EPTWhere is diamond league? - Page 5
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
kyophan
United States113 Posts
| ||
|
sCCrooked
Korea (South)1306 Posts
Oh guys by the way I won the MegaMillions just now. See ya later. | ||
|
virusak
Czech Republic344 Posts
On June 05 2010 01:53 fantomex wrote: Now that thats answered... Where are all the tournaments? Is bnet2 seriously not going to have tournaments running 24/7 on release? Have they even tested tournaments in beta? read the OP, what you say doesn't make sense regarding this thread | ||
|
jamesr12
United States1549 Posts
| ||
|
allowicious
United States972 Posts
On June 05 2010 01:49 Diminotoor wrote: To all the morons thanking Blizzard for this "much needed change", there is 0 proof that diamond exists at all anymore. They may have just removed it altogether. Wait until someone can show us what rec requirement they passed to get in. ![[image loading]](http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/11/leaguekn.jpg) Under the help screen, it still shows the diamond league as one of the 5 leagues. Plus, if they did remove diamond, then they must have added another league below bronze in order to compensate, which I don't think they did. Like everyone else is saying, they just made it more difficult to get into diamond - a much needed change in my opinion. | ||
|
Kibibit
United States1551 Posts
On June 05 2010 01:49 Diminotoor wrote: To all the morons thanking Blizzard for this "much needed change", there is 0 proof that diamond exists at all anymore. They may have just removed it altogether. Wait until someone can show us what rec requirement they passed to get in. That doesn't make the assumption that "Diamond doesn't exist" any less ridiculous. | ||
|
virusak
Czech Republic344 Posts
On June 05 2010 01:57 allowicious wrote: Under the help screen, it still shows the diamond league as one of the 5 leagues. Plus, if they did remove diamond, then they must have added another league below bronze in order to compensate, which I don't think they did. Like everyone else is saying, they just made it more difficult to get into diamond - a much needed change in my opinion. they could have easily ust forgotten, and they wouldn't have to compensate, just increase the number of divisions in each league | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
|
KaRnaGe[cF]
United States355 Posts
| ||
|
allowicious
United States972 Posts
On June 05 2010 01:58 biology]major wrote: they should reduce the number of platinum divisions and just make it such that top 2-3 players from each plat div gets into diamond. Pretty much a legit pro league. That's not completely balanced though. Some divisions are much tougher than others. The top 2-3 players in division A may have around 800-1000 points, whereas the top 2-3 players in division Z may only have like 400 points. Before the reset, #1 in my division was Idra with around 900 or so points. I was nowhere near the top 3 players in my division, but I played players who were #1-3 in their respective divisions, and they only had like 400 points. | ||
|
Severedevil
United States4839 Posts
| ||
|
jamesr12
United States1549 Posts
| ||
|
Cheerio
Ukraine3178 Posts
| ||
|
[Carbon]
United States2 Posts
 | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
Nerchio
Poland2633 Posts
| ||
|
virusak
Czech Republic344 Posts
On June 05 2010 02:21 Nerchio wrote: 349 points 20-3 record and platinum, but not suprised actually because it will need probably about ~1k points may be that case, but why would blizz implement this idea now, it will be insanely hard to get 1000 points in 3 days, wouldn't it not? | ||
|
[Carbon]
United States2 Posts
On June 05 2010 02:26 virusak wrote: may be that case, but why would blizz implement this idea now, it will be insanely hard to get 1000 points in 3 days, wouldn't it not? Only a couple hundred games. Who needs work, school or sleep? | ||
|
Skeyser
Canada219 Posts
| ||
|
Elite00fm
United States548 Posts
Your record has nothing to do with it Your rating has nothing to do with it Your division rank has has nothing to do with it How well you do in your games has nothing to do with it | ||
| ||
