The Hillary needing a village to write her jokes was one of the better ones, imo.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5737
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
![]()
Falling
Canada11272 Posts
The Hillary needing a village to write her jokes was one of the better ones, imo. | ||
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
| ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21354 Posts
On October 22 2016 18:51 LegalLord wrote: Trump was much cleverer and funnier in the primary season than in the general. He lost his touch somewhere along the way. Hes not winning, and despite the bubble he will have formed around himself of yes-men a little bit of reality tends to seep in to let him know that he is indeed not winning. His personality can't take that, puts him under stress and messes with his more relaxed 'creative' side. | ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
On October 22 2016 16:23 plasmidghost wrote: Reuters This is just one poll of course, but I'm legitimately surprised that he gained despite his rather poor debate performance. Other polls show him narrowing the gap a moderate amount, but I don't think he'll be able to get within 4 points on average before the election unless some huge campaign-ending information gets released. The stat I bolded is crazy, that means at least 3% of Americans (unless I can't math) believe he committed sexual assault and are voting for him. It doesn't meant 3% of Americans as in 3% of all Americans. It means 3% of whoever the hell they called. Media polls are usually off by pretty big margins. Sometimes it's deliberate yeah. But really it's who is picking up these unsolicited phone calls from a marketer who wants to ask some questions? They're not exactly the same as people who will vote in 17 days. | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4315 Posts
WikiLeaks poisons Hillary’s relationship with left After learning how Clinton feels about them, liberals vow to push back against her agenda and appointments. By Kenneth P. Vogel 10/21/16 05:05 AM EDT Liberal groups and activists are assembling opposition research-style dossiers of the most dismissive comments in the WikiLeaks emails about icons of their movement like Clinton’s Democratic primary rival Bernie Sanders, and their stances on trade, Wall Street reform, energy and climate change. And some liberal activists are vowing to use the email fodder to oppose Clinton policy proposals or appointments deemed insufficiently progressive. “We were already kind of suspicious of where Hillary’s instincts were, but now we see that she is who we thought she was,” said one influential liberal Democratic operative. “The honeymoon is going to be tight and small and maybe nonexistent,” the operative said. The emails, which also show Clinton praising Wall Street in a manner that’s discordant with her tough campaign rhetoric, have made many progressives less inclined to give Clinton the benefit of the doubt on nominees with more centrist backgrounds or ties to Wall Street, said the operative. “Some of the first fights that she is going to be dealing with are going to be personnel fights like about who she’s going to pick for Treasury, Securities and Exchange Commission, Education and Labor, and for regulatory agencies like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Federal Trade Commission. Progressives are going to be on guard.” The WikiLeaks revelations have not influenced the hierarchy around Clinton or her feelings about trusted advisers like Podesta, Sullivan and Tanden, according to a source close to the campaign. Podesta and Sullivan helped Clinton prep for Wednesday’s debate here and traveled aboard the campaign plane with her to the debate, while Tanden is still listed as a co-chair of Clinton’s transition team. But it could pose a major problem for Clinton’s efforts to fill out a transition team and a prospective administration if Sullivan, Tanden, Podesta or other close advisers became widely seen on the left as unwilling to work in good faith with the Democratic Party’s left flank, which largely aligned behind Sanders during his bitter Democratic primary campaign against Clinton. | ||
Biff The Understudy
France7805 Posts
On October 22 2016 12:44 oBlade wrote: He did quite well, if you go by all the people laughing. Only lost the crowd for the about 3 minutes when he was going for the jugular. Hillary didn't have the same kind of highs, whether because she had to go after or whatever reason. But nobody was thrown under any bus, it's a friendly fun dinner. He did quite well? He got fucking booed, it made the headlines in the whole world. Hey, here is an exercise for you : see if you can spot the difference: I don't want it getting out of this room but my opponent is an impressive fellow in many ways. Political opponents can have a little trouble seeing the best in each other. But I have had a few glimpses of this man at his best. And I admire his great skill, energy, and determination. It's not for nothing that he has inspired so many folks in his own party and beyond. Senator Obama talks about making history and he has made quite a bit of it already. There was a time when the mere invitation of an African-American citizen to dine at the White House was taken as an outrage and an insult in many corridors. and Hillary is so corrupt she got kicked off the Watergate Commission. How corrupt do you have to be to get kicked off the Watergate Commission? Pretty corrupt | ||
Biff The Understudy
France7805 Posts
On October 22 2016 20:20 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/wikileaks-hilary-clinton-progressives-230009 WikiLeaks poisons Hillary’s relationship with left After learning how Clinton feels about them, liberals vow to push back against her agenda and appointments. By Kenneth P. Vogel 10/21/16 05:05 AM EDT Berniebros being bitter. Wow. Now that's news. | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11926 Posts
On October 22 2016 20:01 Probe1 wrote: It doesn't meant 3% of Americans as in 3% of all Americans. It means 3% of whoever the hell they called. Media polls are usually off by pretty big margins. Sometimes it's deliberate yeah. But really it's who is picking up these unsolicited phone calls from a marketer who wants to ask some questions? They're not exactly the same as people who will vote in 17 days. This is going to be very simplistic because I'm not a statistician. If you call a sufficiently large amount of people, you can posit that it is representative of the population at large, assuming the sample you called isn't biased in a significant way. The law of large numbers allows you to do that. Generally those polls offer a margin of error for their results, specifically based on the fact that they don't call all americans. It is expected that the exact result may vary if you call more people. It is also expected that it won't change in a hugely significant way. Generally the margin of error is something around 5% of the result, tops. It's statistically wrong to dismiss those stats as being representative of "only the people who answered". You need a more precise argument than that to dismiss them. | ||
Biff The Understudy
France7805 Posts
Trump says the world hates Obama and that's why countries are turning on the US Always fun to compare Mr Fact Free and The Reality: ![]() Ooops | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43788 Posts
On October 22 2016 18:47 JinDesu wrote: The cringiest stuff was when they already started lightly booing his joke, then he says he doesn't know if they are angry at her or what, then he proceeds to tell a bunch of catholics that she probably hates catholics and get a full solid booing. Especially considering how many times Trump has flat-out lied about the importance of the Bible and religion in his life. I'm not religious but I'd facepalm every time he tried pandering to the religious right. He's an awful hypocrite. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43788 Posts
On October 22 2016 14:02 oBlade wrote: When someone uses the words "cringe" or "awkward" in my experience it's usually to blame someone else for own their emotional reaction. In your case anything Trump will be cringe, so we probably watched different videos. I can think of two past instances where I thought Trump was legitimately funny, and they were both when he didn't take himself seriously and decided to poke fun at himself. The first was at his CC Roast, at the end when he fired jokes back. The second was a parody clip where he bought a random woman's van and children because he didn't have time to wait for the valet to retrieve his car. But this speech was cringeworthy. | ||
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On October 22 2016 16:23 plasmidghost wrote: Reuters This is just one poll of course, but I'm legitimately surprised that he gained despite his rather poor debate performance. Other polls show him narrowing the gap a moderate amount, but I don't think he'll be able to get within 4 points on average before the election unless some huge campaign-ending information gets released. The stat I bolded is crazy, that means at least 3% of Americans (unless I can't math) believe he committed sexual assault and are voting for him. That poll only has one day post-debate performance (the 20th). Don't assume any changes in it have the slightest thing to do with the debate, it's more likely to be general tightening, regression to the mean, or just random error than be possibly attributable to the debate. | ||
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
On October 22 2016 20:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Especially considering how many times Trump has flat-out lied about the importance of the Bible and religion in his life. I'm not religious but I'd facepalm every time he tried pandering to the religious right. He's an awful hypocrite. I dearly hope that most American presidents lied about their belief in superstitions. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43788 Posts
On October 22 2016 22:11 a_flayer wrote: I dearly hope that most American presidents lied about their belief in superstitions. I wish, but unlikely. | ||
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
oBlade
United States5290 Posts
On October 22 2016 20:28 Biff The Understudy wrote: He did quite well? He got fucking booed, it made the headlines in the whole world. Hey, here is an exercise for you : see if you can spot the difference: and He also got laughs, applause, whistles, and cheers. You're caught in a vortex. It's a lighthearted dinner, not everything is the latest chapter in "lol Drumpf BTFO." | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On October 23 2016 01:17 oBlade wrote: your heart just isn't in this anymoreHe also got laughs, applause, whistles, and cheers. You're caught in a vortex. It's a lighthearted dinner, not everything is the latest chapter in "lol Drumpf BTFO." | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
https://www.thenation.com/article/what-i-really-told-project-veritas-so-called-reporters/ | ||
oBlade
United States5290 Posts
Must be too busy with my brain. | ||
| ||