EPTThat account was created on 2010-11-16 17:25:17 and had 16 posts.
Reason: You are unacceptably rude. Go back to the cesspool of the battle.net forums from whence you came.
Automated Ban List [Latest: 11betautos] - Page 468
| Forum Index > Closed |
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-11-16 17:25:17 and had 16 posts. Reason: You are unacceptably rude. Go back to the cesspool of the battle.net forums from whence you came. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-12-08 20:52:32 and had 7 posts. Reason: I have my reasons. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-11-16 17:25:17 and had 16 posts. Reason: I have my reasons. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-12-08 21:57:38 and had 1 posts. Reason: I have my reasons. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-06-15 16:28:53 and had 1540 posts. Reason: After being warned about stupid one liners two months ago, the only posts since then that weren't one liners were insulting or flaming people. Gj. Manner up or get out of here. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-11-04 14:46:11 and had 57 posts. Reason: Sorry for the speeding ticket. You have 2 previously banned acounts and are still opening shitty threads. For reference, start making threads that have content in them, as opposed to the following: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=165271 http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=175256 | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-12-09 01:28:10 and had 0 posts. Reason: I guess not. - Dane Cook | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-11-05 06:01:56 and had 58 posts. Reason: On December 09 2010 03:19 Domokan wrote: wow a game about strategy and using good strategy wins games not who is faster at clicking buildings over and over. Why are ppl saying it's easier nobody gives a crap about how fast you can click each building because of old game mechanics. Now the game is more focued on micro and strategy which is more enjoyable to watch. I don't give a rat butt about watching you practice everyday to click your buildings fast in sc1. Good players don't hotkey everything in 1 hotkey brah, it's jsut there for new players it dont' make the game easier to win pro level. You won't see no pro zerg saying it's easy mode just hotkey 1 all units go in! A ATTACK FIGHTING WIN!!!! OMGGG.!!! baneling muta lings all in 1 hotkey easy mode attack win! stfu with your bullsht statements. yeah buddy lets just hotkey our raven tanks and marines and A move in, not even stimming or throwing pdd down or siege correctly. yeah hotkey all marines and rauders and just charge into banelings not even making marauder tank damage. it's not easy it's just there for new players stfu good lord. Oh noooo auto mining, the game is no longer skilled base because we don't have to send each scv to a mineral patch oh nooo skilless game ! who cares about that crap, rts is strategy and micro is what makes the game fun and skill. it's like chess , we are not playin gsim city who can click and build faster. RTS is a game of the mind nobody gives a rat butt about you clicking your buildings over and over with high speed. thats not skill it's a mindless thing that you obtain from just doing it over and over alot, like typing. One would think that people would stop with the stupidity in the thread after Naz's previous ban wave. To make matters worse, you post this gem: On December 09 2010 03:36 Domokan wrote: you think yourself a high mighty elite cause you can click fast in sc1? elitisist asshole. And your post history/user info is awful too. When you get back, I hope that you stop mashing on your keyboard and actually think about what you post for once. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2009-05-11 05:09:19 and had 121 posts. Reason: Show some respect. Even if you think there's nothing heroic about covering a grenade with your own body to save your comrades you don't have to go out of your way to insult the guy. When you get back I recommend you chill out and maybe try posting in a rational tone. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-11-04 16:47:48 and had 15 posts. Reason: You have 15 posts, 2 warnings, and you continue to have terrible posting habits. Take a short break and think about if you really want to be here. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-12-09 11:31:26 and had 0 posts. Reason: You dodge slower than a Machamp with No Guard. Wait it out. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-09-01 12:04:34 and had 8 posts. Reason: Successful meme isn't successful | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-07-01 18:09:34 and had 63 posts. Reason: On December 08 2010 23:39 worldEnder wrote: I hope next time SKT wins, they do a ceremony where they fuck each other. what the fuck post with some class or not at all | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-09-17 02:22:18 and had 184 posts. Reason: Inb4 ban! Nope. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-12-09 12:14:13 and had 1 posts. Reason: advertising | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-10-08 08:47:51 and had 28 posts. Reason: Don't make terrible threads. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-12-05 18:23:59 and had 1 posts. Reason: Advertising. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2003-01-12 07:35:36 and had 6073 posts. Reason: "He is a forum member with like 60 posts. Why the fuck are you guys wasting your time on him?" Not acceptable. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-10-11 13:09:36 and had 71 posts. Reason: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=7243421 Not acceptable. | ||
|
TL.net Bot
TL.net131 Posts
That account was created on 2010-07-22 04:42:27 and had 688 posts. Reason: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=7243536 Not acceptable. | ||
| ||
