EPTI just watched you stand around on that play and literally not move from a spot while Feried got THREE offensive rebounds right around you while you stood and watched.
Go sit down.
NBA Playoffs 2012 - Page 73
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Vindicare605
United States16109 Posts
I just watched you stand around on that play and literally not move from a spot while Feried got THREE offensive rebounds right around you while you stood and watched. Go sit down. | ||
|
ghrur
United States3786 Posts
Also, can you point me to the rule about intent? Section IV--Flagrant Foul a. If contact committed against a player, with or without the ball, is interpreted to be unnecessary, a flagrant foul--penalty (1) will be assessed. A personal foul is charged to the offender and a team foul is charged to the team. Unless you mean this: 2. Whether or not the player was making a legitimate basketball play (e.g., whether a player is making a legitimate effort to block a shot; note, however, that a foul committed during a block attempt can still be considered flagrant if other criteria are present such as recklessness and hard contact to the head); In which case Farried was hit on the head by Kobe and fell hard which can be called recklessness. | ||
|
vasculaR
Malaysia791 Posts
ZzzZZ Z Z Z z z | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16109 Posts
On May 11 2012 13:22 Jerubaal wrote: I don't think intent matters in some instances. As long as it's deemed unnecessary or excessive. Kobe may not have meant it, but he whacked the guy pretty hard in the head. Intent is what is supposed to make a foul flagrant. Perfect example of why intent matters is when Al Harrington got his nose broken by an inadvertent elbow from Andrew Bynum. That's a lot of contact obviously but there wasn't even a foul called because it was clearly an accident. Intent is what separates a flagrant from a simple foul. | ||
|
Holcan
Canada2593 Posts
Faried is a monster, I love him so much. I'm on Ace's fuck Al Harrington bus now. | ||
|
Remfire
492 Posts
On May 11 2012 13:20 Vindicare605 wrote: Look at it again. His arm is almost mirroring Feried's arm, with his hand draped over the ball. The refs called it flagrant because of the way Feried fell which is something they tend to do. I mean your wrong but whatever | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On May 11 2012 13:26 Vindicare605 wrote: Intent is what is supposed to make a foul flagrant. Perfect example of why intent matters is when Al Harrington got his nose broken by an inadvertent elbow from Andrew Bynum. That's a lot of contact obviously but there wasn't even a foul called because it was clearly an accident. Intent is what separates a flagrant from a simple foul. Not really, its the degree of recklessness and risk to injury that the player you foul is exposed to. If it was intentional he was out. And I agree, either Pau is not trying or Faried is just destroying him, I think its a bit of both but more the latter. | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16109 Posts
On May 11 2012 13:26 heliusx wrote: i would be so pissed if i was kobe, dude is sick and is the only one trying To their credit, Sessions Barnes and Hill are playing hard still. But everyone else should just go home. Go on the plane now and save everybody the trouble. Maybe give McRoberts and the Rookies some playing time. Can't be any worse than what we're seeing right now. | ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
| ||
|
MassHysteria
United States3678 Posts
On May 11 2012 13:26 Vindicare605 wrote: Intent is what is supposed to make a foul flagrant. Perfect example of why intent matters is when Al Harrington got his nose broken by an inadvertent elbow from Andrew Bynum. That's a lot of contact obviously but there wasn't even a foul called because it was clearly an accident. Intent is what separates a flagrant from a simple foul. No vindic, if anything it would separate a I from a II really. A I can still be called even if you are making a play for the ball. | ||
|
Kamille
Monaco1035 Posts
| ||
|
MassHysteria
United States3678 Posts
edit: maybe the amount is tho atm: 25 | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16109 Posts
On May 11 2012 13:32 MassHysteria wrote: No vindic, if anything it would separate a I from a II really. A I can still be called even if you are making a play for the ball. Like i said. SUPPOSED to. Obviously that's not how it works and obviously I know that what you're saying is true, it just shouldn't be that way. | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16109 Posts
Kobe's shooting percentage tonight so far is 57% while the rest of the team is at 33%. (12-21 and 14-42 respectively) | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On May 11 2012 13:38 Vindicare605 wrote: Fun stat of the night. Kobe's shooting percentage tonight so far is 57% while the rest of the team is at 33%. (12-21 and 14-42 respectively) So really he should be taking all of the shots. | ||
| ||
