|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
And so California's idiotic primary system strikes. The November election will be between two democrats, left-wing progressive Kamala Harris, and bumbling fool Loretta Sanchez. 10/10.
This system was sold by the democrats as a way of ensuring we get moderates, etc, but instead it just leads to chaos. There were 34 names on the ballot. The two people with the highest name ID won.
I just hope that Sanchez has more foot-in-mouth moments so at least make this entertaining.
|
louisiana has a jungle primary, and so do a few other places
|
Still a terrible idea, pushed for obvious reasons.
|
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange claims Google is working closely with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign to promote the Democratic presidential candidate.
Assange appeared via video link from the Ecuadorian embassy in London as part of the 'New Era of Journalism: Farewell to Mainstream international media' forum in Moscow.
He said: "Google is directly engaged with Hillary Clinton’s campaign" and claimed the technology giant used the US State Department on a "a quid pro quo" basis.
"Of course when she is in power… she is a problem for freedom of speech. We know what she is going to do. And she made the chart for the destruction of Libya, she was involved in the process of taking the Libyan armoury and sending it to Syria." Assange reiterated his claims that Clinton is a "war hawk" that "seemingly" wants to start wars.
"What we have with Clinton is someone who is a hawk but who has the tools of legal interventionism, a rhetorical cover to start wars, and someone who seemingly wants to start them… From WikiLeaks’ perspective Hillary Clinton is a problem in terms of war and peace."
He also pointed out that former Google CEO Eric Schmidt is now heading the Pentagon innovation board.
"Google is heavily integrated with Washington power, at personal level and at business level. Google, which has increasing control over the distribution channels,… is intensely allying itself with the US exceptionalism. Source
|
|
lol Bernie. He lost, he lost big, he lost by millions of votes. He lots by hundreds of pledged delegates. But hes staying in becuase this is the most attention he will ever get given how all hes done in congress is rename post offices. What a sad sad excuse for a canidate.
|
yep I'm a little confused. There's no chance that he can win and this seems intentionally disruptive.
|
Maybe he just feels that... 200m is a lot of money and he should keep pushing to give his people the platform considering "the average donation was $27!!"
Also, Julian likes life apparently
![[image loading]](https://i.sli.mg/C9zBs6.jpg)
A collection of salt for Hillary supporters. Salt mining
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
im just getting popcorn ready for the shitshow that will happen at the Dem convention -- time to re-watch 1968
|
On June 08 2016 15:18 SK.Testie wrote: Maybe he just feels that... 200m is a lot of money and he should keep pushing to give his people the platform considering "the average donation was $27!!"
the largest group of donors for sanders is the unemployed
|
On June 08 2016 16:32 CorsairHero wrote:Show nested quote +On June 08 2016 15:18 SK.Testie wrote: Maybe he just feels that... 200m is a lot of money and he should keep pushing to give his people the platform considering "the average donation was $27!!"
the largest group of donors for sanders is the unemployed
Well to be fair a lot of people in college have no reason to be employed (some are some arent).
|
On June 08 2016 08:14 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Western white countries are literally the least racist countries in the world and that's not a racist thing to say that's a fact. How many refugees has the West taken in just from this Syrian conflict compared to actual Middle-Eastern countries like Saudi-Arabia or Bahrain or UAE? Just to note, the three countries who have the largest population of refugees from Syria are Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan.
On June 08 2016 08:44 SK.Testie wrote: What of Mexico? It's full of beautiful and awesome people I agree and I loved my visit there. But I was also robbed within one day of being there which hadn't happened to me once in all my days of being in the west. So maybe.. republicans can say.. BUILD THE WALL? In related news, when can we build a wall around Barcelona?
On June 08 2016 08:45 GGTeMpLaR wrote: The west has virtually no inequality problem. + Show Spoiler +
On June 08 2016 09:19 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I have a government security clearance so yes I've been through vetting processes and no they are not infallible. Well, this was funny up until now. Now I'm just scared :O
On June 08 2016 09:32 SK.Testie wrote: 3. The Mexican government is essentially giving the USA a big "fuck you" by being cartel country and a massive problem with drugs flooding in. The citizens WANT to give a fuck you back. The Mexican government is giving the USA a big fuck you by "being cartel country"? What?
No really, what? Can you, like, explain that one again?
|
Testie the drugs are flooding in because the Americans want drugs and their own government isn't providing access let alone quality 
|
On June 08 2016 15:57 amazingxkcd wrote: im just getting popcorn ready for the shitshow that will happen at the Dem convention -- time to re-watch 1968
Wishful thinking. Obama bringing in Sanders to the White House certainly means this is over and things will be ironed out soon.
|
I found this hilarious. I was looking at the primary results and noticed that Crooked Hillary only got 101 votes in North Dakota. That's about how many votes she deserves nationnwide. ROFL.
|
On June 08 2016 18:53 Ravianna26 wrote: I found this hilarious. I was looking at the primary results and noticed that Crooked Hillary only got 101 votes in North Dakota. That's about how many votes she deserves nationnwide. ROFL.
I believe she got around 1/4 of the votes and Bernie got around 60% of the votes in ND: http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president 101 to 253.
|
Canada11279 Posts
On June 08 2016 18:53 Ravianna26 wrote: I found this hilarious. I was looking at the primary results and noticed that Crooked Hillary only got 101 votes in North Dakota. That's about how many votes she deserves nationnwide. ROFL. And Bernie got 253, lol. You do realize it's a caucus state, yes? Now granted that's a low percentage for her, but Bernie has cleaned up on a lot of the caucuses throughout the campaign. This was basically the 2012 Ron Paul strategy with legs, whereas Ron Paul never really got off the ground.
|
On June 08 2016 19:03 Falling wrote:Show nested quote +On June 08 2016 18:53 Ravianna26 wrote: I found this hilarious. I was looking at the primary results and noticed that Crooked Hillary only got 101 votes in North Dakota. That's about how many votes she deserves nationnwide. ROFL. And Bernie got 253, lol. You do realize it's a caucus state, yes? Now granted that's a low percentage for her, but Bernie has cleaned up on a lot of the caucuses throughout the campaign. This was basically the 2012 Ron Paul strategy with legs, whereas Ron Paul never really got off the ground.
The only reason Bernie did as well as he did was because it was a 2 person race. If you want to see how Ron would have fared in a head on with Romney look at Virginia from 2012. If the GOP 2012 race was between Romney and Paul, Paul would have done as well or better than Bernie, and that's with a much more hostile media (when they decided not to ignore/marginalize him anyways). When Ron was ahead in Iowa the media went berserk.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
assange the Kremlin troll
|
On June 08 2016 16:32 CorsairHero wrote:Show nested quote +On June 08 2016 15:18 SK.Testie wrote: Maybe he just feels that... 200m is a lot of money and he should keep pushing to give his people the platform considering "the average donation was $27!!"
the largest group of donors for sanders is the unemployed Judging by Sanders usual demographic i'm betting a large chunk of that is young, white kids who went to a Liberal arts college and majored in something with no job at the end, leaving them with large student loans.They were hoping for Sanders to win and retrospectively wipe their college debt. Not a big stretch.
|
|
|
|