EPTOn February 26 2016 19:02 Soap wrote:
Does that include the border with Alaska, I wonder?
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3050
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
Does that include the border with Alaska, I wonder? | ||
Falling
Canada11367 Posts
On February 26 2016 19:12 JinDesu wrote: Does that include the border with Alaska, I wonder? We could make it shorter to make it easier- just give us the other half of BC's coastline and that should cut the wall down considerably. Just pinch it off at the Yukon, Alaska, BC border  | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
Soap
Brazil1546 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany11615 Posts
| ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On February 26 2016 19:53 Simberto wrote: Why bother with a wall though. Just drive the canadians into the sea, and you no longer need any wall whatsoever. Way cheaper. And you get to hear the lamentations of their women. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On February 26 2016 19:53 Simberto wrote: Why bother with a wall though. Just drive the canadians into the sea, and you no longer need any wall whatsoever. Way cheaper. are you kidding, occupying canada would be worse than occupying iraq, imagine the suicide mooses. | ||
|
Deathstar
9150 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44989 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
kwizach
3658 Posts
On February 26 2016 23:22 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Do you think he was including the Alaskan border? I don't think he was, but if Alaska were included then I think his statistic isn't as mind-numbingly idiotic. Who are you talking about? Because Trump's numbers were not too wrong (US-Mexico: 1,954 miles, US-Canada: 5,525 miles, so 2,82 times instead of 4 times), but Rove was way off the mark. | ||
|
killa_robot
Canada1884 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10131 Posts
On February 26 2016 19:02 Soap wrote: https://twitter.com/KarlRove/status/703064375980994561 He worked with Bush. No wonder he can't get the slightlest sense of size even looking at a scale map. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
On February 26 2016 23:28 Plansix wrote: I am now convinced that Trump watches Games of Thrones and thinks “That looks really effective, we should build one. Only bigger. Much bigger.” Trump stars in Game of Thrones. In other news: Obama Administration Set to Expand Sharing of Data That N.S.A. Intercepts WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is on the verge of permitting the National Security Agency to share more of the private communications it intercepts with other American intelligence agencies without first applying any privacy protections to them, according to officials familiar with the deliberations. The change would relax longstanding restrictions on access to the contents of the phone calls and email the security agency vacuums up around the world, including bulk collection of satellite transmissions, communications between foreigners as they cross network switches in the United States, and messages acquired overseas or provided by allies. The idea is to let more experts across American intelligence gain direct access to unprocessed information, increasing the chances that they will recognize any possible nuggets of value. That also means more officials will be looking at private messages — not only foreigners’ phone calls and emails that have not yet had irrelevant personal information screened out, but also communications to, from, or about Americans that the N.S.A.’s foreign intelligence programs swept in incidentally. Civil liberties advocates criticized the change, arguing that it will weaken privacy protections. They said the government should disclose how much American content the N.S.A. collects incidentally — which agency officials have said is hard to measure — and let the public debate what the rules should be for handling that information. Man this was hard to write on a phone. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19295 Posts
On February 26 2016 23:22 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Do you think he was including the Alaskan border? I don't think he was, but if Alaska were included then I think his statistic isn't as mind-numbingly idiotic. He actually read wikipedia wrong: The terrestrial boundary (including small portions of maritime boundaries on the Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic coasts, as well as the Great Lakes) is 8,891 kilometres (5,525 mi) long, of which 2,475 kilometres (1,538 mi) is with Alaska | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On February 26 2016 13:04 GreenHorizons wrote: Mass shooting doesn't get any response... Let me guess, not a "terrorist" and probably white right? Nope a black man. So probably not a "terrorist" right? | ||
|
KwarK
United States43192 Posts
On February 27 2016 00:50 BisuDagger wrote: He actually read wikipedia wrong: The terrestrial boundary (including small portions of maritime boundaries on the Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic coasts, as well as the Great Lakes) is 8,891 kilometres (5,525 mi) long, of which 2,475 kilometres (1,538 mi) is with Alaska Who knew Canada was so big tho. | ||
| ||
