|
Yeah. Chalrenge is a bad loser. You have to wipe him out completely.
|
u gotta skate8152 Posts
Well yeah, but that's what I would have done. Props to FF then for being good mannered.
|
On December 24 2008 21:38 usopsama wrote:
Yeah. Chalrenge is a bad loser. You have to wipe him out completely.
CHALRENGE IS THE BEST. you get outa here!
|
On December 24 2008 21:33 Shikyo wrote:
Damn it! BackHo could have just made a name of himself to the history as the biggest fail ever
|
Bulgaria5679 Posts
Haha BackHo with a bad mannered zizi yo haha
|
I personally would have demanded a rematch and then 5-pooled.
|
On December 24 2008 21:35 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:33 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. get outta here who eliminates all buildings to win in pro matchs lately? and GG is just formality you can't possibly turn a won game into a loss cus of a couple of letters, that'd be retarded beyond backho Savior, Nal_rA, etc. You can't force a player to quit and lose even if they're behind, what the fuck? How else would the epic comebacks ever happened? Savior vs TT? So the person who's ahead can force himself to win by saying "GG"? WTF, and you tell me to get outta here when you're so clueless?
GTFO, this is totally different
Savior-rA is an elimination GAME where both are still capable of winning. In a game where one guy has no CHANCE in hell of winning, and you rule for him and against the winner (despite being an idiot), that's a stupid technicality.
There's no basis in the actual game for firefist winning, so therefore he lost.
|
|
|
On December 24 2008 21:37 tracer wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:35 baubo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:30 tracer wrote:
Backho wins.
It was a complete accident and FireFist himself admitted that the match was lost so... haha. How the FUCK can it be an "accident"? Backho accidently hitting enter key and typed ziziyo and typed enter again all by accident!? I find the result fulfilling in terms of Backho deserving to move on, but firefist should deserve at least a rematch just so Failho can be punished by such an epic fail. No... he probably had it typed and was waiting to hit the enter key as soon as FireFist GG'd himself. That was an obvious GG moment. His hand slipped, or he got a little anxious, that's all.
I see. That makes him no less retarded though to actually type something like that in when you don't know when the opponent's going to gg.
I'm glad Backho moved on though. Just so we can see more fun stuff like this.
|
epic moment these last 2 days from seeing random queens used (either efficiently or not). to clash of the titans. to epic fail mode in the batoo osl
|
On December 24 2008 21:40 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:35 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:33 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. get outta here who eliminates all buildings to win in pro matchs lately? and GG is just formality you can't possibly turn a won game into a loss cus of a couple of letters, that'd be retarded beyond backho Savior, Nal_rA, etc. You can't force a player to quit and lose even if they're behind, what the fuck? How else would the epic comebacks ever happened? Savior vs TT? So the person who's ahead can force himself to win by saying "GG"? WTF, and you tell me to get outta here when you're so clueless? GTFO, this is totally different Savior-rA is an elimination GAME where both are still capable of winning. In a game where one guy has no CHANCE in hell of winning, and you rule for him and against the winner (despite being an idiot), that's a stupid technicality. There's no basis in the actual game for firefist winning, so therefore he lost.
How do you define "chance"? Savior didn't have a "chance" to win that game. BackHo could sit in the middle of the map doing nothing, let firefist rebuild and kill him. Boxer had no "chance" against Jojo. Look at the rules, "the person who GGs first loses". Why do you argue against me, when it's impossible to define who won a game and who lost when there are still buildings standing? Backho just was greatly ahead, but didn't win. -_- You win by killing your opponent's buildings, alternatively you can GG, which means you give up. The first person to GG loses. Which part don't you get? Show me the Kespa rules that state that you can GG first if you're ahead, or GTFO yourself, you BM troll.
|
They should never have given the option to admit defeat to FireFist. He can't claim a win here without being crucified.
Referees should have stayed objective and either given FireFist the win or just say the game was over already so Backho wins. None of this asking the players crap.
On December 24 2008 21:44 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:40 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:35 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:33 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. get outta here who eliminates all buildings to win in pro matchs lately? and GG is just formality you can't possibly turn a won game into a loss cus of a couple of letters, that'd be retarded beyond backho Savior, Nal_rA, etc. You can't force a player to quit and lose even if they're behind, what the fuck? How else would the epic comebacks ever happened? Savior vs TT? So the person who's ahead can force himself to win by saying "GG"? WTF, and you tell me to get outta here when you're so clueless? GTFO, this is totally different Savior-rA is an elimination GAME where both are still capable of winning. In a game where one guy has no CHANCE in hell of winning, and you rule for him and against the winner (despite being an idiot), that's a stupid technicality. There's no basis in the actual game for firefist winning, so therefore he lost. How do you define "chance"? Savior didn't have a "chance" to win that game. BackHo could sit in the middle of the map doing nothing, let firefist rebuild and kill him. Boxer had no "chance" against Jojo. Look at the rules, "the person who GGs first loses". Why do you argue against me, when it's impossible to define who won a game and who lost when there are still buildings standing? Backho just was greatly ahead, but didn't win. -_- You win by killing your opponent's buildings, alternatively you can GG, which means you give up. The first person to GG loses. Which part don't you get? Show me the Kespa rules that state that you can GG first if you're ahead, or GTFO yourself, you BM troll.
Lol dude what are you talking about. All those guys did have a chance to win, albeit a small one. Firefist had no chance. No chance whatsoever.
|
On December 24 2008 21:41 baubo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:37 tracer wrote:On December 24 2008 21:35 baubo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:30 tracer wrote:
Backho wins.
It was a complete accident and FireFist himself admitted that the match was lost so... haha. How the FUCK can it be an "accident"? Backho accidently hitting enter key and typed ziziyo and typed enter again all by accident!? I find the result fulfilling in terms of Backho deserving to move on, but firefist should deserve at least a rematch just so Failho can be punished by such an epic fail. No... he probably had it typed and was waiting to hit the enter key as soon as FireFist GG'd himself. That was an obvious GG moment. His hand slipped, or he got a little anxious, that's all. I see. That makes him no less retarded though to actually type something like that in when you don't know when the opponent's going to gg. I'm glad Backho moved on though. Just so we can see more fun stuff like this.
Not really, it's common for pros to want to GG back before the other guy leaves the game.
The retarded bit is being so amped up that you push down on it before his opponent's GG.
|
On December 24 2008 21:33 tracer wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. Yea, that's the rule. Had FireFist not admitted defeat, the match would have gone to him. Quite a mannered guy (the audience applauded him for that).
If you think the other way, though, had FF ridden on that technicality and advanced, he would likely end up being the most hated player in the OSL...haha.
On December 24 2008 21:33 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. get outta here who eliminates all buildings to win in pro matchs without something else going on? and GG is just formality you can't possibly rule a won game into a loss cus of a couple of letters, that'd be retarded beyond backho
That's KeSPA's rule, yes. It forces a degree of gm between players, and formalizes wins/losses.
Watch the final match of OGN vs KHAN PL grand finals last year...Jangbi won by building elimination, as his opponent (whose ID slips past me) refused to gg, and bad manneredly built random pylons all around the map...-____-;;
I don't see why this is so hard for you to grasp...
|
On December 24 2008 21:44 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:40 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:35 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:33 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. get outta here who eliminates all buildings to win in pro matchs lately? and GG is just formality you can't possibly turn a won game into a loss cus of a couple of letters, that'd be retarded beyond backho Savior, Nal_rA, etc. You can't force a player to quit and lose even if they're behind, what the fuck? How else would the epic comebacks ever happened? Savior vs TT? So the person who's ahead can force himself to win by saying "GG"? WTF, and you tell me to get outta here when you're so clueless? GTFO, this is totally different Savior-rA is an elimination GAME where both are still capable of winning. In a game where one guy has no CHANCE in hell of winning, and you rule for him and against the winner (despite being an idiot), that's a stupid technicality. There's no basis in the actual game for firefist winning, so therefore he lost. How do you define "chance"? Savior didn't have a "chance" to win that game. BackHo could sit in the middle of the map doing nothing, let firefist rebuild and kill him. Boxer had no "chance" against Jojo. Look at the rules, "the person who GGs first loses". Why do you argue against me, when it's impossible to define who won a game and who lost when there are still buildings standing? Backho just was greatly ahead, but didn't win. -_- You win by killing your opponent's buildings, alternatively you can GG, which means you give up. The first person to GG loses. Which part don't you get? Show me the Kespa rules that state that you can GG first if you're ahead, or GTFO yourself, you BM troll.
But it was ZiZi YO, not GG
GG no re
|
There will be more BackHo phailure tomorrow on MST....................
|
On December 24 2008 21:46 .risingdragoon wrote:Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:41 baubo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:37 tracer wrote:On December 24 2008 21:35 baubo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:30 tracer wrote:
Backho wins.
It was a complete accident and FireFist himself admitted that the match was lost so... haha. How the FUCK can it be an "accident"? Backho accidently hitting enter key and typed ziziyo and typed enter again all by accident!? I find the result fulfilling in terms of Backho deserving to move on, but firefist should deserve at least a rematch just so Failho can be punished by such an epic fail. No... he probably had it typed and was waiting to hit the enter key as soon as FireFist GG'd himself. That was an obvious GG moment. His hand slipped, or he got a little anxious, that's all. I see. That makes him no less retarded though to actually type something like that in when you don't know when the opponent's going to gg. I'm glad Backho moved on though. Just so we can see more fun stuff like this. Not really, it's common for pros to want to GG back before the other guy leaves the game. The retarded bit is being so amped up that you push down on it before his opponent's GG.
what are you basing that on?
no one cares if they get to say gg when they win and no one types it out beforehand.
|
I bet on FF but this was Backho obviously and Firefist's manner says it all: Backho won.
GG
|
On December 24 2008 21:45 Liquid`Nazgul wrote:They should never have given the option to admit defeat to FireFist. He can't claim a win here without being crucified. Referees should have stayed objective and either given FireFist the win or just say the game was over already so Backho wins. None of this asking the players crap. Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:44 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:40 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:35 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:33 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. get outta here who eliminates all buildings to win in pro matchs lately? and GG is just formality you can't possibly turn a won game into a loss cus of a couple of letters, that'd be retarded beyond backho Savior, Nal_rA, etc. You can't force a player to quit and lose even if they're behind, what the fuck? How else would the epic comebacks ever happened? Savior vs TT? So the person who's ahead can force himself to win by saying "GG"? WTF, and you tell me to get outta here when you're so clueless? GTFO, this is totally different Savior-rA is an elimination GAME where both are still capable of winning. In a game where one guy has no CHANCE in hell of winning, and you rule for him and against the winner (despite being an idiot), that's a stupid technicality. There's no basis in the actual game for firefist winning, so therefore he lost. How do you define "chance"? Savior didn't have a "chance" to win that game. BackHo could sit in the middle of the map doing nothing, let firefist rebuild and kill him. Boxer had no "chance" against Jojo. Look at the rules, "the person who GGs first loses". Why do you argue against me, when it's impossible to define who won a game and who lost when there are still buildings standing? Backho just was greatly ahead, but didn't win. -_- You win by killing your opponent's buildings, alternatively you can GG, which means you give up. The first person to GG loses. Which part don't you get? Show me the Kespa rules that state that you can GG first if you're ahead, or GTFO yourself, you BM troll. Lol dude what are you talking about. All those guys did have a chance to win, albeit a small one. Firefist had no chance. No chance whatsoever.
How do you define that... It's Kespa, it's OSL, not just some random game between your friends where you can say that the person who was winning won. You can't just decide in every game if they have a chance or not. What if the situation was a bit different, say firefist still had like 10 hydras in his main, although he still was way behind? And then backho GG's first, how do you define if he had a chance or not? Don't you get it -_- You need set rules for these things.
|
On December 24 2008 21:45 Liquid`Nazgul wrote:They should never have given the option to admit defeat to FireFist. He can't claim a win here without being crucified. Referees should have stayed objective and either given FireFist the win or just say the game was over already so Backho wins. None of this asking the players crap. Show nested quote +On December 24 2008 21:44 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:40 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:35 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:33 .risingdragoon wrote:On December 24 2008 21:31 Shikyo wrote:On December 24 2008 21:29 .risingdragoon wrote:
this is dumb
even if backho is an idiot he still won, so what if he gged first like a retard
he won IN THE game No he didn't. The person who kills all of the opponent's buildings wins. Alternatively, the player who GG's first and leaves the game loses. Also, after you gg you must leave. get outta here who eliminates all buildings to win in pro matchs lately? and GG is just formality you can't possibly turn a won game into a loss cus of a couple of letters, that'd be retarded beyond backho Savior, Nal_rA, etc. You can't force a player to quit and lose even if they're behind, what the fuck? How else would the epic comebacks ever happened? Savior vs TT? So the person who's ahead can force himself to win by saying "GG"? WTF, and you tell me to get outta here when you're so clueless? GTFO, this is totally different Savior-rA is an elimination GAME where both are still capable of winning. In a game where one guy has no CHANCE in hell of winning, and you rule for him and against the winner (despite being an idiot), that's a stupid technicality. There's no basis in the actual game for firefist winning, so therefore he lost. How do you define "chance"? Savior didn't have a "chance" to win that game. BackHo could sit in the middle of the map doing nothing, let firefist rebuild and kill him. Boxer had no "chance" against Jojo. Look at the rules, "the person who GGs first loses". Why do you argue against me, when it's impossible to define who won a game and who lost when there are still buildings standing? Backho just was greatly ahead, but didn't win. -_- You win by killing your opponent's buildings, alternatively you can GG, which means you give up. The first person to GG loses. Which part don't you get? Show me the Kespa rules that state that you can GG first if you're ahead, or GTFO yourself, you BM troll. Lol dude what are you talking about. All those guys did have a chance to win, albeit a small one. Firefist had no chance. No chance whatsoever.
I think it was because the game was clearly BackHo's, but technically, it should have gone to FF. That's why it had to be resolved as thus...otherwise, I agree, KeSPA should have straight given it to FF.
Perhaps KeSPA, in matters like these, want to give the decision to players so they can avoid being villified no matter the decision...it keeps KeSPA out of that whole thing. haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
