• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:12
CET 07:12
KST 15:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice4Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza1Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Gypsy to Korea It's March 3rd
Tourneys
[BSL22] Open Qualifier #1 - Sunday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Diablo 2 thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
YouTube Thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ONE GREAT AMERICAN MARINE…
XenOsky
Just Watchers: Why Some Only…
TrAiDoS
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1336 users

What's In A Draft: TI3 Group Stage Draft Analysis

Forum Index > Dota 2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 17:32:33
September 20 2013 17:01 GMT
#1

The International 3


Follow TI3 on
Liquipedia and in the LR Thread

Focus Mode
Turn off Focus Mode [x]


What's In A Draft: TI3 Group Stage Draft Analysis


by UnoPolak




Dota has always had a close link with statistics, dating back to the spreadsheet of numbers at the end of a game in the original WC3 mod. Valve has continued this tradition with live stats for spectators, a WebAPI for match history, and a basic replay parser that Statsman Bruno has expanded upon. Now there is a shiny new tool called Skadi, allowing even more information to be parsed from replays. For example, we can efficiently determine not only which heroes were picked and banned by a specific team in a bunch of replays, but how long it took them to do it. The International 3 pitted the sixteen best teams against each other, so where better to look to see how top captains drafted? We will be looking at just the group stages since there are an equal number of games for each team, and we should be able to establish general trends as well as tease out the differences between teams. Spoiler alert: Na`Vi and Alliance fans will not be disappointed.

[image loading]
Acronyms: TI3 - The International 3, FP - First pick, SP - Second pick



Overall Draft Times


The International 3 took place during patch 6.78c. This patch had five 30 second bans, five 40 second picks, and 110 seconds of reserve time, giving a maximum possible time of 460 seconds per team. You can see the full breakdown of teams below, but two deserve special mention.

Fastest Draft in the West: Virtus.Pro had the shortest individual draft of 63 seconds in a victory over LGD.int (match page), which breaks down to an average of 6 seconds for each pick or ban. The next lowest individual draft was 118 seconds by Rattlesnake, which is nearly a full minute longer. Virtus.Pro also had the lowest average draft time of 253 seconds, so apparently CIS Dota can be as aggressive in the draft as it is on the battlefield.

Slow and Steady Wins the Race: Alliance had both the longest individual draft of 449 seconds in a victory over Orange (match page) and the highest average draft time of 401 seconds. They banned only 23 different heroes, tied for lowest during the group stages, and still spent nearly all of the allotted time for each individual ban.

In fact, the top three teams in the entire tournament were all in the four longest average draft times during the group stages. Of course just taking longer in the draft does not guarantee success, but it does suggest that these teams were very methodical, taking as much time as possible to think through the draft in order to set up their team for success. We’ll look at exactly how they did this a little later.

[image loading]



Pick/side preference


[image loading]

Another thing that we can look at is the preference for specific sides or pick orders. Before each match, a coin flip was performed backstage, with the winner choosing either a side or first/second pick, and the loser selecting whatever was left. Unfortunately these decisions were not recorded, so we can only make educated guesses. The general consensus seems to have been that Dire is the better side with the much talked about “Dire advantage” around Roshan, and FP being the better pick order since you get both the overall first and last pick. The entire group stage saw 75 games pitting Radiant with FP against Dire with SP, and only 38 games of Radiant with SP against Dire with FP. Interestingly, teams with both Dire and FP only went 16-22 in the group stages though, so either the consensus was wrong, or execution simply trumps all.

 

Dire and/or Bust: LGD, Rattesnake, DK and Alliance got Dire at least 11 times each. It is difficult to believe that they won the coin flip that many times, but this does indicate that if given the choice Dire was their preference. There was mixed success, ranging from Alliance’s 11-0 run on Dire to Rattlesnake’s 2-10.

The Middle Road: Dignitas appeared to have no bias to either side or pick order with a nearly equal distribution of Radiant/Dire and FP/SP. We cannot speculate if they had specific preferences against individual opponents either since they only played two games against each other team.

Bucking the Trend: Na`Vi, mouz and Fnatic all showed a preference for Radiant over either Dire or even FP, opting for Radiant and SP 9, 8, and 7 times, respectively. Na`Vi’s captain Puppey has stated in the past that he prefers the Radiant jungle, and Funn1k’s ancient farming on Radiant during the group stages was much commented on during the International, so they obviously had a plan which led them to a 10-2 record as Radiant. The other two did not fare quite as well with records of 4-6 and 5-4.


Individual Pick/Ban Timings


[image loading]

The effect of Radiant vs. Dire on the individual pick and ban times is negligible compared to who has first pick (FP) and second pick (SP), so we will be focusing on pick order only. The averages from all of the group stage games follow trends that are not very surprising if you are familiar with drafting. However, there are a few teams that do wildly different things from the others, and that is what we will be highlighting as we go along.

Draft Preparation: Teams had been preparing for months before TI3, and a lot of this effort would have been spent preparing their drafts. The first few bans and picks would have been enumerated and weighed long before each game, and as a result was that the very first ban from each team generally took less than 20 seconds. A few teams took a little longer, but curiously enough, none more so than Zenith. Iceiceice frequently sat there with the first overall ban watching as up to 49 seconds cut into Zenith’s reserve time before making a selection. Was this somehow another mind game coming from the enigmatic Iceiceice?

[image loading]


Back-to-Back Decisions: There are a few points during the pick/ban phase during which a team has to makes two decisions in a row. The first one is when the team with SP gets back-to-back picks in the first picking stage. Both of these picks are given a full 40 second clock. However,  we found that the second pick only took 15 seconds on average, which is just under half the 33 seconds for the first pick. The most extreme example of this back-to-back picking was Team Liquid, who frequently spent 30 seconds of their reserve time for that first pick before spending less than 3 seconds of the allotted 40 for the second pick. One school of thought is that by quickly locking in that second pick you give your opponent less overall time to plan. Contrast this to Na`Vi, who used less time on the first pick (47 seconds) and a lot more time for the second pick (42 seconds). Two explanations for this difference come to mind. The first and obvious reason is that Na`Vi do not choose their second hero before they pick the first and thus need to spend the time thinking about their choice. The more interesting reason is that Na`Vi usually decide on their heroes just as quickly as Liquid, but choose to take their time and discuss the rest of their draft before locking their selection in. This does give the opposing team an extra 40 seconds to think about their own draft, but if they don’t know what your second pick is, the time is more effective for you than them. This “information advantage” is not unique to Na`Vi either.

[image loading]



Time as a Resource


We are used to thinking of health, mana, and gold as resources, but what about draft time? Each team can lock in their pick or ban before the allotted time has run out, after which the remaining time is lost. We can add up that lost allotted time during the draft for each team, and a very clear trend appears.

Waste Not, Want Not: Alliance never lost more than 65 of the total allotted 350 seconds, whereas LGD.int, TongFu, Rattlesnake, VP, LGD and Dignitas lost at least 70 seconds in every single draft. I believe this is another example of a team using an information advantage to increase the effectiveness of their draft relative to their opponents, similar to how Na`Vi extended their SP second pick but in this case expanded to every single pick and ban. Their hero pool was relatively small with the fewest number of different heroes banned at 23 and an average number of different heroes picked at 34. It is possible that Alliance spent all of this additional time considering exactly which hero to pick or ban, but their hero pool is does not suggest they were considering a much wider number of heroes than their opponents so it is more likely that they were already looking ahead in the draft.

[image loading]


Play to Your Strength: Orange had the second lowest lost allotted time, but used their reserve time very differently to Alliance. Alliance preferred to use their reserve time during the middle portion of the draft, specifically the second ban phase. On the other hand Orange preferred FP which also gave them the last overall pick, something that the opponent could not counterpick at all. They placed a lot of emphasis on that last overall pick by stockpiling their reserve time and entering that last pick with an average of 49 seconds of reserve time, compared to Alliance’s 17 seconds. A few other teams averaged as much reserve time on their last pick as Orange, but none came close to spending the average of 37 seconds of reserve time on that last pick like Orange did. During TI3 there were quite a few comments about the number of different heros that Mushi was playing, and nearly half the time Mushi’s hero was picked at the very end. From this we can say that Orange’s strategy revolved around building a flexible team without expending too much reserve time and then finding that perfect hero to complete the draft at the very end.

[image loading]



Conclusion


The top three teams of TI3 (Alliance, Na`Vi, and Orange) each displayed a methodical approach to drafting. They used the majority of the allotted time for each pick and ban as well as their reserve time. In regards to the allotted time usage it is highly probable that they were leveraging an information advantage over the opponent, keeping their decision hidden while continuing to think about the next step in the draft while the opponent was still unsure about the current pick or ban. Of course, other teams also used the majority of the allotted time to much less success, so one must remember that this is not a game-changing advantage, but an interesting one to analyse nonetheless. The way these top teams utilized their reserve time varied quite a bit, with pinpointed bans in the second phase from Alliance and exotic last picks from Orange. The competition at TI3 is stiff, but these three teams in particular found that bit of efficiency in the draft to help set themselves up for success.




About the writer:
UnoPolak started playing Dota 2 in early 2012 and is now an administrator of the Dota Noobs community. More recently he started contributing to the open-source Skadi project and is one of the founding members of SkadiStats, a group whose aim is the in-depth analysis of professional replays.


CREDITS
Writers: UnoPolak
Gfx: riptide, Heyoka
Editors: Firebolt145
Photography and art via Valve and R1CH

Dantak
Profile Joined January 2006
Czech Republic648 Posts
September 20 2013 17:13 GMT
#2
Wow, never thought there are so many statistics to be analyzed. 6 seconds per hero, that must have been crazy :-).

Nice article!
"Life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery." - f33red k0r34n z3rg
sc14s
Profile Joined March 2011
United States5052 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 17:20:42
September 20 2013 17:19 GMT
#3
cool read! It would be interesting to see how much more we could infer with better stats to look into the drafter's brains during the picking phase.
Jonrock
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
Germany80 Posts
September 20 2013 17:21 GMT
#4
Who had the super-interesting job of rewatching all the vods for all the drafts and take the times? :D
take apart your head
ChriseC
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany440 Posts
September 20 2013 17:22 GMT
#5
very interesting

but are there statistics about which teams picked which heros and which player played which heros? i would be thankful to see it
Sn0_Man
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
Tebellong44238 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 18:43:34
September 20 2013 17:25 GMT
#6
+ Show Spoiler [Fixed] +
Small error:
However, we found that the second pick only took 15 seconds on average, which is just over half the 33 seconds for the first pick

Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers. Some may say its "strategical superiority" but there is obviously a some amount of execution factored into that (much like naga's incredible winrates were heavily affected by her being played most by Alliance).

I guess it kinda boils down to "what came first? the chicken or the egg" and we don't really know for sure.
LiquidDota StaffSCIENTISTS BAFFLED | 3275929302
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
September 20 2013 17:53 GMT
#7
Jonrock, no one had to sit and watch all of the VODs, Skadi allowed us parse everything from a single script. If you want to look at all of the team draft times, check out this imgur gallery.
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 17:55:16
September 20 2013 17:54 GMT
#8
Thank you for the work of researching this, perhaps a more thorough look at best of's and the draft times of these different sets would be nice in addition to this.
Aerisky
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States12129 Posts
September 20 2013 17:55 GMT
#9
Whoa, thanks for the analysis. Really interesting stuff with drafting, soooo important :O
Jim while Johnny had had had had had had had; had had had had the better effect on the teacher.
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
September 20 2013 18:00 GMT
#10
On September 21 2013 02:53 UnoPolak wrote:
Jonrock, no one had to sit and watch all of the VODs, Skadi allowed us parse everything from a single script. If you want to look at all of the team draft times, check out this imgur gallery.


magic
DV G
Profile Joined September 2012
Argentina2339 Posts
September 20 2013 18:08 GMT
#11
very interesting.

worth the read.
Go pro or die trying
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
September 20 2013 18:16 GMT
#12
On September 21 2013 02:54 c0sm0naut wrote:
Thank you for the work of researching this, perhaps a more thorough look at best of's and the draft times of these different sets would be nice in addition to this.


I agree, this is a good place to start and there is a lot of room to grow. One thing that is particularly interesting once you have the "average" drafts for each team is to find any outliers, certain picks/bans that a team really struggled with.
Verator
Profile Joined June 2010
United States283 Posts
September 20 2013 18:16 GMT
#13
On September 21 2013 02:25 Sn0_Man wrote:

Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers.


They say specifically that these are from the group stages, not the playoffs.
So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence. -- Bertrand Russell
Sn0_Man
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
Tebellong44238 Posts
September 20 2013 18:17 GMT
#14
On September 21 2013 03:16 Verator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2013 02:25 Sn0_Man wrote:

Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers.


They say specifically that these are from the group stages, not the playoffs.

Fine, replace "the 2nd place finishers" with "the 2nd best team in the tournament"
LiquidDota StaffSCIENTISTS BAFFLED | 3275929302
UnoPolak
Profile Joined August 2013
18 Posts
September 20 2013 18:20 GMT
#15
On September 21 2013 02:25 Sn0_Man wrote:
Small error:
Show nested quote +
However, we found that the second pick only took 15 seconds on average, which is just over half the 33 seconds for the first pick


Otherwise, Excellent. I feel like the "Dire 2nd pick" stats are likely skewed simply by a large amount of those happening against Na'Vi, the 2nd place finishers. Some may say its "strategical superiority" but there is obviously a some amount of execution factored into that (much like naga's incredible winrates were heavily affected by her being played most by Alliance).

I guess it kinda boils down to "what came first? the chicken or the egg" and we don't really know for sure.


Great point about the importance of other factors. You are right that the draft and pick/side decisions are only incremental advantages over an opponent, and it is difficult to assign a W/L to any one specific factor.
Targe
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom14103 Posts
September 20 2013 18:22 GMT
#16
Awesome article!
11/5/14 CATACLYSM | The South West's worst Falco main
FuzzyJAM
Profile Joined July 2010
Scotland9300 Posts
September 20 2013 18:29 GMT
#17
On September 21 2013 02:53 UnoPolak wrote:
Jonrock, no one had to sit and watch all of the VODs, Skadi allowed us parse everything from a single script. If you want to look at all of the team draft times, check out this imgur gallery.

Damn it, I was having fun imagining some poor intern with a stopclock and a notepad.
Did you ever say Yes to a single joy?
Iceman331
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1306 Posts
September 20 2013 18:42 GMT
#18
This is really cool. Brings up a lot of interesting points on different drafting styles.
K-poptosis
Profile Joined April 2013
United States333 Posts
September 20 2013 19:04 GMT
#19
I loved the idea of this article when it was first discussed and Unopolak really brought it to life. Great job!
@Kpoptosis
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
September 20 2013 19:41 GMT
#20
Unopolak is a hero.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 48m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft370
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 20875
GuemChi 1155
Snow 115
Dewaltoss 106
Bale 31
Noble 13
Icarus 8
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm206
League of Legends
JimRising 807
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv523
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1013
Mew2King14
Other Games
summit1g10771
C9.Mang0372
Sick106
RuFF_SC270
ceh90
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick674
Counter-Strike
PGL68
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH538
• practicex 34
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity7
• Azhi_Dahaki1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1150
• Lourlo1067
• Stunt419
• HappyZerGling138
Other Games
• Scarra975
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
3h 48m
KCM Race Survival
3h 48m
WardiTV Winter Champion…
5h 48m
Classic vs Nicoract
herO vs YoungYakov
ByuN vs Gerald
Clem vs Krystianer
Replay Cast
17h 48m
Ultimate Battle
1d 5h
Light vs ZerO
WardiTV Winter Champion…
1d 5h
MaxPax vs Spirit
Rogue vs Bunny
Cure vs SHIN
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
1d 17h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
OSC
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-04
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.