• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:48
CEST 05:48
KST 12:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 631 users

US Politics Mega-Blog - Page 169

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 167 168 169 170 171 Next
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
February 05 2019 03:13 GMT
#3361
xDaunt, any thoughts on a constitutional argument Roger Stone could make in a civil case, for his arrest?
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
February 05 2019 03:24 GMT
#3362
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/04/us/politics/trump-inaugural-committee-subpoena.html

It's coming down for him folks. SDNY is now really pushing the needle. With Sam Patten, Cohen, and Rick Gates all pleading guilty doesn't look good for Trump team. And this isn't part of the Mueller investigation, this is a whole different investigation on it's own...
Life?
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-02-05 03:33:10
February 05 2019 03:33 GMT
#3363
If I had a dime for every time THIS is the beginning of the end, the final push, the undeniable proof.

Remember the Trump Hotel computer communicating to Russian banks? Remember Papadopoulis? The dossier? The scale of hype was matched only by the later silence.

Show down soon Mr Mueller and let’s see if anything’s true about treasonous collusion. I’m ready for things to go back down to improper business dealings abroad (if that’s the narrative that the left finally settles upon).
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 05 2019 04:08 GMT
#3364
On February 05 2019 12:13 Doodsmack wrote:
xDaunt, any thoughts on a constitutional argument Roger Stone could make in a civil case, for his arrest?

I'm not sure that Stone has a claim against Mueller's team that concerns the arrest, but then again, this isn't really my area of law. The bigger question is whether members of Mueller's team are now subject to some kind of civil, criminal, administrative (ethical), or judicial (contempt) liability for the leaks. Leaking stuff that is supposed to be under seal and/or kept confidential is a gigantic no-no for attorneys.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 05 2019 04:11 GMT
#3365
On February 05 2019 12:24 ShoCkeyy wrote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/04/us/politics/trump-inaugural-committee-subpoena.html

It's coming down for him folks. SDNY is now really pushing the needle. With Sam Patten, Cohen, and Rick Gates all pleading guilty doesn't look good for Trump team. And this isn't part of the Mueller investigation, this is a whole different investigation on it's own...

You're reading this wrong. SDNY is on a fishing expedition because they don't have anything yet. Mueller's team has the same problem, which was evidenced yet again by the contents (or pertinent lack thereof) of the Stone indictment.
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-02-05 11:23:13
February 05 2019 11:22 GMT
#3366
On February 05 2019 11:14 GoTuNk! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2019 10:12 iamthedave wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:21 GoTuNk! wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:20 IgnE wrote:
If infanticide was good enough for the Greeks it’s Western enough for me


huh should we start having slaves again?


0 Hour contracts, working poor and sweatshop employees would like to have a word with you.

We don't call it slavery but the bottom rung of our working class is very, very close to it.


I sometimes wonder if you are a pre-programmed bot.


That's probably because you pay no attention, which would explain your habit of posting Fox talking points almost word for word on a regular basis and your demonstrated lack of understanding of almost any issue.
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
GoTuNk!
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Chile4591 Posts
February 05 2019 12:07 GMT
#3367
On February 05 2019 20:22 iamthedave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2019 11:14 GoTuNk! wrote:
On February 05 2019 10:12 iamthedave wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:21 GoTuNk! wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:20 IgnE wrote:
If infanticide was good enough for the Greeks it’s Western enough for me


huh should we start having slaves again?


0 Hour contracts, working poor and sweatshop employees would like to have a word with you.

We don't call it slavery but the bottom rung of our working class is very, very close to it.


I sometimes wonder if you are a pre-programmed bot.


That's probably because you pay no attention, which would explain your habit of posting Fox talking points almost word for word on a regular basis and your demonstrated lack of understanding of almost any issue.


I pay attention, and I wonder how a guy who compares low skilled jobs with slavery can tie his shoes in the morning.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9612 Posts
February 05 2019 13:09 GMT
#3368
On February 05 2019 21:07 GoTuNk! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2019 20:22 iamthedave wrote:
On February 05 2019 11:14 GoTuNk! wrote:
On February 05 2019 10:12 iamthedave wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:21 GoTuNk! wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:20 IgnE wrote:
If infanticide was good enough for the Greeks it’s Western enough for me


huh should we start having slaves again?


0 Hour contracts, working poor and sweatshop employees would like to have a word with you.

We don't call it slavery but the bottom rung of our working class is very, very close to it.


I sometimes wonder if you are a pre-programmed bot.


That's probably because you pay no attention, which would explain your habit of posting Fox talking points almost word for word on a regular basis and your demonstrated lack of understanding of almost any issue.


I pay attention, and I wonder how a guy who compares low skilled jobs with slavery can tie his shoes in the morning.

Comparing one thing to another thing literally means that you are analyzing the differences between them.
I don't understand what your problem is.
RIP Meatloaf <3
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-02-05 13:38:21
February 05 2019 13:36 GMT
#3369
On February 05 2019 21:07 GoTuNk! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2019 20:22 iamthedave wrote:
On February 05 2019 11:14 GoTuNk! wrote:
On February 05 2019 10:12 iamthedave wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:21 GoTuNk! wrote:
On February 05 2019 09:20 IgnE wrote:
If infanticide was good enough for the Greeks it’s Western enough for me


huh should we start having slaves again?


0 Hour contracts, working poor and sweatshop employees would like to have a word with you.

We don't call it slavery but the bottom rung of our working class is very, very close to it.


I sometimes wonder if you are a pre-programmed bot.


That's probably because you pay no attention, which would explain your habit of posting Fox talking points almost word for word on a regular basis and your demonstrated lack of understanding of almost any issue.


I pay attention, and I wonder how a guy who compares low skilled jobs with slavery can tie his shoes in the morning.


As I said, you demonstrate absolutely no understanding of the issue. There's plenty of valid responses and counterpoints. I could come up with several. The fact you immediately resort to invective is pretty telling.
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
February 05 2019 14:42 GMT
#3370
xDaunt is it or is it not an investigation into Trumps Inaugural Committee? Because it sure looks like it’s an investigation. Especially when they were subpoenaed. If there wasn’t anything then th subpoenas wouldn’t happen right?

Danglers I specifically wrote this has nothing to do with Mueller yet you brought him up as if he’s running the SDNY investigation lmao
Life?
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
February 05 2019 15:01 GMT
#3371
On February 05 2019 23:42 ShoCkeyy wrote:
xDaunt is it or is it not an investigation into Trumps Inaugural Committee? Because it sure looks like it’s an investigation. Especially when they were subpoenaed. If there wasn’t anything then th subpoenas wouldn’t happen right?

Danglers I specifically wrote this has nothing to do with Mueller yet you brought him up as if he’s running the SDNY investigation lmao

You’ll notice I specifically cited examples of “the next big thing” promises to really bring Trump down (or really put the screws in him) that weren’t Mueller in there too. You think those were all Mueller lol? It feels like three of these stories are born and die every two weeks.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 05 2019 15:38 GMT
#3372
On February 05 2019 23:42 ShoCkeyy wrote:
xDaunt is it or is it not an investigation into Trumps Inaugural Committee? Because it sure looks like it’s an investigation. Especially when they were subpoenaed. If there wasn’t anything then th subpoenas wouldn’t happen right?

Danglers I specifically wrote this has nothing to do with Mueller yet you brought him up as if he’s running the SDNY investigation lmao

Sure, it is an investigation by SDNY like I said. My point in bringing up Mueller is that this is the same type of story that we have seen for the past two years in which a news outlets breathlessly reports that something relating to Trump is under investigation so as to create the impression that Trump did something seriously wrong. Now, while the Russia collusion stuff is starting to look like a set up of Trump, I'm not willing to entertain that thought yet as it pertains to the SDNY investigation. My point is merely that all of these reports of "investigations" into Trump mean little more than the media and various others are flailing in their attempts to take down Trump.
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
February 05 2019 15:52 GMT
#3373
On February 06 2019 00:38 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2019 23:42 ShoCkeyy wrote:
xDaunt is it or is it not an investigation into Trumps Inaugural Committee? Because it sure looks like it’s an investigation. Especially when they were subpoenaed. If there wasn’t anything then th subpoenas wouldn’t happen right?

Danglers I specifically wrote this has nothing to do with Mueller yet you brought him up as if he’s running the SDNY investigation lmao

Sure, it is an investigation by SDNY like I said. My point in bringing up Mueller is that this is the same type of story that we have seen for the past two years in which a news outlets breathlessly reports that something relating to Trump is under investigation so as to create the impression that Trump did something seriously wrong. Now, while the Russia collusion stuff is starting to look like a set up of Trump, I'm not willing to entertain that thought yet as it pertains to the SDNY investigation. My point is merely that all of these reports of "investigations" into Trump mean little more than the media and various others are flailing in their attempts to take down Trump.


I agree.

But one puzzling thing to me is why you don't see the same thing with Hilary. You obviously give more credit to Hilary accusations than Trump ones, but I don't understand why beyond gut my team/their team dynamics. Do you not recognise that the character of the two sets of accusations is borderline identical?
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-02-05 15:55:27
February 05 2019 15:54 GMT
#3374
The fact that a subpoena was issued by federal prosecutors to Trump's inauguration is not a non-story. It's a real and serious criminal investigation. There's also no reason to assume that it's a fishing expedition unless one wants to dismiss everything related to investigations of Trump and the clown posse that surrounds him.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-02-05 16:28:14
February 05 2019 16:01 GMT
#3375
On February 04 2019 07:37 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 04 2019 06:10 xDaunt wrote:
On February 04 2019 05:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 04 2019 05:22 xDaunt wrote:
On February 03 2019 14:49 IgnE wrote:
On February 03 2019 12:05 xDaunt wrote:
On February 03 2019 11:16 IgnE wrote:
On February 03 2019 10:36 xDaunt wrote:
On February 03 2019 10:30 IgnE wrote:
On February 03 2019 10:25 xDaunt wrote:
[quote]
Yes, but not in the Randian sense. The better way to put it is that I'm suspicious of any philosophy or worldview that strays from the concept of the truth being objective.


Is the truth knowable?

At least some of it is. All of it? Maybe not.


What kinds of things are knowable?

A lot of things. The mathematical and the empirical are just a couple examples.


So who are some "subjectivists" (postmodern neomarxists?) that deny mathematical and empirical truths?

Certainly no one worth talking about. But you're asking the wrong question.


Well supply the right one for me.

I don't know how far into left field you want to go, but you'd have been better off pushing me on ethics and/or morality. In reality, we don't need to go any further than sex classifications based upon self-identity and self-reporting rather than objective measures are bullshit.


I wasn't pushing you anywhere, I was letting you decide where to go. I asked what kinds of truths you think are knowable and you deliberately decided not to talk about ethics and/or morality. Do you think that there are knowable, absolute moral and/or ethical truths?


I do believe that there is an absolute, objective morality. What I am less sure of is the extent to which it is completely knowable.

There's nothing particularly "true" about our categories for sex or gender. Empirically speaking, trans people are not in denial about what their body looks like, what body parts they have, what chromosomes they have, or whether or not they had or have high levels of testosterone coursing through their body. What is in dispute is the categories sex and gender themselves, categories constituting and constituted by interpersonal discourse.

So what are we to make of your suggestion that "sex classifications [should be] based upon … objective measures?" If we agree the dispute is over the categories (i.e. not the scientifically empirical), then this assertion is ultimately a normative, subjective stance concerning what we might call the "meaning" of "woman" or "man." But I am at a loss as to how this dispute concerns something you've called "subjectivism," or how it concerns truth.


I disagree with your construction of what the trans community is doing. Yes, there certainly is a categorization component of their advocacy in which they are redefining sex and gender and creating more boxes than just "male" and "female." But this categorization component is only skin deep. The real action lies in the boxes that they are creating and how those boxes are defined. Those boxes are defined through concepts of self-identity. So what we ultimately get is gender as a spectrum in which the individuals place themselves. And just to complicate matters, gender is now a fluid concept, so people can move themselves up and down the spectrum as they see fit. The intellectual foundation for this is dubious at best.

If you were really concerned about whether someone had a penis or ovaries (or neither or both), would simply changing the question from "what sex are you?" to "what kind of gonads do you have?" satisfy you? Or are you are invested in the specific question of "what sex are you?" And, if you are, have you thought about what it might mean to compel people to answer that question a certain way?


For the most part, I really don't care what people do in their private lives and how they view themselves. What I do care about is the extent to which these otherwise private views affect the greater society. To your point, I certainly get that "compelling" people to answer the gender/sex question in a certain way may negatively impact those people. But I am not prepared to conclude that their interests are as important as the greater majority's. The trans community is minuscule part of the greater population. While I don't mind giving them basic protections, they must conform to us rather than impose their views upon us.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 05 2019 16:08 GMT
#3376
On February 06 2019 00:52 iamthedave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 06 2019 00:38 xDaunt wrote:
On February 05 2019 23:42 ShoCkeyy wrote:
xDaunt is it or is it not an investigation into Trumps Inaugural Committee? Because it sure looks like it’s an investigation. Especially when they were subpoenaed. If there wasn’t anything then th subpoenas wouldn’t happen right?

Danglers I specifically wrote this has nothing to do with Mueller yet you brought him up as if he’s running the SDNY investigation lmao

Sure, it is an investigation by SDNY like I said. My point in bringing up Mueller is that this is the same type of story that we have seen for the past two years in which a news outlets breathlessly reports that something relating to Trump is under investigation so as to create the impression that Trump did something seriously wrong. Now, while the Russia collusion stuff is starting to look like a set up of Trump, I'm not willing to entertain that thought yet as it pertains to the SDNY investigation. My point is merely that all of these reports of "investigations" into Trump mean little more than the media and various others are flailing in their attempts to take down Trump.


I agree.

But one puzzling thing to me is why you don't see the same thing with Hilary. You obviously give more credit to Hilary accusations than Trump ones, but I don't understand why beyond gut my team/their team dynamics. Do you not recognise that the character of the two sets of accusations is borderline identical?

Because she hasn't been investigated (to our knowledge). Literally everything that she did that, on its face, looks far worse than what Trump has done has been swept under the rug by one government agency or another.

I really don't mind that much that an investigation was made into Trump and his campaign. Law enforcement has considerable discretion to look at potentially criminal activity when made aware of it. What I do mind is the manner in which the FBI and DOJ have gone about their investigation of Trump. There is quite a record now of these entities manufacturing and laundering evidence for the purpose of pushing an investigation about which they should have concluded that there was no merit long ago. Throw in the obvious politicization of the campaign, including the rampant media leaks, and it is obvious that something wrong has happened.
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
February 05 2019 16:31 GMT
#3377
Lol Hillary wasn't investigated? Why do you try and to claim that she wasn't.

Here's a report from your man himself Ron Johnson, obviously some Bias in the report, but I also included the FBI's report.

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-07 Interim Report_The Clinton Email Scandal and the FBI's Investigation of It.pdf

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/Hillary R. Clinton Part 01 of 28/view

The fact that you probably overlook Pence's use of personal email, and not Hillary's use of personal emails shows your own bias.

Life?
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 05 2019 16:52 GMT
#3378
I'm not overlooking anyone's personal use of emails. But to my knowledge, no one did what Hillary did. Nor was anyone else's email compromised to the degree that Hillary's was. Now, if you want to take the position that Hillary's use of personal email was investigated, I think that's fair. There was quite a bit of investigation into it. However, that still doesn't change the fact that it was all swept under the rug by DOJ rather than prosecuted as it should have been. Again, Comey outlined in explicit detail how she violated the law even though he purposefully tweaked some of the language that he used to justify not referring her for prosecution.
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
February 05 2019 17:14 GMT
#3379
I mean Pence’s private email was hacked. So it was compromised to the same level as Hillary. I mean at least Hillary had a private server trying to protect her own private email.
Life?
Nouar
Profile Joined May 2009
France3270 Posts
February 05 2019 17:20 GMT
#3380
On February 06 2019 01:52 xDaunt wrote:
I'm not overlooking anyone's personal use of emails. But to my knowledge, no one did what Hillary did. Nor was anyone else's email compromised to the degree that Hillary's was. Now, if you want to take the position that Hillary's use of personal email was investigated, I think that's fair. There was quite a bit of investigation into it. However, that still doesn't change the fact that it was all swept under the rug by DOJ rather than prosecuted as it should have been. Again, Comey outlined in explicit detail how she violated the law even though he purposefully tweaked some of the language that he used to justify not referring her for prosecution.


As an IT security specialist, and ex-custodian of government cryptos, I have issue with the assumption that Hillary's emails were compromised.

First, IT security : her server was not hacked to the extent of the available knowledge and expertise conducted... So no, her email server, while underprotected (since it was accessible via RDP hence somewhat vulnerable), has not been compromised until proven otherwise.
Then a fucking idiot (sorry, no other words) deleted emails after their retention was ordered, as we was supposed to have done the deletion prior to the request but failed to do so.

Second, classified data assets compromission is by definition when classified information is out in the open (lost, opened in an unsecured area where unauthorized eyes can land on them, other reasons) and has been potentially disseminated.
While there was definitely a breach of the rules in dealing with classified information, it was not determined that she had lost classified data due to that. (If you compare to the guy that took pictures of classified areas of a submarine, and SENT THEM to someone else, that shouldn't have had access to those. That guy, whom Trump often referred to, has been convicted due to that dissemination of information).

She did lie about the fact that it contained no classified information, and probably should have been charged with that, at least. Though it seems the messages in question were not really properly marked, and from experience, politicians, though they should, are usually not proficient enough in classifications. HRC was not a newbie, she should know, but it's pretty hard to prove the intent to lie/deceive.

Again, you are supposedly a lawyer, but often use very specific words in the wrong way. Please be careful.
NoiR
Prev 1 167 168 169 170 171 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Korean StarCraft League #77
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 209
ProTech62
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 758
Leta 168
Sharp 111
MaD[AoV]48
Bale 18
Icarus 10
LuMiX 1
Dota 2
monkeys_forever802
League of Legends
JimRising 782
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 219
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King128
Other Games
summit1g9587
shahzam824
WinterStarcraft339
Maynarde156
NeuroSwarm73
SortOf56
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick41862
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH300
• practicex 14
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1090
Other Games
• Scarra2401
• Shiphtur298
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6h 12m
WardiTV European League
12h 12m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
20h 12m
The PondCast
1d 6h
WardiTV European League
1d 8h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 12h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.