• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:32
CEST 13:32
KST 20:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence2Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups1WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments0SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion Playing StarCraft as 2 people on the same network [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group C [ASL20] Ro16 Group B [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! Is there English video for group selection for ASL
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1249 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7840

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7838 7839 7840 7841 7842 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
June 12 2017 17:12 GMT
#156781
On June 13 2017 02:05 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2017 02:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:54 Lmui wrote:
Up here in Vancouver which is currently an incredibly expensive place to live thanks to the influx of foreign money, this is what the city is doing to ensure affordability:

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/vancouver-approves-20-64-living-wage-for-all-staff-1.3083830

We're pretty closely aligned culturally to Portland, so this is something which Portland could do as well.

There's a lot of employers which pay between minimum wage and living wages.
About 5 years back, when I was a student, I worked as a cashier at Home Depot. It paid pretty well when I started ($8 min wage, $10 hourly) but by the time I left, I was making $10.50 I think when the min. wage got raised up to $10. Tracking the amount of people who're making anything from min-wage to min-wage +$2 would be good in order to get a reference for how many people are "stuck" at a below-poverty line wage.


Portland is really against living wage because people like to demonize "burger flippers". We are really bad about needing to look down on other people in order to feel good about ourselves.

What happened to the quite dignity of going to work every day and just making your way through the world? Apparently Portland lives up to most of the expectations the TV show set for it. They call themselves far left leaning, but then demonize working people. Sigh.


I wouldn't say it is any worse than anywhere else. All over the country, people making $15-$20/hour feel threatened by the idea that someone working in fast food would make as much as them.


however the PNW (present company excluded) do a good job of pretending they're better than the rest of the country.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
chocorush
Profile Joined June 2009
694 Posts
June 12 2017 17:13 GMT
#156782
To be fair, people are willing to work for relatively bad wages to reap the convenience of living in the city. They need the city more than the city needs them, so wages can be pushed below what we consider livable standards.

Relocating to areas with more affordable economies is much lower than the decades long gone that we like to compare our living standards to, and that is a conscious choice people are making that results in them having less relative wealth.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-12 17:21:33
June 12 2017 17:15 GMT
#156783
On June 13 2017 02:08 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2017 01:54 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:40 xDaunt wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:33 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:26 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
President Trump’s private lawyer Marc Kasowitz has advised White House staffers—who are not his clients—not to retain their own lawyers, according to the New York Times. Kasowitz has also reportedly broken the long-standing protocol that presidents’ private attorneys operate through the White House Counsel’s office and don’t engage directly with other government employees whom they do not represent. These guidelines exist to make sure the staffers understand their rights and do not feel pressured to cooperate with their bosses’ private counsel. Kasowitz’s spokesperson told the Times these claims are “inaccurate” but refused to comment further.

As former White House attorneys have explained to TPM, Kasowitz is tasked with defending Trump personally, a job that inevitably conflicts with what is best for the White House as an institution.

But if Kasowitz did indeed tell White House staff not to retain their own lawyers, that presents additional problems. Those staffers may be interviewed in the coming months by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, possible collusion with the Trump campaign, and any administration attempts to quash the federal inquiries.

Former White House counsel Robert Bauer warned that Kasowitz’s conversations “could be interpreted as an act of obstruction, a means of dissuading the witnesses from cooperating in the investigation.”

Telling the staffers not to retain their own counsel is also to Kasowitz’s advantage, making it easier for him to interview them as he builds his defense for Trump without having to go through a pack of lawyers each time.


Source

I work at a low power law firm that does a lot of meat and potatoes legal work. Nothing crazy. My first day I was told to never ever tell anyone they do not need or should not get their own lawyer. What is that man doing in the White House? Why is he talking to staffers?

I highly doubt that whatever Kasowitz said is being reported accurately by the NYT.

Considering his inexperience in this area of law, I wouldn't be surprised. Several outsets are also reporting he wants to set up an office within the White House. If he did that, he would be interacting with potential witnesses on a daily basis. And if any of the staff hired an attorney, he and his staff wouldn't be allowed to speak with them at all. The man is out of his league.

How is he inexperienced in this area of law and out of his league? He's a high-powered litigator. He knows all of this stuff. Given the above and the less than pristine record of media outlets reporting this stuff, I think that the simplest explanation is that the reporting is wrong.

He is a high powered litigators in the business field. Not criminal law and not goverment institutions. I know what happened when lawyers dive head long into an field they have not practiced. And to be frank, I am going to take the credibility of the NYT over Trump and his attorney. And all of the lawyers quoted in the piece too, all whom equally credentialed.

On June 13 2017 02:05 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2017 02:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:54 Lmui wrote:
Up here in Vancouver which is currently an incredibly expensive place to live thanks to the influx of foreign money, this is what the city is doing to ensure affordability:

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/vancouver-approves-20-64-living-wage-for-all-staff-1.3083830

We're pretty closely aligned culturally to Portland, so this is something which Portland could do as well.

There's a lot of employers which pay between minimum wage and living wages.
About 5 years back, when I was a student, I worked as a cashier at Home Depot. It paid pretty well when I started ($8 min wage, $10 hourly) but by the time I left, I was making $10.50 I think when the min. wage got raised up to $10. Tracking the amount of people who're making anything from min-wage to min-wage +$2 would be good in order to get a reference for how many people are "stuck" at a below-poverty line wage.


Portland is really against living wage because people like to demonize "burger flippers". We are really bad about needing to look down on other people in order to feel good about ourselves.

What happened to the quite dignity of going to work every day and just making your way through the world? Apparently Portland lives up to most of the expectations the TV show set for it. They call themselves far left leaning, but then demonize working people. Sigh.


I wouldn't say it is any worse than anywhere else. All over the country, people making $15-$20/hour feel threatened by the idea that someone working in fast food would make as much as them.

I live in the of those bastions of "liberal" thinking and policy. It is the same shit. People are all about left leaning ideas right up until someone picking up garbage might be paid $25 an hour(Boston wages).
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
June 12 2017 17:21 GMT
#156784
speaking of top legal minds

The U.S. government has asked the Supreme Court to step in and make a ruling on the revised travel ban. The 9th Circuit’s decision is the latest legal loss for President Trump’s travel ban, which tried to temporarily shut down the U.S. refugee program and suspend the issuance of new visas to residents of six Muslim-majority countries.


WaPo
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-12 17:22:26
June 12 2017 17:22 GMT
#156785
Any chance Trump just fires deputy AG and Mueller? I think this move while politically unpopular could save him from impeachment down the line.
Question.?
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
June 12 2017 17:24 GMT
#156786
On June 13 2017 02:22 biology]major wrote:
Any chance Trump just fires deputy AG and Mueller? I think this move while politically unpopular could save him from impeachment down the line.


it wouldn't be a good idea to go full watergate, but i wouldn't put it past trump to conduct his very own version of the saturday night massacre
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
June 12 2017 17:25 GMT
#156787
On June 13 2017 02:22 biology]major wrote:
Any chance Trump just fires deputy AG and Mueller? I think this move while politically unpopular could save him from impeachment down the line.

Am I missing something? Because adding to the fire he started by firing the person investigating him sounds like an awful idea.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 12 2017 17:25 GMT
#156788
On June 13 2017 02:22 biology]major wrote:
Any chance Trump just fires deputy AG and Mueller? I think this move while politically unpopular could save him from impeachment down the line.

I wouldn't put it past trump; not sure it'd help him though. Mueller's reputation is buying trump time; otherwise the heat would be on him even more. Firing Mueller would risk a very severe and immediate backlash.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18832 Posts
June 12 2017 17:26 GMT
#156789
Since there's no statute on point any longer, the circumstances under which a special prosecutor can be fired are unclear, though the existing DoJ regulation suggests that some kind of good cause is required.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 12 2017 17:41 GMT
#156790
On June 13 2017 02:15 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2017 02:08 xDaunt wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:54 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:40 xDaunt wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:33 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:26 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
President Trump’s private lawyer Marc Kasowitz has advised White House staffers—who are not his clients—not to retain their own lawyers, according to the New York Times. Kasowitz has also reportedly broken the long-standing protocol that presidents’ private attorneys operate through the White House Counsel’s office and don’t engage directly with other government employees whom they do not represent. These guidelines exist to make sure the staffers understand their rights and do not feel pressured to cooperate with their bosses’ private counsel. Kasowitz’s spokesperson told the Times these claims are “inaccurate” but refused to comment further.

As former White House attorneys have explained to TPM, Kasowitz is tasked with defending Trump personally, a job that inevitably conflicts with what is best for the White House as an institution.

But if Kasowitz did indeed tell White House staff not to retain their own lawyers, that presents additional problems. Those staffers may be interviewed in the coming months by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, possible collusion with the Trump campaign, and any administration attempts to quash the federal inquiries.

Former White House counsel Robert Bauer warned that Kasowitz’s conversations “could be interpreted as an act of obstruction, a means of dissuading the witnesses from cooperating in the investigation.”

Telling the staffers not to retain their own counsel is also to Kasowitz’s advantage, making it easier for him to interview them as he builds his defense for Trump without having to go through a pack of lawyers each time.


Source

I work at a low power law firm that does a lot of meat and potatoes legal work. Nothing crazy. My first day I was told to never ever tell anyone they do not need or should not get their own lawyer. What is that man doing in the White House? Why is he talking to staffers?

I highly doubt that whatever Kasowitz said is being reported accurately by the NYT.

Considering his inexperience in this area of law, I wouldn't be surprised. Several outsets are also reporting he wants to set up an office within the White House. If he did that, he would be interacting with potential witnesses on a daily basis. And if any of the staff hired an attorney, he and his staff wouldn't be allowed to speak with them at all. The man is out of his league.

How is he inexperienced in this area of law and out of his league? He's a high-powered litigator. He knows all of this stuff. Given the above and the less than pristine record of media outlets reporting this stuff, I think that the simplest explanation is that the reporting is wrong.

He is a high powered litigators in the business field. Not criminal law and not goverment institutions. I know what happened when lawyers dive head long into an field they have not practiced. And to be frank, I am going to take the credibility of the NYT over Trump and his attorney. And all of the lawyers quoted in the piece too, all whom equally credentialed.

The ethical rules that are at issue here apply equally to civil and criminal litigators. That he may do predominantly civil work is irrelevant. Both types of lawyers should know what their obligations are. And what the other lawyers say in the piece doesn't really matter either because they don't know any more about the key factual issue than the NYT does: what Kasowitz actually told staffers. Attorney advisements are never one-liners. I have no doubt that there's a lot more that he said that is not being reported.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35159 Posts
June 12 2017 17:48 GMT
#156791
I remember watching a video a few years back about a portion of London that got gentrified, but then nobody wanted to move into the area. So all the people that got priced out of their own neighborhood just came back and squatted in the McMansions. I'd love to hear the outrage if something like that happened here.
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-12 17:53:03
June 12 2017 17:49 GMT
#156792
I dunno. Kasowitz didn't proofread his official press statement after letting Trump reshuffle it and also submitted a very unusual request to the Justice Department that Comey's releasing the memos to the press should be investigated as illegal. This is all concrete stuff that clearly illustrates at the bare minimum some frazzling and little experience with this area of law.

He's also the guy that threatened to the sue the NYT over publishing the sexual assault allegations and totally ran away with his tail between his legs.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-12 17:54:39
June 12 2017 17:54 GMT
#156793
Wtf...



"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 12 2017 17:55 GMT
#156794
On June 13 2017 02:41 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2017 02:15 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 02:08 xDaunt wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:54 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:40 xDaunt wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:33 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2017 01:26 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
President Trump’s private lawyer Marc Kasowitz has advised White House staffers—who are not his clients—not to retain their own lawyers, according to the New York Times. Kasowitz has also reportedly broken the long-standing protocol that presidents’ private attorneys operate through the White House Counsel’s office and don’t engage directly with other government employees whom they do not represent. These guidelines exist to make sure the staffers understand their rights and do not feel pressured to cooperate with their bosses’ private counsel. Kasowitz’s spokesperson told the Times these claims are “inaccurate” but refused to comment further.

As former White House attorneys have explained to TPM, Kasowitz is tasked with defending Trump personally, a job that inevitably conflicts with what is best for the White House as an institution.

But if Kasowitz did indeed tell White House staff not to retain their own lawyers, that presents additional problems. Those staffers may be interviewed in the coming months by special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, possible collusion with the Trump campaign, and any administration attempts to quash the federal inquiries.

Former White House counsel Robert Bauer warned that Kasowitz’s conversations “could be interpreted as an act of obstruction, a means of dissuading the witnesses from cooperating in the investigation.”

Telling the staffers not to retain their own counsel is also to Kasowitz’s advantage, making it easier for him to interview them as he builds his defense for Trump without having to go through a pack of lawyers each time.


Source

I work at a low power law firm that does a lot of meat and potatoes legal work. Nothing crazy. My first day I was told to never ever tell anyone they do not need or should not get their own lawyer. What is that man doing in the White House? Why is he talking to staffers?

I highly doubt that whatever Kasowitz said is being reported accurately by the NYT.

Considering his inexperience in this area of law, I wouldn't be surprised. Several outsets are also reporting he wants to set up an office within the White House. If he did that, he would be interacting with potential witnesses on a daily basis. And if any of the staff hired an attorney, he and his staff wouldn't be allowed to speak with them at all. The man is out of his league.

How is he inexperienced in this area of law and out of his league? He's a high-powered litigator. He knows all of this stuff. Given the above and the less than pristine record of media outlets reporting this stuff, I think that the simplest explanation is that the reporting is wrong.

He is a high powered litigators in the business field. Not criminal law and not goverment institutions. I know what happened when lawyers dive head long into an field they have not practiced. And to be frank, I am going to take the credibility of the NYT over Trump and his attorney. And all of the lawyers quoted in the piece too, all whom equally credentialed.

The ethical rules that are at issue here apply equally to civil and criminal litigators. That he may do predominantly civil work is irrelevant. Both types of lawyers should know what their obligations are. And what the other lawyers say in the piece doesn't really matter either because they don't know any more about the key factual issue than the NYT does: what Kasowitz actually told staffers. Attorney advisements are never one-liners. I have no doubt that there's a lot more that he said that is not being reported.

I understand everything you are saying. This simply comes down a difference of who each of us trust more, the NYT reporters or Trump’s counsel to act as a responsible, ethical attorney. Which is fine, you have always expressed a pretty low opinion of the NYT's reporting.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
June 12 2017 17:55 GMT
#156795
On June 13 2017 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2017 01:54 Lmui wrote:
Up here in Vancouver which is currently an incredibly expensive place to live thanks to the influx of foreign money, this is what the city is doing to ensure affordability:

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/vancouver-approves-20-64-living-wage-for-all-staff-1.3083830

We're pretty closely aligned culturally to Portland, so this is something which Portland could do as well.

There's a lot of employers which pay between minimum wage and living wages.
About 5 years back, when I was a student, I worked as a cashier at Home Depot. It paid pretty well when I started ($8 min wage, $10 hourly) but by the time I left, I was making $10.50 I think when the min. wage got raised up to $10. Tracking the amount of people who're making anything from min-wage to min-wage +$2 would be good in order to get a reference for how many people are "stuck" at a below-poverty line wage.


Portland is really against living wage because people like to demonize "burger flippers". We are really bad about needing to look down on other people in order to feel good about ourselves.

Amen.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 12 2017 17:56 GMT
#156796
On June 13 2017 02:49 TheTenthDoc wrote:
I dunno. Kasowitz didn't proofread his official press statement after letting Trump reshuffle it and also submitted a very unusual request to the Justice Department that Comey's releasing the memos to the press should be investigated as illegal. This is all concrete stuff that clearly illustrates at the bare minimum some frazzling and little experience with this area of law.

Like I've already said, this issue has nothing to do with whether Kasowitz has practiced in criminal or governmental law. The issue is one of attorney ethics, which apply universally to all attorneys. For this reason, I know what the rules are even though I don't have a criminal law practice.

Also, take another look at the TPM article and the NYT article. Here's what the NYT article says:

He told aides gathered in one meeting who had asked whether it was time to hire private lawyers that it was not yet necessary, according to another person with direct knowledge.


And here's what TPM says:

President Trump’s private lawyer Marc Kasowitz has advised White House staffers—who are not his clients—not to retain their own lawyers, according to the New York Times.


As an attorney, I'll tell you that those are two very, very different statements. This looks like TPM creating fake news to me.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
June 12 2017 18:01 GMT
#156797
On June 13 2017 02:49 TheTenthDoc wrote:
I dunno. Kasowitz didn't proofread his official press statement after letting Trump reshuffle it and also submitted a very unusual request to the Justice Department that Comey's releasing the memos to the press should be investigated as illegal. This is all concrete stuff that clearly illustrates at the bare minimum some frazzling and little experience with this area of law.

He's also the guy that threatened to the sue the NYT over publishing the sexual assault allegations and totally ran away with his tail between his legs.


pretty sure kasowitz will just file whatever trump tells him to file and say whatever trump tells him to say. it may not be legal best practice, but he knows where the money is coming from and how to keep it coming.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
June 12 2017 18:02 GMT
#156798
On June 13 2017 02:54 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Wtf...

https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/874293744442408960

https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/874297130164289536

It's the only way the manchild will be able to actually get anything done, has to puff himself up first.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-12 18:04:39
June 12 2017 18:03 GMT
#156799
On June 13 2017 03:01 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2017 02:49 TheTenthDoc wrote:
I dunno. Kasowitz didn't proofread his official press statement after letting Trump reshuffle it and also submitted a very unusual request to the Justice Department that Comey's releasing the memos to the press should be investigated as illegal. This is all concrete stuff that clearly illustrates at the bare minimum some frazzling and little experience with this area of law.

He's also the guy that threatened to the sue the NYT over publishing the sexual assault allegations and totally ran away with his tail between his legs.


pretty sure kasowitz will just file whatever trump tells him to file and say whatever trump tells him to say. it may not be legal best practice, but he knows where the money is coming from and how to keep it coming.

Attorneys have a duty to zealously advocate the interests of their clients. Whether an attorney loses or wins a case, in and of itself, has nothing to do with the quality of the attorney.

On June 13 2017 03:04 Mohdoo wrote:
Does Kasowitz have much to lose by just doing what Trump tells him to do? So long as he is never blamed for things going wrong, seems like a good way to be incredibly wealthy.


Exactly.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15712 Posts
June 12 2017 18:04 GMT
#156800
Does Kasowitz have much to lose by just doing what Trump tells him to do? So long as he is never blamed for things going wrong, seems like a good way to be incredibly wealthy.
Prev 1 7838 7839 7840 7841 7842 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
Mondays #51
WardiTV207
Harstem188
OGKoka 152
Rex86
CranKy Ducklings63
LiquipediaDiscussion
Afreeca Starleague
10:00
Ro16 Group C
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Afreeca ASL 14597
sctven
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 188
OGKoka 163
Lowko103
Rex 86
ProTech74
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 10866
Bisu 5156
Rain 4858
Flash 3002
Sea 2072
BeSt 1407
EffOrt 726
actioN 584
Hyun 463
Stork 341
[ Show more ]
Zeus 286
firebathero 188
Hyuk 183
ZerO 172
Nal_rA 141
Soulkey 139
ggaemo 133
Mong 96
Mind 94
Pusan 86
JYJ78
Rush 78
Liquid`Ret 74
Barracks 51
PianO 49
Aegong 44
Movie 39
yabsab 31
Icarus 20
Terrorterran 17
SilentControl 15
Noble 13
soO 12
Sea.KH 12
sSak 12
Bale 9
Hm[arnc] 8
Sacsri 8
Dota 2
singsing2278
Dendi267
BananaSlamJamma233
Fuzer 137
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1484
x6flipin545
shoxiejesuss487
byalli167
Super Smash Bros
Westballz6
Other Games
B2W.Neo436
crisheroes314
XaKoH 177
NeuroSwarm49
Mew2King45
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 337
lovetv 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 41
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota229
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
4h 28m
OSC
12h 28m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
22h 28m
Afreeca Starleague
22h 28m
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
PiGosaur Monday
1d 12h
LiuLi Cup
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Online Event
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.