EPTOn June 12 2017 08:14 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
20 percent voter turnout and like 80 percent approved. so basically 18 percent of country voted and everyone else stayed home.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7836
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
20 percent voter turnout and like 80 percent approved. so basically 18 percent of country voted and everyone else stayed home. | ||
KwarK
United States43219 Posts
On June 12 2017 08:24 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: 20 percent voter turnout and like 80 percent approved. so basically 18 percent of country voted and everyone else stayed home. Would you turnout for a non binding vote where you know it's going to be a landslide? | ||
|
Zambrah
United States7384 Posts
On June 12 2017 08:24 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: 20 percent voter turnout and like 80 percent approved. so basically 18 percent of country voted and everyone else stayed home. Sounds like they'll fit in just fine. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
from the nbc article on it Puerto Rico historically has had high turnout in most elections. This one was unusually low. In the last plebiscite held in 2012, more than 1.9 million voted, and 800,000 chose statehood. In 1993, nearly 2 million Puerto Ricans voted. the island's other two main political parties had pushed for a boycott of the plebiscite, and it showed in the turnout numbers. About 1.3 percent voted for the current commonwealth status and about 1.5 percent voted for independence. compared to 500,000 people voting in total this time. 97 percent for 23 percent turnout. If turnouts different it's because there was a decision to not vote if you were planning on rejecting. but yeah nothing is going to come from this. GOP doesn't want more democrats in congress, same reason why DC still also has taxation without representation. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On June 12 2017 08:56 zlefin wrote: I'd say the DC situation is a bit different and more complicated than the puerto rico situation; since I'm not sure you can change the DC situation without an amendment. I'm not an expert but regardless the GOP has no desire to put any effort into either which makes things more difficult | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On June 12 2017 08:14 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/AP/status/874020406159712256 What you do when you're bankrupt but remember the federal government still has cash (so to speak). | ||
|
KwarK
United States43219 Posts
On June 12 2017 10:18 Danglars wrote: What you do when you're bankrupt but remember the federal government still has cash (so to speak). They're bankrupt because the Federal Government changed the tax advantaged status of the island to push all of the pharmaceutical companies out. https://taxfoundation.org/tax-policy-helped-create-puerto-rico-s-fiscal-crisis/ | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On June 12 2017 11:06 Plansix wrote: Can puerto-rico even sustaine an economy that can support a US standard of living on its own? Tourism only goes so far. Tax breaks seems like the only way it could create a non tourism economy. no it cannot; it's typical wages are simply too far below the standards of the rest of the US. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35162 Posts
On June 12 2017 11:06 Plansix wrote: Can puerto-rico even sustaine an economy that can support a US standard of living on its own? Tourism only goes so far. Tax breaks seems like the only way it could create a non tourism economy. Does the US even support it's own standard of living? | ||
|
Howie_Dewitt
United States1416 Posts
On June 12 2017 20:07 Gahlo wrote: Does the US even support it's own standard of living? Of course not. That's why there are a bunch of angry people. The minimum wage is enough to barely get by on if you work your ass off and take every bit of overtime and get as many part-time jobs as possible, but it's not nearly enough to live on. Those people are stuck in those jobs, and are forced to put their children into situations that lead to the same life that they had; upward mobility is impossible because the children of those workers are funneled into garbage public school systems and are essentially trained to accept what their parents got as an okay standard of living. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
This is a good assessment of Russian influence over the election. It was extra effective because some people were happy use it to help them. | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On June 12 2017 20:46 Howie_Dewitt wrote: Of course not. That's why there are a bunch of angry people. The minimum wage is enough to barely get by on if you work your ass off and take every bit of overtime and get as many part-time jobs as possible, but it's not nearly enough to live on. Those people are stuck in those jobs, and are forced to put their children into situations that lead to the same life that they had; upward mobility is impossible because the children of those workers are funneled into garbage public school systems and are essentially trained to accept what their parents got as an okay standard of living. You mean a minority of minimum wage earners get trapped in those jobs and don't just use them as their first job. It should be clear from the proportion of very young people in those jobs that take them and how few are making minimum wage a year later. Talk about corporate welfare and the minority that feel stuck, but don't be absurd about "those people are stuck" and "upward mobility is impossible" unless you're personally a politician running for office. We know from Trump that liars are tolerated. | ||
| ||
