Gom is not consistent here...
NaNiwa not invited to Code S - Page 146
| Forum Index > Closed |
While I understand that there's a need to discuss this matter, this thread has way too many trash posts in it. Please think carefully about what you want to say. Ad hominem attacks on Swedish people in general, calling you fellow Starcraft fans idiots etc etc will be dealt with with harsher punishment from here on out. Keep it civil people. Page 230: Here's some more stuff that'll get you banned! - Conspiracy theory mongering about MLG and GOM - Comparing people to Hitler - Posting useless one liners of arguments that have already been repeated ad nauseum. | ||
|
Haiku-Fr
France7 Posts
Gom is not consistent here... | ||
|
Elefanto
Switzerland3584 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:29 Brendonious wrote: Everyone remember to Email and Tweet @GOMTV and @WoWnStarcraft so they know what an unprofitable decision they made Yes, they should value profit over the integrity of their tournament. So that's how you do business today. | ||
|
Mycl
Australia1370 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:26 Legace wrote: I am genuinly curious. Lets say, for the sake of the hypothesis, that Naniwa was allowed to forfeit the game -- what is the difference in forfeiting the game before it's played and "forfeiting it ingame"? If a forfeit happens before you get into the booth it most likely means that the tournament organizers gave the ok and allowed you to forfeit. | ||
|
Vardant
Czech Republic620 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:29 Biane wrote: This seemed to be the clearest way to tell/show people (who are TLDR) that the exchange program didnt stand for providence. Yes and somehow, they forgot to tell it to the guys HOSTING the actual tournament. How does that make any sense is just beyond me. | ||
|
Pwnographics
New Zealand1097 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:29 Brendonious wrote: Everyone remember to Email and Tweet @GOMTV and @WoWnStarcraft so they know what an unprofitable decision they made The whole reason they made this decision was because people tweeted and emailed them saying to bar naniwa. | ||
|
CakeSauc3
United States1437 Posts
| ||
|
zanga
659 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:29 NeoSlicerZ wrote: Wait, i thought the gsl was being held in South korea, not North. Lol. User was warned for this post | ||
|
Rupyness
52 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:20 zHarveLi wrote: Ehm, no, basicly he caused this to happen by himself, so it's not mlg's fault for him getting booted by his own doing. You cant get booted for something that happens in anpther tournament. Contracts are legally binding cant be some arbitrary rule thay you can use to revoke a contract | ||
|
shadymmj
1906 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:21 Starcraftmazter wrote: What is most troubling to me, is that most people are completely missing the key issues here. My email to GOM: "In particular the rule you are using as justification in regards to disrespect and offence of players can be used in many instances. For instance, in some GSTL, oGsMC went over and banged the both of his enemy player before the game. This is easily both offensive and disrespectful - yet no action was taken." oGsMC went over and banged the both of his enemy player before the game LOLOLOLOLO what an email to send | ||
|
Shalaiyn
Netherlands2735 Posts
| ||
|
buldermar
Denmark102 Posts
To me, it seems absurdly easy to guaranee that all matches has some kind of value. Can anyone explain the logic behind not having all matches have some value? The decision of letting this situation be possible in the first place appears unprofessional to me - regardless of whether or not the punishment is justifiable. | ||
|
bonedriven
258 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:19 yFot wrote: So if the monkey doesnt want to dance, does it deserve to die? What monkey? Is there a story or something? But the monkey needs to get off the stage! ![]() | ||
|
Psychout
Finland16 Posts
| ||
|
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
| ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10660 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:20 careohx wrote: Bow down to the almighty GOM they can apparently do whatever they want. They can even insult players on TV classy. Bow down to the almighty Naniwa who can apparently do whatever he wants. He can even insult players on TV classy. | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:29 Biane wrote: This seemed to be the clearest way to tell/show people (who are TLDR) that the exchange program didnt stand for providence. That's not stated in the rules on either the gom or mlg site (it's actually implied the opposite that all mlg are a part of it). If they are that half-assed about it they deserve all the flack they get regardless. | ||
|
kazie
258 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
Pwnographics
New Zealand1097 Posts
On December 14 2011 22:30 Shalaiyn wrote: So a rage-6 pool is fine but a 7 probe rush which can destroy a 6 pool isn't? At least 6 pool raged with his hands on his keyboard and not using them to support his slumped over face. | ||
|
mstrkrft
Austria10 Posts
stupid GomTV shitheads.... making a mountain out of a molehill! Very clever! User was temp banned for this post. | ||
| ||
