EPTOn August 03 2016 06:04 farvacola wrote:
Here's a hint: "Russia did nothing wrong when it invaded Crimea."
Here's a hint: "Russia did nothing wrong when it invaded Crimea."
The lizard lords can do no wrong. Hail Haster!
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4627
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
The lizard lords can do no wrong. Hail Haster! | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15723 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:05 oBlade wrote: The difference here, at least for Ryan, is that I think this shows Trump has been bullshitting Ryan. I think Ryan was probably operating under some assumptions of Trump at least being friendly. This is very much not friendly and paints a picture of Trump thinking he runs the show. Trump does not run the show. If Ryan lets Trump hold this over his head, Ryan loses his power completely. Ryan can't allow this. | ||
|
Naracs_Duc
746 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:07 Trainrunnef wrote: I get the feeling that Hillary and the DNC also rigged the republican primaries so that they could get Trump the nomination. He is by far the best secret agent that ever lived. Huge. They're the one's who didn't want Super Delegates to act as gatekeepers to ensure the party message is maintained. They reap what they sow. | ||
Dromar
United States2145 Posts
On August 03 2016 05:48 Mohdoo wrote: I take this as Trump trying to sabotage his own campaign so that he can write a book about it and end up with an incredibly loyal post-election following. At this point this is what I'm thinking as well. He's done a ton of crazy stuff throughout his campaign, but it really seems like this last week he's thrown it into overdrive, and he's not even trying to fix his mistakes. He's just tearing everything apart. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:28 Naracs_Duc wrote: They're the one's who didn't want Super Delegates to act as gatekeepers to ensure the party message is maintained. They reap what they sow. This is the reason why the DNC has Super Delegates. Trump is the reason. Discussions about electability us to be front and center for both parties. But that went by the way side when the Republicans convinced themselves that Romney was going to win right up until he got curb stomped. | ||
KwarK
United States43201 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:34 KwarK wrote: Except the superdelegates wouldn't actually have worked because using them to overrule the voters is never gonna end well. You all saw the fit the Bernie supporters threw even after Bernie withdrew his nomination. Imagine if he hadn't. Bernie isn't Trump. Trump truly believes he can go it alone because he doesn't understand how goverment works.. Bernie understand that he needs the democrats to accomplish anything in goverment. The Super delegates are to prevent someone like Trump, who is actively destroying their party. Not that I don't enjoy the Republicans bending over backwards trying to justify Trump while also having daily news reports of racist voter ID laws shot down. Its a good time. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45002 Posts
~ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/richard-hanna-hillary-clinton_us_57a08f42e4b08a8e8b5f45ba?section=politics | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18838 Posts
Edit: poo on you ticklish | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: "Richard Hanna Becomes First Republican Congressman To Say He’ll Vote For Hillary Clinton" ~ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/richard-hanna-hillary-clinton_us_57a08f42e4b08a8e8b5f45ba?section=politics That editors note though | ||
|
Naracs_Duc
746 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:34 KwarK wrote: Except the superdelegates wouldn't actually have worked because using them to overrule the voters is never gonna end well. You all saw the fit the Bernie supporters threw even after Bernie withdrew his nomination. Imagine if he hadn't. They threw such a huge fit that he lost by millions of votes and was behind in state wins AND delegate wins. Bernie literally lost on every metric and without Super Delegates would still be miles behind Hilary. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
That is why I respect Huffington Post, they don't even try to give people the delusion that they are not completely biased. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:34 KwarK wrote: Except the superdelegates wouldn't actually have worked because using them to overrule the voters is never gonna end well. You all saw the fit the Bernie supporters threw even after Bernie withdrew his nomination. Imagine if he hadn't. Superdelegates would have been key for Republicans if the Republican race had been proportionally allocated and stayed 3-man till the bitter end. I don't think they could-or should-ever really do anything in a 1v1 race. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:44 Plansix wrote: That is why I respect Huffington Post, they don't even try to give people the delusion that they are not completely biased. It is interesting to contemplate why a biased-by-design network would call itself Fair and Balanced. They were the pioneers and they've achieved the greatest success being biased, so they must be on to something. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:54 Doodsmack wrote: It is interesting to contemplate why a biased-by-design network would call itself Fair and Balanced. They were the pioneers and they've achieved the greatest success being biased, so they must be on to something. I don't think their success comes just from being biased; though it does help somewhat that they're exploiting a less-served category. I think it's more that they're simply better at being entertaining. | ||
|
CannonsNCarriers
United States638 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:43 Naracs_Duc wrote: They threw such a huge fit that he lost by millions of votes and was behind in state wins AND delegate wins. Bernie literally lost on every metric and without Super Delegates would still be miles behind Hilary. But the emails proved everyone who didn't vote for Bernie was Corrupt, so the elections are invalid. Bernie would have won if we discounted all the Shillariate haters who only voted for the Establishment because of Wall Street Money. /s4p | ||
|
xAPOCALYPSEx
1418 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:07 Trainrunnef wrote: I get the feeling that Hillary and the DNC also rigged the republican primaries so that they could get Trump the nomination. He is by far the best secret agent that ever lived. Huge. I can't tell what's less believable; Trump working for Hillary and friends or Trump really being as stupid as he's been in the past few days. It's hard to say | ||
|
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
On August 03 2016 06:54 Doodsmack wrote: It is interesting to contemplate why a biased-by-design network would call itself Fair and Balanced. They were the pioneers and they've achieved the greatest success being biased, so they must be on to something. I don't really know what's fair and not biased about Trump. Like there always seems to be this politeness in the US where a scientist will go up on a stage and debate a creationist and it goes on for hours.. sometimes it's completely legit to call an idiot an idiot. | ||
| ||
