EPThack just streamed very recently, and a lot of other players have really important matches coming up
and until you get around 1500- 2000 viewers it's not worth it for the money
Why Koreans suddenly streamed on TL then stopped? - Page 5
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
hack just streamed very recently, and a lot of other players have really important matches coming up and until you get around 1500- 2000 viewers it's not worth it for the money | ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
I`m sorry but I am sick of people just going on speculation and stating things as factual. DRG comments doesn`t suggest that they outright banned them from streaming. Get real people and stop trying to make s2con into this big villain. | ||
|
cydereal
United States193 Posts
On August 18 2011 07:57 mango_destroyer wrote: I`m sorry but I am sick of people just going on speculation and stating things as factual. DRG comments doesn`t suggest that they outright banned them from streaming. Get real people and stop trying to make s2con into this big villain. I understand your sentiment, but people are afraid of a new KeSPA arising. Many of the great growth surges in SC2 were only possible over this last year because there wasn't a body like KeSPA around meddling with things. | ||
|
forgottendreams
United States1771 Posts
On August 18 2011 07:57 mango_destroyer wrote: I`m sorry but I am sick of people just going on speculation and stating things as factual. DRG comments doesn`t suggest that they outright banned them from streaming. Get real people and stop trying to make s2con into this big villain. It's pretty sad when all circumstantial evidence should lead any rational person to believe an empire is in the making people just pass it off like "Wal-Mart isn't buying people out or bribing zoning officials, it just has lower prices nobody can compete with". That is exactly how empires are built and retain a stranglehold over a peoples over time, because they just passively let it go by. | ||
|
Skamtet
Canada634 Posts
On August 18 2011 07:44 carloselcoco wrote: No, that's false.As far as I know that is only if you reside within the US. The payment has to be made within the US at least as far as I know. | ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
On August 18 2011 08:04 forgottendreams wrote: It's pretty sad when all circumstantial evidence should lead any rational person to believe an empire is in the making people just pass it off like "Wal-Mart isn't buying people out or bribing zoning officials, it just has lower prices nobody can compete with". That is exactly how empires are built and retain a stranglehold over a peoples over time, because they just passively let it go by. What exactly are you talking about? I am not arguing that s2con isn`t starting to turn out like a Kespa entity. I am talking about the ignorant posts stating they did indeed ban these players from streaming like it was a fact. | ||
|
forgottendreams
United States1771 Posts
On August 18 2011 08:11 mango_destroyer wrote: What exactly are you talking about? I am not arguing that s2con isn`t starting to turn out like a Kespa entity. I am talking about the ignorant posts stating they did indeed ban these players from streaming like it was a fact. If you really want to argue about small semantics over a bigger and more important picture I'll opt out of that one. Let's be honest, if your boss "prefers" you do something, you do it. At least in the U.S. | ||
|
tsarnicky
104 Posts
On August 18 2011 08:11 mango_destroyer wrote: What exactly are you talking about? I am not arguing that s2con isn`t starting to turn out like a Kespa entity. I am talking about the ignorant posts stating they did indeed ban these players from streaming like it was a fact. I haven't read all of the posts, but I've read most of them, and I'm nearly certain that everyone said sc2con "suggested"（or preferred, or some such non-absolute) that their players not stream... so stop raging. and the person right above me is right. | ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
On August 18 2011 08:14 tsarnicky wrote: I haven't read all of the posts, but I've read most of them, and I'm nearly certain that everyone said sc2con "suggested"（or preferred, or some such non-absolute) that their players not stream... so stop raging. and the person right above me is right. A few of them already edited their post. | ||
|
tsarnicky
104 Posts
On August 18 2011 08:17 mango_destroyer wrote: A few of them already edited their post. trust me most of them said suggested/preferred from the beginning, I've been following this thread since it started (lol obv). also if its such a big deal for you why don't you just pm them. | ||
|
PBG
40 Posts
| ||
|
Draz
United States44 Posts
On August 18 2011 06:53 tsarnicky wrote: Hi everyone, there was a time a few weeks ago when a lot of Koreans from nearly all teams got streams and broadcasted close to daily, then suddenly they stopped. Does anyone know why？ My idea: that period was between gsl s edit: and yes i know dragon, golden, and rainbow still stream Mod edit: Ah Geeze its KESPA all over again. | ||
|
Bobster
Germany3075 Posts
How about letting the players (or teams) decide that shit for themselves on a case-by-case basis instead of mandating it for everyone? I'm growing more weary of SC2con by the minute. Someone crush them please and make a good organisation in their stead. StarCraft 2 association aims to be an official association approved by Blizzard, and it will deal with the following: Protection of rights for the gamers and teams, operations of StarCraft 2 team's business-league sponsor, arbitrator for when there is an issue between a gamer and a team, and furthering the popularity of StarCraft 2 leagues that are linked with Blizzard-GomTV (editor's note: this most likely means, leagues that opened legit with permission from them). Also, the association does not aim for profit, and will focus on the right path for the association by listening to what fans want. As a first thing to do, they will put forth plans to support teams with PCs and starting online team league. He continued, "Unlike existing e-sports association, we would like people to think this is a different kind of a group from them, and that our no.1 issue is to protect the rights of the gamers. We must gather all our strength to help with our current difficult situation for StarCraft 2 progamer teams. To that end, we wish for the fans to give us support." It's fine if the team coach and team rules prefer players would not stream, but that's on a case-by-case basis that must be settled between the player in question and the team - I take serious issue with a general mandate that SC2con has apparently imposed on all of its members. | ||
|
Kamikiri
United States1319 Posts
| ||
|
MurMiLLo
United States260 Posts
| ||
|
Gentso
United States2218 Posts
| ||
Ares[Effort]
DEMACIA6550 Posts
| ||
| ||
