|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead?
What's the point of you?
For a theory based on logic, I'd say the timing and location of this has more to do with UK's election.
And/Or the UK has arrested ~14 related to the Manchester attack, and the investigation spurred these remaining terrorists into action, before they were caught.
|
I'm pretty sure LegalLord was joking but who knows really 
|
On June 04 2017 09:11 Leporello wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? What's the point of you? For a theory based on logic, I'd say the timing and location of this has more to do with UK's election. And/Or the UK has arrested ~14 related to the Manchester attack, and the investigation spurred these remaining terrorists into action, before they were caught.
I think he's being sarcastic?
the serious answer is that US terrorism is almost entirely self radicalized people who have been here a while and I've yet to see any actual argument on to how that would be affected by who the president was (as far as I know there hasn't been any major policy changes or the like that would make one more likely to be caught before hand.)
|
On June 04 2017 09:11 Leporello wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? What's the point of you? For a theory based on logic, I'd say the timing and location of this has more to do with UK's election. And/Or the UK has arrested ~14 related to the Manchester attack, and the investigation spurred these remaining terrorists into action, before they were caught.
He seems to have bought into Trump's ideology, lock, stock and barrel, it's pretty sad. Why actually investigate the details of an incident when you can just take credit for it, and use it to push your agenda? At the very least it's what Trump himself is trying to do.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On June 04 2017 08:48 LegalLord wrote:
You know, since Trump took office we haven't had a terrorist attack on US soil. We must be doing something right.
Doesnt that rely on not defining non-muslim incidents as terrorism?
|
On June 04 2017 09:34 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 08:48 LegalLord wrote:
You know, since Trump took office we haven't had a terrorist attack on US soil. We must be doing something right. Doesnt that rely on not defining non-muslim incidents as terrorism?
Wiki suggests that it does. None of that radical Islamic terrorism though.
|
On June 04 2017 09:15 NewSunshine wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 09:11 Leporello wrote:On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? What's the point of you? For a theory based on logic, I'd say the timing and location of this has more to do with UK's election. And/Or the UK has arrested ~14 related to the Manchester attack, and the investigation spurred these remaining terrorists into action, before they were caught. He seems to have bought into Trump's ideology, lock, stock and barrel, it's pretty sad. Why actually investigate the details of an incident when you can just take credit for it, and use it to push your agenda? At the very least it's what Trump himself is trying to do.
No it doesn't seem that way.
|
|
|
On June 04 2017 09:15 NewSunshine wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 09:11 Leporello wrote:On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? What's the point of you? For a theory based on logic, I'd say the timing and location of this has more to do with UK's election. And/Or the UK has arrested ~14 related to the Manchester attack, and the investigation spurred these remaining terrorists into action, before they were caught. He seems to have bought into Trump's ideology, lock, stock and barrel, it's pretty sad. Why actually investigate the details of an incident when you can just take credit for it, and use it to push your agenda? At the very least it's what Trump himself is trying to do.
LL hasn't bought into anything. He has always been a Russian living in the US talking about how the west is ending and the glory of mother Russia and Putin.
|
On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead?
??? A new low.
|
On June 04 2017 10:04 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 09:15 NewSunshine wrote:On June 04 2017 09:11 Leporello wrote:On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? What's the point of you? For a theory based on logic, I'd say the timing and location of this has more to do with UK's election. And/Or the UK has arrested ~14 related to the Manchester attack, and the investigation spurred these remaining terrorists into action, before they were caught. He seems to have bought into Trump's ideology, lock, stock and barrel, it's pretty sad. Why actually investigate the details of an incident when you can just take credit for it, and use it to push your agenda? At the very least it's what Trump himself is trying to do. LL hasn't bought into anything. He has always been a Russian living in the US talking about how the west is ending and the glory of mother Russia and Putin.
And you're a paid US agent trying to spread their oppressive globalist capitalist propaganda in the Netherlands.
Edit: what I mean to say is, let the man have his opinions without attacking him on a personal level in a public forum.
|
On June 04 2017 10:05 Dangermousecatdog wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? ??? A new low.
You've never seen his "People fail to assimilate under soviet rule" posts.
|
How to lose a Supreme Court challenge in a single tweet:
|
It really is fascinating how Trump continues to fail to grasp that all of his communications can and will be used against him over and over in the judicial sphere, just because nobody called him on outright lying about his past statements during electoral season in Republican debates.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On June 04 2017 10:05 Dangermousecatdog wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? ??? A new low.
He's quite clearly joking, or so I thought? Maybe in poor taste but I do not think he's serious, it's very much in line with past remarks of irreverence on Trumpian accomplishments.
|
On June 04 2017 10:53 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2017 10:05 Dangermousecatdog wrote:On June 04 2017 09:07 LegalLord wrote:
Well maybe it was the idea of a ban that just scared em off and convinced them to go attack Europe instead? ??? A new low. He's quite clearly joking, or so I thought? Maybe in poor taste but I do not think he's serious, it's very much in line with past remarks of irreverence on Trumpian accomplishments.
I'd say in unacceptably poor taste; at any rate, this is why I prefer to require a /sarcasm label; as it's so hard to tell on the internet.
if you label it it's a lot clearer.
|
It also helps to be less Romanian considering that was a pretty easy one.
|
The first post seemed very unsarcastic.
|
|
|
Epic failure and ignorance. Wonder how the acting solicitor general geeks about this. Honestly I don't think they will even take the case at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
