EPThttp://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Wikileak-Clinton-Told-Oil-Majors-Environmentalism-Is-Russian-Hoax.html
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5499
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4461 Posts
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Wikileak-Clinton-Told-Oil-Majors-Environmentalism-Is-Russian-Hoax.html | ||
|
farvacola
United States18872 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On October 11 2016 20:14 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Wikileaks : Clinton told oil majors environmentalism is "Russian Hoax". http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Wikileak-Clinton-Told-Oil-Majors-Environmentalism-Is-Russian-Hoax.html Do you even read the shit you post? “We were up against Russia pushing oligarchs and others to buy media. We were even up against phony environmental groups, and I’m a big environmentalist, but these were funded by the Russians to stand against any effort, oh that pipeline, that fracking, that whatever will be a problem for you, and a lot of the money supporting that message was coming from Russia,” Clinton allegedly said. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18487 Posts
On October 11 2016 20:14 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Wikileaks : Clinton told oil majors environmentalism is "Russian Hoax". http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Wikileak-Clinton-Told-Oil-Majors-Environmentalism-Is-Russian-Hoax.html I think you need to learn to read. That isn't what she said at all. Not that I like her support of fracking, but you can choose not to support that without having to lie about what she said. Anyway, I don't know why I am still responding to you. Go enjoy your swimming pool of gold, and leave us alone. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8216 Posts
On October 11 2016 18:04 zeo wrote: It was leftist nationalist populism in the 90's. I'm sure you think your personal attacks and buzzwords are convincing all of your American friends that they should continue living in a Plutocracy but reality is a bit different. You can't hide this level of corruption in the modern age, it will all come tumbling down sooner or later. All you need is someone that can't be bought out and is willing to take out the trash  Yeah, you sound like French ligueurs in the 1930's. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V1FFVWEQnSM I was going to ask you what exactly makes you believe that a man with more scandals than the whole of Washington politicians put together will "take out the trash" but don't bother. You like Trump for the reason every far right leader succeeds: because his machisto crap makes you believe he is the savior, the great providential man that will clean up some vague elites you resent. Seen that somewhere before. As for the "this guy is so rich he can't be bought" it's not only unbelievably dumb and naive in itself. It's also disproven in the most spectacular fashion in recent history by Berlisconi, who actually shares quite a few traits with your orange hero. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On October 11 2016 20:14 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Wikileaks : Clinton told oil majors environmentalism is "Russian Hoax". http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Wikileak-Clinton-Told-Oil-Majors-Environmentalism-Is-Russian-Hoax.html For the record, would you consider it to be a disqualifying factor about a candidate for president of the United States that they believe obviously false conspiracy theories about foreign governments perpetrating hoaxes? | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8216 Posts
On October 11 2016 20:14 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Wikileaks : Clinton told oil majors environmentalism is "Russian Hoax". http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Wikileak-Clinton-Told-Oil-Majors-Environmentalism-Is-Russian-Hoax.html Are you serious? | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8216 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18872 Posts
 | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4461 Posts
Why does your foundation keep accepting their money then Hill? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774 On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H" <hrod17@clintonemail.com> wrote: While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence >> assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and >> other radical Sunni groups in the region. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On October 11 2016 20:49 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Clinton admits in private emails that Saudi Arabia and Qatar governments help fund ISIL. Why does your foundation keep accepting their money then Hill? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774 On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H" <hrod17@clintonemail.com> wrote: I'm a little unclear on why it would be immoral to accept money which is to be directly put to charitable purposes, even if the source is distasteful. (If the money were directly stolen that would be different.) You also still haven't answered this: For the record, would you consider it to be a disqualifying factor about a candidate for president of the United States that they believe obviously false conspiracy theories about foreign governments perpetrating hoaxes? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18487 Posts
On October 11 2016 21:00 Aquanim wrote: I'm a little unclear on why it would be immoral to accept money which is to be directly put to charitable purposes, even if the source is distasteful. (If the money were directly stolen that would be different.) You also still haven't answered this: Why would that be a downside for nettles? He himself believes obviously false conspiracy theories about all manner of things. Presumably he'd cheer any president with a similarly tenuous grasp on the truth. All hail his most illustrious Trumpiness! | ||
|
farvacola
United States18872 Posts
| ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18487 Posts
On October 11 2016 21:21 farvacola wrote: Glenn Beck basically endorsed Hillary lol, hell hath frozen over. No. He just very emphatically did NOT endorse Trump (and considered voting for Clinton, but decided not to). He endorsed some random 3rd party candidate. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/glenn-beck-hillary-clinton_us_57fc695be4b0e655eab74351 | ||
|
farvacola
United States18872 Posts
| ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8216 Posts
On October 11 2016 20:49 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Clinton admits in private emails that Saudi Arabia and Qatar governments help fund ISIL. Why does your foundation keep accepting their money then Hill? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774 On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H" <hrod17@clintonemail.com> wrote: Hi, Do you know that Trump has not put a penny in his foundation since 2009 and that his foundation has spent millions of dollars given by oeople who thought they were doing charitable stuff in justice fee for trials of his that had nothing to do with said foundation? I would like to know what you think about it. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18487 Posts
| ||
|
LemOn
United Kingdom8629 Posts
| ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4461 Posts
On October 11 2016 21:36 Biff The Understudy wrote: Hi, Do you know that Trump has not put a penny in his foundation since 2009 and that his foundation has spent millions of dollars given by oeople who thought they were doing charitable stuff in justice fee for trials of his that had nothing to do with said foundation? I would like to know what you think about it. Unrelated. We're talking about Clinton herself stating Saudi and Qatar are funding ISIL yet the US continue to send weapons to Saudi, continue to count Saudi as an ally and Clinton allows Saudi to donate to her charity. Anyway wikileaks just released another 1,100 emails a few minutes ago. This is turning into a real nightmare for Clinton. | ||
| ||
