EPTKlazart fans zergrushes authonomy.com - Page 25
| Forum Index > Closed |
JWD
United States12607 Posts
| ||
|
stack
Canada348 Posts
On March 24 2009 00:47 Hot_Bid wrote: Can people stop arguing about whether they like Klazart's commentary or not? This thread is to discuss his book and authonomy.com, please stay on topic. If we head down the "why do people hate Klaz?" road, the result will be lots of bans and closings. Let's just say people have a lot of different opinions on which commentators are good and leave it at that. <font size=3>Consider this an official warning, 2 day temp bans for people that keep bringing this up.</font> didnt enjoy your book | ||
Chill
Calgary25955 Posts
On March 24 2009 00:43 Kong John wrote: He might not have been the first one but he defenetly is the most succesfull one, hes getting alot of views on his commentated videos and is the reason alot of people including me got into starcraft. I wanna know why everyone seems to dislike Klaz, i mean hes contributed alot to sc and the esports scene. Why do people seem to have some kind of beef with him? Right, so he wasn't the first. That was the question. | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
On March 24 2009 01:31 stack wrote: didnt enjoy your book That's okay, it's not for everyone. Only the truly gosu players like it, noobs just don't understand it. | ||
|
Klaz
Ireland334 Posts
 I actually feel pretty bad for this, was never my intention... oh well. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25955 Posts
| ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
Next time you should just say "I want every third fan of mine to vote for it" LOL? | ||
|
Klaz
Ireland334 Posts
Hot_Bid is right though, seeing what's happened, I'd prolly do it a LOT differently if I had a redo, but hey + Show Spoiler + I'm sure so would Jangbi Also.... does any one find it interesting that while the site appears to be broken, the advertisements for Bookarmy and the Sony Reader are working just fine? | ||
|
achap54
United States49 Posts
On March 24 2009 01:53 Klaz wrote: Thank you to Hot_Bid and co for taking down Shadow_Rush. The authonomy site seems to be dying horribly atm I actually feel pretty bad for this, was never my intention... oh well.@Klaz, your book excerpt did get some sincere critiques from Authonomy users. Were they helpful? | ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
| ||
|
Klaz
Ireland334 Posts
Achap54 - yes immensly, thanks | ||
|
Klaz
Ireland334 Posts
| ||
|
pyrogenetix
United Arab Emirates5090 Posts
| ||
|
racps
United Kingdom12 Posts
On March 24 2009 02:22 Klaz wrote: oh wait never mind, i remember now I added a plug at the end of the commentary, but that was before I knew the website was dying..... ugh... what a mess.... Dear Klaz, Regardless of the merits of your book (or not; I haven't read it yet, because I have tons queued up to read first), I think your presence has been useful insofar as it has highlighted a couple of issues: a) lack of futureproofing of authonomy (it was creaking before you came along); b) lack of real commitment to authonomy by HC (it will be interesting to see what they say about your book if it does make the top5); c) lack of innovative strategy for authonomy by HC; d) ease of manipulability of the current ranking systems on there. I do think it's slightly disingenous of you to say you couldn't foresee what effect your fans would have on the site (and you do have a lot of fans, because from what I can see, many people see you as very committed on other starcraft forums). However, this is immaterial to the fact that I hope something new for authonomy will come out of this. Best regards, R | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
nttea
Sweden4353 Posts
| ||
|
Klaz
Ireland334 Posts
| ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
On March 24 2009 02:36 racps wrote: ... c) lack of innovative strategy for authonomy by HC; ... Lack of innovative strategy? Have you even read Shadow Rush? | ||
|
Klaz
Ireland334 Posts
On March 24 2009 02:36 racps wrote: Dear Klaz, Regardless of the merits of your book (or not; I haven't read it yet, because I have tons queued up to read first), I think your presence has been useful insofar as it has highlighted a couple of issues: a) lack of futureproofing of authonomy (it was creaking before you came along); b) lack of real commitment to authonomy by HC (it will be interesting to see what they say about your book if it does make the top5); c) lack of innovative strategy for authonomy by HC; d) ease of manipulability of the current ranking systems on there. I do think it's slightly disingenous of you to say you couldn't foresee what effect your fans would have on the site (and you do have a lot of fans, because from what I can see, many people see you as very committed on other starcraft forums). However, this is immaterial to the fact that I hope something new for authonomy will come out of this. Best regards, R Look at most professional websites, especially social networking ones, youtube, facebook, twitter, etc etc etc. Look at TEAMLIQUID where we are now. They have so many more users than authonomy yet function perfectly fine. How could I predict that a website run by professionals as a business would have less bandwidth than most amateur gaming forums out there? I honestly don't have as many fans as you seem to think I do. | ||
|
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
On March 24 2009 02:40 zulu_nation8 wrote: so klaz can you steal a game from a D level player now zulu did you find anything better to do with your time than write huge whiny blogs about youtube commentators | ||
| ||
