• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:30
CEST 08:30
KST 15:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week0[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation13$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation RSL Season 1 - Final Week The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Summer Games Done Quick 2025! US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 584 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5218

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5216 5217 5218 5219 5220 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
showstealer1829
Profile Blog Joined May 2014
Australia3123 Posts
September 27 2016 08:59 GMT
#104341
On September 27 2016 17:53 zeo wrote:
Seeing as how biased the moderator was Trump did fine, made both Clinton and the mod look like fools. Clinton got really desperate with her character assassination attempts and Trump just deflected with turning them into policy driven answers.

All in all Clinton has no chance against a non-biased moderator. Looking forward to the next debates.

edit: Not to mention Clinton wearing that earpiece.


I sense sarcasm.

I HOPE it's sarcasm...
There is no understanding. There is only Choya. Choya is the way. Choya is Love. Choya is Life. Has is the Light in the Protoss Dark and Nightmare is his chosen Acolyte
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
September 27 2016 09:01 GMT
#104342
On September 27 2016 14:58 Chris1 wrote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/financial-markets-say-clinton-beat-trump-in-the-debate-2016-09-26

http://ca.investing.com/commodities/gold

Gold is the investors safe haven so it should rise for a Trump potus and fall for a Hilary, atleast according to some experts.

It's already up around 26% this year.
What does that say about the financial situation?
I think it's going up no matter who gets in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
September 27 2016 09:04 GMT
#104343
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
September 27 2016 09:05 GMT
#104344
On September 27 2016 17:57 Ghostcom wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 17:48 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:32 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 16:36 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 15:54 {ToT}ColmA wrote:
as i am not an american who has to vote for either of those two..i am glad. i feel sorry for you guys out there. i can not come to terms that those two are in vote for presidency. what happend america

Hillary Clinton is maybe not charismatic, but you can make a case that she is the most qualified, most honest and most transparent candidate in recent history. Obama and Sanders endorsed her, she has the full support of the democratic party.

Hatred of HRC is 95% a consequence of right-wing smear campaigns and various types of sexist undercurrents in America. Viewed objectively she is a normal candidate, a normal politician, better than most and with many accomplishments throughout her life, plus the bonus factor of being potentially the first female president.

Trump is an unabashedly sexist and racist cretin, literally a threat to world civilization. His ascendency is a total disgrace.

Please don't equate these two in any way. .


Gotta love this holier-than-though attitude. People like you are just as much to blame for Trump as right wing white supremacists are.

"Sexist undercurrent" and "right wing smear", you have to be joking. There's a lot of objectionable shit about Hillary and the Clinton foundation, lots of reasonable concerns that she's just bullshitting.

Please read this article which demonstrates what everyone already knows: people support the far right because they are racists and because they feel loss of status compared to minorities (see the whining about political correctness). It's not because of the left alienating people, it's because mainstream politicians can not abandon commitment to tolerance and modern governance to cater to white nationalists. And since no good deed goes unpunished they get called out of touch because of it.

By the way, I don't know what you tried to imply, but sexism does exist in the USA and affects how people perceive Clinton. For instance, female authority is rejected. (example)

And there is a long history of right wing smears against Clinton. (some examples here)


I might be misunderstanding you here: Are you implying that all of Trumps supporters are racists?

Being racist correlates to supporting Trump and supporting the European populist parties. You can draw your own conclusions, but in my view Clinton wasn't wrong when she called half of Trump supporters "deplorable".
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
DickMcFanny
Profile Blog Joined September 2015
Ireland1076 Posts
September 27 2016 09:07 GMT
#104345
On September 27 2016 18:04 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!


That's all smoke and no fire.

Or rather: that's plenty of smoke, plenty of fire, but Americans don't really care about fire.
| (• ◡•)|╯ ╰(❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6282 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-27 09:09:16
September 27 2016 09:08 GMT
#104346
On September 27 2016 18:04 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!

You should have stopped reading at 'John Oliver did a piece' and taken it as a joke.

On September 27 2016 18:07 DickMcFanny wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:04 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!


That's all smoke and no fire.

Or rather: that's plenty of smoke, plenty of fire, but Americans don't really care about fire.

Unless its a fire-arm
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17972 Posts
September 27 2016 09:09 GMT
#104347
On September 27 2016 17:52 Shingi11 wrote:
It just blows me away how incompetent trump is. He set the bar so low he had to basically show up and smile and he would of came out ok and he still fucks it up. Hillary is being judged to presidential elect standards and this debate shows why. I mean if you are going to blow off prep for a 90 min debate what makes you think you are going to do any less running the most powerful country in the world.

Pretty much my impression too. I had (have) to work today, so couldn't stay up for the debate, but the exerpts I saw now are quite impressive. All he had to do was show he could manage to not behave like a toddler for 90 minutes. And even that was too much to ask. All that interrupting when he was having his own quotes thrown back at him was pathetic.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
September 27 2016 09:10 GMT
#104348
On September 27 2016 18:05 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 17:57 Ghostcom wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:48 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:32 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 16:36 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 15:54 {ToT}ColmA wrote:
as i am not an american who has to vote for either of those two..i am glad. i feel sorry for you guys out there. i can not come to terms that those two are in vote for presidency. what happend america

Hillary Clinton is maybe not charismatic, but you can make a case that she is the most qualified, most honest and most transparent candidate in recent history. Obama and Sanders endorsed her, she has the full support of the democratic party.

Hatred of HRC is 95% a consequence of right-wing smear campaigns and various types of sexist undercurrents in America. Viewed objectively she is a normal candidate, a normal politician, better than most and with many accomplishments throughout her life, plus the bonus factor of being potentially the first female president.

Trump is an unabashedly sexist and racist cretin, literally a threat to world civilization. His ascendency is a total disgrace.

Please don't equate these two in any way. .


Gotta love this holier-than-though attitude. People like you are just as much to blame for Trump as right wing white supremacists are.

"Sexist undercurrent" and "right wing smear", you have to be joking. There's a lot of objectionable shit about Hillary and the Clinton foundation, lots of reasonable concerns that she's just bullshitting.

Please read this article which demonstrates what everyone already knows: people support the far right because they are racists and because they feel loss of status compared to minorities (see the whining about political correctness). It's not because of the left alienating people, it's because mainstream politicians can not abandon commitment to tolerance and modern governance to cater to white nationalists. And since no good deed goes unpunished they get called out of touch because of it.

By the way, I don't know what you tried to imply, but sexism does exist in the USA and affects how people perceive Clinton. For instance, female authority is rejected. (example)

And there is a long history of right wing smears against Clinton. (some examples here)


I might be misunderstanding you here: Are you implying that all of Trumps supporters are racists?

Being racist correlates to supporting Trump and supporting the European populist parties. You can draw your own conclusions, but in my view Clinton wasn't wrong when she called half of Trump supporters "deplorable".

You can't belittle and browbeat people into voting for a particular candidate or outcome.
Brexit should have shown you that.
The more you do it the more you push fence sitters towards Trump.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
DickMcFanny
Profile Blog Joined September 2015
Ireland1076 Posts
September 27 2016 09:10 GMT
#104349
On September 27 2016 18:05 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 17:57 Ghostcom wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:48 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:32 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 16:36 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 15:54 {ToT}ColmA wrote:
as i am not an american who has to vote for either of those two..i am glad. i feel sorry for you guys out there. i can not come to terms that those two are in vote for presidency. what happend america

Hillary Clinton is maybe not charismatic, but you can make a case that she is the most qualified, most honest and most transparent candidate in recent history. Obama and Sanders endorsed her, she has the full support of the democratic party.

Hatred of HRC is 95% a consequence of right-wing smear campaigns and various types of sexist undercurrents in America. Viewed objectively she is a normal candidate, a normal politician, better than most and with many accomplishments throughout her life, plus the bonus factor of being potentially the first female president.

Trump is an unabashedly sexist and racist cretin, literally a threat to world civilization. His ascendency is a total disgrace.

Please don't equate these two in any way. .


Gotta love this holier-than-though attitude. People like you are just as much to blame for Trump as right wing white supremacists are.

"Sexist undercurrent" and "right wing smear", you have to be joking. There's a lot of objectionable shit about Hillary and the Clinton foundation, lots of reasonable concerns that she's just bullshitting.

Please read this article which demonstrates what everyone already knows: people support the far right because they are racists and because they feel loss of status compared to minorities (see the whining about political correctness). It's not because of the left alienating people, it's because mainstream politicians can not abandon commitment to tolerance and modern governance to cater to white nationalists. And since no good deed goes unpunished they get called out of touch because of it.

By the way, I don't know what you tried to imply, but sexism does exist in the USA and affects how people perceive Clinton. For instance, female authority is rejected. (example)

And there is a long history of right wing smears against Clinton. (some examples here)


I might be misunderstanding you here: Are you implying that all of Trumps supporters are racists?

Being racist correlates to supporting Trump and supporting the European populist parties. You can draw your own conclusions, but in my view Clinton wasn't wrong when she called half of Trump supporters "deplorable".


Of course that's your view, that's the sickening attitude of the left that everyone who disagrees with us is a racist / sexist / homophobe / Islamophobe / whatever stupid SJW buzzword of the week you can come with and morally inferior.
| (• ◡•)|╯ ╰(❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17972 Posts
September 27 2016 09:10 GMT
#104350
On September 27 2016 17:59 showstealer1829 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 17:53 zeo wrote:
Seeing as how biased the moderator was Trump did fine, made both Clinton and the mod look like fools. Clinton got really desperate with her character assassination attempts and Trump just deflected with turning them into policy driven answers.

All in all Clinton has no chance against a non-biased moderator. Looking forward to the next debates.

edit: Not to mention Clinton wearing that earpiece.


I sense sarcasm.

I HOPE it's sarcasm...

No. It's zeo. He believes Hillary is a body-double robot sent by the Reptilians to further the Illuminati goals. Or something.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17972 Posts
September 27 2016 09:11 GMT
#104351
On September 27 2016 18:01 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 14:58 Chris1 wrote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/financial-markets-say-clinton-beat-trump-in-the-debate-2016-09-26

http://ca.investing.com/commodities/gold

Gold is the investors safe haven so it should rise for a Trump potus and fall for a Hilary, atleast according to some experts.

It's already up around 26% this year.
What does that say about the financial situation?
I think it's going up no matter who gets in.

Of course you do, it's basically what you do here. Predict the world will end and the gold price will go up. At least you have returned to your core task. Based on your latest string of coherent posts I was afraid you'd gone sane or something, but glad to see we're back to business as usual
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
September 27 2016 09:13 GMT
#104352
On September 27 2016 18:08 zeo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:04 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!

You should have stopped reading at 'John Oliver did a piece' and taken it as a joke.

Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:07 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 18:04 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!


That's all smoke and no fire.

Or rather: that's plenty of smoke, plenty of fire, but Americans don't really care about fire.

Unless its a fire-arm

fyi, I don't get my information on politics from John Oliver clips, but I linked since it's a fun watch and might be more convincing than an article
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6282 Posts
September 27 2016 09:15 GMT
#104353
On September 27 2016 18:10 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 17:59 showstealer1829 wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:53 zeo wrote:
Seeing as how biased the moderator was Trump did fine, made both Clinton and the mod look like fools. Clinton got really desperate with her character assassination attempts and Trump just deflected with turning them into policy driven answers.

All in all Clinton has no chance against a non-biased moderator. Looking forward to the next debates.

edit: Not to mention Clinton wearing that earpiece.


I sense sarcasm.

I HOPE it's sarcasm...

No. It's zeo. He believes Hillary is a body-double robot sent by the Reptilians to further the Illuminati goals. Or something.

ad hominem

ad ˈhɒmɪnɛm/

adverb & adjective
1. (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
"an ad hominem response"

2. relating to or associated with a particular person.
"the office was created ad hominem for Fenton"
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6282 Posts
September 27 2016 09:17 GMT
#104354
On September 27 2016 18:13 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:08 zeo wrote:
On September 27 2016 18:04 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!

You should have stopped reading at 'John Oliver did a piece' and taken it as a joke.

On September 27 2016 18:07 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 18:04 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
John Oliver did a piece about the Foundation and Email scandals which shows there is nothing there which should disqualify her. And she did release her health records and tax returns. There is nothing about Hillary Clinton which is a secret, only right-wing insinuations that she is hiding something. (is Hillary a robot from other space??)

We'll see, it's only a few weeks now until Julian Assange releases his "October Surprise" mega-batch of emails.
This stuff is apparently far more incriminating than the last stuff he put out.
Gonna be fireworks!


That's all smoke and no fire.

Or rather: that's plenty of smoke, plenty of fire, but Americans don't really care about fire.

Unless its a fire-arm

fyi, I don't get my information on politics from John Oliver clips, but I linked since it's a fun watch and might be more convincing than an article

It actually was hilarious, he even quoted Politifact, I thought that happened only in memes.
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-27 09:25:38
September 27 2016 09:18 GMT
#104355
On September 27 2016 18:10 DickMcFanny wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:05 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:57 Ghostcom wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:48 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:32 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 16:36 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 15:54 {ToT}ColmA wrote:
as i am not an american who has to vote for either of those two..i am glad. i feel sorry for you guys out there. i can not come to terms that those two are in vote for presidency. what happend america

Hillary Clinton is maybe not charismatic, but you can make a case that she is the most qualified, most honest and most transparent candidate in recent history. Obama and Sanders endorsed her, she has the full support of the democratic party.

Hatred of HRC is 95% a consequence of right-wing smear campaigns and various types of sexist undercurrents in America. Viewed objectively she is a normal candidate, a normal politician, better than most and with many accomplishments throughout her life, plus the bonus factor of being potentially the first female president.

Trump is an unabashedly sexist and racist cretin, literally a threat to world civilization. His ascendency is a total disgrace.

Please don't equate these two in any way. .


Gotta love this holier-than-though attitude. People like you are just as much to blame for Trump as right wing white supremacists are.

"Sexist undercurrent" and "right wing smear", you have to be joking. There's a lot of objectionable shit about Hillary and the Clinton foundation, lots of reasonable concerns that she's just bullshitting.

Please read this article which demonstrates what everyone already knows: people support the far right because they are racists and because they feel loss of status compared to minorities (see the whining about political correctness). It's not because of the left alienating people, it's because mainstream politicians can not abandon commitment to tolerance and modern governance to cater to white nationalists. And since no good deed goes unpunished they get called out of touch because of it.

By the way, I don't know what you tried to imply, but sexism does exist in the USA and affects how people perceive Clinton. For instance, female authority is rejected. (example)

And there is a long history of right wing smears against Clinton. (some examples here)


I might be misunderstanding you here: Are you implying that all of Trumps supporters are racists?

Being racist correlates to supporting Trump and supporting the European populist parties. You can draw your own conclusions, but in my view Clinton wasn't wrong when she called half of Trump supporters "deplorable".


Of course that's your view, that's the sickening attitude of the left that everyone who disagrees with us is a racist / sexist / homophobe / Islamophobe / whatever stupid SJW buzzword of the week you can come with and morally inferior.

I'm sorry, I'm late to this thread. Who exactly are you talking about when you say "we"? Are you part of a group of people with certain beliefs?

On September 27 2016 18:10 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:05 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:57 Ghostcom wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:48 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:32 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 16:36 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 15:54 {ToT}ColmA wrote:
as i am not an american who has to vote for either of those two..i am glad. i feel sorry for you guys out there. i can not come to terms that those two are in vote for presidency. what happend america

Hillary Clinton is maybe not charismatic, but you can make a case that she is the most qualified, most honest and most transparent candidate in recent history. Obama and Sanders endorsed her, she has the full support of the democratic party.

Hatred of HRC is 95% a consequence of right-wing smear campaigns and various types of sexist undercurrents in America. Viewed objectively she is a normal candidate, a normal politician, better than most and with many accomplishments throughout her life, plus the bonus factor of being potentially the first female president.

Trump is an unabashedly sexist and racist cretin, literally a threat to world civilization. His ascendency is a total disgrace.

Please don't equate these two in any way. .


Gotta love this holier-than-though attitude. People like you are just as much to blame for Trump as right wing white supremacists are.

"Sexist undercurrent" and "right wing smear", you have to be joking. There's a lot of objectionable shit about Hillary and the Clinton foundation, lots of reasonable concerns that she's just bullshitting.

Please read this article which demonstrates what everyone already knows: people support the far right because they are racists and because they feel loss of status compared to minorities (see the whining about political correctness). It's not because of the left alienating people, it's because mainstream politicians can not abandon commitment to tolerance and modern governance to cater to white nationalists. And since no good deed goes unpunished they get called out of touch because of it.

By the way, I don't know what you tried to imply, but sexism does exist in the USA and affects how people perceive Clinton. For instance, female authority is rejected. (example)

And there is a long history of right wing smears against Clinton. (some examples here)


I might be misunderstanding you here: Are you implying that all of Trumps supporters are racists?

Being racist correlates to supporting Trump and supporting the European populist parties. You can draw your own conclusions, but in my view Clinton wasn't wrong when she called half of Trump supporters "deplorable".

You can't belittle and browbeat people into voting for a particular candidate or outcome.
Brexit should have shown you that.
The more you do it the more you push fence sitters towards Trump.

This is the typical threat that I see all the time: don't call out racism because then people will vote for racists. I don't think that makes sense. People vote for racists because they are racist, but they don't want to admit this to themselves so they come up with byzantine rationalizations and tales of injured pride or anti-establishment votes or whatnot. And it serves as a useful threat to control the perimeters of the debate, don't call out the elephant in the room and pretend to ignore that these parties serve the interests of a racist base that cares about some form of white nationalism.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
September 27 2016 09:22 GMT
#104356
On September 27 2016 18:05 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 17:57 Ghostcom wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:48 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:32 DickMcFanny wrote:
On September 27 2016 16:36 Grumbels wrote:
On September 27 2016 15:54 {ToT}ColmA wrote:
as i am not an american who has to vote for either of those two..i am glad. i feel sorry for you guys out there. i can not come to terms that those two are in vote for presidency. what happend america

Hillary Clinton is maybe not charismatic, but you can make a case that she is the most qualified, most honest and most transparent candidate in recent history. Obama and Sanders endorsed her, she has the full support of the democratic party.

Hatred of HRC is 95% a consequence of right-wing smear campaigns and various types of sexist undercurrents in America. Viewed objectively she is a normal candidate, a normal politician, better than most and with many accomplishments throughout her life, plus the bonus factor of being potentially the first female president.

Trump is an unabashedly sexist and racist cretin, literally a threat to world civilization. His ascendency is a total disgrace.

Please don't equate these two in any way. .


Gotta love this holier-than-though attitude. People like you are just as much to blame for Trump as right wing white supremacists are.

"Sexist undercurrent" and "right wing smear", you have to be joking. There's a lot of objectionable shit about Hillary and the Clinton foundation, lots of reasonable concerns that she's just bullshitting.

Please read this article which demonstrates what everyone already knows: people support the far right because they are racists and because they feel loss of status compared to minorities (see the whining about political correctness). It's not because of the left alienating people, it's because mainstream politicians can not abandon commitment to tolerance and modern governance to cater to white nationalists. And since no good deed goes unpunished they get called out of touch because of it.

By the way, I don't know what you tried to imply, but sexism does exist in the USA and affects how people perceive Clinton. For instance, female authority is rejected. (example)

And there is a long history of right wing smears against Clinton. (some examples here)


I might be misunderstanding you here: Are you implying that all of Trumps supporters are racists?

Being racist correlates to supporting Trump and supporting the European populist parties. You can draw your own conclusions, but in my view Clinton wasn't wrong when she called half of Trump supporters "deplorable".


I'm specifically asking you to expand on your statements because I don't want to jump to conclusions...

Now you are stating that being racist (assumption: being racists towards non-whites) correlates to supporting Trump - which is likely true. However, I hope you can see the difference between this, and claiming that everyone who supports Trump are racist (which the initial post I responded to implied). So perhaps you can understand my confusion here?
showstealer1829
Profile Blog Joined May 2014
Australia3123 Posts
September 27 2016 09:22 GMT
#104357
On September 27 2016 18:10 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 17:59 showstealer1829 wrote:
On September 27 2016 17:53 zeo wrote:
Seeing as how biased the moderator was Trump did fine, made both Clinton and the mod look like fools. Clinton got really desperate with her character assassination attempts and Trump just deflected with turning them into policy driven answers.

All in all Clinton has no chance against a non-biased moderator. Looking forward to the next debates.

edit: Not to mention Clinton wearing that earpiece.


I sense sarcasm.

I HOPE it's sarcasm...

No. It's zeo. He believes Hillary is a body-double robot sent by the Reptilians to further the Illuminati goals. Or something.


There is no understanding. There is only Choya. Choya is the way. Choya is Love. Choya is Life. Has is the Light in the Protoss Dark and Nightmare is his chosen Acolyte
Kickboxer
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Slovenia1308 Posts
September 27 2016 09:24 GMT
#104358
I though Trump looked like shit. He is literally unable to answer a question.

As a first-time viewer, I also found the entire debate deplorable. Just a bunch of name calling and emotionally charged drivel. Polimarketing reality TV... if this is what wins elections in the Golden Age of the West, we are all fucked
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-27 09:34:21
September 27 2016 09:30 GMT
#104359
On September 27 2016 18:11 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:01 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On September 27 2016 14:58 Chris1 wrote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/financial-markets-say-clinton-beat-trump-in-the-debate-2016-09-26

http://ca.investing.com/commodities/gold

Gold is the investors safe haven so it should rise for a Trump potus and fall for a Hilary, atleast according to some experts.

It's already up around 26% this year.
What does that say about the financial situation?
I think it's going up no matter who gets in.

Of course you do, it's basically what you do here. Predict the world will end and the gold price will go up. At least you have returned to your core task. Based on your latest string of coherent posts I was afraid you'd gone sane or something, but glad to see we're back to business as usual

Doesn't bother me mate - I've made over 20k on gold mining stocks this year.
Most small caps have doubled or tripled since January.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
CorsairHero
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada9491 Posts
September 27 2016 09:33 GMT
#104360
On September 27 2016 18:30 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 27 2016 18:11 Acrofales wrote:
On September 27 2016 18:01 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On September 27 2016 14:58 Chris1 wrote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/financial-markets-say-clinton-beat-trump-in-the-debate-2016-09-26

http://ca.investing.com/commodities/gold

Gold is the investors safe haven so it should rise for a Trump potus and fall for a Hilary, atleast according to some experts.

It's already up around 26% this year.
What does that say about the financial situation?
I think it's going up no matter who gets in.

Of course you do, it's basically what you do here. Predict the world will end and the gold price will go up. At least you have returned to your core task. Based on your latest string of coherent posts I was afraid you'd gone sane or something, but glad to see we're back to business as usual

Doesn't bother me mate I've made over 20k on gold mining stocks this year.
Most small caps have doubled or tripled since January.


feel free to post your buy and sell orders for the year lmao
© Current year.
Prev 1 5216 5217 5218 5219 5220 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 30m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 223
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 288
Noble 117
PianO 105
Bale 25
JulyZerg 16
Dota 2
ODPixel211
NeuroSwarm94
League of Legends
JimRising 714
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor106
Other Games
summit1g8818
Stewie2K792
shahzam739
monkeys_forever438
SortOf65
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38137
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH361
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota257
League of Legends
• Lourlo1505
• Stunt547
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 30m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
6h 30m
Replay Cast
17h 30m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 9h
OSC
1d 13h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.