EPTEU CraftCup: what a joke - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
cYaN
Norway3322 Posts
| ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
|
avilo
United States4100 Posts
On May 01 2010 03:56 FortuneSyn wrote: Sounds like special treatment. yep, that is pretty ridiculous. It only happened because he's a known player, so they showed favoritism. If you are unknown you are screwed...well that is what happened in this instance. just rofl at going back two roundS AFTER matches had been played just incompetence there. | ||
|
Chriamon
United States886 Posts
On May 01 2010 04:10 avilo wrote: yep, that is pretty ridiculous. It only happened because he's a known player, so they showed favoritism. If you are unknown you are screwed...well that is what happened in this instance. just rofl at going back two roundS AFTER matches had been played just incompetence there. Yea, I keep refreshing craftcup's website, I wanna see what their "official" explanation ends up being. | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On May 01 2010 04:09 TheAntZ wrote: Are iccup admins in charge of craftcup? I didnt really look into it but it'd make sense O: I think the Craftcup guys have a Red Alert 3 background, but I could be wrong. I just saw some "RA3 craftcup" mentions in the rules. | ||
|
PanzerDragoon
United States822 Posts
| ||
|
vergibaby
United States20 Posts
| ||
|
Zed03
Canada112 Posts
The original poster is sharing his experience with the starcraft 2 community in regards to a starcraft 2 tournament and you start trolling with useless questions and comments. CraftCup should offer a legitimate explanation for their actions or be shunned by the community, its really that simple. | ||
|
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
On May 01 2010 04:23 Zed03 wrote: Kralic's comments on first page truly show there are retarded people on the internet. The original poster is sharing his experience with the starcraft 2 community in regards to a starcraft 2 tournament and you start trolling with useless questions and comments. CraftCup should offer a legitimate explanation for their actions or be shunned by the community, its really that simple. You are a bad troll. Craftcup is making an explanation for it following their tournament. Thanks for the compliment that I am retarded, I will try better to please the masses on the internet. | ||
|
Chriamon
United States886 Posts
hopefully jinro vs HuK can happen. (grid here: http://craftcup.com/?site=grid&tID=162) | ||
|
VTArlock
United States1763 Posts
| ||
|
Smurfa
Bulgaria11 Posts
| ||
|
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
| ||
|
Manaldski
229 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
Erucious
Norway393 Posts
Once an admin tells you you are through, and you already played your 3rd match, it should stand. If you didnt play your 3rd match yet then by all means, you should play your R2 match with Nightend. This smells fishy... Even if Nightend was given a 30min "break" so to say, and the miscommunication happened on their end, you shouldn't be punished for it. In that case, i think Nightend shouldve been "punished" for it since he had to go where he had to play a game, permission or no permission. Curious what they will say about this | ||
|
SensFaiL
United States98 Posts
On May 01 2010 04:13 FrozenArbiter wrote: I think the Craftcup guys have a Red Alert 3 background, but I could be wrong. I just saw some "RA3 craftcup" mentions in the rules. Yes, there roots are from Red Alert 3 | ||
|
starcraft911
Korea (South)1263 Posts
On May 01 2010 03:40 EleanorRIgby wrote: sounds like special treatment to me this and nightend isn't even good, seems weird they would do this for him as he's going to get shit on in round 6 anyways. | ||
|
NightOne
Canada215 Posts
 better unsign up... i dnt wanna play on a shawdy tournament.. | ||
|
UbiNax
Denmark381 Posts
| ||
| ||
