| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Kollapse
United States125 Posts
I'm going to assume she played a major role in her daughter's death. Can she sleep well at night? It'll be tough to go out in public for quite some time. Her parents...have to know she's very likely guilty. Maybe not likely enough for the judicial system, but they must know. What would truly fascinate me is if she finds joy again in life. | ||
|
SnoLeee
United Kingdom25 Posts
I don't like the idea that Casey Anthony now has the opportunity to make millions on interviews, books etc all of the back of Caylee, but unfortunately that is the world. I really want to see Caylee get the justice she deserves after being killed and then just dumped in some swamp area, but while saying that I want the person to be punished to be the guilty person. I don't think we are ever going to know what happened to Caylee or who did it, which is not right at all! Rest in peace Caylee. | ||
|
MozzarellaL
United States822 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:13 Kollapse wrote: What would truly fascinate me is if she finds joy again in life. She didn't seem to have any trouble finding joy after her daughter was dead. | ||
|
Kollapse
United States125 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:16 MozzarellaL wrote: She didn't seem to have any trouble finding joy after her daughter was dead. Fascinating. | ||
|
Malgrif
Canada1095 Posts
sorry first time hearing about the case | ||
|
Geosensation
United States256 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:18 Malgrif wrote: wait so what was her testimony on what happened to her daughter? sorry first time hearing about the case she didn't testify im pretty sure | ||
|
sAfuRos
United States743 Posts
Joke witnesses, joke defense, joke Casey Anthony, etc Did the prosecution totally fuck up or something? | ||
|
Enzyme
Australia183 Posts
Assume you are innocent, can you imagine being falsely accused of killing your own child? Can you then imagine being in the court system for years not knowing your fate. Can you then imagine finally being acquitted, but then despite the evidence (you know, the actual facts rather than people just going with their 'feelings' and shit) everyone just assumes you are guilty and harasses you and your life is destroyed anyway. There is no point arguing from a public standpoint if she is guilty, because she has been found innocent to the best standards we can provide. Does this let some guilty people free? Yes. However, the system is designed to protect the innocent, and as someone who does not plan to commit any crimes, I am heavily favored to a system that presumes innocence. A system that presumes guilt is no better than the dark ages. If you cannot accept the verdict, then that is your own entirely biased opinion and you have no right to harass or otherwise harm other people based on your own opinion. | ||
|
Froadac
United States6733 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:20 sAfuRos wrote: Wait what the hell? Last i checked this case was gg, Casey Anthony was totally boned? Joke witnesses, joke defense, joke Casey Anthony, etc Did the prosecution totally fuck up or something? All 3 were jokes. But it was all distracting enough to cause doubt. | ||
|
stork4ever
United States1036 Posts
Mr O Reilly is flipping out on TV. | ||
|
MayorITC
Korea (South)798 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:13 Kollapse wrote: I can't imagine where she goes from here. I'm going to assume she played a major role in her daughter's death. Can she sleep well at night? It'll be tough to go out in public for quite some time. Her parents...have to know she's very likely guilty. Maybe not likely enough for the judicial system, but they must know. What would truly fascinate me is if she finds joy again in life. Have you been keeping up with the case? This is the same woman who goes to a nightclub less than a week after she reports her kid "missing" and is photographed with a big ass grin on her face. | ||
|
MidKnight
Lithuania884 Posts
Ok ok, that was a troll. Seriously though, it's rather obvious she neglected her child at the very least. | ||
|
SnoLeee
United Kingdom25 Posts
| ||
|
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:35 MayorITC wrote: Have you been keeping up with the case? This is the same woman who goes to a nightclub less than a week after she reports her kid "missing" and is photographed with a big ass grin on her face. And by the way, a large portion of the Casey's defense relies on the jury believing she was physically and sexually abused by her father as a child, and essentially taught to lie. The defense also put her father in the spotlight, accusing him of doing most of the cover-up, as well as questioned his wellbeing (they insinuated that he was suicidal because of guilt). So her life is pretty much fxed, lol. Everyone knows her picture, even her parents want nothing to do with her (they were quoted as not believing in Casey's story, but also not wanting her to go to jail), and she'll never have a quality job for the rest of her life. | ||
|
SnoLeee
United Kingdom25 Posts
| ||
|
j4ckd4v13z
United Kingdom98 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:20 Enzyme wrote: The fact of the matter is that she was found innocent. End of story. The legal system is designed to protect the innocent. Publicly harassing people even though they have been found innocent is disgusting. Assume you are innocent, can you imagine being falsely accused of killing your own child? Can you then imagine being in the court system for years not knowing your fate. Can you then imagine finally being acquitted, but then despite the evidence (you know, the actual facts rather than people just going with their 'feelings' and shit) everyone just assumes you are guilty and harasses you and your life is destroyed anyway. There is no point arguing from a public standpoint if she is guilty, because she has been found innocent to the best standards we can provide. Does this let some guilty people free? Yes. However, the system is designed to protect the innocent, and as someone who does not plan to commit any crimes, I am heavily favored to a system that presumes innocence. A system that presumes guilt is no better than the dark ages. If you cannot accept the verdict, then that is your own entirely biased opinion and you have no right to harass or otherwise harm other people based on your own opinion. Partially true, except when you look at the evidence there is essentially no way she could've not killed her daughter. In cases like this the law system is flawed because the prosecution fucked up and a lack of "solid evidence", disgusting she can get away with this | ||
|
SnoLeee
United Kingdom25 Posts
On July 06 2011 09:53 j4ckd4v13z wrote: Partially true, except when you look at the evidence there is essentially no way she could've not killed her daughter. In cases like this the law system is flawed because the prosecution fucked up and a lack of "solid evidence", disgusting she can get away with this Would you like to explain your reasoning on " when you look at the evidence there is essentially no way she could've not killed her daughter."? The prosecution didn't mess up, they presented all the facts of the case and how it could have implicated Casey in murder. Perhaps they could have presented it differently but they certainly didn't mess up. None of the evidence clearly beyond reasonable doubt determined Casey murdered her daughter. | ||
|
Kurr
Canada2338 Posts
On July 06 2011 10:00 SnoLeee wrote: Would you like to explain your reasoning on " when you look at the evidence there is essentially no way she could've not killed her daughter."? The prosecution didn't mess up, they presented all the facts of the case and how it could have implicated Casey in murder. Perhaps they could have presented it differently but they certainly didn't mess up. None of the evidence clearly beyond reasonable doubt determined Casey murdered her daughter. When you read the entire story, there's essentially a 99.9% chance she killed her daughter. All the lies she told police, the diary entry, the missing for 1 month and no report, the smell in the car + hair, the items found at the crime scene, the searches on her computer, etc... I know it's not enough in court but in my mind it adds up and there is no way for me to think she didn't kill her daughter. I hate seeing someone lie so much to police trying to help her daughter, it makes no sense. And she goes partying when her girl is missing? Come on... I understand how the court system works, but the fact that she was found not guilty is blasphemy IMO. | ||
|
sunprince
United States2258 Posts
On July 06 2011 10:09 Kurr wrote:When you read the entire story, there's essentially a 99.9% chance she killed her daughter. All the lies she told police, the diary entry, the missing for 1 month and no report, the smell in the car + hair, the items found at the crime scene, the searches on her computer, etc... I know it's not enough in court but in my mind it adds up and there is no way for me to think she didn't kill her daughter. I hate seeing someone lie so much to police trying to help her daughter, it makes no sense. And she goes partying when her girl is missing? Come on... I understand how the court system works, but the fact that she was found not guilty is blasphemy IMO. A lot of circumstantial evidence doesn't equate to concrete proof of murder. It's pretty obvious she has something to do with her daughter's death, but the available evidence makes it impossible to prove what exactly that was. | ||
|
SnoLeee
United Kingdom25 Posts
On July 06 2011 10:09 Kurr wrote: When you read the entire story, there's essentially a 99.9% chance she killed her daughter. All the lies she told police, the diary entry, the missing for 1 month and no report, the smell in the car + hair, the items found at the crime scene, the searches on her computer, etc... I know it's not enough in court but in my mind it adds up and there is no way for me to think she didn't kill her daughter. I hate seeing someone lie so much to police trying to help her daughter, it makes no sense. And she goes partying when her girl is missing? Come on... I understand how the court system works, but the fact that she was found not guilty is blasphemy IMO. But what if that was you on trial for murder with all the same information going against you, but you and only you knew you didnt do it? Would you happily say give me the lethal injection as I can see things look really really bad against me even though I know didn't do it? Or would you hire a defense team who can pick holes in every part of the prosecutions case(not because the prosecution is bad just that there are a lot of holes in it) so that you don't get punished for something you didn't do? I love how some people just totally see one explanation and that is the end of it, that is why there is a jury who look at both sides and make a decision. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby4848 B2W.Neo1184 Beastyqt983 ceh9545 mouzStarbuck280 C9.Mang0229 Sick220 KnowMe213 Hui .127 Trikslyr51 MindelVK10 |
|
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
Leta vs YSC
GSL
Rogue vs Percival
Zoun vs Solar
Replay Cast
GSL
Cure vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Bunny
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
