He either got a mental problem or he is a super super genius that we can't understand.
-post from my phone.
Forum Index > Closed |
bonedriven
258 Posts
March 24 2012 22:47 GMT
#2341
He either got a mental problem or he is a super super genius that we can't understand. -post from my phone. | ||
Catch
United States616 Posts
March 24 2012 23:11 GMT
#2342
The Rawness Letter #4 Note: You don't really need to read the other three, but it will make a lot more sense. I at least recommend letter number one. Also, I skipped sections II and III in the link. Some of my favorite quotes from the article... A major problem with the PUA stuff is that it attacks the symptoms of one’s disease and not the actual disease itself. Most of the solutions are surface solutions. So you feel better in the short run and get some quick results, but ultimately you do worse in the long run. The main thing that turned me off from those books is that they didn’t talk about guiding principles and empowering mindsets, just loads and loads of tactics. ^- Very prevalent in PU these days. Probably why I only read Mark's stuff. Another major problem is that even when pickup does recommend inner core work, which it terms “inner game,” it recommends it filtered through an outcome-dependent external validation mindframe, which causes the advice to undermine itself. I’ll go more into this later in the section on David DeAngelo, but the shorthand version is that it recommends for you to do all this inner work, but trains you to do it primarily for the outcome of getting validation from women. So you walk in with the assumption that a woman is automatically of higher value than you and that you have to proactively prove your higher value by saying or doing something impressive before you know anything about her? Do you even know if she’s bringing anything to the table that makes her even worth impressing? The DHV comes down to bragging and humblebragging, and once you do either you give the other person authority over you because you are affirming that they are worth impressing and auditioning for, before they’ve even done anything to demonstrate they bring anything of value themselves. It’s another form of taking a test, except you’re volunteering on your own for a test that hasn’t even been offered yet! A very insightful man, and actually one of the blogs I'll start reading from now on. This took me awhile to get through, and his other posts aren't nearly this long (Nor deal with PU really) but still are very high quality. | ||
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
March 24 2012 23:15 GMT
#2343
I've recently been reading a lot of stuff on Reddit's /r/seduction subreddit which is basically their PUA/self-improvement subreddit, and I'm wondering what other users think about this subreddit as a resource for general self-improvement. | ||
Catch
United States616 Posts
March 24 2012 23:59 GMT
#2344
| ||
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
March 25 2012 03:10 GMT
#2345
On March 25 2012 08:11 Catch wrote: Perhaps the most complete and upfront article about PUA I've ever seen. I'll warn you right now, it is incredible long (~20,000 words) but might just be the best thing I've ever read that really dissected pick up down to the core, discussing the good and (mostly) the bad. Probably the reason I say screw PUA as it is right now, and am more into the self improvement side of things. The Rawness Letter #4 Note: You don't really need to read the other three, but it will make a lot more sense. I at least recommend letter number one. Also, I skipped sections II and III in the link. Some of my favorite quotes from the article... Show nested quote + A major problem with the PUA stuff is that it attacks the symptoms of one’s disease and not the actual disease itself. Most of the solutions are surface solutions. So you feel better in the short run and get some quick results, but ultimately you do worse in the long run. Show nested quote + The main thing that turned me off from those books is that they didn’t talk about guiding principles and empowering mindsets, just loads and loads of tactics. ^- Very prevalent in PU these days. Probably why I only read Mark's stuff. Show nested quote + Another major problem is that even when pickup does recommend inner core work, which it terms “inner game,” it recommends it filtered through an outcome-dependent external validation mindframe, which causes the advice to undermine itself. I’ll go more into this later in the section on David DeAngelo, but the shorthand version is that it recommends for you to do all this inner work, but trains you to do it primarily for the outcome of getting validation from women. Show nested quote + So you walk in with the assumption that a woman is automatically of higher value than you and that you have to proactively prove your higher value by saying or doing something impressive before you know anything about her? Do you even know if she’s bringing anything to the table that makes her even worth impressing? The DHV comes down to bragging and humblebragging, and once you do either you give the other person authority over you because you are affirming that they are worth impressing and auditioning for, before they’ve even done anything to demonstrate they bring anything of value themselves. It’s another form of taking a test, except you’re volunteering on your own for a test that hasn’t even been offered yet! A very insightful man, and actually one of the blogs I'll start reading from now on. This took me awhile to get through, and his other posts aren't nearly this long (Nor deal with PU really) but still are very high quality. I liked this quote: "Ever wonder why pickup artists develop this fanatical hatred of beta males? It’s their hatred of the beta traits they fear still exist within themselves, so they try to destroy these unwanted traits by first projecting them onto other male targets and then destroying those other targets." Anyways, it was an insightful article. I liked his analysis of Mystery and Style in particular, which brought out things that I had not noticed before. I still think PUA is valuable and that people can benefit from it without personality disorders, but it does seem rather prone to attracting those sorts of people. The inner game paradox in particular is an interesting one. You have to be internally validated, but once you are, you externally validate yourself by how many women you've slept with. It's always my opinion that people counting the number of lays are still completely externally validated, and highly codependent. I mean, most people keep track of how many times they've gotten laid, but those who use the number as some sort of validator appear to me to have some deep seated issues. It's also interesting to note that he doesn't condemn pua. Rather, he says that the sort of people that could actually sort through the good advice and recognize the bad advice are probably not the sort of people that are attracted to it. I agree. | ||
squattincassanova
United States650 Posts
March 25 2012 03:23 GMT
#2346
![]() | ||
HellRoxYa
Sweden1614 Posts
March 25 2012 03:25 GMT
#2347
On March 25 2012 12:23 squattincassanova wrote: Ever wonder why in so many pick up threads there are so many people that care more about what other PUAs do or think than actually talking to girls? ![]() I love you. Do you seriously think everyone has the same objective you do? | ||
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
March 25 2012 03:28 GMT
#2348
On March 25 2012 12:23 squattincassanova wrote: Ever wonder why in so many pick up threads there are so many people that care more about what other PUAs do or think than actually talking to girls? ![]() Not really. | ||
kef
283 Posts
March 25 2012 05:12 GMT
#2349
On March 25 2012 08:11 Catch wrote: Perhaps the most complete and upfront article about PUA I've ever seen. I'll warn you right now, it is incredible long (~20,000 words) but might just be the best thing I've ever read that really dissected pick up down to the core, discussing the good and (mostly) the bad. Probably the reason I say screw PUA as it is right now, and am more into the self improvement side of things. The Rawness Letter #4 Note: You don't really need to read the other three, but it will make a lot more sense. I at least recommend letter number one. Also, I skipped sections II and III in the link... I've read parts 1, 2, and 3 and am midway through part 4. This is a huge eye opener for me. It really illuminated some of the problems I've been having as I've gone from more of a people-pleaser to narcissist ala PUA. | ||
BHZ
Spain19 Posts
March 25 2012 20:47 GMT
#2350
Yeah, it's terrible to have sex with many different hot women because... because... (... well, let's try to come up with an excuse...) ... yeah, because it means that you seek external validation! Genius | ||
Catch
United States616 Posts
March 25 2012 22:57 GMT
#2351
On March 25 2012 12:10 shinosai wrote: Show nested quote + On March 25 2012 08:11 Catch wrote: Perhaps the most complete and upfront article about PUA I've ever seen. I'll warn you right now, it is incredible long (~20,000 words) but might just be the best thing I've ever read that really dissected pick up down to the core, discussing the good and (mostly) the bad. Probably the reason I say screw PUA as it is right now, and am more into the self improvement side of things. The Rawness Letter #4 Note: You don't really need to read the other three, but it will make a lot more sense. I at least recommend letter number one. Also, I skipped sections II and III in the link. Some of my favorite quotes from the article... A major problem with the PUA stuff is that it attacks the symptoms of one’s disease and not the actual disease itself. Most of the solutions are surface solutions. So you feel better in the short run and get some quick results, but ultimately you do worse in the long run. The main thing that turned me off from those books is that they didn’t talk about guiding principles and empowering mindsets, just loads and loads of tactics. ^- Very prevalent in PU these days. Probably why I only read Mark's stuff. Another major problem is that even when pickup does recommend inner core work, which it terms “inner game,” it recommends it filtered through an outcome-dependent external validation mindframe, which causes the advice to undermine itself. I’ll go more into this later in the section on David DeAngelo, but the shorthand version is that it recommends for you to do all this inner work, but trains you to do it primarily for the outcome of getting validation from women. So you walk in with the assumption that a woman is automatically of higher value than you and that you have to proactively prove your higher value by saying or doing something impressive before you know anything about her? Do you even know if she’s bringing anything to the table that makes her even worth impressing? The DHV comes down to bragging and humblebragging, and once you do either you give the other person authority over you because you are affirming that they are worth impressing and auditioning for, before they’ve even done anything to demonstrate they bring anything of value themselves. It’s another form of taking a test, except you’re volunteering on your own for a test that hasn’t even been offered yet! A very insightful man, and actually one of the blogs I'll start reading from now on. This took me awhile to get through, and his other posts aren't nearly this long (Nor deal with PU really) but still are very high quality. I liked this quote: "Ever wonder why pickup artists develop this fanatical hatred of beta males? It’s their hatred of the beta traits they fear still exist within themselves, so they try to destroy these unwanted traits by first projecting them onto other male targets and then destroying those other targets." Anyways, it was an insightful article. I liked his analysis of Mystery and Style in particular, which brought out things that I had not noticed before. I still think PUA is valuable and that people can benefit from it without personality disorders, but it does seem rather prone to attracting those sorts of people. The inner game paradox in particular is an interesting one. You have to be internally validated, but once you are, you externally validate yourself by how many women you've slept with. It's always my opinion that people counting the number of lays are still completely externally validated, and highly codependent. I mean, most people keep track of how many times they've gotten laid, but those who use the number as some sort of validator appear to me to have some deep seated issues. It's also interesting to note that he doesn't condemn pua. Rather, he says that the sort of people that could actually sort through the good advice and recognize the bad advice are probably not the sort of people that are attracted to it. I agree. Oh hey shinosai. I pretty much think ya hit it on the head, PUA is valuable but I look of it more as a springboard. A springboard that can easily snap; it did on me after all. I think PU also has a high tendency to really make people develop some symptoms of disorders, if not outright disorders themselves, such as anxiety or narcissism. I remember a quote that said that we often hate things in other people that we hate in ourselves. As for the inner game thing I agree. Work on that inner game so you can be validated by women, not to validate yourself seems to be the message that pick up spews forth. That was the main thing I fell for, and when I didn't receive any external validation from women, it completely backfired on me. I also like his stance on how we try and say "Oh women do this because of an evolutionary basis" but if that were the case, men would be murdering others for taking the last steak or something inane like that. Ever wonder why in so many pick up threads there are so many people that care more about what other PUAs do or think than actually talking to girls? Yeah, because me not sharing my conquests online with a bunch of anonymous people means exactly that. I don't come online to talk about girls, what point is there in that? Hahaha I can't believe what I am reading. Yeah, it's terrible to have sex with many different hot women because... because... (... well, let's try to come up with an excuse...) ... yeah, because it means that you seek external validation! Genius Or you could try reading it, instead of posting nonsense. He doesn't even condemn sex in the letters. | ||
squattincassanova
United States650 Posts
March 26 2012 00:34 GMT
#2352
On March 26 2012 07:57 Catch wrote: Yeah, because me not sharing my conquests online with a bunch of anonymous people means exactly that. I don't come online to talk about girls, what point is there in that? whos says my post was about you? | ||
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
March 26 2012 01:47 GMT
#2353
| ||
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
March 26 2012 06:24 GMT
#2354
On March 26 2012 10:47 Xiphos wrote: All those talk about validation is manifesting a cringe-worthy feeling to my mind. How about you go out there and do what the fuck you want? Don't seek approval from ANYBODY and just complete every daily task with the mindset of complete self-interest. The point isn't really that it's wrong to be validated by others. But rather than one should not base their emotional self worth on the reactions of others. Thinking in ways such as, "If I get laid then I'm a good pua" can lead to consequences when you don't actually get laid. Certainly I seek approval all the time. I seek approval from teachers who are in a position of authority, from my boss at work, etc. These things sometimes make me feel good. But if I don't get their approval, I do not suddenly feel worthless. This is because I never base my emotional self worth on the opinions of others. Or, if I do, it would be on the opinions of others that actually matter. Not some random woman that I don't even know. It is generally a self-determination. So, it's okay to feel to good about yourself if you got laid. Hell, pat yourself on the back. But deciding whether or not you're an awesome guy or a fucking loser based on your lay count for the year is the kind of validation that indicates destructive personality traits. Because on a long enough time line, eventually you're going to have a drought, and that's the day that your coping mechanism falls apart. | ||
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
March 26 2012 06:39 GMT
#2355
On March 26 2012 07:57 Catch wrote: Show nested quote + On March 25 2012 12:10 shinosai wrote: On March 25 2012 08:11 Catch wrote: Perhaps the most complete and upfront article about PUA I've ever seen. I'll warn you right now, it is incredible long (~20,000 words) but might just be the best thing I've ever read that really dissected pick up down to the core, discussing the good and (mostly) the bad. Probably the reason I say screw PUA as it is right now, and am more into the self improvement side of things. The Rawness Letter #4 Note: You don't really need to read the other three, but it will make a lot more sense. I at least recommend letter number one. Also, I skipped sections II and III in the link. Some of my favorite quotes from the article... A major problem with the PUA stuff is that it attacks the symptoms of one’s disease and not the actual disease itself. Most of the solutions are surface solutions. So you feel better in the short run and get some quick results, but ultimately you do worse in the long run. The main thing that turned me off from those books is that they didn’t talk about guiding principles and empowering mindsets, just loads and loads of tactics. ^- Very prevalent in PU these days. Probably why I only read Mark's stuff. Another major problem is that even when pickup does recommend inner core work, which it terms “inner game,” it recommends it filtered through an outcome-dependent external validation mindframe, which causes the advice to undermine itself. I’ll go more into this later in the section on David DeAngelo, but the shorthand version is that it recommends for you to do all this inner work, but trains you to do it primarily for the outcome of getting validation from women. So you walk in with the assumption that a woman is automatically of higher value than you and that you have to proactively prove your higher value by saying or doing something impressive before you know anything about her? Do you even know if she’s bringing anything to the table that makes her even worth impressing? The DHV comes down to bragging and humblebragging, and once you do either you give the other person authority over you because you are affirming that they are worth impressing and auditioning for, before they’ve even done anything to demonstrate they bring anything of value themselves. It’s another form of taking a test, except you’re volunteering on your own for a test that hasn’t even been offered yet! A very insightful man, and actually one of the blogs I'll start reading from now on. This took me awhile to get through, and his other posts aren't nearly this long (Nor deal with PU really) but still are very high quality. I liked this quote: "Ever wonder why pickup artists develop this fanatical hatred of beta males? It’s their hatred of the beta traits they fear still exist within themselves, so they try to destroy these unwanted traits by first projecting them onto other male targets and then destroying those other targets." Anyways, it was an insightful article. I liked his analysis of Mystery and Style in particular, which brought out things that I had not noticed before. I still think PUA is valuable and that people can benefit from it without personality disorders, but it does seem rather prone to attracting those sorts of people. The inner game paradox in particular is an interesting one. You have to be internally validated, but once you are, you externally validate yourself by how many women you've slept with. It's always my opinion that people counting the number of lays are still completely externally validated, and highly codependent. I mean, most people keep track of how many times they've gotten laid, but those who use the number as some sort of validator appear to me to have some deep seated issues. It's also interesting to note that he doesn't condemn pua. Rather, he says that the sort of people that could actually sort through the good advice and recognize the bad advice are probably not the sort of people that are attracted to it. I agree. Oh hey shinosai. I pretty much think ya hit it on the head, PUA is valuable but I look of it more as a springboard. A springboard that can easily snap; it did on me after all. I think PU also has a high tendency to really make people develop some symptoms of disorders, if not outright disorders themselves, such as anxiety or narcissism. I remember a quote that said that we often hate things in other people that we hate in ourselves. As for the inner game thing I agree. Work on that inner game so you can be validated by women, not to validate yourself seems to be the message that pick up spews forth. That was the main thing I fell for, and when I didn't receive any external validation from women, it completely backfired on me. I also like his stance on how we try and say "Oh women do this because of an evolutionary basis" but if that were the case, men would be murdering others for taking the last steak or something inane like that. Show nested quote + Ever wonder why in so many pick up threads there are so many people that care more about what other PUAs do or think than actually talking to girls? Yeah, because me not sharing my conquests online with a bunch of anonymous people means exactly that. I don't come online to talk about girls, what point is there in that? Show nested quote + Hahaha I can't believe what I am reading. Yeah, it's terrible to have sex with many different hot women because... because... (... well, let's try to come up with an excuse...) ... yeah, because it means that you seek external validation! Genius Or you could try reading it, instead of posting nonsense. He doesn't even condemn sex in the letters. Yea, looking back, I first got into pua several years ago. I definitely developed the emotional vampire thing, and eventually it backfired when my close female friend decided not to put up with it anymore. And I returned right back into my former self, which generally accepted responsibility for everything that went wrong, including other people's reactions to me, and blamed it on myself. I definitely felt like human interaction was like a logical puzzle that could be cracked. That there would be a certain thing I could say or do in each situation to control it. Well, anyways, several years later, I've developed better habits. I accept that I cannot control other people's reactions to me, that there is no perfect thing to say... but perhaps most importantly the opinions of random strangers don't really matter to me anymore. I'm awesome because I choose to do things that are awesome, but my opinion of myself is not outcome dependent. Not that my mood can't be influenced by good things or bad things, but I'm ultimately not going to decide that I'm a loser when things don't go my way. Also, ultimate success with women is dancing. Nuff said. Hope to get to post some videos at the nightclub sometime, perhaps with a random girl who I am seeking validation from. ![]() | ||
karpo
Sweden1998 Posts
March 26 2012 06:54 GMT
#2356
On March 26 2012 09:34 squattincassanova wrote: Show nested quote + On March 26 2012 07:57 Catch wrote: Yeah, because me not sharing my conquests online with a bunch of anonymous people means exactly that. I don't come online to talk about girls, what point is there in that? whos says my post was about you? Oh wow. That kind of comeback is the lamest shit ever. If course you wrote that about Catch or at least as a indirect jab at him and people like him. You seem very defensive and insecure for a "alpha" bro that gets laid and has great game. Just sayan. | ||
squattincassanova
United States650 Posts
March 26 2012 09:00 GMT
#2357
To be honest, everything that could ever be debated in PUA has been, either on this thread, or thousands of other threads online. The only thing that hasn't been shared are peoples actual personal experiences. Thats why I am not going to type out pages of boring keyboard jockey material and rather I tell stories about my own life. Its more entertaining that way. Plus, if you wan't material, go bit torrent every damn RSD, MM, Sinn, David Deangelo, whatever the fuck you want and mental masterbate for the next 4 years. | ||
gugarutz
Austria110 Posts
March 26 2012 11:26 GMT
#2358
On March 26 2012 18:00 squattincassanova wrote: Actually my wide general comment about every PUA thread on the internet including this one. It has nothing to do with Catch. I honestly didn't even read his post. To be honest, everything that could ever be debated in PUA has been, either on this thread, or thousands of other threads online. The only thing that hasn't been shared are peoples actual personal experiences. Thats why I am not going to type out pages of boring keyboard jockey material and rather I tell stories about my own life. Its more entertaining that way. Plus, if you wan't material, go bit torrent every damn RSD, MM, Sinn, David Deangelo, whatever the fuck you want and mental masterbate for the next 4 years. but why are you on an online forum then, if i don't want to "mental masturbate" about pua then i'll get my friends and talk with them outside in a nice bar or whatever. the only reason i read about pua on the internet is because these forums are the only place i can philosophize about that since irl there are better things to do (aka girls). Why would i share storys with strangers (trolls) on the internet when i can just talk irl with friends. the only exception i understand is when PUAs tell these stories to pump hopes and enthusiasm of afcs (their main market). ?! | ||
squattincassanova
United States650 Posts
March 26 2012 16:13 GMT
#2359
On March 26 2012 20:26 gugarutz wrote: Show nested quote + On March 26 2012 18:00 squattincassanova wrote: Actually my wide general comment about every PUA thread on the internet including this one. It has nothing to do with Catch. I honestly didn't even read his post. To be honest, everything that could ever be debated in PUA has been, either on this thread, or thousands of other threads online. The only thing that hasn't been shared are peoples actual personal experiences. Thats why I am not going to type out pages of boring keyboard jockey material and rather I tell stories about my own life. Its more entertaining that way. Plus, if you wan't material, go bit torrent every damn RSD, MM, Sinn, David Deangelo, whatever the fuck you want and mental masterbate for the next 4 years. but why are you on an online forum then, if i don't want to "mental masturbate" about pua then i'll get my friends and talk with them outside in a nice bar or whatever. the only reason i read about pua on the internet is because these forums are the only place i can philosophize about that since irl there are better things to do (aka girls). Why would i share storys with strangers (trolls) on the internet when i can just talk irl with friends. the only exception i understand is when PUAs tell these stories to pump hopes and enthusiasm of afcs (their main market). ?! Because Pickup is like fight club. The number one rule about fight club is you don't talk about it. Which means outside of my pickup friends, I can't talk about this stuff. And when I am with my pick up friends, they are usually advanced enough that we don't actually talk about "pickup" when we go out. Its more just hanging out and getting girls. I might ask about how their date with the girl went, but nothing about the actual theory of pickup. | ||
Snotling
Germany885 Posts
March 26 2012 16:32 GMT
#2360
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • musti20045 StarCraft: Brood War![]() • davetesta22 • IndyKCrew ![]() • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • Laughngamez YouTube • intothetv ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
OSC
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
BSL Nation Wars 2
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] SOOP Global
ByuN vs Zoun
Rogue vs Bunny
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL Nation Wars 2
The PondCast
|
|