EPT[OSL] Bacchus OSL 2009 Ro16 Day 5 - Page 27
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
| ||
|
Sadistx
Zimbabwe5568 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On July 08 2009 20:25 darktreb wrote: Leta was guaranteed to advance so it doesn't mean THAT much. Still fun game to watch. Ya Leta was auto-in Kwarno is auto out  | ||
|
lazz
Australia3119 Posts
On July 08 2009 20:19 Pyrthas wrote: No, it's not. It's trying to be an accurate evaluation of the top ten players during the last month. Of course, people will disagree about who the top ten are. But if it were just trying to be a list of the top ten people the author liked best, the response to disagreement wouldn't be "No, see, I don't think that your reasoning is correct, for the following reasons"; it would be "But I don't care what you think, because this list isn't trying to be accurate according to any external standard; I'm just saying who I like best." Reasonable people can disagree about something without it being subjective. But if something really *is* subjective, there isn't any way to resolve the disagreement, and there's no point discussing anything or presenting reasons in favor of one side or the other. The PR is clearly intended to be based on and responsive to such reasons. Of course, it's not always serious, and sometimes in borderline cases "because I (don't) like him" is the reason for a particular ordering. And that is, of course, subjective. But it's usually also an admission of "Hey these guys are pretty close and I don't think that the available evidence really decides the issue either way, so for the hell of it I'm gonna put this guy ahead of this other guy," which is, of course, another objective judgment that could be mistaken. Jesus why did I write all that ugh. I won't clutter the lr thread more, sorry. You can't be scientifically objective about something that is inherently a matter of opinion: "Who are the top players of the last month?" is an inherently subjective question because there is no way to precisely, accurately, scientifically "measure" the strength of each player. | ||
|
SuperArc
Austria7781 Posts
| ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
 got backko/typeb wrong | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
or Bisu is gonna smash it with a blunt weapon | ||
|
ondik
Czech Republic2908 Posts
| ||
|
JohnBall
Brazil1272 Posts
| ||
boesthius
United States11637 Posts
| ||
|
baubo
China3370 Posts
| ||
|
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
| ||
|
samachking
Bahrain4949 Posts
On July 08 2009 20:30 JohnBall wrote: So, is Bisu out for sure already? If GoGo beats insurance, Bisu is out. If not, tiebreak is forced between hwasin,Bisu,GoGo. | ||
|
Dice
Korea (South)926 Posts
Yeah, I just checked. Thanks for the optimistic post though.  I don't have any expectations to finish first but I do hope I can at least make it in the top 10. :p | ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
On July 08 2009 20:30 JohnBall wrote: So, is Bisu out for sure already? don't wet your pants yet hwasin > gogo for tie breakers | ||
disciple
9071 Posts
On July 08 2009 20:30 JohnBall wrote: So, is Bisu out for sure already? I dont know which one is more worrying : 1. Jd playing really bad in his last 3 games or 2. Bisu being on the wrong side of every unorthodox strategy in the Liquipedia | ||
|
FranzF1
Chile1710 Posts
The game of zero was epic... that guy is crazy! and that's the best thing of he. | ||
|
poilord
Germany3252 Posts
| ||
|
baubo
China3370 Posts
On July 08 2009 20:35 Kentor wrote: don't wet your pants yet hwasin > gogo for tie breakers If I were Hwasin, I'd just lose to go.go to avoid the embarrassment of Bisu calling me insurance yet again after Bisu wins the tie-breakers. | ||
|
Grommit
United States162 Posts
0/4 sweet | ||
| ||
