EPTHe just said "You should see this guy" then just did a little bit of casual arm flailing in a manner that looks suspectly like the guy he was saying you should see. I'm sure it's just a coinkydink
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3962
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
He just said "You should see this guy" then just did a little bit of casual arm flailing in a manner that looks suspectly like the guy he was saying you should see. I'm sure it's just a coinkydink | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
leftist priorities right here | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15729 Posts
On June 07 2016 09:36 Introvert wrote: Bringing "We need to be first!" to a whole new level. And trying to influence tomorrow. Hmm, fun thoughts! Funny thing about this is that I think it helps Bernie. Bernie supporters look at things like numbers and yell oligarchy. They aren't going to accept Bernie isn't going to be president until he endorses someone. Meanwhile, Clinton supporters in Cali are probably happy they don't need to waste their time voting. If the topic is "Did he make fun of a disabled guy", and you say he did not, I think it is fair to ask what you think he was intending to do with his arms. EDIT: Anyone looking for a laugh: https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4mtuc1/media_is_prepared_to_anoint_clinton_tomorrow/ Going quietly with our tail between our legs is not the plan. Clinton will not intimidate the Progressive Awakening into "unifying" behind her. We cannot legitimatize the media's narrative and must strike back with the truth the second NJ is called. I'm planning to use #ItsNotOver or #ImDoneWithHer - what's your plan? | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On June 07 2016 09:41 Mohdoo wrote: Funny thing about this is that I think it helps Bernie. Bernie supporters look at things like numbers and yell oligarchy. They aren't going to accept Bernie isn't going to be president until he endorses someone. Meanwhile, Clinton supporters in Cali are probably happy they don't need to waste their time voting. If the topic is "Did he make fun of a disabled guy", and you say he did not, I think it is fair to ask what you think he was intending to do with his arms. EDIT: Anyone looking for a laugh: https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4mtuc1/media_is_prepared_to_anoint_clinton_tomorrow/ https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/669980142475845632/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc^tfw | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Introvert
United States4885 Posts
On June 07 2016 09:41 Mohdoo wrote: Funny thing about this is that I think it helps Bernie. Bernie supporters look at things like numbers and yell oligarchy. They aren't going to accept Bernie isn't going to be president until he endorses someone. Meanwhile, Clinton supporters in Cali are probably happy they don't need to waste their time voting. If the topic is "Did he make fun of a disabled guy", and you say he did not, I think it is fair to ask what you think he was intending to do with his arms. EDIT: Anyone looking for a laugh: https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4mtuc1/media_is_prepared_to_anoint_clinton_tomorrow/ IDK, I don't think these stories normally drive things that way. On another note, I read that like 25%+ of democratic primary voters already voted, and Clinton had like a 9 point among them. Just imagine if Bernie losses by a small amount. But that's yet another story in the book titled "Why having weeks of early voting is dumb." CA has a 4 week (FOUR!) early voting period. Insane. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15729 Posts
On June 07 2016 09:49 Introvert wrote: IDK, I don't think these stories normally drive things that way. On another note, I read that like 25%+ of democratic primary voters already voted, and Clinton had like a 9 point among them. Just imagine if Bernie losses by a small amount. But that's yet another story in the book titled "Why having weeks of early voting is dumb." CA has a 4 week (FOUR!) early voting period. Insane. Yeah, I certainly realize that things like this tend to actually inflate the winner, as we are seeing with Trump. But I think the Bernie supporters are a whole different beast. If anything, being declared the losers will make more of them skip class to go vote. Also, do you see Cali's early voting as a bad thing or something? | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
He ran on a borderline communist platform of redistribution of wealth from the 1% to the 99% with adding all sorts of free government programs to benefit the masses. And what he ended up doing was taking 200 million dollars in donations from the 99% and giving it back to the 1% | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
| ||
|
oBlade
United States5823 Posts
They do seem obsessed with Trump's limbs, whether it's their goofy shape, trying to draw a comparison to the Nazis, or saying he was making fun of the disability of a random journalist that his audience knew nothing about. | ||
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
Donate! Match me! Phone bank! It was devoid of fun and humour. Its jokes were lame and tame. Gotta give them credit for effort and enthusiasm. It'd be nice for S4P to go full on delusional and demand Bernie run with Jill Stein. Hell, they paid enough into it to get some proper representation. They know it's unwise and would play election spoiler, but some of them actually want it enough just to push the progressive agenda and to give Hillary the middle finger. I'm 99% sure it would never happen, but a man can dream of brighter days. On June 07 2016 09:57 zlefin wrote: I always like to claim I could do a better job than the politicians; that I could even do better as president than some of them! But Trump makes my claims seem so empty, doing better than that is just soooo easy. If that were true Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, or Ted Cruz would have won the nomination. Ted Cruz is a nut but the man is an extremely capable politician, and an excellent liar. Rand Paul is just well liked despite having to pander to the GoP base. And Rubio was supposed to be the GoP's latino vote winner. That's why so many big donors donated to his campaign after it was clear Bush wasn't going to cut it. From day one Trump was against every massive outlet in the world. And he succeeded. And he's brought up a lot of important issues that were never talked about, or never known. He really did kill it on his energy conference, and he'd be very good for the Canadian economy with renewing the Keystone XL pipeline that Obama murdered us on. Now, if he's the Hillary plant we were warned about all along, he'll implode his campaign for funsies. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
It would be the funniest shit ever to watch the democratic party destroy itself trying to beat Trump just like the republican party did. | ||
|
Introvert
United States4885 Posts
On June 07 2016 09:53 Mohdoo wrote: Yeah, I certainly realize that things like this tend to actually inflate the winner, as we are seeing with Trump. But I think the Bernie supporters are a whole different beast. If anything, being declared the losers will make more of them skip class to go vote. Also, do you see Cali's early voting as a bad thing or something? 4 weeks is way too long. Things change in that amount of time. For instance, the report about Clinton wasn't out 29 days ago (IIRC this is the # of days in Cali. Easier to say 4 weeks). We hold elections on certain days, the fact that in CA you cast a vote a full month in advance is madness. 14 days tops. Preferably 7-10. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On June 07 2016 09:47 GGTeMpLaR wrote: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/669980142475845632/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc^tfw http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/27/us/politics/donald-trump-says-his-mocking-of-new-york-times-reporter-was-misread.html?_r=0 Stop embarrassing yourself. Trump didn't know about his disability in the same way he didn't know David Duke was a white supremacist, right? He just choose to use those arm motions because he always uses them in every single public speech of his (by always uses them I mean he has never ever done it before or after that of course). | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15729 Posts
On June 07 2016 10:04 xDaunt wrote: This is funny to see how badly the mainstream media is in the tank for Hillary. What a bullshit call of the primary. Couldn't someone argue the race should have been called after Indiana? This whole thing has been a matter of form rather than purpose for a while. Edit: Can't help but wonder if this Brock shithead will help Clinton's votes tomorrow. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On June 07 2016 10:07 Mohdoo wrote: Couldn't someone argue the race should have been called after Indiana? This whole thing has been a matter of form rather than purpose for a while. Edit: Can't help but wonder if this Brock shithead will help Clinton's votes tomorrow. Calling it based upon the polling of super delegates --- not their actual votes --- before all of the primaries is done is bullshit. I think that the media (and DNC whom I am sure is complicit in this) have made a huge mistake. Hillary needs to bring Bernie supporters into the tent, not antagonize them further. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On June 07 2016 10:03 On_Slaught wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/27/us/politics/donald-trump-says-his-mocking-of-new-york-times-reporter-was-misread.html?_r=0 Stop embarrassing yourself. I'm not the #nevertrump'er here. | ||
|
CannonsNCarriers
United States638 Posts
On June 07 2016 10:11 xDaunt wrote: Calling it based upon the polling of super delegates --- not their actual votes --- before all of the primaries is done is bullshit. I think that the media (and DNC whom I am sure is complicit in this) have made a huge mistake. Hillary needs to bring Bernie supporters into the tent, not antagonize them further. If they think this projected loss stings their egos today, wait until tomorrow when the ACTUAL losses roll in! | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On June 07 2016 10:11 xDaunt wrote: Calling it based upon the polling of super delegates --- not their actual votes --- before all of the primaries is done is bullshit. I think that the media (and DNC whom I am sure is complicit in this) have made a huge mistake. Hillary needs to bring Bernie supporters into the tent, not antagonize them further. Yeah people just to brush off what Chris Matthews said a while ago that they would declare her the nominee before California polls closed but this seals it. A massive fuck up. | ||
| ||
