|
|
Which country will be ready to take as an "emergency emigrant" except Canada? Cause the reason - running from a war is pretty damn huge :|
Weren't you singing a song about how you want russia to go apeshit over protesters etc, how about you try it there?
|
On March 01 2014 09:25 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +Which country will be ready to take as an "emergency emigrant" except Canada? Cause the reason - running from a war is pretty damn huge :| Weren't you singing a song about how you want russia to go apeshit over protesters etc, how about you try it there?  I think he was mostly upset about potentially his father losing a job, although now that the possibility that his fathers current oligarch employer is replaced by his fathers former oligarch employer again things will work out.
|
On March 01 2014 09:25 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +Which country will be ready to take as an "emergency emigrant" except Canada? Cause the reason - running from a war is pretty damn huge :| Weren't you singing a song about how you want russia to go apeshit over protesters etc, how about you try it there? 
Nah, am joking.
But tbh Canadian passport in perspetive fits more than Russian for me :D Oh gosh, the only problem is french language.
|
On March 01 2014 09:27 Sub40APM wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:25 m4ini wrote:Which country will be ready to take as an "emergency emigrant" except Canada? Cause the reason - running from a war is pretty damn huge :| Weren't you singing a song about how you want russia to go apeshit over protesters etc, how about you try it there?  I think he was mostly upset about potentially his father losing a job, although now that the possibility that his fathers current oligarch employer is replaced by his fathers former oligarch employer again things will work out.
U have to be suggested for a comedian role here in this topic, keep going.
|
On March 01 2014 09:27 cSc.Dav1oN wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:25 m4ini wrote:Which country will be ready to take as an "emergency emigrant" except Canada? Cause the reason - running from a war is pretty damn huge :| Weren't you singing a song about how you want russia to go apeshit over protesters etc, how about you try it there?  Nah, am joking. But tbh Canadian passport in perspetive fits more than Russian for me :D Oh gosh, the only problem is french language. you dont have to speak French to get a Canadian citizenship, but if you speak French its easier to get it because Quebec sets its own immigration quota.
|
On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what?
come on, i was following the discussion and it ended by talking about a possible nuclear war, i didn't come from nowhere with that btw i won't lie to you that i laughed a bit with the invading things
|
On March 01 2014 09:32 Makro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? come on, i was following the discussion and it ended by talking about a possible nuclear war, i didn't come from nowhere with that btw i won't lie to you that i laughed a bit with the invading things
Nuclear war cause of 3rd world country in a middle of Europe with broken economy and industry? Only in Hollywood movie it can happen. THIS country is just the EDJE between West and Russia :D
|
On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? People were talking about "nuclear war" when Russia invaded Gergia, too.
People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis.
|
On March 01 2014 09:35 cSc.Dav1oN wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:32 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? come on, i was following the discussion and it ended by talking about a possible nuclear war, i didn't come from nowhere with that btw i won't lie to you that i laughed a bit with the invading things Nuclear war cause of 3rd world country in a middle of Europe with broken economy and industry? Only in Hollywood movie it can happen. THIS country is just the EDJE between West and Russia :D
Ukraine is 2nd world.
1st World is America & Friends 2nd World is Former USSR, China, & Friends 3rd World is Non-Aligned India & Friends (Switzerland was 3rd World :p) 4th World are the naked people in National Geographic
|
People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis.
Might have to do with the opinion that putin would not hesitate for a second to use his arsenal if needed.
|
On March 01 2014 09:37 zeonmx wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? People were talking about "nuclear war" when Russia invaded Gergia, too. People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis. We miss the cold war so much.
|
On March 01 2014 09:44 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis. Might have to do with the opinion that putin would not hesitate for a second to use his arsenal if needed. You mean the very same conventional arsenal that US has been pulling out on Middle Eastern affairs for past decades or so? Fair enough.
|
No, he means nukes; even Russia can't even come close to the US's conventional arsenal.
|
On March 01 2014 09:48 zeonmx wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:44 m4ini wrote:People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis. Might have to do with the opinion that putin would not hesitate for a second to use his arsenal if needed. You mean the very same conventional arsenal that US has been pulling out on Middle Eastern affairs for past decades or so? Fair enough.
We both know that i wasn't talking about that. What i do know is that my personal enviroment wasn't talking about nuclear wars every time the US went ham on something (stupidity etc, hipocrisis, lies, yes, but not nuclear threats). With russia they do, for the simple fact that even bush seemed alot more reasonable than putin.
|
On March 01 2014 09:45 Godwrath wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:37 zeonmx wrote:On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? People were talking about "nuclear war" when Russia invaded Gergia, too. People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis. We miss the cold war so much. Whenever the word Russia comes up on this forum, we turn into the comment section of a fox news article. Not even kidding.
|
On March 01 2014 09:57 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:45 Godwrath wrote:On March 01 2014 09:37 zeonmx wrote:On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? People were talking about "nuclear war" when Russia invaded Gergia, too. People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis. We miss the cold war so much. Whenever the word Russia comes up on this forum, we turn into the comment section of a fox news article. Not even kidding. Pretty sure you had made your part back there.
|
On March 01 2014 09:35 cSc.Dav1oN wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:32 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? come on, i was following the discussion and it ended by talking about a possible nuclear war, i didn't come from nowhere with that btw i won't lie to you that i laughed a bit with the invading things Nuclear war cause of 3rd world country in a middle of Europe with broken economy and industry? Only in Hollywood movie it can happen. THIS country is just the EDJE between West and Russia :D
Meanwhile in 1914...
|
On March 01 2014 09:37 zeonmx wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? People were talking about "nuclear war" when Russia invaded Georgia, too. People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis.
Kinda makes me wish I could read 13 or more languages to see if other nations media say the same thing about the USA when they start a war.
|
On March 01 2014 10:08 Orcasgt24 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 09:37 zeonmx wrote:On March 01 2014 07:44 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 06:50 Makro wrote:On March 01 2014 05:29 mijagi182 wrote:On March 01 2014 01:53 Makro wrote: starting a nuclear war for ukraine (no offense) seems to be highly over exagerated, i don't think leaders (more, their advisor) are that stupid this is probably a resonable stance, but given your location it gets kind of familiar  ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Die_for_Danzig?well, we all know how it ended back then. throwing things randomly like this without taking the historical context is a cheap move from you and i think throwing "nuclear war" at this point was... well, lets say premature. tbh i am more interested in where you put the line, when starting it would be ok. Like russians invading Paris or what? People were talking about "nuclear war" when Russia invaded Georgia, too. People just loves to bring out the words "nuclear war" in every Russia-related military/incidents/crisis. Kinda makes me wish I could read 13 or more languages to see if other nations media say the same thing about the USA when they start a war.
In germany they don't. They sometimes fear some other country interfering with nukes when the US goes ham again, but it was afaik never about the US actively nuking something. Not that the outcome would be different, it's just about that the consens is that the US would defend themselves or counterstrike, but not be the aggressor with nukes.
|
|
|
|
|