and FP/SP. We cannot speculate if they had specific preferences against individual opponents either since they only played two games against each other team.

Bucking the Trend: Na`Vi, mouz and Fnatic all showed a preference for Radiant over either Dire or even FP, opting for Radiant and SP 9, 8, and 7 times, respectively. Na`Vi’s captain Puppey has stated in the past that he prefers the Radiant jungle, and Funn1k’s ancient farming on Radiant during the group stages was much commented on during the International, so they obviously had a plan which led them to a 10-2 record as Radiant. The other two did not fare quite as well with records of 4-6 and 5-4.


Individual Pick/Ban Timings


[image loading]

The effect of Radiant vs. Dire on the individual pick and ban times is negligible compared to who has first pick (FP) and second pick (SP), so we will be focusing on pick order only. The averages from all of the group stage games follow trends that are not very surprising if you are familiar with drafting. However, there are a few teams that do wildly different things from the others, and that is what we will be highlighting as we go along.

Draft Preparation: Teams had been preparing for months before TI3, and a lot of this effort would have been spent preparing their drafts. The first few bans and picks would have been enumerated and weighed long before each game, and as a result was that the very first ban from each team generally took less than 20 seconds. A few teams took a little longer, but curiously enough, none more so than Zenith. Iceiceice frequently sat there with the first overall ban watching as up to 49 seconds cut into Zenith’s reserve time before making a selection. Was this somehow another mind game coming from the enigmatic Iceiceice?

[image loading]


Back-to-Back Decisions: There are a few points during the pick/ban phase during which a team has to makes two decisions in a row. The first one is when the team with SP gets back-to-back picks in the first picking stage. Both of these picks are given a full 40 second clock. However,  we found that the second pick only took 15 seconds on average, which is just under half the 33 seconds for the first pick. The most extreme example of this back-to-back picking was Team Liquid, who frequently spent 30 seconds of their reserve time for that first pick before spending less than 3 seconds of the allotted 40 for the second pick. One school of thought is that by quickly locking in that second pick you give your opponent less overall time to plan. Contrast this to Na`Vi, who used less time on the first pick (47 seconds) and a lot more time for the second pick (42 seconds). Two explanations for this difference come to mind. The first and obvious reason is that Na`Vi do not choose their second hero before they pick the first and thus need to spend the time thinking about their choice. The more interesting reason is that Na`Vi usually decide on their heroes just as quickly as Liquid, but choose to take their time and discuss the rest of their draft before locking their selection in. This does give the opposing team an extra 40 seconds to think about their own draft, but if they don’t know what your second pick is, the time is more effective for you than them. This “information advantage” is not unique to Na`Vi either.

[image loading]



Time as a Resource


We are used to thinking of health, mana, and gold as resources, but what about draft time? Each team can lock in their pick or ban before the allotted time has run out, after which the remaining time is lost. We can add up that lost allotted time during the draft for each team, and a very clear trend appears.

Waste Not, Want Not: Alliance never lost more than 65 of the total allotted 350 seconds, whereas LGD.int, TongFu, Rattlesnake, VP, LGD and Dignitas lost at least 70 seconds in every single draft. I believe this is another example of a team using an information advantage to increase the effectiveness of their draft relative to their opponents, similar to how Na`Vi extended their SP second pick but in this case expanded to every single pick and ban. Their hero pool was relatively small with the fewest number of different heroes banned at 23 and an average number of different heroes picked at 34. It is possible that Alliance spent all of this additional time considering exactly which hero to pick or ban, but their hero pool is does not suggest they were considering a much wider number of heroes than their opponents so it is more likely that they were already looking ahead in the draft.

[image loading]


Play to Your Strength: Orange had the second lowest lost allotted time, but used their reserve time very differently to Alliance. Alliance preferred to use their reserve time during the middle portion of the draft, specifically the second ban phase. On the other hand Orange preferred FP which also gave them the last overall pick, something that the opponent could not counterpick at all. They placed a lot of emphasis on that last overall pick by stockpiling their reserve time and entering that last pick with an average of 49 seconds of reserve time, compared to Alliance’s 17 seconds. A few other teams averaged as much reserve time on their last pick as Orange, but none came close to spending the average of 37 seconds of reserve time on that last pick like Orange did. During TI3 there were quite a few comments about the number of different heros that Mushi was playing, and nearly half the time Mushi’s hero was picked at the very end. From this we can say that Orange’s strategy revolved around building a flexible team without expending too much reserve time and then finding that perfect hero to complete the draft at the very end.

[image loading]



Conclusion


The top three teams of TI3 (Alliance, Na`Vi, and Orange) each displayed a methodical approach to drafting. They used the majority of the allotted time for each pick and ban as well as their reserve time. In regards to the allotted time usage it is highly probable that they were leveraging an information advantage over the opponent, keeping their decision hidden while continuing to think about the next step in the draft while the opponent was still unsure about the current pick or ban. Of course, other teams also used the majority of the allotted time to much less success, so one must remember that this is not a game-changing advantage, but an interesting one to analyse nonetheless. The way these top teams utilized their reserve time varied quite a bit, with pinpointed bans in the second phase from Alliance and exotic last picks from Orange. The competition at TI3 is stiff, but these three teams in particular found that bit of efficiency in the draft to help set themselves up for success.




About the writer:
UnoPolak started playing Dota 2 in early 2012 and is now an administrator of the Dota Noobs community. More recently he started contributing to the open-source Skadi project and is one of the founding members of SkadiStats, a group whose aim is the in-depth analysis of professional replays.


CREDITS
Writers: UnoPolak
Gfx: riptide, Heyoka
Editors: Firebolt145
Photography and art via Valve and R1CH

Dantak
Profile Joined January 2006
Czech Republic648 Posts
September 20 2013 17:13 GMT
#2
Wow, never thought there are so many statistics to be analyzed. 6 seconds per hero, that must have been crazy :-).

Nice article!
"Life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery." - f33red k0r34n z3rg
sc14s
Profile Joined March 2011
United States5052 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 17:20:42
September 20 2013 17:19 GMT
#3
cool read! It would be interesting to see how much more we could infer with better stats to look into the drafter's brains during the picking phase.
Jonrock
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
Germany80 Posts
September 20 2013 17:21 GMT
#4
Who had the super-interesting job of rewatching all the vods for all the drafts and take the times? :D
take apart your head
ChriseC
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany440 Posts
September 20 2013 17:22 GMT
#5
very interesting

but are there statistics about which teams picked which heros and which player played which heros? i would be thankful to see it
Sn0_Man
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
Tebellong44238 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 18:43:34
September 20 2013 17:25 GMT
#6
+ Show Spoiler [Fixed] +
Small error:
However, we found that the second pick only took 15 seconds on average, which is just over half the 33 seconds for the first pick

Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers. Some may say its "strategical superiority" but there is obviously a some amount of execution factored into that (much like naga's incredible winrates were heavily affected by her being played most by Alliance).

I guess it kinda boils down to "what came first? the chicken or the egg" and we don't really know for sure.
LiquidDota StaffSCIENTISTS BAFFLED | 3275929302
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
September 20 2013 17:53 GMT
#7
Jonrock, no one had to sit and watch all of the VODs, Skadi allowed us parse everything from a single script. If you want to look at all of the team draft times, check out this imgur gallery.
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 17:55:16
September 20 2013 17:54 GMT
#8
Thank you for the work of researching this, perhaps a more thorough look at best of's and the draft times of these different sets would be nice in addition to this.
Aerisky
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States12129 Posts
September 20 2013 17:55 GMT
#9
Whoa, thanks for the analysis. Really interesting stuff with drafting, soooo important :O
Jim while Johnny had had had had had had had; had had had had the better effect on the teacher.
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
September 20 2013 18:00 GMT
#10
On September 21 2013 02:53 UnoPolak wrote:
Jonrock, no one had to sit and watch all of the VODs, Skadi allowed us parse everything from a single script. If you want to look at all of the team draft times, check out this imgur gallery.


magic
DV G
Profile Joined September 2012
Argentina2339 Posts
September 20 2013 18:08 GMT
#11
very interesting.

worth the read.
Go pro or die trying
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
September 20 2013 18:16 GMT
#12
On September 21 2013 02:54 c0sm0naut wrote:
Thank you for the work of researching this, perhaps a more thorough look at best of's and the draft times of these different sets would be nice in addition to this.


I agree, this is a good place to start and there is a lot of room to grow. One thing that is particularly interesting once you have the "average" drafts for each team is to find any outliers, certain picks/bans that a team really struggled with.
Verator
Profile Joined June 2010
United States283 Posts
September 20 2013 18:16 GMT
#13
On September 21 2013 02:25 Sn0_Man wrote:

Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers.


They say specifically that these are from the group stages, not the playoffs.
So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence. -- Bertrand Russell
Sn0_Man
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
Tebellong44238 Posts
September 20 2013 18:17 GMT
#14
On September 21 2013 03:16 Verator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2013 02:25 Sn0_Man wrote:

Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers.


They say specifically that these are from the group stages, not the playoffs.

Fine, replace "the 2nd place finishers" with "the 2nd best team in the tournament"
LiquidDota StaffSCIENTISTS BAFFLED | 3275929302
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
September 20 2013 18:20 GMT
#15
On September 21 2013 02:25 Sn0_Man wrote:
Small error:
Show nested quote +
However, we found that the second pick only took 15 seconds on average, which is just over half the 33 seconds for the first pick


Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers. Some may say its "strategical superiority" but there is obviously a some amount of execution factored into that (much like naga's incredible winrates were heavily affected by her being played most by Alliance).

I guess it kinda boils down to "what came first? the chicken or the egg" and we don't really know for sure.


Great point about the importance of other factors. You are right that the draft and pick/side decisions are only incremental advantages over an opponent, and it is difficult to assign a W/L to any one specific factor.
Targe
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom14103 Posts
September 20 2013 18:22 GMT
#16
Awesome article!
11/5/14 CATACLYSM | The South West's worst Falco main
FuzzyJAM
Profile Joined July 2010
Scotland9300 Posts
September 20 2013 18:29 GMT
#17
On September 21 2013 02:53 UnoPolak wrote:
Jonrock, no one had to sit and watch all of the VODs, Skadi allowed us parse everything from a single script. If you want to look at all of the team draft times, check out this imgur gallery.

Damn it, I was having fun imagining some poor intern with a stopclock and a notepad.
Did you ever say Yes to a single joy?
Iceman331
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1306 Posts
September 20 2013 18:42 GMT
#18
This is really cool. Brings up a lot of interesting points on different drafting styles.
K-poptosis
Profile Joined April 2013
United States333 Posts
September 20 2013 19:04 GMT
#19
I loved the idea of this article when it was first discussed and Unopolak really brought it to life. Great job!
@Kpoptosis
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
September 20 2013 19:41 GMT
#20
Unopolak is a hero.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
11:00
Playoffs Day 3
MaxPax vs Percival
herO vs Clem
WardiTV1255
IntoTheiNu 456
Ryung 404
Rex138
EnkiAlexander 30
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Ryung 404
SortOf 169
Rex 138
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 18613
EffOrt 1122
Hyuk 1106
Stork 496
actioN 294
firebathero 263
Hyun 206
ggaemo 174
Soulkey 151
Last 108
[ Show more ]
Backho 89
ToSsGirL 82
Pusan 71
Sharp 70
[sc1f]eonzerg 59
Barracks 41
Free 31
soO 28
Sacsri 25
yabsab 23
HiyA 20
Rock 16
Noble 14
GoRush 13
Sexy 13
JulyZerg 11
IntoTheRainbow 10
NotJumperer 7
Icarus 6
Terrorterran 3
Dota 2
Gorgc5901
qojqva587
Counter-Strike
byalli1040
kRYSTAL_20
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor619
Liquid`Hasu217
Quackniix83
Other Games
singsing2481
B2W.Neo1093
DeMusliM451
XBOCT314
Lowko266
RotterdaM79
QueenE57
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream18140
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 20
• Adnapsc2 14
• Dystopia_ 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix4
• Michael_bg 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos3031
• TFBlade1502
Other Games
• WagamamaTV319
Upcoming Events
Ladder Legends
30m
Bunny vs GgMaChine
ByuN vs Percival
MaxPax vs Krystianer
Solar vs Cham
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
30m
BSL
4h 30m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19h 30m
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
20h 30m
Ladder Legends
1d
BSL
1d 4h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
Wardi Open
1d 19h
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
1d 19h
Soma vs hero
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Escore
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W4
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W5
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.