|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On October 12 2016 01:49 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 01:41 Madkipz wrote:On October 12 2016 01:30 Gorsameth wrote:On October 12 2016 01:16 Plansix wrote: And now we watch the final stage of the story, where Bannon tries to destroy the GOP as best he can so he can soak up all the remaining supporters in some sort of xenophobic, populist party. I can’t say I am thrilled, since they have zero respect for government, the rule of law, civil rights or democracy as a whole.
But maybe Republicans will find footing and gain a spine. But that requires them standing with the Democrats. Sounds like the perfect situation to me. Bannon destroys the GOP. The nutters go to whatever Breitbart party he creates and the sane Republicans go back to doing their job. And the FPTP system helps to keep the nutters forever out of power. What more could you want? Those republicans will turncoat into democrats, and then you have a one party system. Except you don't because the democrats are a multiparty coalition that votes together once it decides a platform in order to defeat the other multiparty coalition they dislike more than they dislike each other. Take away the Republicans and the Democrats will fracture into two parties. There will always be two parties. We can dream where the entire goverment is fiscally conservative democrats and progressive democrats. We can dream.
|
the misinterpretations around the email leaks are actually hilarious
|
On October 12 2016 02:03 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 01:49 KwarK wrote:On October 12 2016 01:41 Madkipz wrote:On October 12 2016 01:30 Gorsameth wrote:On October 12 2016 01:16 Plansix wrote: And now we watch the final stage of the story, where Bannon tries to destroy the GOP as best he can so he can soak up all the remaining supporters in some sort of xenophobic, populist party. I can’t say I am thrilled, since they have zero respect for government, the rule of law, civil rights or democracy as a whole.
But maybe Republicans will find footing and gain a spine. But that requires them standing with the Democrats. Sounds like the perfect situation to me. Bannon destroys the GOP. The nutters go to whatever Breitbart party he creates and the sane Republicans go back to doing their job. And the FPTP system helps to keep the nutters forever out of power. What more could you want? Those republicans will turncoat into democrats, and then you have a one party system. Except you don't because the democrats are a multiparty coalition that votes together once it decides a platform in order to defeat the other multiparty coalition they dislike more than they dislike each other. Take away the Republicans and the Democrats will fracture into two parties. There will always be two parties. We can dream where the entire goverment is fiscally conservative democrats and progressive democrats. We can dream.
I'll be a real live independent undecided voter then! I'm excited at the prospect of voting for candidates from both parties.
|
The hot takes are endless and deeply stupid.
|
Trump trying to throw Arizona? Bold strategy Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
|
On October 12 2016 02:11 On_Slaught wrote: Trump trying to throw Arizona? Bold strategy Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
he's trying to murder suicide john mccain.
|
On October 12 2016 01:59 Dan HH wrote:lol, his staff should have changed his twitter password without telling him after the Machado thing and they'd have no more meltdowns on their hands Meltdown is really not an accurate way to describe a tweet.
|
On October 12 2016 02:11 On_Slaught wrote: Trump trying to throw Arizona? Bold strategy Cotton. Let's see if it pays off. Trump won the Arizona primary in a landslide even after he called McCain pathetic the first time around.
|
On October 12 2016 02:13 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 01:59 Dan HH wrote:lol, his staff should have changed his twitter password without telling him after the Machado thing and they'd have no more meltdowns on their hands Meltdown is really not an accurate way to describe a tweet. Subjective interpretations of an event are not bound by the confines of accuracy.
|
On October 12 2016 02:13 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 01:59 Dan HH wrote:lol, his staff should have changed his twitter password without telling him after the Machado thing and they'd have no more meltdowns on their hands Meltdown is really not an accurate way to describe a tweet. Yeah, I'm not describing a tweet
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On October 12 2016 02:14 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 02:13 oBlade wrote:On October 12 2016 01:59 Dan HH wrote:lol, his staff should have changed his twitter password without telling him after the Machado thing and they'd have no more meltdowns on their hands Meltdown is really not an accurate way to describe a tweet. Subjective interpretations of an event are not bound by the confines of accuracy. So your post was a meltdown, everything's equivalent, humans don't need to discuss things ever again.
|
On October 12 2016 02:16 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 02:14 Plansix wrote:On October 12 2016 02:13 oBlade wrote:On October 12 2016 01:59 Dan HH wrote:lol, his staff should have changed his twitter password without telling him after the Machado thing and they'd have no more meltdowns on their hands Meltdown is really not an accurate way to describe a tweet. Subjective interpretations of an event are not bound by the confines of accuracy. So your post was a meltdown, everything's equivalent, humans don't need to discuss things ever again. You got it son, I'm proud of you.
|
you know hes been attacking his own party all morning right? hes gonna bring everyone down with him lololol
|
I'm not sure if this is a civil war or a murder suicide at this point.
|
A reminder that rich Biff Tannen from Back to the Future 2 was based on Trump. In the 80s.
We were told this was coming. They just got the year wrong.
|
God this is even more beautiful than I could have possibly imagined.
|
On October 12 2016 02:19 PassiveAce wrote: you know hes been attacking his own party all morning right? hes gonna bring everyone down with him lololol People who have already been shitting on him, and he's also right.
|
On October 12 2016 01:47 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 01:46 RoomOfMush wrote:On October 12 2016 01:39 Plansix wrote: I am not excited about an offshoot party that is powered by pure xenophobia and conspiracy theories having any place level of popularity in the US goverment system. That is a scary thing to have on your doorstep, one charismatic leader away from power.
Of course, they will likely implode. But until then the discourse in this country will be garbage You could put all the bad people into camps. Concentrate them on one spot, you know? Maybe you can then find a final solution to your problem. This bait is low grade and pretty shit. One might call it a shit post. Actually it was a pretty good bait, come on ! Good one RoomOfMush.
Trump is really the funniest candidate ever.
|
I love the delusion that attacking the party that you joined somehow going to help him in any way. He is only proving everything Clinton has said to be true.
Edit: I still think we should call him Biff from now how. It all makes way more sense with time travel.
|
On October 12 2016 02:23 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2016 02:19 PassiveAce wrote: you know hes been attacking his own party all morning right? hes gonna bring everyone down with him lololol People who have already been shitting on him, and he's also right.
How would you say your thoughts on Trump have changed over the past year?
|
|
|
|