easy no-scope.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1394
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
nunez
Norway4003 Posts
easy no-scope. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
nunez
Norway4003 Posts
disease, before accurately identifying its supposed symptoms. i would have prefered it the other way around, but i think i get it now. what you mean that is, but not why that is the case. i'll leave that to the doctor... dr. marx... mahaha. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On November 04 2014 11:56 Nyxisto wrote: This is an online board that exists because people make a living from playing video games on the internet and other people make a living from commentating on it. If that is a viable career path then I don't think we have a problem. Also productivity increases way slower than it did in the past. Societies survived when single machines replaced hundreds of workers over night, I think we're going to survive a robot that cleans toilets. Come on nyx. This is clearly a stupid comment. Every single recession since the 70s has resulted in a jobless recovery, and everyone knows that only a handful of progamers make enough money to live on. Even fewer make more than the median wage. | ||
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
On November 04 2014 13:01 IgnE wrote: Come on nyx. This is clearly a stupid comment. Every single recession since the 70s has resulted in a jobless recovery, and everyone knows that only a handful of progamers make enough money to live on. Even fewer make more than the median wage. That's true, but the recessions also didn't really have to do a lot with job automation, which was the mechanism in question. I really think we have a lot of stuff going wrong but "machines taking our jerbs" really seems like a horror scenario from the past. Progaming also just was one example. There are tons of new jobs that people couldn't have imagined even a decade ago, I don't really think we're running out of ideas. | ||
Shiragaku
Hong Kong4308 Posts
On November 04 2014 12:46 oneofthem wrote: um no. i do like critical theory, particularly early horkheimer. but not marxist in the short run. marxism as a piece of economics and social program is just unscientific, for lack of a better description. it made some good critical and aspirational points I can imagine you have had quite a few adventures with anti-revisionists and other Marxist-Leninists. On November 04 2014 13:05 Nyxisto wrote: That's true, but the recessions also didn't really have to do a lot with job automation, which was the mechanism in question. I really think we have a lot of stuff going wrong but "machines taking our jerbs" really seems like a horror scenario from the past. Progaming also just was one example. There are tons of new jobs that people couldn't have imagined even a decade ago, I don't really think we're running out of ideas. The discourse surrounding jobs, at least in America is kind of irking me. Jobs can be found somewhat easily. What cannot be found however is a job that can provide someone with a living wage. Also, there are plenty of new jobs coming around, but with the destruction of humanities and with many scientific fields being dismissed in favor for very specific fields, America seems to be going towards the path of China regarding their economics, namely strong development with jobs only about development. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On November 04 2014 13:15 Shiragaku wrote: I can imagine you have had quite a few adventures with anti-revisionists and other Marxist-Leninists. there's the religious sort of marxists, yea. kind of a strange existence. but not all self declared marxists are adherents to the orthodox teleology stuff. | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On November 04 2014 13:05 Nyxisto wrote: That's true, but the recessions also didn't really have to do a lot with job automation, which was the mechanism in question. I really think we have a lot of stuff going wrong but "machines taking our jerbs" really seems like a horror scenario from the past. Progaming also just was one example. There are tons of new jobs that people couldn't have imagined even a decade ago, I don't really think we're running out of ideas. Tons of new types of jobs with not many people doing them. Google and Facebook, some of the two strongest growth companies of the last decade have very few employees given their net worth. And contrary to what you say, job automation has been one of the greatest factors in the decreasing proportion of able-bodied adults participating in the workforce. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On November 04 2014 13:01 IgnE wrote: Come on nyx. This is clearly a stupid comment. Every single recession since the 70s has resulted in a jobless recovery, and everyone knows that only a handful of progamers make enough money to live on. Even fewer make more than the median wage. http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CIVPART/ Jobless recoveries are a relatively new development. It has less to do with robots and more to do with labor arbitrage. | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/LNS11300001 ![]() Labor arbitrage is obviously a factor, but even that has to do with technology. You can't run factories in China without international flights, telephone lines, computers, and other network devices that only started to come online in the late 60s. Technological shifts also played a major factor in the the hollowing out of the workforce through the loss of mid-level, living wage jobs that were routine and came with well-defined protocols and instructions since they were replaced or downsized with the aid of robotization in the case of factories and computerization in the case of administrative positions. | ||
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On November 04 2014 15:06 IgnE wrote: Please gender-ize that graph for me. Workforce participation is going to go up if you consistently add only the women who are getting jobs, since they show up in the numerator and the denominator. http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/LNS11300001 ![]() Labor arbitrage is obviously a factor, but even that has to do with technology. You can't run factories in China without international flights, telephone lines, computers, and other network devices that only started to come online in the late 60s. Technological shifts also played a major factor in the the hollowing out of the workforce through the loss of mid-level, living wage jobs that were routine and came with well-defined protocols and instructions since they were replaced or downsized with the aid of robotization in the case of factories and computerization in the case of administrative positions. Look at your graph dog, male labor participation is always declining. Its not robots, its WOMEN! | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
On November 04 2014 12:34 oneofthem wrote: marxist narrative portrays inevitable, long run collapse of capitalism. the orthodox marxist idea anyway. historical materialism or whatever. scientific marxism? that post was like two posts jammed into one. not very consistent in scope. Just like Schumpeter, and many other theorists. And Marx never talk about capitalism. Capitalism is not a marxist term, it appeared after Marx actually. Marx talk about the accumulation of capital, and believe that the accumulation of capital create crisis in the system and of the system (of accumulation). There are no empiric ground to state that he was absolutly wrong in any of those points, but yeah just dismiss all Marx because you never read it is a common stance... In fact, Piketty's work pay a high respect to Marx's, showing how important his intuitions were. And marx being unscientific is untrue. He is the most scientific theorist of his time, he even tried to use statistics and empirical data before they were possible. By the way, scientific marxism does not exist, it's scientific socialism, and you cannot understand the term if you don't go back to utopian socialist, such as Fourrier and Owens. Marx himself criticized utopian socialism but never referred to his own ideas as "scientific socialism"... Really Marx is one of the greatest thinkers in the history of social sciences, and anybody who disagree with that is either taking an ideological stance or has never read it and has little knowledge on the history of economical thought. For god sake, Marx even talked about the environment in 1844 ! | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
The Air Force on Monday fired two more nuclear commanders and disciplined a third, fresh evidence of leadership lapses in a nuclear missile corps that has suffered a rash of recent setbacks, including the firing last year of its top commander. The most senior officer to be relieved Monday was Col. Carl Jones, the No. 2 commander of the 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, in charge of 150 of the Air Force's 450 Minuteman 3 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles. He was dismissed "for a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership abilities," and has been reassigned as a special assistant to the wing commander. The actions Monday were confirmed in response to an AP inquiry about an internal Air Force investigation of two commanders at the 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, which also is responsible for 150 Minuteman 3 missiles. It is unusual for disciplinary action to be taken against senior officers at two of the Air Force's three nuclear missile bases on the same day. Officials said the timing was a coincidence. It extends a pattern of leadership failures in the ICBM force over the past year. Last March nine officers were fired at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, which is the third of the three nuclear missile bases, in response to an exam-cheating scandal there. Last year, Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, commander of the entire ICBM force, was fired after an investigation into a drinking binge and other misconduct while he was in Russia as head of a visiting U.S. government delegation. Source | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Five states are gearing up for votes that could raise their minimum wages in Tuesday's general election, near the end of a year that saw protests in cities around the United States by workers demanding better wages. A coalition of organizations called D15 has been been coordinating many of the demonstrations and strikes to push for a minimum wage of $15 an hour. Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska, Illinois and South Dakota have proposals on their ballots to raise their state minimum wage requirements, which currently range from $6.25 to $8.25 an hour. Four of the states lean Republican. Many in the party have traditionally opposed the government setting minimum wage limits, arguing that doing so could cause job losses and stifle economic growth. This year’s ballot measures are largely expected to pass because every minimum wage initiative that has appeared on statewide ballots since 1996 has gained voter approval, according to the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, a U.S. liberal advocacy organization. Over the past two years, 13 states and the District of Columbia have enacted minimum wage increases, raising pay for 7 million workers, according to a recent White House estimate. Cities are also eyeing action. In June, the Seattle City Council unanimously approved an ordinance to phase in a $15 hourly minimum wage — the highest in the nation. And in April, the Maryland legislature approved raising the state's minimum wage on to $10.10 an hour, equaling the highest state rate in the nation and drawing praise from President Barack Obama. Maryland's minimum wage has been $7.25 an hour, and was last raised in 2006. The bill will raise it in stages to $10.10 in July 2018. Source | ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
On November 04 2014 23:19 oneofthem wrote: science doesn't mean using maths or claiming to be scientific. it means being open to empirical evidence and not being slave to one theory to the contrary of said evidence. According to your definition, journalism is a science. Science is the act of producing knowledge on an object through the repetitive use of an objective practice (the "scientific practice") and objectified tools. But the caracteristics of the knowledge can vary, between social science and experimental sciences for exemple. Mathematic is just a tool, that has not more not less value than any other tool. Concepts, being philosophical or sociological, are tools too. The result of social sciences don't have the same kind of caracteristics as the knowledge on physics, because the experiments cannot be reproduced, since all knowledge is bound a context that you cannot truly define, and thus reproduce. Marx tried to produce tools in order to objective his practice as a scientist. He crafted his tools, in an era where tools were almost inexistant : Smith, in his time, became one of the founder of modern economy because he also crafted tools, being himself greatly influenced by Quesnay's desire to craft his own tool. Now compare Marx to Say or M. Friedman... | ||
aksfjh
United States4853 Posts
On November 04 2014 15:22 IgnE wrote: And women joining the labor force to take lower-paying positions has obscured the fact that we've been having jobless recoveries since before 2000? We've only been having jobless recoveries since 2000. A rapid expansion of the labor force doesn't make a recovery jobless, it just adds an underlying issue of a higher supply of labor the economy needs to absorb to the existing problem that we just lost a bunch of jobs. Women haven't been replacing men 1:1. | ||
| ||