EPTBR#2 Very close to release - Page 15
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5472 Posts
| ||
|
Savio
United States1850 Posts
On April 13 2009 09:59 Savio wrote: just out of curiosity, Poll: Did you read the transcript? (Vote): Yes, I couldn't wait (Vote): No, I didn't want to spoil it I thought the vote would go the other way. I guess we all like suprises.  | ||
|
kerr0r
Norway319 Posts
On April 14 2009 00:55 Savio wrote: I thought the vote would go the other way. I guess we all like suprises. Or maybe everyone wants to SEE some gameplay rather than read a transcript of a (fairly useless) commentary of a (likely mediocre) game. | ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
On April 13 2009 23:11 Hammy wrote: What kind of "extras" do you think Bnet might have? (that's a real question) I mean iccup will be using the same interface, will have AMM and stuff, and a decent ladder. I'm just wondering what blizzard could add to Bnet that iccup couldn't add to The Abyss within a week. And on the other hand iccup's got sooo many advantages, like those stated above, but also the fact that the whole world is centralized on the same server, rather than having to switch gateways to play people from different areas. iccup will have amm? if that is true: hallelujah. | ||
|
Bosu
United States3247 Posts
| ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5472 Posts
On April 14 2009 01:55 choboPEon wrote: iccup will have amm? if that is true: hallelujah. Speculation for now. No one knows if they'll even be running a server. | ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
On April 14 2009 01:58 SoleSteeler wrote: Speculation for now. No one knows if they'll even be running a server. frankly, amm is the main reason i am looking forward to b.net 2.0 it is so very wonderful. | ||
|
Terranist
United States2496 Posts
On April 14 2009 02:18 choboPEon wrote: frankly, amm is the main reason i am looking forward to b.net 2.0 it is so very wonderful. definitely. AMM made playing wc3 so hassle free. | ||
|
Skyze
Canada2324 Posts
There will be no Iccup or alternate server for SC2.. until maybe 5-6 years into the game, when Blizzard is working on a new RTS and not deleting any hackers/etc. I dont understand why people think iccup will be on sc2, it would be irrelevant.. Iccup cant hack the bnet 2 module, keep up with consistant updates AND offer any prizes/rewards that blizzard can.. Hell, Iccup on SC1 has its fair share of issues that were never even fixed, how could they keep up with a much much more complex system in bnet 2.0? | ||
|
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
| ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5472 Posts
| ||
|
inReacH
Sweden1612 Posts
Having said that, if blizzard pays attention to making sure there is low lat, I don't think any independent servers can compete. | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33723 Posts
| ||
|
Tintti
Finland46 Posts
| ||
|
kerr0r
Norway319 Posts
 | ||
|
Tsagacity
United States2124 Posts
On April 14 2009 05:37 Tintti wrote: About an hour ago it took about 20 minutes to load the page, so I guess they were updating something. I was 99% sure that it was BR2. That wasn't the case apparently.. Meh, there are plenty of non-exciting potential explanations for a slow load time | ||
|
Savio
United States1850 Posts
| ||
|
ShivaN
United States933 Posts
| ||
|
Tsagacity
United States2124 Posts
On April 14 2009 06:02 ShivaN wrote: Well http://www.starcraft2.com/features/battlereports/2.xml no longer redirects to BR1 and is now just an error page. It's something...I guess.. ;\ Try again. I got an error once, but now it's redirecting again | ||
|
Pufftrees
2449 Posts
On April 14 2009 06:02 ShivaN wrote: Well http://www.starcraft2.com/features/battlereports/2.xml no longer redirects to BR1 and is now just an error page. It's something...I guess.. ;\ I only get an error about half the time, other half just goes straight to BR1 as before. | ||
| ||
