|
On January 20 2013 14:08 GhostLink wrote:
This is interesting. By saying there are no limits, one would be limiting themselves to that statement. There are no absolutes goes the same way. Everything is relative? Not the previous statement. It's a simple logical paradox that will just go round and round in circles.
In reality, it's impossible to break a limit without limiting yourself, resign all absolutes without creating one.
Then of course I'm limiting myself with this opinion, but there is no way around it.
So, most philosophers have adapted a slightly different statement "There is but one absolute: there are no absolutes".
But then again it's the same thing, so who cares?
lol that was great, thanks for posting.
|
On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about.
It has no topic, think of it as a thread to improvise your freedom of thought. Think with your instinct.
|
This thread has changed my life
|
On January 20 2013 14:12 ECHOZs wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It has no topic, think of it as a thread to improvise your freedom of thought. Think with your instinct.
In other words, go Stevie Wonder style and figure out what you really think.
Edit: And yes, that includes the head bobbing and shades.
|
On January 20 2013 14:13 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:12 ECHOZs wrote:On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It has no topic, think of it as a thread to improvise your freedom of thought. Think with your instinct. In other words, go Stevie Wonder style and figure out what you really think. Edit: And yes, that includes the head bobbing and shades.
Haha yes, the most important thing imo is being honest and genuine. When you are honest and do what you love you don't need to remember anything.
|
On January 20 2013 14:13 MountainDewJunkie wrote:
This thread has changed my life
Its changed mine 6 days ago, welcome to the club, but remember not to limit yourself :D
|
On January 20 2013 14:10 ECHOZs wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:07 sam!zdat wrote:On January 20 2013 14:04 ECHOZs wrote:On January 20 2013 14:01 sam!zdat wrote:On January 20 2013 13:59 ECHOZs wrote:On January 20 2013 13:58 sam!zdat wrote:
Just wait until he discovers hegel... hegel......Go on you're gonna love hegel. I don't want to give you any spoilers Are there such things as absolutes? The Absolute is not a Thing. At least I don't think so. Exactly, that is how I see it. It depends on every individual, every piece of matter, every thing is independent, but it is also self reliant.
Hmm, well I was reading about this today but I didn't really understand it. It's like, the Thing is in-itself, but it is also for-itself, but the for-itself is reflected back into the in-itself. Or something. No clue, to be honest.
What are differences between individuals and groups?
good question 
|
Now since some people are starting to see things from a new perspective shall the real fun begin?
|
On January 20 2013 14:00 docvoc wrote:
What kind of existentialist bs is this. I thought these theories of philosophy were discarded a while ago as they didn't lead to any form of real argument and were just self-fulfilling, self-serving prophecies about how nothing has limits or how no one really controls anything.
This isn't existentialism and existentialism isn't gibberish. Further, existentialism still has limits. Existentialism argues at the core that existence precedes essence (which goes contrary to most of the rest of the history of philosophy which assumes otherwise).
|
I, on the other hand, argue that precedence essentially exists!
|
On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about.
It's old-school trolling. The modern style is to try to get a reaction by randomly insulting people. It's extremely effective but unfortunately gets shut down too fast by mods.
The classical style is to post something that's mostly, but not completely gibberish while engaging in conversations where your partner is never quite certain if you're being serious or not.
|
Facilitate don't dictate, what do you think this means?
|
On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about.
That's because the majority of this thread makes no sense at all and is just a heap of pseudo-intellectual rubbish.
|
On January 20 2013 14:23 hypercube wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It's old-school trolling. The modern style is to try to get a reaction by randomly insulting people. It's extremely effective but unfortunately gets shut down too fast by mods. The classical style is to post something that's mostly, but not completely gibberish while engaging in conversations where your partner is never quite certain if you're being serious or not.
You are limiting yourself lol. What does it matter if I'm serious or not? Read the thread and analyze my posts and you will find a complete pattern of consistency.
|
On January 20 2013 14:23 hypercube wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It's old-school trolling. The modern style is to try to get a reaction by randomly insulting people. It's extremely effective but unfortunately gets shut down too fast by mods. The classical style is to post something that's mostly, but not completely gibberish while engaging in conversations where your partner is never quite certain if you're being serious or not.
Well-said and well-spotted, living up to your name good sir hahaha :D
|
On January 20 2013 14:23 hypercube wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It's old-school trolling. The modern style is to try to get a reaction by randomly insulting people. It's extremely effective but unfortunately gets shut down too fast by mods. The classical style is to post something that's mostly, but not completely gibberish while engaging in conversations where your partner is never quite certain if you're being serious or not.
You're just not thinking outside the box, man
|
On January 20 2013 14:27 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:23 hypercube wrote:On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It's old-school trolling. The modern style is to try to get a reaction by randomly insulting people. It's extremely effective but unfortunately gets shut down too fast by mods. The classical style is to post something that's mostly, but not completely gibberish while engaging in conversations where your partner is never quite certain if you're being serious or not. You're just not thinking outside the box, man
Exactly, to truly see outside the box you must look inside.
|
On January 20 2013 14:29 ECHOZs wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:27 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On January 20 2013 14:23 hypercube wrote:On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It's old-school trolling. The modern style is to try to get a reaction by randomly insulting people. It's extremely effective but unfortunately gets shut down too fast by mods. The classical style is to post something that's mostly, but not completely gibberish while engaging in conversations where your partner is never quite certain if you're being serious or not. You're just not thinking outside the box, man Exactly, to truly see outside the box you must look inside.
LOL
|
On January 20 2013 14:26 ECHOZs wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2013 14:23 hypercube wrote:On January 20 2013 14:09 Shana wrote:
What the fuck are you guys talking about? I read all 9 pages twice and I'm still confused as what the hell this thread about. It's old-school trolling. The modern style is to try to get a reaction by randomly insulting people. It's extremely effective but unfortunately gets shut down too fast by mods. The classical style is to post something that's mostly, but not completely gibberish while engaging in conversations where your partner is never quite certain if you're being serious or not. Read the thread and analyze my posts and you will find a complete pattern of consistency.
It's true.
|
I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq. I cannot dunk on shaq.
I CAN DUNK ON SHAQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nope didn't work. t.t
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
